发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Southern Journal of Communication最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Dan Quayle on family values: Epideictic appeals in political campaigns 丹·奎尔谈家庭价值观:政治竞选中流行的诉求
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1995-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949509372972
C. Smith
{"title":"Dan Quayle on family values: Epideictic appeals in political campaigns","authors":"C. Smith","doi":"10.1080/10417949509372972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372972","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines Vice President Dan Quayle's call for a reassertion of family values in the context of the presidential campaign of 1992. The study begins by establishing the milieu of the campaign and the derivation of it's rhetorical strategy from Vice President Agnew. The study concludes that Quayle was effective in re‐ordering the political agenda, and consolidating the support of the right by playing on dialectical tensions grounded in values. But his appeals were undercut with the general audience because of his lack of credibility as an epideictic speaker and Americans’ suspicions about politicians issuing moral advice.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"02 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130235827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Reagan, rhetoric, and the public philosophy: Ethics and politics in the 1984 campaign 《里根、修辞与公共哲学:1984年竞选中的道德与政治》
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1995-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949509372967
C. Johnstone
{"title":"Reagan, rhetoric, and the public philosophy: Ethics and politics in the 1984 campaign","authors":"C. Johnstone","doi":"10.1080/10417949509372967","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372967","url":null,"abstract":"Ethical analysis of Ronald Reagan's rhetorical practice enables us to bring order to our recent political history. His 1984 campaign for re‐election is especially fitting as a vehicle for this analysis because Reagan is fundamentally a campaigner and because the campaign centered on normative issues. Appropriate ethical standards are grounded in the values and procedures of democratic decision making. When appraised by these standards—rules of disclosure, argument, confrontation, and public competence—the Reagan campaign is found deficient in upholding principles that undergird the political system within which he operated, and upon which the election process depends for its legitimacy and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116690171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Spatial metaphors in African‐American discourse 非裔美国人话语中的空间隐喻
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1995-03-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949509372973
Richard W. Leeman
{"title":"Spatial metaphors in African‐American discourse","authors":"Richard W. Leeman","doi":"10.1080/10417949509372973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372973","url":null,"abstract":"Three orators’ speeches are analyzed for their use of relational, locational and directional types of spatial metaphors. Frances Harper utilized all three types in her call for elemental justice. Mordecai Johnson blended directional with locational metaphors to recreate the African‐American's journey. Louis Lomax employed literal space as evidence for his metaphorical generalizations about racial pride and responsibility. The essay concludes by examining the potential importance of understanding symbolic space for critics of African‐American discourse.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124614705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Legal judgment and cultural motivation: Enthymematic form in Marbury v. Madison 法律判断与文化动机:马布里诉麦迪逊案的热力学形式
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372959
Per Fjelstad
{"title":"Legal judgment and cultural motivation: Enthymematic form in Marbury v. Madison","authors":"Per Fjelstad","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372959","url":null,"abstract":"Historians and critics have long assessed the political import of Marbury v. Madison, an 1803 Supreme Court decision that declared part of a Congressional act unconstitutional. Critics explain the decision as part of an evolution in constitutional law and as a lively political drama. This essay identifies inferences by which the written opinion poses judgments about the function of law. The opinion delimits law to decisions about personal rights; it radicalizes its field of concern by reversing its argumentative momentum; it develops a progression of dichotomies that ask readers to stand in for the viability of a contractual political order. These ways of constructing the issue ask readers to affirm a formative myth of national identity.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"426 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127744010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Property rights, human rights, and American jurisprudence: The rejection of John J. Parker's nomination to the Supreme court 财产权、人权与美国法理学:约翰·j·帕克最高法院大法官提名遭拒
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372962
Trevor Parry‐Giles
{"title":"Property rights, human rights, and American jurisprudence: The rejection of John J. Parker's nomination to the Supreme court","authors":"Trevor Parry‐Giles","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372962","url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the constitutive and ideological power of the Supreme Court nomination process. It maintains that this process has evolved in the twentieth century into a rhetorical ritual whereby the American community publicly enacts and configures collective commitments to civil liberties, the law, and constitutional democracy. As such, the ideological power of the Supreme Court nomination process is manifest in the rhetorical negotiation and debate concerning nominees and their placement within the symbolically constructed scope of acceptable judicial philosophy. Specifically, this essay examines the power of the debates concerning Herbert Hoovers nomination of John J. Parker to the Supreme Court in 1930 to constrict the symbolic influence of “property rights” and to expand the importance of “human rights” as specific commitments definitive of American jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131583110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Critical legal rhetorics: The theory and practice of law in a postmodern world 批判法律修辞学:后现代世界中的法律理论与实践
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372961
M. Hasian
{"title":"Critical legal rhetorics: The theory and practice of law in a postmodern world","authors":"M. Hasian","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372961","url":null,"abstract":"Traditional liberal theories of jurisprudence consider the “rule of law” as a collection of rules and principles created without the help of rhetoric. From this perspective the judicial system is ideally a neutral forum wherein experts interpret rather than create the law. This essay claims that this orthodox view of the relationship between law and rhetoric needs extensive revision, and argues the need for a critical legal rhetoric that examines the ways in which the law is constituted and enacted beyond the domain of Supreme Court decision making. By illustrating how the rights talk found in appellate decisions can serve as sword, shield, and menace, this essay invites critics to consider seriously the participatory role that ordinary citizens take in the creation of their own legal culture. The author contends that in the case of reproductive rights, extra‐judicial public arguments provided part of the fragmentary materials that called into question the rule of law which allowed for the compulsory ster...","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126102688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Of innocence, exclusion, and the burning of flags: The romantic realism of the law 关于无辜、排斥和焚烧国旗:法律的浪漫现实主义
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372958
W. Lewis
{"title":"Of innocence, exclusion, and the burning of flags: The romantic realism of the law","authors":"W. Lewis","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372958","url":null,"abstract":"This essay continues the challenge to the image of law as neutral adjudication by arguing that, while authoritative judicial discourse in the modern liberal state has presented itself as realistic discourse that argues to singular conclusions, it is better to see it as a profoundly rhetorical enterprise that writes legal decisions as romances in which Law is the heroic central character. Focusing on the first flag burning case Texas v. Johnson, the essay examines the decision as argument and as romance. It concludes by suggesting that the case (and legal decisions in general) would benefit from a sense of law at once more rhetorically sensitive, communal, and tragic.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126902017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
Judicial legitimacy and legal interpretation in the debate between Brutus and Publius 布鲁图斯与普布利乌斯之争中的司法正当性与法律解释
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372964
H. Hohmann
{"title":"Judicial legitimacy and legal interpretation in the debate between Brutus and Publius","authors":"H. Hohmann","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372964","url":null,"abstract":"In the model of legal interpretation and judicial legitimacy which emerges from Publius’ replies to Brutus and his fellow Anti‐federalists, legal interpretation is seen not as an application of formal hermeneutic methods to ascertain exclusively the empirical semantic meaning of rules, or the historical psychological intentions of legislators, but as a rhetorical process in which controversial arguments provide a basis for the judicial determination of a legal meaning which results in a normatively justifiable application of the law. The formal derivation of law from the legislative process, and of judicial decisions from the common meaning of the law, can only provide a prima facie legitimation which must be able to withstand critical arguments related to the ultimate norms which provide the substantive justification for government and law. To guard against judicial arbitrariness in deciding among the claims of conflicting visions of justice and the public good, the first stage of the rhetorical process ...","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127021022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cultivating the “higher law” in American jurisprudence: John Quincy Adams, neo‐classical rhetoric, and the Amistad case 美国法学中“高等法”的培育:约翰·昆西·亚当斯、新古典修辞学与阿米斯塔德案
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372960
S. O’Rourke
{"title":"Cultivating the “higher law” in American jurisprudence: John Quincy Adams, neo‐classical rhetoric, and the Amistad case","authors":"S. O’Rourke","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372960","url":null,"abstract":"Working from the assumption that John Quincy Adams brought to his address in United States v. Amistad (1841) the precepts of rhetoric he had taught at Harvard, this essay offers a reading of the speech that is grounded in neo‐classical rhetoric and informed by our current understanding of rhetoric's constitutive function. The reading reveals that Adams used the precepts of neo‐classical rhetoric to cultivate a “higher law” in American jurisprudence and, in so doing, sketched a rhetoric of American law.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130983760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Back to the garden: Therapeutic place metaphor in field of dreams 回到花园:梦境中的治疗场所隐喻
Southern Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1994-11-01 DOI: 10.1080/10417949409372950
Roger C. Aden
{"title":"Back to the garden: Therapeutic place metaphor in field of dreams","authors":"Roger C. Aden","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372950","url":null,"abstract":"Field of Dreams provides “cultural therapy” for individuals concerned about the ongoing transformation from the industrial age to the technological age. The therapy, the creation of a place metaphor similar to the Garden of Eden, illuminates the benefits of self‐sacrifice and producerism valued by American culture prior to the industrial age. By sacrificing for others, the film suggests, individuals can transcend time and find their home on earth. The implications of this therapy, culturally and theoretically, suggest that place metaphors are perhaps the best symbolic approach to coping with cultural transformations.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126047922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信