发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Opportunistic Breach of Contract 机会性违约
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.20
Francesco Parisi, Ariel Porat, B. Bix
{"title":"Opportunistic Breach of Contract","authors":"Francesco Parisi, Ariel Porat, B. Bix","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.20","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Law and economics scholarship has traditionally analyzed efficient breach cases monolithically. By grouping efficient breach cases together, this literature treats the subjective motives and the distributive effects of the breach as immaterial. The Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment introduced a distinction based on the intent and the effects of the breach, allowing courts to use disgorgement remedies in cases of ‘opportunistic’ breach of contract (i.e., ‘deliberate and profitable’ breaches). In this article, we evaluate this approach, focusing on the effects of disgorgement remedies on allocative and productive efficiency, information-forcing and competitive effects, and restraint of breach-searching incentives. We show that, even from a purely consequentialist perspective, disgorgement remedies may be normatively warranted, especially when involving sellers’ breach. Recent experimental evidence revealed that the preferences and reactions of ordinary people are in line with our evaluation of the effects of opportunistic breach.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140421864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Foundations of Constitutional Democracy: The Kelsen-Natural Law Controversy 宪政民主的基础：凯尔森与自然法之争
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2024.3
Nathan Gibbs
{"title":"The Foundations of Constitutional Democracy: The Kelsen-Natural Law Controversy","authors":"Nathan Gibbs","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.3","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In the immediate post-war period, a set of thinkers, most notably Jacques Maritain, developed influential natural law theories of constitutional democracy. The central tenet of the natural law approach to the post-war settlement was that, without the type of foundational understanding of the constitutional system it was proposing, the new democratic political institutions would relapse into totalitarianism. In response to this natural law challenge, Hans Kelsen sought to explicate and defend a self-consciously secular and relativistic understanding of the basis of constitutional democracy. This article will examine the debate between the Kelsenian and the natural law view of constitutional democracy. The debate raises questions of foundational importance, and a number of issues are of particular concern in the present global context. These issues concern the role of moral pluralism and its relevance to the structure of constitutional democracy, and the relationship between universal values and the common good of particular communities.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140424614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Power to Contract and the Offer-and-Acceptance Analysis of Contract Formation 缔约权力与合同订立的要约与承诺分析
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.19
Irina Sakharova
{"title":"The Power to Contract and the Offer-and-Acceptance Analysis of Contract Formation","authors":"Irina Sakharova","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.19","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The offer-and-acceptance analysis has long been questioned as not (easily) applicable to certain methods of contracting. This paper looks at this analysis through the prism of normative powers and identifies much deeper problems with the analytic explanation of how such unilateral normative powers as offer and acceptance can generate such a normative result as concluding a contract. It argues that even if the powers to offer and accept are exercised, as they are in certain methods of contracting, these are not the normative powers that create contractual obligations; such obligations are always created by the jointly exercised power to contract. The paper substantiates an account of the power to contract as a sui generis normative power and explains the role the unilateral powers to offer and to accept play when they are exercised, while also explaining why there is no need to ‘invent’ offering and accepting where there are none.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140431087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shadows or Forgeries? Explaining Legal Normativity 阴影还是赝品？解释法律规范性
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2024.1
Alma Diamond
{"title":"Shadows or Forgeries? Explaining Legal Normativity","authors":"Alma Diamond","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Legal norms serve as practical standards for individuals and officials. While this ‘normative aspect’ of law is widely acknowledged, its significance for theories of law remains contested. In this paper, I examine three views on the matter. First, that we should explain legal norms as reason-giving. Second, that we should explain legal discourse as being about reasons for action. Third, that we should explain law as capable of being reason-giving. I survey some challenges associated with each of these views. What they have in common is an implicit assumption about the form that normative explanation must take: that it must be a linear, non-reductive explanation. There is an alternative model for normative explanation available, however. That model explains normative notions in terms of the practices and attitudes involved in recognizing, offering, and demanding them. I highlight the potentials, and limitations, of this practice-centered alternative.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140441453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism 为德沃金的单一体系反实证主义辩护
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2024.2
Maricarmen Jenkins
{"title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","authors":"Maricarmen Jenkins","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this article, I argue that Dworkin’s one-system view of law and morality is not as easy to refute or dismiss as some would suggest. In a recent article, Dindjer criticizes a new kind of opposition to legal positivism characterized by both its opposition to a two-system view of law and morality and its promotion of a one-system alternative picture. By re-examining Dworkin’s criticisms of the two-system view and by providing additional reasoning of my own, I show that Dworkin’s one-system interpretative approach is not just sensible but also promising in refocusing contemporary debates in general jurisprudence on a moral and political reading of the structural features of law.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"42 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139782546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism 为德沃金的单一体系反实证主义辩护
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2024.2
Maricarmen Jenkins
{"title":"Defending Dworkin’s One-System Anti-Positivism","authors":"Maricarmen Jenkins","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.2","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this article, I argue that Dworkin’s one-system view of law and morality is not as easy to refute or dismiss as some would suggest. In a recent article, Dindjer criticizes a new kind of opposition to legal positivism characterized by both its opposition to a two-system view of law and morality and its promotion of a one-system alternative picture. By re-examining Dworkin’s criticisms of the two-system view and by providing additional reasoning of my own, I show that Dworkin’s one-system interpretative approach is not just sensible but also promising in refocusing contemporary debates in general jurisprudence on a moral and political reading of the structural features of law.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"96 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139842200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Physical-Emotional Distinction in Tort 侵权行为中身体与情感的区别
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.6
Philip Petrov
{"title":"The Physical-Emotional Distinction in Tort","authors":"Philip Petrov","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.6","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Several legal scholars have recently argued that U.S. tort law’s physical-emotional distinction commits tort to the objectionable position of mind-body dualism, but they have not considered the distinction’s role as an aid to judicial cognition and decision-making. Drawing primarily on the law of negligent infliction of emotional distress, this essay argues that tort’s physical-emotional distinction is not a relic of mind-body dualism but a heuristic that judges have used to structure and simplify the difficult but unavoidable task of drawing lines between legally cognizable and non-cognizable harm. The analysis has at least three normative implications: (1) users of tort’s physical-emotional distinction should clarify that they neither endorse dualism nor depreciate emotional harm; (2) because judicial expertise may not extend to the task of drawing lines between legally cognizable and non-cognizable harm, judicial performance in this area may be more adequate than critics suggest; and (3) although it may not be possible to determine the optimal way of drawing lines between legally cognizable and non-cognizable emotional harm, moral-philosophical tools such as Rawlsian and Scanlonian contractualism may be able to identify partial or pro tanto considerations for choosing among different ways of doing so.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122164101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism 权利谈话与宪法情感主义
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.7
Alexander Loehndorf
{"title":"Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism","authors":"Alexander Loehndorf","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.7","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper builds on the work of several exceptional scholars from the disciplines of philosophy, law, and history. My central aim is to introduce and explicate an idea closely related to (and derivative of) the concept of rights talk, a concept I call ‘constitutional emotivism’. By drawing upon scholars including Mary Ann Glendon, Jamal Greene, A.J. Ayer, and Alasdair MacIntyre, I aim to gather the conceptual threads that I trace through their work which together form the idea of constitutional emotivism. In a sentence, constitutional emotivism is the conflation of moral disagreements with constitutional rights grievances. When this conflation occurs, rights conflicts that never needed to occur in the first place reinforce rights talk and its uncompromising nature.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114443022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to Charter Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions 公法的魔鬼:限制宪章权利的行政决定的三位一体研究
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.8
Richard Stacey
{"title":"Public Law’s Cerberus: A Three-Headed Approach to Charter Rights-Limiting Administrative Decisions","authors":"Richard Stacey","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.8","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article offers a theoretical and doctrinal solution to a vexing question in public law: how to determine the justifiability of Charter rights-limiting administrative decisions. The jurisprudence suggests three approaches, or modes of reasoning: minimal impairment analysis, ‘interest balancing’, and ‘values-advancing reasoning’. Like Cerberus, the guard dog of Hades, Canadian public law has become three-headed. While scholars and courts argue about which mode of reasoning is categorically best, the culture of justification compels us to ask instead which provides the most compelling explanation for each rights-limiting decision. Just as cutting off one of Cerberus’s heads would diminish his effectiveness as a guard dog, rejecting either of the modes of reasoning would limit decision makers’ capacity to explain their decisions and undermine a culture of justification. The article makes a theoretical case for retaining all three modes of reasoning and sets out a doctrinal approach to determining when each is applicable.","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125239259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Standard Picture and Statutory Interpretation – ERRATUM 标准图片和法定解释-勘误
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.5
A. Graham
{"title":"The Standard Picture and Statutory Interpretation – ERRATUM","authors":"A. Graham","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2023.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":212152,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123260809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信