丹·奎尔谈家庭价值观:政治竞选中流行的诉求

C. Smith
{"title":"丹·奎尔谈家庭价值观:政治竞选中流行的诉求","authors":"C. Smith","doi":"10.1080/10417949509372972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines Vice President Dan Quayle's call for a reassertion of family values in the context of the presidential campaign of 1992. The study begins by establishing the milieu of the campaign and the derivation of it's rhetorical strategy from Vice President Agnew. The study concludes that Quayle was effective in re‐ordering the political agenda, and consolidating the support of the right by playing on dialectical tensions grounded in values. But his appeals were undercut with the general audience because of his lack of credibility as an epideictic speaker and Americans’ suspicions about politicians issuing moral advice.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"02 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dan Quayle on family values: Epideictic appeals in political campaigns\",\"authors\":\"C. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949509372972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines Vice President Dan Quayle's call for a reassertion of family values in the context of the presidential campaign of 1992. The study begins by establishing the milieu of the campaign and the derivation of it's rhetorical strategy from Vice President Agnew. The study concludes that Quayle was effective in re‐ordering the political agenda, and consolidating the support of the right by playing on dialectical tensions grounded in values. But his appeals were undercut with the general audience because of his lack of credibility as an epideictic speaker and Americans’ suspicions about politicians issuing moral advice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"02 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949509372972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究考察了副总统丹·奎尔在1992年总统竞选背景下呼吁重申家庭价值观。这项研究首先建立了竞选活动的环境,并从副总统阿格纽那里得到了修辞策略的推导。该研究的结论是,奎尔有效地重新安排了政治议程,并通过发挥基于价值观的辩证紧张关系来巩固对权利的支持。但他的吸引力在普通听众中被削弱了,因为他作为一名流行病演说家缺乏可信度,而且美国人对政治家发布道德建议持怀疑态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dan Quayle on family values: Epideictic appeals in political campaigns
This study examines Vice President Dan Quayle's call for a reassertion of family values in the context of the presidential campaign of 1992. The study begins by establishing the milieu of the campaign and the derivation of it's rhetorical strategy from Vice President Agnew. The study concludes that Quayle was effective in re‐ordering the political agenda, and consolidating the support of the right by playing on dialectical tensions grounded in values. But his appeals were undercut with the general audience because of his lack of credibility as an epideictic speaker and Americans’ suspicions about politicians issuing moral advice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信