New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition最新文献

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1108/s2397-5210202105

引用次数: 0

Prelims 预备考试

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.1108/s2397-521020200000004001

引用次数: 0

Examining CEOs’ Business Model Schemas: A Cognitive Mapping of Differences Between Industry Insiders and Outsiders ceo商业模式图式研究:行业内部人与行业外部人差异的认知映射

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.1108/S2397-521020200000004003

Somendra Narayan, J. Sidhu, C. Baden-Fuller, H. Volberda

{"title":"Examining CEOs’ Business Model Schemas: A Cognitive Mapping of Differences Between Industry Insiders and Outsiders","authors":"Somendra Narayan, J. Sidhu, C. Baden-Fuller, H. Volberda","doi":"10.1108/S2397-521020200000004003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2397-521020200000004003","url":null,"abstract":"At the level of a cognitive schema, a business model is a mental map of a firm’s value-creating, value-delivering, and value-capturing activities and the linkages between them. An important question in the study of business models as cognitive schemas is whether and how schemas differ across industry actors and whether the differences are connected to the variation observed in actual business models in the industry. This chapter examines, in particular, the ways in which business model schemas of industry insiders differ from those of industry outsiders. Using data from interviews with chief executive officers (CEOs) of 30 legal-tech firms, we graphically construct and analyze the CEOs’ schemas of important causal interdependencies between their firms’ activities. The analysis shows systematic differences between insiders and outsider CEOs’ schemas. We theorize that these differences underlie insider and outsider CEOs’ distinct approaches to opportunity recognition, expertise perception, and value framing, and have consequences for actual business model evolution in the industry.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130598280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Index 指数

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.1108/s2397-521020200000004012

引用次数: 0

Exploring the Connections Between Business Models and Cognition: A Commentary 探索商业模式与认知之间的联系:评论

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.1108/s2397-521020200000004002

K. Sund, R. Galavan, M. Bogers

{"title":"Exploring the Connections Between Business Models and Cognition: A Commentary","authors":"K. Sund, R. Galavan, M. Bogers","doi":"10.1108/s2397-521020200000004002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s2397-521020200000004002","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we reflect on an expanding literature that links theories of cognition and business models. Managers hold in their mind perceptual constructs or schemas of the business model. These guide the process of distinguishing between options and making choices. Those familiar with business model development will easily recognise that the perceptual construct provides only a summary of the business model, and that a more complex conceptualisation of how business model elements interact is needed. The business model is then much more than a visualisation. It is a schematic model of theorised interaction that is created, shaped, and shared over time. The underlying processes of this creation, shaping, and sharing are cognitive activities taking place at individual, organisational, and inter-organisational levels. Theories of managerial and organisational cognition are thus critical to understanding the acts of business modelling and business model innovation. Here we suggest some of the ways that business model and cognition literatures can be connected, present existing literature, and reflect on future avenues of research to explore the cognitive foundations of business modelling.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122251770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Cognition and Innovation 认知与创新

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-16 DOI: 10.1108/s2397-52102018

K. Sund, R. Galavan, S. Brusoni

引用次数: 3

Chapter 1 Cognition and Innovation: A Framework and Invitation to Explore 第一章认知与创新:一个框架与探索邀请

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181001

K. Sund, R. Galavan, S. Brusoni

引用次数: 7

Author Biographies 作者传记

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181009

引用次数: 0

Chapter 4 The Relationship Between Demand–Pull Attention and Radical Product Innovation: Evidence through Computer-Aided Text Analysis 第四章需求拉动型注意力与突破性产品创新的关系:基于计算机辅助文本分析的证据

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181004

E. Biehl, Kerstin Fehre, M. Tietze

{"title":"Chapter 4 The Relationship Between Demand–Pull Attention and Radical Product Innovation: Evidence through Computer-Aided Text Analysis","authors":"E. Biehl, Kerstin Fehre, M. Tietze","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000This study updates the discussion on demand-pull attention as a source of radical product innovation. Demand-pull attention shows an ex ante alignment with market characteristics and needs as opposed to pushing resources toward markets. The authors suggest a holistic framework and specify three dimensions of demand-pull attention: anticipated or revealed market demand, market environment, and external economic environment. Based on a large German longitudinal panel consisting of 941 firm-year observations from 2003 to 2013, the authors conceptualized the measurement of demand-pull dimensions’ attention and radical product innovation using computer-aided text analysis of annual reports. The authors analyzed the relationship between the attention that a firm pays to different demand-pull dimensions and the firm’s strategic intention to radically innovate; thus, the authors actually focused on the cognitive sources of radical product innovations. This chapter suggests that radical product innovation activities are positively driven by attention toward the market environment and market demand orientation. However, the hypothesis, which assumed a negative relationship between attention toward the external economic environment and radical innovation, could not be significantly confirmed. This demands a closer look into the underlying decision processes of firms when deciding on radical product innovations. With the theoretical grounding on the attention-based view of the firm, the authors contribute to a better understanding of the role that organizational cognition plays in innovation processes.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124832490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Chapter 3 A Socio-Cognitive Model of Innovation Adoption and Implementation 第三章创新采用与实施的社会认知模型

New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181003

Tabish Zaman, M. Mount, Tyrone S. Pitsis, Rory O'Connor, S. Dean

{"title":"Chapter 3 A Socio-Cognitive Model of Innovation Adoption and Implementation","authors":"Tabish Zaman, M. Mount, Tyrone S. Pitsis, Rory O'Connor, S. Dean","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-431-620181003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000In this chapter the authors present a field study investigating the adoption of information communications technology innovation at a UK-based University hospital. The authors have followed the implementation of electronic medicine chart technology (EMEDs) designed to replace “traditional” paper-based systems used by doctors, nurses, and pharmacists teams in the hospital. Having studied the interactions between the “user” and “implementer” groups, the findings of this chapter offer a socio-cognitive model of innovation adoption which accounts for the intra- and inter-team idiosyncrasies that underpin the processes of implementation. Using the concept of interactive framing as the analytical lens, findings of this chapter illustrate that the adoption and diffusion process of innovation is a social process resulting from the interaction of organizational team members. The cycles constituting the adoption and implementation of EMEDs in this research encapsulate the conflicting experience of different groups and their transition from implementation to acceptance. The authors have adopted a socio-cognitive perspective to explain the asymmetrical experience of different groups in a complex, high reliable organization.","PeriodicalId":214682,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123014029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4