{"title":"Association of Central and General Obesity Measures With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.","authors":"Keyi Si,Yingying Yang,Qianqian Liu,Qin Wang,Shaohua Yin,Qingqiang Dai,Yuting Yao,Lei Yuan,Guizhu Wu","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000005758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005758","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVETo examine the association between the combination of central and general obesity measures and the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).METHODSWaist/height ratio and body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) for 251,143 participants (aged 39-71 years) without pre-existing POP from the UK Biobank were collected at enrollment between 2006 and 2010. Participants were followed through December 19, 2022. Incident POP was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes and operating procedure codes in the medical records. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between obesity measures and incident POP. Population-attributable fractions were calculated to indicate the proportion of cases that were attributable to obesity measures.RESULTSDuring a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 9,781 POP cases were recorded. Central obesity (waist/height ratio 0.5 or greater) was associated with a 48% increased risk of POP regardless of BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.56). Approximately 21.7% (95% CI, 19.1-24.4%) of all POP cases were attributable to central obesity. In addition, overweight without central obesity (BMI 25-29.9 and waist/height ratio less than 0.5) was associated with a 23% higher risk of POP (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.34), and this accounted for 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1-2.9%) of all POP cases. The magnitude of increased POP risk associated with central obesity varied by age (younger than 60 years vs 60 years or older: 57% vs 39%) and by history of hysterectomy (no vs yes: 54% vs 27%).CONCLUSIONCentral obesity and overweight without central obesity are risk factors for POP.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142490504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Age to Initiate Routine Breast Cancer Screening.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Clinical Practice Update provides revised guidance on the age to start routine breast cancer screening with mammography. This document is a focused update of related content in Practice Bulletin No. 179, Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women (Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e1-16).</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Tribute to John T. Queenan, MD (1933-2024).","authors":"James R Scott","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ohad Rotenberg, Georgios Doulaveris, Gary L Goldberg, Malte Renz, Kathleen Whitney, Leeann Dar, Noam Rotenberg, Haotian Wu, Thierry Van den Bosch, Pe'er Dar
{"title":"Combining Ultrasonography and Endometrial Aspiration as a One-Stop Screening for Endometrial Neoplasia.","authors":"Ohad Rotenberg, Georgios Doulaveris, Gary L Goldberg, Malte Renz, Kathleen Whitney, Leeann Dar, Noam Rotenberg, Haotian Wu, Thierry Van den Bosch, Pe'er Dar","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005752","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography to screen for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study from February 2014 to October 2020 at the ultrasound unit of a large urban academic medical center. The study included 1,635 women aged 50 years or older referred for endometrial evaluation, with follow-up through January 2021. Participants underwent saline infusion sonohysterography combined with ultrasound-guided endometrial aspiration. The primary outcome measured was a diagnosis of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia within 1 year from screening. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined evaluation method, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,170 women who completed the study protocol, 82 (7.0%) had endometrial cancer and 42 (3.6%) had endometrial hyperplasia. Of all patients who developed cancer during the follow-up period, 85.5% were diagnosed within 1 year after evaluation. The application of simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography together demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.1%, specificity of 24.9%, PPV of 11.8%, and NPV of 99.6%. Using a theoretical sequential approach, assuming an endometrial aspiration is performed only in patients determined to be high risk by sonohysterography, demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.4%, specificity of 99.9%, PPV of 99.0%, and NPV of 99.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography is an effective one-stop outpatient screening tool for detecting endometrial cancer and hyperplasia in women aged 50 years or older. With the integration of two screening modalities into a single procedure, simultaneous endometrial aspiration and sonohysterography may overcome the limitations inherent in each of the currently recommended methods individually, potentially improving patient prognosis and streamlining the diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Jessica L Cohen, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Amy B Knudsen, Scott A Lorch, Tanayott Thaweethai, Jason D Wright, Anjali J Kaimal, Alexander Melamed
{"title":"Betamethasone Exposure and Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Among Late Preterm Births by Planned Mode of Delivery and Gestational Age.","authors":"Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Jessica L Cohen, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Amy B Knudsen, Scott A Lorch, Tanayott Thaweethai, Jason D Wright, Anjali J Kaimal, Alexander Melamed","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the effect of late preterm antenatal steroids on the risk of respiratory morbidity among subgroups of patients on the basis of the planned mode of delivery and gestational age at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of the ALPS (Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid) Trial, a multicenter trial conducted within the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of individuals with singleton gestations and without preexisting diabetes who were at high risk for late preterm delivery (34-36 weeks of gestation). We fit binomial regression models to estimate the risk of respiratory morbidity, with and without steroid administration, by gestational age and planned mode of delivery at the time of presentation. We assumed a homogeneous effect of steroids on the log-odds scale, as was reported in the ALPS trial. The primary outcome was neonatal respiratory morbidity, as defined in the ALPS Trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2,825 patients at risk for late preterm birth. The risk of respiratory morbidity varied significantly by planned mode of delivery (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% CI, 1.55-2.33 for cesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery) and week of gestation at presentation (adjusted RR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.50-0.63). For those planning cesarean delivery and presenting in the 34th week of gestation, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 39.4% (95% CI, 30.8-47.9%) without steroids and 32.0% (95% CI, 24.6-39.4%) with steroids. In contrast, for patients presenting in the 36th week and planning vaginal delivery, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 6.9% (95% CI, 5.2-8.6%) without steroids and 5.6% (95% CI, 4.2-7.0%) with steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absolute risk difference of neonatal respiratory morbidity between those exposed and those unexposed to late preterm antenatal steroids varies considerably by gestational age at presentation and planned mode of delivery. Because only communicating the relative risk reduction of antenatal steroids for respiratory morbidity may lead to an inaccurate perception of benefit, more patient-specific estimates of risk expected with and without treatment may inform shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Penelope Strid, Regina M Simeone, Rebecca Hall, Jessica R Meeker, Sascha R Ellington
{"title":"A New Tool for Estimating the Number of Pregnant People in the United States.","authors":"Penelope Strid, Regina M Simeone, Rebecca Hall, Jessica R Meeker, Sascha R Ellington","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowing the approximate number of women of reproductive age (ie, 15-49 years) who are pregnant at a point in time in the United States can aid in emergency preparedness resource allocation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a pregnancy estimator toolkit in 2012, which could be used to estimate the number of pregnant people in a geographic area at a point in time. This original toolkit did not account for pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of gestation; however, an updated toolkit released by the CDC in May 2024 uses a ratio of live births to estimate the number of pregnancy losses before 20 weeks at a point in time for improved estimation of total pregnant people at a point in time.</p><p><strong>Instrument: </strong>We used the CDC's updated reproductive health tool, \"Estimating the Number of Pregnant Women in a Geographic Area.\"</p><p><strong>Experience: </strong>Using publicly available data for 2020, we gathered the necessary input values, including total births, fetal deaths, and induced abortions, and applied the equation available in the CDC toolkit to estimate the number of pregnant people in the United States at any point in time in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 2020, there were 75,582,028 women of reproductive age in the United States, and we estimate that approximately 2,962,052 or 3.9% of women of reproductive age were pregnant at any point in time in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong
{"title":"Association Among Surgeon Volume, Surgical Approach, and Uterine Size for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.","authors":"Sarah Santiago, Darington Richardson, Neil Kamdar, Sara R Till, Sawsan As-Sanie, Christopher X Hong","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between surgeon volume and surgical approach for patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications among uteri of varying sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2021 within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. For each hysterectomy, the relative annual volume of the performing surgeon was assessed by calculating the proportion of hysterectomy cases contributed by the surgeon each calendar year relative to the total number of hysterectomies in the registry for that year. Hysterectomies were stratified into tertiles: those performed by low-volume surgeons, intermediate-volume surgeons, and high-volume surgeons. Uterine size was represented by the uterine specimen weight and categorized to facilitate clinical interpretation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed incorporating interaction terms for surgeon volume and uterine size to explore potential effect modification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54,150 hysterectomies were included. Hysterectomies performed by intermediate- and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons (intermediate-volume: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI, 1.47-1.92; high-volume: aOR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.87-2.46). Moreover, this likelihood increased with increasing uterine weight. For uteri weighing between 1,000 g and 1,999 g, the odds of minimally invasive approach was significantly higher among intermediate-volume surgeons (aOR 3.38, 95% CI, 2.04-5.12) and high-volume (aOR 9.26, 95% CI, 5.64-15.2) surgeons, compared with low-volume surgeons. After including an interaction term for uterine weight and surgeon volume, we identified effect modification of surgeon volume on the relationship between uterine size and choice of minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uteri up to 3,000 g in weight, hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons have a higher likelihood of being performed through a minimally invasive approach compared with those performed by low-volume surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton
{"title":"Sexual Orientation-Related Disparities in Neonatal Outcomes.","authors":"Payal Chakraborty, Colleen A Reynolds, Sarah McKetta, Kodiak R S Soled, Aimee K Huang, Brent Monseur, Jae Downing Corman, Juno Obedin-Maliver, A Heather Eliassen, Jorge E Chavarro, S Bryn Austin, Bethany Everett, Sebastien Haneuse, Brittany M Charlton","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether disparities exist in adverse neonatal outcomes among the offspring of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexually minoritized (LGB+) birthing people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data from 1995 to 2017 from the Nurses' Health Study II, a cohort of nurses across the United States. We restricted analyses to those who reported live births (N=70,642) in the 2001 or 2009 lifetime pregnancy questionnaires. Participants were asked about sexual orientation identity (current and past) and same-sex attractions and partners. We examined preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia among 1) completely heterosexual; 2) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity; 3) mostly heterosexual; 4) bisexual; and 5) lesbian or gay participants. We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios for each outcome and weighted generalized estimating equations to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with completely heterosexual participants, offspring born to parents in all LGB+ groups combined (groups 2-5) had higher estimated risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1.22, 95% CI, 1.15-1.30) and low birth weight (1.27, 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) but not macrosomia (0.98, 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). In the subgroup analysis, risk ratios were statistically significant for heterosexual participants with past same-sex attractions, partners, or identity (preterm birth 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.37; low birth weight 1.32, 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). Risk ratios were elevated but not statistically significant for lesbian or gay participants (preterm birth 1.37, 95% CI, 0.98-1.93; low birth weight 1.46, 95% CI, 0.96-2.21) and bisexual participants (preterm birth 1.29, 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; low birth weight 1.24, 95% CI, 0.74-2.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The offspring of LGB+ birthing people experience adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birth weight. These findings highlight the need to better understand health risks, social inequities, and health care experiences that drive these adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colleen Sinnott, Lisbet Lundsberg, Jennifer Culhane, Caitlin Partridge, Anna E Denoble
{"title":"Late-Onset Postpartum Hypertension After Normotensive Pregnancy.","authors":"Colleen Sinnott, Lisbet Lundsberg, Jennifer Culhane, Caitlin Partridge, Anna E Denoble","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better inform efforts to improve and extend postpartum care, we sought to estimate the incidence of de novo hypertension up to 6 months postpartum in patients without evidence of hypertension during pregnancy or immediately postpartum. This retrospective cohort study included all patients delivering within an academic health care system. All blood pressure (BP) measurements from fertilization to 6 months postpartum were obtained from the electronic medical record and used to identify patients who remained normotensive throughout pregnancy and in the first 6 weeks postpartum. By 6 months postpartum, nearly one-fifth of this large, previously normotensive cohort had developed BP abnormalities per American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association criteria. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing the transition from obstetrics to primary care in the postpartum period.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Screening Characteristics of Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Volume for Detection of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy.","authors":"Hui Xiao Chao, Travis Zack, Andrew D Leavitt","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iron deficiency in pregnancy remains underdiagnosed despite professional society recommendations for first-trimester complete blood count (CBC) screening. To determine the effectiveness of the CBC hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) to identify iron deficiency in pregnancy, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 20,550 pregnancies from 2009 to 2022 at the University of California, San Francisco, obstetrics clinics. A total of 16,547 (80.5%) pregnant individuals had first-trimester screening CBC; 345 (2.1%) had a coincident ferritin test. Hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dL and MCV level less than 80 fL each had sensitivity of only 30% (95% CI, 20-41%) to detect first-trimester iron deficiency (ferritin level less than 30), corresponding to a negative likelihood ratio of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.05) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.99), respectively. More than 50% of the 1,749 women with documented iron deficiency anytime during pregnancy were neither anemic nor microcytic at the time of diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}