Mitali Ray,Lacey W Heinsberg,Rebecca B McNeil,William A Grobman,Amir Lueth,Robert M Silver,C Noel Bairey Merz,Lisa D Levine,Lynn M Yee,Daniel E Weeks,Yvette P Conley,Janet M Catov
{"title":"Allostatic Load Mediates Associations Between Race and Ethnicity and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.","authors":"Mitali Ray,Lacey W Heinsberg,Rebecca B McNeil,William A Grobman,Amir Lueth,Robert M Silver,C Noel Bairey Merz,Lisa D Levine,Lynn M Yee,Daniel E Weeks,Yvette P Conley,Janet M Catov","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate whether chronic stress exposure, measured by allostatic load (a biological measure of chronic stress embodiment, including stressors exacerbated by structural inequities [eg, structural racism]) and patient-reported perceived stress in the first trimester of pregnancy, mediates the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a secondary analysis of data from nuMoM2b (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be), a large prospective cohort study. We evaluated self-identified race and ethnicity as an independent variable (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian, non-Hispanic White), and our outcome of interest was HDP (ie, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia). Allostatic load was operationalized with regression- and count-based approaches. Perceived stress was collected with the Cohen perceived stress scale. We investigated allostatic load and perceived stress and used causal mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach to evaluate whether they mediated the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and HDP, adjusting for age and tobacco use. Mediation analyses were conducted for each minoritized racial and ethnic group compared with non-Hispanic White participants.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe sample included 645 participants who developed HDP and 2,438 participants without HDP or other adverse pregnancy outcome. Allostatic load and perceived stress varied by race and ethnicity; HDP varied by allostatic load but not perceived stress. Allostatic load was a partial mediator exclusively in the comparison of non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White participants (0.027, 95% CI, 0.013-0.040, P<.001; 28.9%). Perceived stress was not a significant mediator.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nFirst-trimester allostatic load mediated the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and HDP for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White participants. This mediation effect was not observed in other racial and ethnic comparisons. These results demonstrate a physiologic pathway through which racism may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes and suggest that interventions targeting allostatic load reduction could help address racial and ethnic disparities in HDP.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether chronic stress exposure, measured by allostatic load (a biological measure of chronic stress embodiment, including stressors exacerbated by structural inequities [eg, structural racism]) and patient-reported perceived stress in the first trimester of pregnancy, mediates the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).
METHODS
This was a secondary analysis of data from nuMoM2b (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be), a large prospective cohort study. We evaluated self-identified race and ethnicity as an independent variable (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian, non-Hispanic White), and our outcome of interest was HDP (ie, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia). Allostatic load was operationalized with regression- and count-based approaches. Perceived stress was collected with the Cohen perceived stress scale. We investigated allostatic load and perceived stress and used causal mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach to evaluate whether they mediated the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and HDP, adjusting for age and tobacco use. Mediation analyses were conducted for each minoritized racial and ethnic group compared with non-Hispanic White participants.
RESULTS
The sample included 645 participants who developed HDP and 2,438 participants without HDP or other adverse pregnancy outcome. Allostatic load and perceived stress varied by race and ethnicity; HDP varied by allostatic load but not perceived stress. Allostatic load was a partial mediator exclusively in the comparison of non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White participants (0.027, 95% CI, 0.013-0.040, P<.001; 28.9%). Perceived stress was not a significant mediator.
CONCLUSION
First-trimester allostatic load mediated the association between self-identified race and ethnicity and HDP for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White participants. This mediation effect was not observed in other racial and ethnic comparisons. These results demonstrate a physiologic pathway through which racism may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes and suggest that interventions targeting allostatic load reduction could help address racial and ethnic disparities in HDP.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.