Plastic Surgery International最新文献

{"title":"Surgical Correction of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis with Frontal Bone Symmetrization and Staggered Osteotomies.","authors":"Seyed Esmail Hassanpour,&nbsp;Masoumeh Abbasnezhad,&nbsp;Hamidreza Alizadeh Otaghvar,&nbsp;Adnan Tizmaghz","doi":"10.1155/2018/3793592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3793592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures that produce abnormal head shape. Plagiocephaly is a general term that describes unilateral flattening of the anterior or posterior quarter of the cranium. Anterior plagiocephaly is almost always due to unilateral coronal synostosis. Early surgical treatment is the best option for these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical correction results of unicoronal craniosynostosis with frontal bone symmetrization and staggered osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All unicoronal craniosynostosis cases treated surgically from 2013 to 2016 at our hospital, with frontal bone symmetrization and staggered osteotomies and fronto-orbital advancement, were reviewed. The following variables were analyzed: sex, age, weight, hospital stay time, ICU stay time, per os (PO) starting time, anesthetic time, estimated blood loss volume (ml), estimated blood loss as percentage of total volume, surgical complication, follow-up time, and Whitaker grade. All data were analyzed with SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study consisted of 33 patients (19 females, 14 males). Average age was 10.24 months, average weight was 8.97 Kg, average hospital stay time was 7.84 days, average ICU stay time was 1.69 days, average PO starting time was 1.24 days after surgery, average anesthetic time was 397.72 minutes, average estimated blood loss was 213.78 ml, and estimated blood loss as percentage of total volume was 31.69%. One case (3.03%) needed reoperation and two cases had postoperative seizure. No mortality was seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is supposed that surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis with frontal bone symmetrization and staggered osteotomies results in lower blood loss, lower complication rate and reoperation, and more durable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3793592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3793592","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36792416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Response to: Comment on \"Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years\".","authors":"Felix J Paprottka,&nbsp;Nicco Krezdorn,&nbsp;Heiko Sorg,&nbsp;Sören Könneker,&nbsp;Stiliano Bontikous,&nbsp;Ian Robertson,&nbsp;Christopher L Schlett,&nbsp;Nils-Kristian Dohse,&nbsp;Detlev Hebebrand","doi":"10.1155/2018/6917454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6917454","url":null,"abstract":"1Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Elise-Averdieck-Straße 17, 27356 Rotenburg (Wümme), Germany 2Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA 3Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Hellweg 100, 45276 Essen, Germany 4Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neubergstraße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany 5Department of Pathology, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Elise-Averdieck-Straße 17, 27356 Rotenburg, Germany 6Department of Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London, UK 7Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"6917454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/6917454","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36438443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years\".","authors":"Felix J Paprottka,&nbsp;Nicco Krezdorn,&nbsp;Heiko Sorg,&nbsp;Sören Könneker,&nbsp;Stiliano Bontikous,&nbsp;Ian Robertson,&nbsp;Christopher L Schlett,&nbsp;Nils-Kristian Dohse,&nbsp;Detlev Hebebrand","doi":"10.1155/2018/5731290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5731290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2017/1283735.].</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"5731290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5731290","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36421250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications among the Elderly after Plastic Surgery Procedures Performed under General Anesthesia.","authors":"Kiyoko Fukui,&nbsp;Masaki Fujioka,&nbsp;Kazumi Yamasaki,&nbsp;Sho Yamakawa,&nbsp;Haruka Matsuo,&nbsp;Miho Noguchi","doi":"10.1155/2018/7053839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7053839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The frequency of surgery involving elderly patients has been increasing. The use of free tissue transfers in the elderly has been examined previously (Howard et al., 2005, Hwang et al., 2016, Grammatica et al., 2015, Serletti et al., 2000, and Sierakowski et al., 2017), whereas there have not been any such studies of plastic surgery procedures. We evaluated the risk factors for complications after plastic surgery procedures performed under general anesthesia in patients aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cases of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent plastic surgery procedures under general anesthesia at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixty-three cases were reviewed. Complications were seen in 137 patients. Age was not predictive of complications. The risk factors included a serum albumin level of <2.8 g/dl (odds ratio (OR): 2.96), an operative time of ≥120 min (OR: 6.22), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists performance status of ≥3 (OR: 2.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age is not contraindication for surgery in the elderly. It is important to assess comorbidities and perform surgical procedures as soon as possible to shorten the surgical period.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"7053839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7053839","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36401369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on \"Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years\".","authors":"S H Heisterkamp","doi":"10.1155/2018/5231565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5231565","url":null,"abstract":"I read with great interest the article by Paprottka et al. [1] which presented the results of a study on complications after breast surgery. The publication of such a study is important for both surgeons and patients, in order to make an informed decision on the expected outcomes of such an invasive surgery. In particular, patients should be aware of the risks involved in such an intervention.Therefore it is of the utmost importance that the design of such a study is correct and that the conclusions are justified by the data. I am concerned with both of these aspects of the study, as well as fundamental dissimilarities in the devices as well as the patient cohorts.","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"5231565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5231565","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36312302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Single Stage Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reduction Mastopexy in the Ptotic Breast.","authors":"M E Pontell, N Saad, A Brown, M Rose, R Ashinoff, A Saad","doi":"10.1155/2018/9205805","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2018/9205805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the proposed increased risk of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is generally not recommended for patients with large or significantly ptotic breasts. NAC preserving strategies in this subgroup include staged or simultaneous NSM and reduction mastopexy. We present a novel approach towards simultaneous NSM and reduction mastopexy in patients with large, ptotic breasts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature pertaining to NSM for women with large, ptotic breasts was reviewed and a surgical approach was designed to allow for simultaneous NSM and reduction mastopexy in such patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients underwent bilateral NSM with simultaneous reduction mammaplasty and immediate reconstruction. The majority of breasts demonstrated advanced ptosis (69% grade III, 31% grade II) and the average breast volume excised was 760 grams. In those patients without a history of smoking, NAC necrosis rates were 0%. In those patients with a history of smoking, 83% of breasts experienced NAC necrosis (60% total, 40% partial). One hundred percent of patients who smoked experienced some degree of NAC necrosis. Among breasts with grade II versus grade III ptosis, NAC necrosis rates were roughly equal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historically, patients with large, ptotic breasts were excluded from NSM due to the proposed increased risk of NAC necrosis. This study demonstrates a safe approach towards NSM and reduction mastopexy using an inferior, wide-based, epithelialized pedicle. While all patients eventually achieved satisfactory results, there was an association between smoking and NAC necrosis. Smoking cessation is paramount to the operation's success.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"9205805"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36068637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years.","authors":"Felix J Paprottka,&nbsp;Nicco Krezdorn,&nbsp;Heiko Sorg,&nbsp;Sören Könneker,&nbsp;Stiliano Bontikous,&nbsp;Ian Robertson,&nbsp;Christopher L Schlett,&nbsp;Nils-Kristian Dohse,&nbsp;Detlev Hebebrand","doi":"10.1155/2017/1283735","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1283735","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are now commonly used for breast reconstruction surgery. There are various products available: ADMs derived from human (HADM), porcine (PADM), or bovine (BADM) sources. Detailed long-term follow-up studies are necessary to detect differences in complication rates between these products.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From 2010 to 2015, forty-one patients underwent 52 ADM-breast reconstructions in our clinic, including oncologic breast reconstructions and breast augmentation revisions (<i>n</i> = 52). 15x HADMs (Epiflex®/DIZG), 21x PADMs (Strattice®/LifeCell), and 16x BADMs (Tutomesh®/RTI Surgical) were implanted. Retrospective data collection with median follow-up of 36 months (range: 12-54 months) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall complication rate was 17% after ADM implantation (HADM: 7%; PADM: 14%; BADM: 31%). In a composite endpoint of complications and Red Breast Syndrome, a lower event probability was observed between BADMs, PADMs, and HADMs (44%, 19%, and 7%, resp.; <i>p</i> = 0.01 for the trend). Furthermore, capsular contracture occurred in 6%, more frequently as compared to the current literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When ADM-based reconstruction is indicated, the authors suggest primarily the use of HADMs and secondary the use of PADMs. It is shown that BADMs have the highest complication probability within our patient cohort; nevertheless, BADMs convey physical advantages in terms of flexibility and better aesthetic outcomes. The indication for the use of ADMs should be filled for each case individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2017 ","pages":"1283735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1283735","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35158940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Plastic Surgery Inclusion in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Perception, Challenges, and Career Choice-A Comparative Study.","authors":"M Farid,&nbsp;R Vaughan,&nbsp;S Thomas","doi":"10.1155/2017/9458741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9458741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The undergraduate medical curriculum has been overcrowded with core learning outcomes with no formal exposure to plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare medical students from two educational settings for the basic understanding, preferred learning method, and factors influencing a career choice in plastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A prospective cohort study based on a web-based anonymous questionnaire sent to final year medical students at Birmingham University (United Kingdom), McGill University (Canada), and a control group (non-medical staff). The questions were about plastic surgery: (1) source of information and basic understanding; (2) undergraduate curriculum inclusion and preferred learning methods; (3) factors influencing a career choice. A similar questionnaire was sent to non-medical staff (control group). The data was analysed based on categorical outcomes (Chi-square <i>χ</i>2) and level of significance <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaire was analysed for 243 students (Birmingham, <i>n</i> = 171/332, 52%) (McGill <i>n</i> = 72/132, 54%). Birmingham students (14%) considered the word \"plastic\" synonymous with \"cosmetic\" more than McGill students (4%, <i>p</i> < 0.025). Teaching was the main source of knowledge for McGill students (39%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while Birmingham students and control group chose the media (70%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). McGill students (67%) more than Birmingham (49%, <i>p</i> < 0.010) considered curriculum inclusion. The preferred learning method was lectures for McGill students (61%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but an optional module for Birmingham (61%). A similar proportion (18%) from both student groups considered a career in plastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students recognised the need for plastic surgery inclusion in the undergraduate curriculum. There was a difference for plastic surgery source of information, operations, and preferred method of learning for students. The study highlighted the urgent need to reform plastic surgery undergraduate teaching in collaboration with national educational bodies worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2017 ","pages":"9458741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9458741","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35102774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Efficiency of Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Vascular Malformations: A Retrospective Study of 63 Patients","authors":"E. Veräjänkorva, R. Rautio, S. Giordano, I. Koskivuo, Otto Savolainen","doi":"10.1155/2016/2809152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2809152","url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims. Vascular malformations are a vast group of congenital malformations that are present at birth. These malformations can cause pain, pressure, and cosmetic annoyance as well as downturn growth and development in a child in the case of high flow. Sclerotherapy has become an important tool in the treatment of vascular malformations. However, little is known about the success rate of sclerotherapy. Material and Methods. In this study, the efficiency of sclerotherapy in the treatment of vascular anomalies was investigated retrospectively in 63 patients treated in Turku University Hospital between 2003 and 2013. Results. Out of the 63 patients investigated, 83% (53) had venous malformations (VMs) and 9% (5) were defined as having arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Patients with a VM were operated on, in 14% (8) out of all VM cases. Hence 86% (45) of patients with a VM received adequate help to their symptoms solely from sclerotherapy. The duration of treatment for the 14% of the VM patients that needed a surgical procedure was prolonged by 7–9 months, that is, by 41%. Conclusions. Sclerotherapy is an effective method in the treatment of VMs with a satisfactory clinical response in patients symptoms in 84% of cases.","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85883717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Comparison of Barbed Sutures and Standard Sutures with regard to Wound Cosmesis in Panniculectomy and Reduction Mammoplasty Patients","authors":"Kristen A. Aliano, Michael Trostler, Indira Michelle Fromm, A. Dagum, Sami U. Khan, D. Bui","doi":"10.1155/2016/7590396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7590396","url":null,"abstract":"Cosmesis is a vital concern for patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. Many variations in wound closure are employed when attempting to minimize a surgical scar's appearance. Barbed sutures are one potential method of achieving improved wound cosmesis and are more common in recent years. To determine if barbed sutures differ from nonbarbed in wound cosmesis, we conducted a single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 18 patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammoplasty or panniculectomy. Patients were their own controls, receiving barbed sutures on one side and standard sutures on the contralateral side. Surgical scars were evaluated postoperatively by patient preference self-assessment and an observer. Ten patients were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively, yielding a mean Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) rating of 4.4 for barbed suture and 3.5 for regular suture (p = 0.15). At 6 months, 8 patients performed self-assessment to determine their preference; 4 preferred the barbed sutures, 1 preferred the regular sutures, and 3 had no preference. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to determine if barbed sutures convey any advantage over standard sutures in wound healing. However, our results suggest that barbed sutures are a reasonable alternative to standard sutures particularly with regard to wound cosmesis.","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88913299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}