Comparing student behavior in mastery and conventional style online physics homework

Matthew Guthrie, Zhongzhou Chen
{"title":"Comparing student behavior in mastery and conventional style online physics homework","authors":"Matthew Guthrie, Zhongzhou Chen","doi":"10.1119/perc.2019.pr.guthrie","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared students’ learning behavior when completing identical online calculus-based physics home-work assignments organized in two ways. One was designed for mastery learning where content is divided into smaller units, and students are required to attempt the assessment once before accessing the content. Students can proceed to the next unit after passing the assessment either before or after studying the content. The second is a conventional design in which students first study a set of instructional materials equivalent to several mastery units then complete multiple assessment problems at once. Our major findings are: 1. in the mastery condition, students solved more problems correctly either immediately after studying the instructional content, or on attempts before accessing the instructional content; 2. for students who solved similar numbers of problems correctly, the mastery condition students spent significantly less time studying compared to the traditional condition students; and 3. students who did not pass mastery units on their initial assessment attempts spent similar amounts of time studying as traditional condition students.","PeriodicalId":208063,"journal":{"name":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"116 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.guthrie","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We compared students’ learning behavior when completing identical online calculus-based physics home-work assignments organized in two ways. One was designed for mastery learning where content is divided into smaller units, and students are required to attempt the assessment once before accessing the content. Students can proceed to the next unit after passing the assessment either before or after studying the content. The second is a conventional design in which students first study a set of instructional materials equivalent to several mastery units then complete multiple assessment problems at once. Our major findings are: 1. in the mastery condition, students solved more problems correctly either immediately after studying the instructional content, or on attempts before accessing the instructional content; 2. for students who solved similar numbers of problems correctly, the mastery condition students spent significantly less time studying compared to the traditional condition students; and 3. students who did not pass mastery units on their initial assessment attempts spent similar amounts of time studying as traditional condition students.
比较学生在掌握和传统在线物理作业方面的行为
我们比较了学生在完成两种方式组织的基于微积分的在线物理家庭作业时的学习行为。一种是专为精通学习设计的,其中内容被分成更小的单元,学生在访问内容之前需要尝试一次评估。学生在学习内容之前或之后通过评估后,可以进入下一个单元。第二种是传统的设计,学生首先学习一套相当于几个掌握单元的教学材料,然后一次完成多个评估问题。我们的主要发现是:1。在掌握条件下,学生在学习完教学内容后立即解决问题或在接触教学内容前尝试解决问题的正确程度更高;2. 对于正确解决相同数量问题的学生,掌握条件下的学生学习时间明显少于传统条件下的学生;和3。在最初的评估尝试中,没有通过精通单元的学生与传统条件下的学生花费了相似的学习时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信