Plastic Surgery Inclusion in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Perception, Challenges, and Career Choice-A Comparative Study.

Plastic Surgery International Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-23 DOI:10.1155/2017/9458741
M Farid, R Vaughan, S Thomas
{"title":"Plastic Surgery Inclusion in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Perception, Challenges, and Career Choice-A Comparative Study.","authors":"M Farid,&nbsp;R Vaughan,&nbsp;S Thomas","doi":"10.1155/2017/9458741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The undergraduate medical curriculum has been overcrowded with core learning outcomes with no formal exposure to plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare medical students from two educational settings for the basic understanding, preferred learning method, and factors influencing a career choice in plastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A prospective cohort study based on a web-based anonymous questionnaire sent to final year medical students at Birmingham University (United Kingdom), McGill University (Canada), and a control group (non-medical staff). The questions were about plastic surgery: (1) source of information and basic understanding; (2) undergraduate curriculum inclusion and preferred learning methods; (3) factors influencing a career choice. A similar questionnaire was sent to non-medical staff (control group). The data was analysed based on categorical outcomes (Chi-square <i>χ</i>2) and level of significance <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaire was analysed for 243 students (Birmingham, <i>n</i> = 171/332, 52%) (McGill <i>n</i> = 72/132, 54%). Birmingham students (14%) considered the word \"plastic\" synonymous with \"cosmetic\" more than McGill students (4%, <i>p</i> < 0.025). Teaching was the main source of knowledge for McGill students (39%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while Birmingham students and control group chose the media (70%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). McGill students (67%) more than Birmingham (49%, <i>p</i> < 0.010) considered curriculum inclusion. The preferred learning method was lectures for McGill students (61%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but an optional module for Birmingham (61%). A similar proportion (18%) from both student groups considered a career in plastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students recognised the need for plastic surgery inclusion in the undergraduate curriculum. There was a difference for plastic surgery source of information, operations, and preferred method of learning for students. The study highlighted the urgent need to reform plastic surgery undergraduate teaching in collaboration with national educational bodies worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2017 ","pages":"9458741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9458741","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9458741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Objective: The undergraduate medical curriculum has been overcrowded with core learning outcomes with no formal exposure to plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare medical students from two educational settings for the basic understanding, preferred learning method, and factors influencing a career choice in plastic surgery.

Design and setting: A prospective cohort study based on a web-based anonymous questionnaire sent to final year medical students at Birmingham University (United Kingdom), McGill University (Canada), and a control group (non-medical staff). The questions were about plastic surgery: (1) source of information and basic understanding; (2) undergraduate curriculum inclusion and preferred learning methods; (3) factors influencing a career choice. A similar questionnaire was sent to non-medical staff (control group). The data was analysed based on categorical outcomes (Chi-square χ2) and level of significance p ≤ 0.05.

Results: Questionnaire was analysed for 243 students (Birmingham, n = 171/332, 52%) (McGill n = 72/132, 54%). Birmingham students (14%) considered the word "plastic" synonymous with "cosmetic" more than McGill students (4%, p < 0.025). Teaching was the main source of knowledge for McGill students (39%, p < 0.001) while Birmingham students and control group chose the media (70%, p < 0.001). McGill students (67%) more than Birmingham (49%, p < 0.010) considered curriculum inclusion. The preferred learning method was lectures for McGill students (61%, p < 0.01) but an optional module for Birmingham (61%). A similar proportion (18%) from both student groups considered a career in plastic surgery.

Conclusions: Medical students recognised the need for plastic surgery inclusion in the undergraduate curriculum. There was a difference for plastic surgery source of information, operations, and preferred method of learning for students. The study highlighted the urgent need to reform plastic surgery undergraduate teaching in collaboration with national educational bodies worldwide.

Abstract Image

整形外科纳入本科医学课程:认知、挑战与职业选择的比较研究。
目的:本科医学课程过于拥挤,核心学习成果没有正式接触到整形外科。摘要本研究旨在比较两种教育背景的医学生对整形外科的基本认识、偏好的学习方法及影响职业选择的因素。设计和背景:一项前瞻性队列研究,基于基于网络的匿名问卷,向伯明翰大学(英国)和麦吉尔大学(加拿大)的最后一年级医科学生和对照组(非医务人员)发送问卷。关于整形手术的问题:(1)信息来源和基本认识;(2)本科课程包容性和首选学习方法;(3)影响职业选择的因素。向非医务人员(对照组)发送了类似的问卷。对数据进行分类结果分析(χ2),显著性水平p≤0.05。结果:对243名学生(伯明翰,n = 171/ 332,52%)(麦吉尔,n = 72/ 132,54%)进行问卷分析。伯明翰大学的学生(14%)比麦吉尔大学的学生(4%,p < 0.025)更多地认为“塑料”一词与“化妆品”同义语。麦吉尔学生的主要知识来源是教学(39%,p < 0.001),伯明翰学生和对照组的主要知识来源是媒体(70%,p < 0.001)。麦吉尔学生(67%)比伯明翰学生(49%,p < 0.010)更多地考虑课程包容性。麦吉尔学生(61%,p < 0.01)的首选学习方法是讲课,而伯明翰学生(61%)的选择是选修模块。在这两个学生群体中,考虑从事整形手术的比例相近(18%)。结论:医学生认识到有必要将整形外科纳入本科课程。整形手术的信息来源、手术方式和学生偏好的学习方法存在差异。该研究强调,迫切需要与世界各国的国家教育机构合作,改革整形外科本科教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信