Pain and Therapy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Percutaneous Foraminal Neuroplasty Using Reference Spinal Needles: Technical Description. 使用参考脊柱针的经皮椎孔神经成形术:技术说明。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00607-4
Victor M Silva-Ortiz, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Jesus Medina-Razcon, Christopher L Robinson
{"title":"Percutaneous Foraminal Neuroplasty Using Reference Spinal Needles: Technical Description.","authors":"Victor M Silva-Ortiz, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Jesus Medina-Razcon, Christopher L Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00607-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00607-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a common cause of chronic lower back pain and radiculopathy often treated by epidural steroid injections. In the absence of imaging findings with a positive physical exam demonstrating symptoms, percutaneous neuroplasty (PNP) may be an alternative to transforaminal epidural steroid injections that have otherwise failed.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present two cases (55-year-old man and 65-year-old woman) with chronic low back pain and radiculopathy with otherwise normal imaging demonstrating no lumbar foraminal stenosis refractory to transforaminal epidural steroid injections. PNP was performed using reference spinal needles with both patients achieving sustained > 50-75% pain relief.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNP offers interventional chronic pain physicians and patients with refractory chronic low back pain with lumbar radiculopathy due to fibrosis an alternative, safe treatment that offers sustained results. Furthermore, this is the first of its kind to offer a step-by-step procedural step of PNP using a reference spinal needle.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1023-1029"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140922587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tension-Type Headache Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 紧张型头痛治疗:补充和替代医学的系统回顾和网络元分析》。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00600-x
Lingli Qin, Ping Song, Xian Li, Longhui Yang, Feng Xu, Xueying Zhu, Lizhen Cai, Guangdi Hu, Weijia Sun, Yunling Zhang, Lu Zhang
{"title":"Tension-Type Headache Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.","authors":"Lingli Qin, Ping Song, Xian Li, Longhui Yang, Feng Xu, Xueying Zhu, Lizhen Cai, Guangdi Hu, Weijia Sun, Yunling Zhang, Lu Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00600-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00600-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tension-type headache (TTH) is common but challenging to manage due to limited effectiveness of conventional treatments. This study examines six complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions through network meta-analysis to identify effective TTH management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases for randomized controlled trials on CAM for TTH treatment. Headache frequency and intensity were the primary outcomes. Methodological quality was evaluated on the basis of the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used R software to conduct this Bayesian network meta-analysis. We used mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CI) to calculate the continuous outcomes and analyzed the percentages of the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2405 participants were analyzed. For reducing headache intensity, the network meta-analysis shows that acupuncture therapy combined with traditional Chinese medicine (AT_TCM), manual therapy (MT), psychological treatment (PT), and traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture and manual therapy (TCM_AT_MT) are superior to Western medicine (WM). In the SUCRA curve, TCM_AT_MT is the best for reducing headache frequency (HF).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review, assessed as low-quality evidence by GRADE, cautiously suggests potential benefits of PT over other CAM interventions for TTH and indicates TCM_AT_MT might better reduce HF. It proposes that combining CAM interventions could enhance outcomes. Due to the preliminary nature of these findings, further high-quality RCTs are essential to confirm these suggestions and provide clearer clinical guidance.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021252073.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"691-717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254882/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140922592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Innovative Applications of Telemedicine and Other Digital Health Solutions in Pain Management: A Literature Review. 远程医疗和其他数字医疗解决方案在疼痛管理中的创新应用:文献综述。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00620-7
Salah N El-Tallawy, Joseph V Pergolizzi, Ingrid Vasiliu-Feltes, Rania S Ahmed, JoAnn K LeQuang, Tariq Alzahrani, Giustino Varrassi, Fouad I Awaleh, Abdullah T Alsubaie, Mohamed S Nagiub
{"title":"Innovative Applications of Telemedicine and Other Digital Health Solutions in Pain Management: A Literature Review.","authors":"Salah N El-Tallawy, Joseph V Pergolizzi, Ingrid Vasiliu-Feltes, Rania S Ahmed, JoAnn K LeQuang, Tariq Alzahrani, Giustino Varrassi, Fouad I Awaleh, Abdullah T Alsubaie, Mohamed S Nagiub","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00620-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00620-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems are facing extraordinary challenges. Our approaches to medicine have changed and created a whole new generation of people who have chronic pain. Various medical services were postponed. The pandemic significantly impacted the bio-psychosocial model of pain and the management of chronic pain. These new challenges affected millions of patients worldwide, with more burden on patients with chronic pain. Telemedicine and digital health rather than traditional office visits have become essential tools for communications, resulting in an unmatched surge in telehealth adoption. This new approach facilitated the remote treatment and follow-up of patients who have difficulty to access the healthcare services, particularly patients with chronic pain and those who were receiving regular controlled medications. An extensive computer search was conducted, during the period (from January 2014 to March 2024), and included literature from PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Google scholar. According to preset inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 38 articles have been included in this review article. This literature review focuses on the innovation of telemedicine and digital health in pain management, especially in the context of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of telemedicine and digital communications, their evolution, and their significance in healthcare. It also emphasizes the benefits, challenges, limitations, and the ethical concerns of telemedicine in pain management after the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the document explores the different modes of the telecommunications and discusses the future directions of the digital health technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"791-812"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255158/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlations of The Central Sensitization Inventory, conditioned pain modulation, cognitions and psychological factors in individuals with chronic neck pain: A cross-sectional study. 慢性颈部疼痛患者的中枢敏感性量表、条件性疼痛调节、认知和心理因素的相关性:横断面研究
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00601-w
Yuwei He, Jialin Wang, Peng Zhao, Ruirui Wang, Meng Li
{"title":"Correlations of The Central Sensitization Inventory, conditioned pain modulation, cognitions and psychological factors in individuals with chronic neck pain: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuwei He, Jialin Wang, Peng Zhao, Ruirui Wang, Meng Li","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00601-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00601-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a global public health problem, with high prevalence and absenteeism rates. Central sensitization (CS) as a basis for chronic pain may play an essential role in its development and progression. It is often comorbid with low conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects, cognitions, and psychological problems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purposes of this study were to (1) explore the relationship between pain-related cognitions and psychological factors, CPM effects, and the central sensitization inventory (CSI) scores; and (2) determine whether cognitions and psychological factors can predict CSI scores and CPM effects in individuals with CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four individuals with CNP were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The following outcome measures were evaluated: The CSI (screening tool) was compared with the cold pressor test (CPT), which was the psychophysical test used to assess the CPM; neck pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), as well as pain-related cognitions (including kinesiophobia and pain catastrophization) and psychological states (including anxiety and depression) using self-report questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSI score was not associated with the CPM effect (r = 0.257, p > 0.05), and no cognitions or psychological factors were associated with CPM (p > 0.05), but CSI score was moderately positively correlated with kinesiophobia (r = 0.554, p < 0.01), lowly positively correlated with pain catastrophization (r = 0.332, p = 0.017) and anxiety (r = 0.492, p < 0.01), but not depression (r = 0.207, p = 0.132). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that kinesiophobia (B = 1.308, p < 0.01) and anxiety (B = 1.806, p = 0.02) were significant positive predictors of CSI score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings confirm some of our hypotheses. Accordingly, the findings inferred that the CSI does not seem to respond to CPM effect in patients with CNP effectively. In addition, CSI score was associated with cognitions and psychological factors, of which kinesiophobia and anxiety were effective predictors. In clinical practice, pain-related cognitions and psychological factors should be fully considered to manage neck pain efficiently.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"843-856"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141093663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Tramadol Hydrochloride Fixed-Dose Combination in Moderate to Severe Acute Low Back Pain: A Phase IV, Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo, Active-Controlled Study (DANTE). 右酮洛芬曲美他莫与盐酸曲马多固定剂量复方制剂治疗中度至重度急性腰痛:IV 期随机、平行组、安慰剂、活性对照研究 (DANTE)。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00623-4
Giustino Varrassi, Magdi Hanna, Stefano Coaccioli, Paolo Fabrizzi, Simone Baldini, Ivan Kruljac, Carles Brotons, Serge Perrot
{"title":"Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Tramadol Hydrochloride Fixed-Dose Combination in Moderate to Severe Acute Low Back Pain: A Phase IV, Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo, Active-Controlled Study (DANTE).","authors":"Giustino Varrassi, Magdi Hanna, Stefano Coaccioli, Paolo Fabrizzi, Simone Baldini, Ivan Kruljac, Carles Brotons, Serge Perrot","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00623-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00623-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dexketoprofen/tramadol 25/75 mg (DKP/TRAM) is a fixed-dose combination of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor and opioid receptor agonist. To better understand the efficacy and safety of DKP/TRAM in the treatment of moderate to severe acute lower back pain (LBP) with or without radiculopathy, we carried out a large explorative phase IV international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study (DANTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 538 patients with or without a history of LBP and experiencing acute LPB of moderate to severe intensity [Numerical Rating Scale-Pain Intensity (NRS-PI) score > 5] were randomized 4:4:1:1 to DKP/TRAM 25/75 mg every 8 h (n = 211), tramadol (TRAM) 100 mg (n = 207), placebo-matched DKP/TRAM (n = 59), or placebo-matched TRAM (n = 61).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoint, defined as the time to first achieve NRS-PI score < 4 or pain intensity reduction ≥ 30% from drug intake up to 8 h after the first dose, was higher in the DKP/TRAM arm than in the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant (46.1% vs. 42.6%, respectively; hazard ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.775, 1.595; p = 0.566). DKP/TRAM achieved superiority over TRAM in total pain relief at 4, 6, and 8 h (p < 0.05). Conversely, in relation to the secondary endpoints, a significantly greater reduction in NRS-PI score was seen with DKP/TRAM versus placebo starting from 1 h, and this reduction remained numerically lower throughout 8 h. Summed pain intensity difference values were also significantly lower at 4, 6, and 8 h with DKP/TRAM compared to TRAM (p < 0.05). Overall, DKP/TRAM was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the primary endpoint was not met, secondary efficacy analyses suggest the superiority of DKP/TRAM over placebo and TRAM alone in terms of total pain relief. DKP/TRAM can be considered to be an effective and safe option for the treatment of moderate to severe acute LBP.</p><p><strong>Dante study registration: </strong>EudraCT number: 2019-003656-37; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05170841.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255173/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Nodule Surgery: A Retrospective Study with Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis. 胸腔镜肺结节手术术后右美托咪定输注与术后慢性疼痛:倾向分数匹配分析的回顾性研究
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00611-8
Hang Sun, Yiwei Zhong, Min Wang, Shujie Niu, Rusong Yang, Yali Tian, Bingbing Li
{"title":"Postoperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Nodule Surgery: A Retrospective Study with Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Hang Sun, Yiwei Zhong, Min Wang, Shujie Niu, Rusong Yang, Yali Tian, Bingbing Li","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00611-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00611-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients frequently suffer from debilitating chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) subsequent to thoracoscopic surgery. The impact of postoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on CPSP remains elusive. This study aimed to scrutinize the effect of dexmedetomidine on both 1-year incidence of CPSP and the quality of recovery after thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis encompassed clinical and follow-up data from 1148 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery at our institution between September 2021 and August 2022. Depending on whether dexmedetomidine was infused intravenously or not on the first night after surgery, patients were stratified into the dexmedetomidine group or the control group, with propensity score matching applied to harmonize baseline characteristics. Comparative analysis sought to delineate distinctions of CPSP and recovery quality 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching, a cohort of 258 patients in each group underwent analysis. Comparisons after matching revealed no statistically significant disparities in 1-year CPSP incidence [76/258 (29.5%) versus 78/258 (30.2%), P = 0.847], moderate-to-severe pain occurrence [17/76 (22.4%) versus 22/78 (28.2%), P = 0.405], neuropathic pain occurrence [11/76 (14.5%) versus 11/78 (14.1%), P = 0.948], and postoperative recovery quality assessed by 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) score (113.1 [107.2, 116.0] versus 113.0 [107.4, 116.0], P = 0.328). Multivariate logistic regression analysis encompassing the entire cohort identified being female [odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.79, P < 0.001) and postoperative rescue analgesia (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09-1.96, P = 0.010) as risk factors for CPSP, while intraoperative fentanyl dosage (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, P = 0.006) emerged as a protective factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prolonged administration of dexmedetomidine did not yield discernible amelioration in either 1-year CPSP or the recovery quality after thoracoscopic surgery. Noteworthy risk factors for CPSP encompassed female sex, postoperative rescue analgesia, and diminished fentanyl dosage intraoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"865-881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Trazodone and Gabapentin Fixed-Dose Combination in Patients Affected by Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: Randomized, Controlled, Dose-Finding Study. 曲唑酮和加巴喷丁固定剂量复方制剂对糖尿病痛性神经病变患者的疗效和安全性:随机对照剂量调查研究》。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00624-3
Solomon Tesfaye, Ponnusamy Saravanan, Edvard Ehler, Karel Zinek, Ilona Palka-Kisielowska, Marcin Nastaj, Pierre Serusclat, Paola Lipone, Andrea Vergallo, Elisa Quarchioni, Fabrizio Calisti, Alessandro Comandini, Agnese Cattaneo
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Trazodone and Gabapentin Fixed-Dose Combination in Patients Affected by Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: Randomized, Controlled, Dose-Finding Study.","authors":"Solomon Tesfaye, Ponnusamy Saravanan, Edvard Ehler, Karel Zinek, Ilona Palka-Kisielowska, Marcin Nastaj, Pierre Serusclat, Paola Lipone, Andrea Vergallo, Elisa Quarchioni, Fabrizio Calisti, Alessandro Comandini, Agnese Cattaneo","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00624-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00624-3","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Up to 50% of diabetic patients with neuropathy suffer from chronic pain, namely painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), an unmet medical need with significant impact on quality of life. Gabapentin is widely used for PDN, albeit with frequent dose-limiting effects. Trazodone, an antidepressant with multi-modal action, has shown promising results when given at low doses as an add-on to gabapentin. Upon previous clinical trials and experimental evidence, a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of both compounds, at low doses, was developed for neuropathic pain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo and reference controlled, dose-finding, multicenter, international, prospective study. Male and female diabetic patients aged 18-75 years and affected by PDN were eligible for enrolment. Patients were randomized (1:1:1:1:2 ratio) to trazodone and gabapentin (Trazo/Gaba) 2.5/25 mg t.i.d. for 8 weeks, Trazo/Gaba 5/50 mg t.i.d. for 8 weeks, Trazo/Gaba 10/100 mg t.i.d. for 8 weeks, gabapentin (Gaba), or placebo (PLB). The aim of the study was to collect preliminary information on the effect of the 3 different FDCs of Trazo/Gaba on pain intensity based on the 11-point numeric rating score (NRS) after 8 weeks of treatment. The secondary objectives were the evaluation of the percentage of responders, neuropathic pain symptoms, anxiety, sleep, quality of life, safety, and tolerability. The primary efficacy endpoint was evaluated with last observation carried out forward (LOCF), using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), including treatment and centers as factors and baseline as covariate and applying linear contrast test, excluding the active treatment. Only if the linear contrast test was significant (p &lt; 0.05), the step-down Dunnett test would be used to determine the minimum effective dose significantly different from PLB. If linearity was not verified, an adjusted ANCOVA model and comparisons with Dunnett test were performed. Before the application of the ANCOVA model, the non-significance of interaction treatment per baseline was verified.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 240 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat (m-ITT) population: 39 in Trazo/Gaba 2.5/25 mg, 38 in Trazo/Gaba 5/50 mg, 37 in Trazo/Gaba 10/100 mg, 83 in PLB, and 43 in Gaba. After 8 weeks of treatment, changes of the average daily pain score based on the 11-point NRS from baseline were - 2.52 ± 2.31 in Trazo/Gaba 2.5/25 mg group, - 2.24 ± 1.96 in Trazo/Gaba 5/50 mg group, - 2.46 ± 2.12 in Trazo/Gaba 10/100 mg group, - 1.92 ± 2.21 in Gaba group, and - 2.02 ± 1.95 in the PLB group. The linear contrast test did not result in significant differences (p &gt; 0.05) among treatment groups. Consequently, the minimum effective dose against PLB was not determined. The multiple comparison with Dunnett adjustment did not show any statistically significant differences vs. PLB after 8 weeks of treatment: Trazo/Gab","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"987-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Chronic Neck Pain: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Study. H-Wave® 设备刺激治疗慢性颈痛:患者报告结果指标 (PROMs) 研究。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00609-2
Ashim Gupta, David Han, Stephen M Norwood
{"title":"H-Wave<sup>®</sup> Device Stimulation for Chronic Neck Pain: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Study.","authors":"Ashim Gupta, David Han, Stephen M Norwood","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00609-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00609-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic neck pain (cNP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, often being refractory to conventional forms of treatment. Various forms of electrical stimulation have been proposed to decrease pain and improve function. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for treatment of cNP have rarely been published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An independent retrospective statistical analysis of PROMs data for users of H-Wave<sup>®</sup> device stimulation (HWDS), prospectively collected by the device manufacturer over a 4-year period, was conducted. Final surveys for 34,192 pain management patients were filtered for pain chronicity limited to 3-24 months and device use of 22-365 days, resulting in 11,503 patients with \"all diagnoses\"; this number was further reduced to 1482 patients with cNP, sprain, or strain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neck pain was reduced by 3.13 points (0-10 pain scale), with significant (≥ 20%) relief in 86.6%. Function/activities of daily living (ADL) improved in 96.19%, while improved work performance was reported in 84.76%. Medication use decreased or stopped in 65.42% and sleep improved in 60.39%. Over 95% reported having expectations met or exceeded, service satisfaction, and confidence in device use, while no adverse events were reported. Subgroup analyses found positive benefit associations with longer duration of device use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Near-equivalent outcomes were self-reported by cNP HWDS patients as for (previously published) chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients. HWDS provided effective and safe cNP relief, improvements in function and ADL, along with additional benefits including decreased medication use, better sleep, and improved work performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"829-841"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140909069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Adverse Effects of IV Morphine for Burn Pain Management in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study. 急诊科静脉注射吗啡治疗烧伤疼痛的疗效和不良反应:观察研究。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5
Francesco Coletta, Rossella Pirolli, Raffaele Annunziata, Manuela Nugnes, Antonio Tommasello, Romolo Villani, Luca Gregorio Giaccari, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Pasquale Sansone
{"title":"Efficacy and Adverse Effects of IV Morphine for Burn Pain Management in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.","authors":"Francesco Coletta, Rossella Pirolli, Raffaele Annunziata, Manuela Nugnes, Antonio Tommasello, Romolo Villani, Luca Gregorio Giaccari, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Pasquale Sansone","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00595-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of pain following a burn is extremely complex because of the multifactorial nature of burn pain (nociceptive and neuropathic). In the pre-hospital setting and emergency department (ED), the main goal of acute pain management is to reduce the patient's pain, allowing them to maintain function and to prevent the chronification of pain. Opioids are used as first-line treatment in management of burn pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) morphine for burn pain management in the ED and to evaluate pain management in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center observational study, patients presenting with second- and third-degree burns were enrolled in our ED. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were performed at ED admission and after 1 h. Pain medications administered before arrival in the ED were reported by the rescue team. All patients received IV acetaminophen every 8 h and IV morphine according NRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included in this study. At the time of arrival to the ED, > 90% of the patients reported severe pain; 95.8% of them received IV morphine to achieve pain relief. After 1 h, > 65% of patients had NRS < 3. The total amount of IV morphine was 18.12 ± 4.26 mg in the first hour. No adverse events were recorded. The BSPAS on admission to the ED was 34.8 ± 5.6, indicating severe anxiety. After 1 h, BSPAS was 12.8 ± 4.8, indicating mild anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV morphine used for burn pain management in the emergency setting significantly improves patient outcomes in terms of pain. IV morphine also reduced anxiety scores at 1 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"857-864"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141096979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined with Moderate Sedation of Remimazolam Tosilate in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. 胃肠道内窥镜检查中经皮电穴位刺激结合使用雷马唑仑托西酯中度镇静剂:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
IF 4.1 2区 医学
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00618-1
Jian-Han Xu, Hai-Ling Tan, Li-Na Zhang, Zan-Gong Zhou, Li Yuan, Ling-Xin Kong, Ming-Quan Song, Li-Jie Qi, Xiang-Yu Ji
{"title":"Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined with Moderate Sedation of Remimazolam Tosilate in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jian-Han Xu, Hai-Ling Tan, Li-Na Zhang, Zan-Gong Zhou, Li Yuan, Ling-Xin Kong, Ming-Quan Song, Li-Jie Qi, Xiang-Yu Ji","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00618-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00618-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Further clinical validation is required to determine whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) can replace opioids and be used in combination with remimazolam for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 outpatients who underwent diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly divided into three groups: fentanyl plus remimazolam group (group C), TEAS plus remimazolam group (group E), and placebo-TEAS plus remimazolam group (group P). The assessments of patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, and pain scale score during the examination constituted the primary endpoints of the study. The secondary endpoints were the time of recovery, recovery of normal behavioral function and discharge, incidence of adverse reactions, and dose of remimazolam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with group C, group E had a greater median score for patient satisfaction at follow-up and a slightly lower median score for physician satisfaction. The pain score of group E was slightly greater than that of group C, but the difference was not significant. However, in group C, the incidence of hypoxemia, the rate of nausea and the severity of vertigo were greater, and the number of patients discharged and resuming normal behavioral function was greater than those in the other two groups. The dose of remimazolam in group C and group E was less than that in group P.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEAS combined with moderate sedation of remimazolam can provide an ideal sedative effect, which preferably suppresses discomfort caused by gastrointestinal endoscopy and has fewer sedation-related complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ID: NCT05485064; First registration (29/07/2022); Last registration (02/11/2022) (Clinical Trials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"919-936"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141420348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信