Rachel Henderson, Kelsey Funkhouser, Marcos D. Caballero
{"title":"A longitudinal exploration of students’ beliefs about experimental physics","authors":"Rachel Henderson, Kelsey Funkhouser, Marcos D. Caballero","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.henderson","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.henderson","url":null,"abstract":"The Michigan State University Physics & Astronomy Department has recently transformed its algebra-based, introductory physics laboratory curriculum. This transformed, two-course sequence, Design, Analysis, Tools, and Apprenticeship (DATA) Lab, emphasizes the development of experimental skills and laboratory practices and provides students with an authentic physics laboratory experience. Here, we will discuss the overall impact of the transformation on how students perceive experimental physics through the two course sequence: mechanics (Lab I) and electricity, magnetism and optics (Lab II). In both courses, data were collected pre-and post-instruction via the Colorado Learning Attitudes and Science Survey for Experimental Physics (E-CLASS); the results will be presented at the course-level and longitudinally. In both courses, the DATA Lab transformation had a positive impact on overall E-CLASS scores. Students in the traditional-to-traditional course sequence demonstrated an overall decline in their overall views about experimental physics. Students enrolled in the transformed-to-transformed course sequence showed an initial increase in their E-CLASS scores and they remained stable throughout the second half of the course sequence. Students in the traditional-to-transformed sequence experienced a significant increase in their E-CLASS scores; however, it only occurred during the second half of the two-course sequence.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131293786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T. Head, R. Lock, Raina Khatri, Z. Hazari, G. Potvin
{"title":"Student response to a careers in physics lesson","authors":"T. Head, R. Lock, Raina Khatri, Z. Hazari, G. Potvin","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.head","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.head","url":null,"abstract":"T. Blake Head,1 Robynne M. Lock,1 Raina Khatri,2 Zahra Hazari,2, 3 and Geoff Potvin2, 4 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, TX, 75429 STEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199 Department of Teaching & Learning, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199 Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134179008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael B. Bennett, Brett L. Fiedler, N. Finkelstein
{"title":"What factors influence pedagogical methods in informal learning spaces?","authors":"Michael B. Bennett, Brett L. Fiedler, N. Finkelstein","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.bennett","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.bennett","url":null,"abstract":"Public engagement is an important component of the operation of many p hysics organizations, such as physics departments. However, unlike in formal education settings, relatively little r es arch has been done on pedagogical approaches in informal physics education; commensurately little res earch has been done on the methods and means of training the facilitators who engage in that pedagogy. Following up on a previous study that characterized modes of pedagogy in informal physics educators, we presen t here preliminary results from a detailed study on the ways in which volunteers in a physics outreach program at the Univ rsity of Colorado understand and operationalize these pedagogical modes, and the ways in which our v olunteer training methods promote or inhibit volunteers’ efficient uptake and utilization of these teaching tools. We find that volunteers’ conceptions of these pedagogical modes tends not to persist robustly from their pre paration at the start of program participation, and that other factors, such as practiced pedagogical behaviors gleaned from formal learning environments, may play a large role in UEs’ enacted pedagogies in PISEC. From these fin dings, we begin to form the basis for changes to the ways in which we support and prepare our volunteers, w ith implications for informal programs at large.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133644205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comparing student behavior in mastery and conventional style online physics homework","authors":"Matthew Guthrie, Zhongzhou Chen","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.guthrie","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.guthrie","url":null,"abstract":"We compared students’ learning behavior when completing identical online calculus-based physics home-work assignments organized in two ways. One was designed for mastery learning where content is divided into smaller units, and students are required to attempt the assessment once before accessing the content. Students can proceed to the next unit after passing the assessment either before or after studying the content. The second is a conventional design in which students first study a set of instructional materials equivalent to several mastery units then complete multiple assessment problems at once. Our major findings are: 1. in the mastery condition, students solved more problems correctly either immediately after studying the instructional content, or on attempts before accessing the instructional content; 2. for students who solved similar numbers of problems correctly, the mastery condition students spent significantly less time studying compared to the traditional condition students; and 3. students who did not pass mastery units on their initial assessment attempts spent similar amounts of time studying as traditional condition students.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"116 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126387968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Students’ use of conceptual resources for understanding superposition","authors":"Lauren C. Bauman, L. Goodhew, Amy D. Robertson","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.bauman","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.bauman","url":null,"abstract":".","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122678849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Student behavior and test security in online conceptual assessment","authors":"Bethany R. Wilcox, S. Pollock","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Wilcox","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Wilcox","url":null,"abstract":"Historically, the implementation of research-based assessments (RBAs) has been a driver of education change within physics and helped motivate adoption of interactive engagement pedagogies. Until recently, RBAs were given to students exclusively on paper and in-class; however, this approach has important drawbacks including decentralized data collection and the need to sacrifice class time. Recently, some RBAs have been moved to online platforms to address these limitations. Yet, online RBAs present new concerns such as student participation rates, test security, and students' use of outside resources. Here, we report on a pilot study addressing these concerns. We gave two upper-division RBAs to courses at five institutions; the RBAs were hosted online and featured embedded JavaScript code which collected information on students' behaviors (e.g., copying text, printing). With these data, we examine the prevalence of these behaviors, and their correlation with students' scores, to determine if online and paper-based RBAs are comparable. We find that browser loss of focus is the most common online behavior while copying and printing events were rarer.We found no statistically significant correlation between any of these online behaviors and students scores. We also found that participation rates for our upper-division population went up when the RBA was given online. These results indicates that, for our upper-division population, scores on online administrations of these RBAs were comparable to in-class versions.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114416228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Faculty survey on upper-division thermal physics content coverage","authors":"Katherine Rainey, Bethany R. Wilcox","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Rainey","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Rainey","url":null,"abstract":"Thermal physics is a core course requirement for most physics degrees and encompasses both thermodynamics and statistical mechanics content. However, the primary content foci of thermal physics courses vary across universities. This variation can make creation of materials or assessment tools for thermal physics difficult. To determine the scope and content variability of thermal physics courses across institutions, we distributed a survey to over 140 institutions to determine content priorities from faculty and instructors who have taught upper-division thermodynamics and/or statistical mechanics. We present results from the survey, which highlight key similarities and differences in thermal physics content coverage across institutions. Though we see variations in content coverage, we found 9 key topical areas covered by all respondents in their upper-division thermal physics courses. We discuss implications of these findings for the development of instructional tools and assessments that are useful to the widest range of institutions and physics instructors.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130743717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"All aboard! Challenges and successes in professional development for physics lab TAs","authors":"Danny Doucette, Russell Clark, C. Singh","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Doucette","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Doucette","url":null,"abstract":"At large research universities in the USA, introductory physics labs are often run by graduate student teaching assistants (TAs). Thus, efforts to reform introductory labs should address the need for effective and relevant TA professional development. We developed and implemented a research-based professional development program that focuses on preparing TAs to effectively support inquiry-based learning in the lab. We identify positive effects by examining three possible ways in which the professional development might have impacted TAs and their work. First, we examine lab TAs' written reflections to understand the effect of the program on TAs' ways of thinking about student learning. Second, we observe and categorize TA-student interactions in the lab in order to investigate whether TA behaviors are changing after the professional development. Third, we examine students' attitudes toward experimental science and present one example case in which students' attitudes improve for those TAs who `buy in' to the professional development. Our results suggest lab TA professional development may have a tangible positive impact on TA performance and student learning.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128841564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Computational Essays: An Avenue for Scientific Creativity in Physics","authors":"T. O. Odden, Marcos D. Caballero","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Odden","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Odden","url":null,"abstract":"Computation holds great potential for introducing new opportunities for creativity and exploration into the physics curriculum. At the University of Oslo we have begun development of a new class of assignment called computational essays to help facilitate creative, open-ended computational physics projects. Computational essays are a type of essay or narrative that combine text and code to express an idea or make an argument, usually written in computational notebooks. During a pilot implementation of computational essays in an introductory electricity and magnetism course, students reported that computational essays facilitated creative investigation at a variety of levels within their physics course. They also reported finding this creativity as being both challenging and motivating. Based on these reflections, we argue that computational essays are a useful tool for leveraging the creative affordances of programming in physics education.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115750631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Westley D. James, Kamryn Lamons, R. Spilka, Caroline Bustamante, Erin M. Scanlon, Jacquelyn J. Chini
{"title":"Hidden walls: STEM course barriers identified by students with disabilities","authors":"Westley D. James, Kamryn Lamons, R. Spilka, Caroline Bustamante, Erin M. Scanlon, Jacquelyn J. Chini","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.James","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.James","url":null,"abstract":"Historically, non-disabled individuals have viewed disability as a personal deficit requiring change to the disabled individual. However, models have emerged from disability activists and disabled intellectuals that emphasize the role of disabling social structures in preventing or hindering equal access across the ability continuum. We used the social relational proposition, which situates disability within the interaction of impairments and particular social structures, to identify disabling structures in introductory STEM courses. We conducted interviews with nine students who identified with a range of impairments about their experiences in introductory STEM courses. We assembled a diverse research team and analyzed the interviews through phenomenological analysis. Participants reported course barriers that prevented effective engagement with course content. These barriers resulted in challenges with time management as well as feelings of stress and anxiety. We discuss recommendations for supporting students to more effectively engage with introductory STEM courses.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123452956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}