Political Communication最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Reintegrating Influencer Media Logic into the Study of Political Influencers 将影响者媒体逻辑重新整合到政治影响者的研究中
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2706641
Fatima Gaw,Erik C. Nisbet
{"title":"Reintegrating Influencer Media Logic into the Study of Political Influencers","authors":"Fatima Gaw,Erik C. Nisbet","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2706641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2706641","url":null,"abstract":"Political influencers are an emerging epistemic authority in politics. Yet, existing scholarship risks conceptually misspecifying them by focusing on their political nature and neglecting their communicative practices established in broader social media influencer literature. This article advances a theoretical intervention to reintegrate influencer studies into the study of political influencers in political communication. Drawing on the media logic tradition, we discuss “influencer media logic” as communication principles that distinguish political influencers from other political media actors and that underpin their persuasiveness. We discuss three principles of influencer media logic, authenticity, intimacy, and platform expertise, and their contribution to restructuring visibility, credibility, and trust in politics. By foregrounding these communicative practices, we address the limitations of existing conceptualizations and clarify mechanisms of influence beyond the political aspect of their content. We discuss research directions to systematically study political influencers and examine their implications for political communication and democratic engagement.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vengeance or Hope? A Role-Based Analysis of Hashtag Activism for the War in Gaza 复仇还是希望?基于角色的加沙战争标签行动主义分析
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2702539
Tay Jeong
{"title":"Vengeance or Hope? A Role-Based Analysis of Hashtag Activism for the War in Gaza","authors":"Tay Jeong","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2702539","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2702539","url":null,"abstract":"Using cross-lingual international X trends data and a unique role-based analytical framework well-suited for the study of granular textual data, this study examines the partisan and spatial distribution of political rhetoric in hashtag activism about the Gaza War in its early phase. Following a triadic classificatory rubric of roles composed of victim-villain-hero, I find that pro-Palestine hashtag activism was overwhelmingly focused on victimhood, but Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East uniquely exhibited comparably strong expressions of glorified sentiments of heroism. In contrast, pro-Israel hashtag activism was driven by villain-centric messages focusing on the topic of denunciation mixed with the rhetoric of victimhood. Contrary to popular characterizations of the discursive conflict as a parallel clash of victimhood or vengeful emotions, the results reveal stark asymmetries in how wartime militancy was rhetorically framed. I propose a power-centric interpretation of the observed rhetorical asymmetries, which I argue stem from diverging practical needs in a heavily unequal bilateral conflict. I also reflect on regional differences within the global Palestine solidarity movement amidst debates about the cultural praxis of subalternity that have intensified since the outbreak of the Gaza War.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"162 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does the Method Affect the Outcome? How Measures of Partisan Slant of Media Outlets and Affective Polarization Drive Results About Polarization in the United States 方法会影响结果吗?媒体的党派倾向和情感极化如何驱动美国两极分化的结果
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-07-05 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2699105
Christian Schemer,Klara Langmann,Ariel Hasell,Brian Weeks
{"title":"Does the Method Affect the Outcome? How Measures of Partisan Slant of Media Outlets and Affective Polarization Drive Results About Polarization in the United States","authors":"Christian Schemer,Klara Langmann,Ariel Hasell,Brian Weeks","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2699105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2699105","url":null,"abstract":"There is abundant evidence that partisan media use is related to polarization in the United States. However, there is less agreement on whether the outcomes of this exposure are detrimental to democracies. Different methods used to measure both partisan media use and polarization may have contributed to the variation in findings in this area of research. The present study relied on survey data from the 2020 U.S. presidential election to systematically examine how methodological differences in determining the partisanship of news outlets and polarization can impact outcomes of interest, such as the correlation between outlet-level partisan slant and affective as well as belief polarization. A specification curve analysis of 504 different ways of operationalizing these independent and dependent variables provided evidence that methodological choices considerably affected the strength of the relationship between partisan media use and affective and belief polarization.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"57 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Joe Rogan Experience: Epistemic Style Over Ideological Extremity in the Manosphere 乔·罗根的经历:庄园中意识形态极端的认知风格
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-06-25 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2690998
Dominik A. Stecuła, Dannagal G. Young, Michael W. Wagner, Dhavan V. Shah
{"title":"The Joe Rogan Experience: Epistemic Style Over Ideological Extremity in the Manosphere","authors":"Dominik A. Stecuła, Dannagal G. Young, Michael W. Wagner, Dhavan V. Shah","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2690998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2690998","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148314099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Democratic Institutions Under Threat: Corrosive Frames, Internet News, and the U.S. Supreme Court 民主制度受到威胁:腐蚀框架、互联网新闻和美国最高法院
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-06-17 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2682952
Justin Wedeking,Michael A. Zilis
{"title":"Democratic Institutions Under Threat: Corrosive Frames, Internet News, and the U.S. Supreme Court","authors":"Justin Wedeking,Michael A. Zilis","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2682952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2682952","url":null,"abstract":"Are democratic institutions under threat in the United States? We examine an understudied democratic bedrock: the judiciary and, in particular, the U.S. Supreme Court. We draw on data from “SCOTUSapp,” a tool that provides a database of 100,000+ news articles across thousands of unexamined sources. We find a new media environment where the Court receives attention from thousands of ideologically fragmented outlets. Additionally, some framings of the Court are potentially corrosive. We then use two experiments to examine the effects of these corrosive news frames. The first experiment (October 2021) provides evidence that frames portraying the Court as embroiled in secrecy, hypocrisy, illegitimacy, and politics cause a decrease in support for judicial independence. These frames are influential among Republicans and Democrats. The second experiment (May 2023) follows Dobbs, which severely damaged judicial faith among Democrats, and shows that corrosive frames lead to a corresponding decline only among strong Republicans.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-Platform Referrers of Misinformation: A Comparative Analysis of Misinformation Visits Referred by Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat, and TikTok 错误信息的多平台引用:对Facebook、Twitter、Instagram、Reddit、YouTube、Snapchat和TikTok引用的错误信息访问的比较分析
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-06-10 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2679492
Ross Dahlke, Ryan C. Moore, Danya Adib-Azpeitia, Johan Ugander, Jeffrey T. Hancock
{"title":"Multi-Platform Referrers of Misinformation: A Comparative Analysis of Misinformation Visits Referred by Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat, and TikTok","authors":"Ross Dahlke, Ryan C. Moore, Danya Adib-Azpeitia, Johan Ugander, Jeffrey T. Hancock","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2679492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2679492","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148385907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Echo Chambers, Rabbit Holes, and Radicalization Pathways on YouTube 评价YouTube上的回声室、兔子洞和激进化途径
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-06-10 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2671765
Megan A. Brown, James Bisbee, Angela Lai, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker
{"title":"Evaluating Echo Chambers, Rabbit Holes, and Radicalization Pathways on YouTube","authors":"Megan A. Brown, James Bisbee, Angela Lai, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2671765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2671765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148286488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence and Consequences of Women’s Algorithmic Underrepresentation in Cross-National Political Google Searches 跨国政治搜索中女性算法代表性不足的普遍性及其后果
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-05-27 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2679476
Tobias Rohrbach,Mykola Makhortykh,Maryna Sydorova
{"title":"The Prevalence and Consequences of Women’s Algorithmic Underrepresentation in Cross-National Political Google Searches","authors":"Tobias Rohrbach,Mykola Makhortykh,Maryna Sydorova","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2679476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2679476","url":null,"abstract":"Search engines like Google have become major information gatekeepers that use artificial intelligence (AI) to determine who and what voters find when searching for political information. Yet there is concern that biases in algorithmically curated representation of women politicians in online search results mirror and amplify structural inequalities and therefore further reduce women’s electoral chances. We empirically assess the prevalence and consequences of algorithmic gender bias in political Google searches in a series of four studies. First, we conduct two multinational algorithm audits of political image searches (study 1: 56 countries and 6,363 images; study 2: 11 countries and 152,098 images) to assess women’s quantitative representation in search results. We find that women politicians’ algorithmic representation on average accurately mirrors the actual gender composition of legislative bodies while consistently remaining below absolute gender parity. Second, we show in two online experiments from three different samples (1,388 respondents in total) how more extreme cases of algorithmic underrepresentation can influence human perceptions of the political reality and actively reinforce a white and masculinized view of politics. These misperceptions act as a casual conduit through which algorithmic biases can not only diminish the perceived chances of winning an election for minoritized candidates but also result in voters feeling that their voices matter less. Together, the results highlight the risk that, under certain conditions, algorithmic systems like search engines can negatively impact electoral processes.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Press and Prejudice: an Interview Study on Politicians’ Perceptions of Partisan News Media Bias 新闻与偏见:政治家对党派新闻媒体偏见认知的访谈研究
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-05-21 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2675595
Karolin Soontjens,Kathleen Beckers,Emma van der Goot,Sophie Morosoli
{"title":"Press and Prejudice: an Interview Study on Politicians’ Perceptions of Partisan News Media Bias","authors":"Karolin Soontjens,Kathleen Beckers,Emma van der Goot,Sophie Morosoli","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2675595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2675595","url":null,"abstract":"In democratic systems, relationships between politicians and journalists are often marked by both interdependence and tension. Prior research shows that when politicians perceive traditional news media as biased and voice these concerns, their interactions with journalists can become increasingly conflictual. However, little is known about what politicians actually mean when they blame legacy media for being slanted, or what they perceive as the underlying causes of such partisan news bias. Understanding these perceptions matters, as they shape politicians’ interactions with journalists, their broader communication about the media, and, ultimately, the quality of democratic debate. Therefore, this study investigates politicians’ perceptions of partisan news bias through face-to-face interviews with 110 Belgian members of parliament. Specifically, we examine how politicians define partisan bias and what they consider its main causes. We find that MPs primarily refer to selection and presentation bias when criticizing legacy media, frequently citing insufficient attention, unfair framing, and selective quoting as grievances. Both right- and left-leaning politicians attribute these issues to the presumed left-wing orientations of journalists. Right-wing MPs argue that journalists’ ideological bias benefits leftist parties, whereas left-leaning MPs believe journalists disadvantage the left to avoid accusations of leftist bias. To a lesser extent, MPs also identify commercial pressures as a source of political bias in news coverage. Overall, the findings show that politicians attribute considerable power to the media and express a shared sense of dependence on its perceived biases and agendas.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"73 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149210840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What the DSA Means Outside Europe: Research Access and Its Limits DSA在欧洲以外意味着什么:研究准入及其限制
IF 7.5 1区 社会学
Political Communication Pub Date : 2026-05-02 DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2026.2665427
Laura Edelson
{"title":"What the DSA Means Outside Europe: Research Access and Its Limits","authors":"Laura Edelson","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2665427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2665427","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148286273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书