Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages最新文献_第6页

A nonstandard standardization theorem 一个非标准的标准化定理

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535886

Beniamino Accattoli, E. Bonelli, D. Kesner, Carlos Lombardi

{"title":"A nonstandard standardization theorem","authors":"Beniamino Accattoli, E. Bonelli, D. Kesner, Carlos Lombardi","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535886","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535886","url":null,"abstract":"Standardization is a fundamental notion for connecting programming languages and rewriting calculi. Since both programming languages and calculi rely on substitution for defining their dynamics, explicit substitutions (ES) help further close the gap between theory and practice. This paper focuses on standardization for the linear substitution calculus, a calculus with ES capable of mimicking reduction in lambda-calculus and linear logic proof-nets. For the latter, proof-nets can be formalized by means of a simple equational theory over the linear substitution calculus. Contrary to other extant calculi with ES, our system can be equipped with a residual theory in the sense of Lévy, which is used to prove a left-to-right standardization theorem for the calculus with ES but without the equational theory. Such a theorem, however, does not lift from the calculus with ES to proof-nets, because the notion of left-to-right derivation is not preserved by the equational theory. We then relax the notion of left-to-right standard derivation, based on a total order on redexes, to a more liberal notion of standard derivation based on partial orders. Our proofs rely on Gonthier, Lévy, and Melliès' axiomatic theory for standardization. However, we go beyond merely applying their framework, revisiting some of its key concepts: we obtain uniqueness (modulo) of standard derivations in an abstract way and we provide a coinductive characterization of their key abstract notion of external redex. This last point is then used to give a simple proof that linear head reduction --a nondeterministic strategy having a central role in the theory of linear logic-- is standard.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72891911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 58

Game semantics for interface middleweight Java 游戏语义的接口中等重量的Java

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535880

A. Murawski, N. Tzevelekos

引用次数: 11

Bias-variance tradeoffs in program analysis 程序分析中的偏差-方差权衡

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535853

Rahul Sharma, A. Nori, A. Aiken

引用次数: 29

Combining proofs and programs in a dependently typed language 用独立类型语言组合证明和程序

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535883

Chris Casinghino, Vilhelm Sjöberg, Stephanie Weirich

引用次数: 71

A trusted mechanised JavaScript specification 一个可信的机械化JavaScript规范

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535876

Martin Bodin, A. Charguéraud, Daniele Filaretti, Philippa Gardner, S. Maffeis, Daiva Naudziuniene, Alan Schmitt, Gareth Smith

{"title":"A trusted mechanised JavaScript specification","authors":"Martin Bodin, A. Charguéraud, Daniele Filaretti, Philippa Gardner, S. Maffeis, Daiva Naudziuniene, Alan Schmitt, Gareth Smith","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535876","url":null,"abstract":"JavaScript is the most widely used web language for client-side applications. Whilst the development of JavaScript was initially just led by implementation, there is now increasing momentum behind the ECMA standardisation process. The time is ripe for a formal, mechanised specification of JavaScript, to clarify ambiguities in the ECMA standards, to serve as a trusted reference for high-level language compilation and JavaScript implementations, and to provide a platform for high-assurance proofs of language properties. We present JSCert, a formalisation of the current ECMA standard in the Coq proof assistant, and JSRef, a reference interpreter for JavaScript extracted from Coq to OCaml. We give a Coq proof that JSRef is correct with respect to JSCert and assess JSRef using test262, the ECMA conformance test suite. Our methodology ensures that JSCert is a comparatively accurate formulation of the English standard, which will only improve as time goes on. We have demonstrated that modern techniques of mechanised specification can handle the complexity of JavaScript.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84396998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 98

Counter-factual typing for debugging type errors 用于调试类型错误的反事实输入

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535863

Sheng Chen, Martin Erwig

{"title":"Counter-factual typing for debugging type errors","authors":"Sheng Chen, Martin Erwig","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535863","url":null,"abstract":"Changing a program in response to a type error plays an important part in modern software development. However, the generation of good type error messages remains a problem for highly expressive type systems. Existing approaches often suffer from a lack of precision in locating errors and proposing remedies. Specifically, they either fail to locate the source of the type error consistently, or they report too many potential error locations. Moreover, the change suggestions offered are often incorrect. This makes the debugging process tedious and ineffective. We present an approach to the problem of type debugging that is based on generating and filtering a comprehensive set of type-change suggestions. Specifically, we generate all (program-structure-preserving) type changes that can possibly fix the type error. These suggestions will be ranked and presented to the programmer in an iterative fashion. In some cases we also produce suggestions to change the program. In most situations, this strategy delivers the correct change suggestions quickly, and at the same time never misses any rare suggestions. The computation of the potentially huge set of type-change suggestions is efficient since it is based on a variational type inference algorithm that type checks a program with variations only once, efficiently reusing type information for shared parts. We have evaluated our method and compared it with previous approaches. Based on a large set of examples drawn from the literature, we have found that our method outperforms other approaches and provides a viable alternative.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90193668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 65

A sound and complete abstraction for reasoning about parallel prefix sums 关于并行前缀和推理的一个健全和完整的抽象

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535882

Nathan Chong, A. Donaldson, J. Ketema

{"title":"A sound and complete abstraction for reasoning about parallel prefix sums","authors":"Nathan Chong, A. Donaldson, J. Ketema","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535882","url":null,"abstract":"Prefix sums are key building blocks in the implementation of many concurrent software applications, and recently much work has gone into efficiently implementing prefix sums to run on massively parallel graphics processing units (GPUs). Because they lie at the heart of many GPU-accelerated applications, the correctness of prefix sum implementations is of prime importance. We introduce a novel abstraction, the interval of summations, that allows scalable reasoning about implementations of prefix sums. We present this abstraction as a monoid, and prove a soundness and completeness result showing that a generic sequential prefix sum implementation is correct for an array of length $n$ if and only if it computes the correct result for a specific test case when instantiated with the interval of summations monoid. This allows correctness to be established by running a single test where the input and result require O(n lg(n)) space. This improves upon an existing result by Sheeran where the input requires O(n lg(n)) space and the result O(n2 lg(n)) space, and is more feasible for large n than a method by Voigtlaender that uses O(n) space for the input and result but requires running O(n2) tests. We then extend our abstraction and results to the context of data-parallel programs, developing an automated verification method for GPU implementations of prefix sums. Our method uses static verification to prove that a generic prefix sum implementation is data race-free, after which functional correctness of the implementation can be determined by running a single test case under the interval of summations abstraction. We present an experimental evaluation using four different prefix sum algorithms, showing that our method is highly automatic, scales to large thread counts, and significantly outperforms Voigtlaender's method when applied to large arrays.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90374862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 29

Consistency analysis of decision-making programs 决策程序的一致性分析

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535858

Swarat Chaudhuri, Azadeh Farzan, Zachary Kincaid

{"title":"Consistency analysis of decision-making programs","authors":"Swarat Chaudhuri, Azadeh Farzan, Zachary Kincaid","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535858","url":null,"abstract":"Applications in many areas of computing make discrete decisions under uncertainty, for reasons such as limited numerical precision in calculations and errors in sensor-derived inputs. As a result, individual decisions made by such programs may be nondeterministic, and lead to contradictory decisions at different points of an execution. This means that an otherwise correct program may execute along paths, that it would not follow under its ideal semantics, violating essential program invariants on the way. A program is said to be consistent if it does not suffer from this problem despite uncertainty in decisions. In this paper, we present a sound, automatic program analysis for verifying that a program is consistent in this sense. Our analysis proves that each decision made along a program execution is consistent with the decisions made earlier in the execution. The proof is done by generating an invariant that abstracts the set of all decisions made along executions that end at a program location l, then verifying, using a fixpoint constraint-solver, that no contradiction can be derived when these decisions are combined with new decisions made at l. We evaluate our analysis on a collection of programs implementing algorithms in computational geometry. Consistency is known to be a critical, frequently-violated, and thoroughly studied correctness property in geometry, but ours is the first attempt at automated verification of consistency of geometric algorithms. Our benchmark suite consists of implementations of convex hull computation, triangulation, and point location algorithms. On almost all examples that are not consistent (with two exceptions), our analysis is able to verify consistency within a few minutes.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91392154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Toward general diagnosis of static errors 对静态误差的一般诊断

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535870

Danfeng Zhang, A. Myers

{"title":"Toward general diagnosis of static errors","authors":"Danfeng Zhang, A. Myers","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2535870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535870","url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a general way to locate programmer mistakes that are detected by static analyses such as type checking. The program analysis is expressed in a constraint language in which mistakes result in unsatisfiable constraints. Given an unsatisfiable system of constraints, both satisfiable and unsatisfiable constraints are analyzed, to identify the program expressions most likely to be the cause of unsatisfiability. The likelihood of different error explanations is evaluated under the assumption that the programmer's code is mostly correct, so the simplest explanations are chosen, following Bayesian principles. For analyses that rely on programmer-stated assumptions, the diagnosis also identifies assumptions likely to have been omitted. The new error diagnosis approach has been implemented for two very different program analyses: type inference in OCaml and information flow checking in Jif. The effectiveness of the approach is evaluated using previously collected programs containing errors. The results show that when compared to existing compilers and other tools, the general technique identifies the location of programmer errors significantly more accurately.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78973918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 53

Profiling for laziness 懒惰剖析

Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages Pub Date : 2014-01-08 DOI: 10.1145/2535838.2535887

Stephen Chang, M. Felleisen

引用次数: 8