{"title":"Policing the Political Boundary: How the r/BarstoolSports Audience Confronts Politicization","authors":"Elliott Edsall","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2715700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2715700","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148899678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trending Topics, Growing Knowledge? How Curating Actors’ Political Social Media Content Affects Youth’s Political Knowledge","authors":"Margot Lissens,Cato Waeterloos,Laura Vandenbosch,Desirée Schmuck","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2708127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2708127","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148899692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Examining the Influence of Media Coverage on Information-Seeking of Judicial Candidates","authors":"Marcy Shieh","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2716378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2716378","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148899680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Knowledge Gap in a High-Choice Media Environment: Experimental Evidence from Online Search","authors":"Roberto Ulloa,Leonard Tiedemann,Peter Selb,Celina Kacperski","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2708131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2708131","url":null,"abstract":"Persistent inequalities in political knowledge are a central concern in political communication. We organize the mechanisms underlying the knowledge-gap literature by distinguishing between individual preconditions, structural features of the information environment, and topic characteristics. Within this framework, we note that self-directed information seeking, a prototypical form of intentional exposure, has received little attention despite its importance in navigating today’s complex information environment. We conducted a field experiment in Germany, combining randomized encouragements and passive browser tracking, to examine how individuals with varying education levels acquire policy-specific knowledge through online search. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (verbal encouragement, financial encouragement, or control) to seek information on three salient policy topics differing in divisiveness and complexity (child support, energy transition, and cannabis legalization). We estimated both intention-to-treat (ITT) and local average treatment effects (LATE) of information seeking on post-search knowledge outcomes, with a focus on education and civic knowledge as moderators. While the interventions equalized information-seeking behavior, the results provide some support for the knowledge gap hypothesis: knowledge gains were concentrated among participants with higher education or baseline civic knowledge, who, according to our post-hoc exploratory analyses, appeared more effective at navigating search results. These findings indicate that a narrowing of knowledge inequalities goes beyond motivation: it calls for both individual-level interventions to strengthen citizens’ skills and structural-level adaptations to foster more equitable learning environments.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constantine Boussalis,Travis G. Coan,Mirya R. Holman
{"title":"Happiness in Political Communication by Men and Women Members of the US Congress","authors":"Constantine Boussalis,Travis G. Coan,Mirya R. Holman","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2705676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2705676","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148899660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sang Jung Kim,Jordan Foley,Yunkang Yang,Keyeun Lee
{"title":"Networked Counterpublics and Contentious Publicity: A Cross-Platform Analysis of QAnon on Parler and Twitter","authors":"Sang Jung Kim,Jordan Foley,Yunkang Yang,Keyeun Lee","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2708132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2708132","url":null,"abstract":"Extremist online movements often leverage social media affordances to shape in-group identity and influence broader publics through agenda-setting practices. This study uses QAnon as a case of a networked counterpublic to examine how these processes unfolded between 2018 and 2021. Drawing on affordance theory, we analyze how QAnon discourse activated the affordances of visibility, association, and persistence on Parler and Twitter – two platforms similar in technical features but distinct in their cultures of use. We identify differentiated affordance-activation practices that support different counterpublic functions: for example, hashtag stacking on Parler can be interpreted as contributing to identity-oriented meaning-making, whereas calls to “do your own research” on Twitter may function as epistemic invitations aimed at drawing mainstream users into conspiratorial interpretation. We further show that QAnon’s contentious publicness – the contestation of pro- and anti-QAnon claims – shifted dynamically across the movement’s developmental stages, and that identical informational resources (shared URLs) generated divergent discursive trajectories across platforms. By tracing these temporal and cross-platform dynamics, we illuminate how extremist counterpublics navigate visibility, identity work, and public contestation, offering insights for the study of political communication in an era of networked extremism.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Common Identities and Political Talk: Evaluating Cross-Cutting Political Discussions in Sports Communities on Reddit","authors":"Ashwin Rajadesingan","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2704899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2704899","url":null,"abstract":"Research suggests that online nonpolitical communities may facilitate better cross-cutting political discussions than explicitly political communities as users’ shared nonpolitical identities can offset partisan bias, in line with the Common Ingroup Identity Model. This study tests this idea through a large-scale computational analysis comparing the quantity, tone, and substance of political discussions on the same topics in political and sports communities on Reddit. Overall, we find that sports communities facilitate more cross-cutting political discussions than political communities, with the exception of soccer communities. These discussions use similar proportions of credible sources but use significantly fewer sources that are not credible compared to discussions in political communities. On the flip side, we do not find evidence of a meaningful difference in toxicity levels of cross-cutting political discussions in sports and political communities. Further, we find that political discussions in sports communities use fewer sources overall. These results advance a nuanced understanding of the promise of nonpolitical spaces for deliberative democracy and the role of common identities in political discussions.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Studying Propaganda as a Social Process","authors":"Christian Baden,Anna Litvinenko,Gregory Asmolov","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2706643","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2706643","url":null,"abstract":"In recent scholarship on propaganda, no aspect has attracted more attention than the digitally mediated propagation of disinformation. In this intervention, we argue that focusing narrowly on disinformation risks missing the forest for all the trees: Only by considering disinformation’s embedding within broader propaganda strategies and processes, we can understand falsehoods’ distinctive rhetorical functions alongside other forms of (normative, motivational, etc.) propaganda messaging, comprehend their persuasive appeal, and theorize their capacity to gain discursive power within contemporary high-choice information environments. Advancing an approach that foregrounds propaganda’s inherent anti-democratic ambition over its manipulative means, we sketch a research agenda suitable to studying propaganda as a social process.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sungwon Jung,Zhi Lin,Joseph M Stepniewski,Jennifer Castillo Cortes,Yuzhe Lei
{"title":"Affective Publics in the YouTube Live Chat: Multimodal Emotional Contagion During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Debate","authors":"Sungwon Jung,Zhi Lin,Joseph M Stepniewski,Jennifer Castillo Cortes,Yuzhe Lei","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2704891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2704891","url":null,"abstract":"Televised debates between political candidates have become dynamic, interactive events on live-streaming platforms where audiences form affective publics through real-time interactions and emotional expressions in live chat. In this study, we focused on real-time emotional contagion on a right-wing YouTube channel during the live-streamed 2024 U.S. presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Examining how multimodal emotional expressions from candidates influence audience responses in live chats (N = 53,095), this study introduces a novel, multi-dimensional approach combining computational techniques, including face emotion recognition, speech emotion analysis, text emotion classification, and time series analysis, to analyze multimodal emotional cues across audio, video, and chat data. Results revealed that Harris’ vocal fear Granger-caused an increase in joy in the live chat, and that emotional contagion patterns varied by user engagement level and political leaning: low-engagement users were primarily influenced by the candidates, whereas higher-engagement users were more influenced by peer emotions. Pro-Trump audiences’ joy was amplified by Harris’s vocal sadness; among pro-Harris audiences, anger increased in response to Harris’s vocal sadness and the moderators’ facial sadness, while joy increased in response to Trump’s facial sadness. Negative public emotions including sadness and anger also reinforced joy in the live chat. These findings offer new insights into the role of emotional contagion in mobilizing online affective publics during live-streamed political events.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Political Fact-Checking Efforts are Constrained by Deficiencies in Coverage, Speed, and Reach","authors":"Morgan Wack,Kayla Duskin,Damian Hodel","doi":"10.1080/10584609.2026.2704896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2026.2704896","url":null,"abstract":"Fact-checking has been promoted as a key method for combating political misinformation. Comparing the spread of election-related misinformation narratives along with their relevant political fact-checks, this study provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of the real-world limitations faced by political fact-checking efforts. In conceptualizing these barriers to impact, this study extends recent work from laboratory and experimental settings to the wider online information ecosystem present during the 2022 U.S. midterm elections. We find that fact-checks as currently developed and distributed are severely inhibited by constraints on their i. coverage, ii. speed, and iii. reach, which we link to fundamental challenges to the production economies and information asymmetries that differentiate corrections from misinformation. Specifically, we provide evidence that fewer than half of all prominent election-related misinformation narratives were fact-checked. Within the subset of fact-checked claims, we find that the median fact-check was released a full four days after the initial appearance of a narrative. Using network analysis to estimate user partisanship and dynamics of information spread, we find additional evidence that fact-checks make up less than 1.2% of narrative conversations and that even when shared, fact-checks are nearly always shared within, rather than between, partisan communities. Finally, we provide empirical evidence which runs contrary to the assumption that fact-checking is politically biased. Through this assessment of the real-world influence of fact-checking efforts, our findings underscore how limitations in coverage, speed, and reach necessitate further examination of the use of fact-checks as the primary method for combating political misinformation.","PeriodicalId":20264,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149003586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}