Neurosurgical focus最新文献

{"title":"Leveraging machine learning for preoperative prediction of supramaximal ablation in laser interstitial thermal therapy for brain tumors.","authors":"Cameron A Rivera, Shovan Bhatia, Venkat Uppalapati, Chandler N Berke, Martin A Merenzon, Lekhaj C Daggubati, Adam S Levy, Ashish H Shah, Ricardo J Komotar, Michael E Ivan","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24434","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Maximizing safe resection in neuro-oncology has become paramount to improving patient survival and outcomes. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) offers similar survival benefits to traditional resection, alongside shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times. The extent of ablation (EOA) achieved using LITT is linked to patient outcomes, with greater EOA correlating with improved outcomes. However, the preoperative predictors for achieving supramaximal ablation (EOA ≥ 100%) are not well understood. By leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques, this study aimed to identify these predictors to enhance patient selection and therefore outcomes. The objective was to explore preoperative predictors for supramaximal EOA using ML in patients with glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on the medical records of 254 patients undergoing LITT from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center. Cohort criteria included age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of glioblastoma, single-trajectory ablation, and a complete dataset. The study assessed preoperative clinical and radiographic factors, using EOA ≥ 100% as the endpoint. Five ML models were used: logistic regression, random forest (RF), gradient boosting, Gaussian naive Bayes, and support vector machine. Training and testing cohorts were subsequently assessed across ML models with fivefold cross-validation. Models were optimized using hyperparameter tuning. Performance was primarily quantified using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort consisted of 72 patients. Among the ML models, RF achieved the highest AUC (mean ± SD 0.94 ± 0.06). The leading models identified that lower preoperative volume, history of prior radiation therapy, history of prior craniotomy, preoperative neurological deficits, history of preoperative seizures, and distance from intracranial heat sinks were predictive of successful ablations in patients. Additionally, RF had the best mean metrics: accuracy 0.88, precision 0.87, specificity 0.87, and sensitivity 0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to investigate the role of ML for optimizing ablation volumes in LITT. These ML models suggest that low preoperative volumes, previous craniotomy, previous radiation therapy, no previous neurological deficits, larger catheter-heat sink distance, and the presence of preoperative seizures are important prognostic factors for predicting successful supramaximal ablations with LITT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating laser interstitial thermal therapy for newly diagnosed, deep-seated, large-volume glioblastoma: survival and outcome analysis.","authors":"Adham M Khalafallah, Khushi H Shah, Maxon V Knott, Chandler N Berke, Ashish H Shah, Ricardo J Komotar, Michael E Ivan","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24457","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24457","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as an alternative for treating glioblastoma (GBM) in patients deemed unsuitable for resection due to deep-seated or eloquent location, age, or comorbidities. However, its safety and efficacy in large-volume, deep-seated, newly diagnosed GBM (nGBM) tumors remain insufficiently studied. Therefore, the authors aimed to assess the outcomes of LITT in the treatment of deep-seated, large-volume nGBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients with nGBM who underwent LITT between February 2013 and August 2023 was conducted. Patients with deep-seated tumor volume ≥ 10 cm3 treated with LITT were compared to patients with deep-seated tumor volume < 10 cm3. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and compared among both groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to evaluate the impact of various clinical and treatment-related factors on patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 patients in the study group (mean ± SD age 65.7 ± 10.2 years, 58% male) with mean tumor volume 36.0 ± 21.6 cm3 were compared to 23 controls (mean age 67.0 ± 12.5 years, 61% male) with mean tumor volume 5.2 ± 2.7 cm3. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay (p = 0.494), temporary neurological deficits and edema within 30 days (p = 0.705 and p > 0.999, respectively), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.139), < 30-day complications (p = 0.918), complications between 30 days and 3 months (p = 0.903), and new motor and speech deficits within 3 months (p = 0.883 and p > 0.999, respectively) between the study and control groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal any statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between groups (p = 0.227). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor volume did not significantly affect the hazard ratio for individuals undergoing LITT (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.83-3.29, p = 0.150).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study suggests that LITT is safe for treating patients with large-volume, deep-seated nGBM compared to those with small-volume tumor. Although there appears to be improved OS in patients with smaller lesions with greater EOA, significance was not achieved in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Management and long-term neurological outcomes of sdAVF.","authors":"Lara Brunasso, Rina Di Bonaventura, Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Alessio Albanese","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS24391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS24391","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stereotactic robot-assisted MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy thalamotomy for medically intractable Holmes tremor: a pilot study and literature review.","authors":"Mickael Aubignat, Mélissa Tir, Martial Ouendo, Salem Boussida, Jean-Marc Constans, Michel Lefranc","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24444","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Holmes tremor (HT) is a complex syndrome characterized by resting, postural, and kinetic tremors. HT significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QOL) and daily activities. Conventional pharmacological treatments for HT often yield inconsistent results. Emerging surgical treatments such as deep brain stimulation and various thalamotomy techniques show promise but come with challenges, including adverse events (AEs) and potential tremor recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of unilateral MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRIgLITT) thalamotomy in patients with medically intractable HT, focusing on tremor reduction, QOL, and AE incidence, and provide a comprehensive review of the literature on thalamotomy techniques for HT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients with medically intractable HT underwent unilateral MRIgLITT thalamotomy between June 2020 and January 2023. Tremor severity was assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) at baseline and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. QOL was measured using the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) questionnaire and 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Subjective patient-rated improvement was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Clinical Status (PGI-C) scale at 12 months. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) before the procedure and at 12 months postoperatively. AEs were monitored throughout the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 50.2 ± 22.37 years, with a mean tremor duration of 5.8 ± 4.55 years. Significant tremor reduction was observed in the treated hand, with mean TRS scores decreasing from 19.00 ± 4.36 at baseline to 11.20 ± 4.44 (p = 0.043) at 3 months and 13.40 ± 5.94 (p = 0.042) at 12 months, indicating a relative reduction of 41.05% and 29.47%, respectively. A significant effect was observed on the QUEST scale at 3 months (p = 0.043), but this effect was no longer present at 12 months. No significant effect was found on the PDQ-39 QOL scale. The PGI-C scale showed a high mean subjective improvement of 88.60% ± 8.36% at 12 months. One patient experienced severe AEs, including dysarthria, hemiparesis, and swallowing difficulties, which required prolonged hospitalization and multidisciplinary rehabilitation, but regressed within 3 months. Cognitive performance, as measured by the MMSE, remained stable (p = 0.785).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unilateral MRIgLITT thalamotomy showed promise as a treatment for medically intractable HT, providing significant tremor reduction with a favorable safety profile. However, the potential for tremor recurrence and minimal functional improvement in fine motor skills highlight the need for long-term follow-up and further research. Larger, multicenter studies are necessary to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient-reported outcome and preference after craniotomy and laser interstitial thermal therapy ablation: a pilot study.","authors":"Isabela Peña Pino, Jiri Bartek, Sharona Ben-Haim, Clark C Chen","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24442","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24442","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that allows cytoreduction of brain tumors and can be considered as an alternative to craniotomy. The authors surveyed 27 patients who underwent both craniotomy and LITT during distinct stages of their oncology journey to assess patient-reported outcomes comparing both procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 9-question survey was developed and validated to assess patient-reported postoperative recovery, pain level, narcotic use, and procedure preference. The survey was administered to patients with WHO grade II-IV gliomas who underwent both craniotomy and LITT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was reviewed by independent surgeons, patient advocates, and patients for face validity and showed > 90% intrarater agreement over time. The cohort had a mean age of 57 ± 12 years, and 78% had glioblastoma. There was no significant difference in symptomatic improvement postcraniotomy or post-LITT (30% vs 4%, p = 0.17). Similarly, no significance was detected in patient-reported recovery time from craniotomy (time required to return to preoperative state: mean 4.3 ± 9.1 weeks, median 2 weeks) or LITT (mean 2 ± 2.3 weeks, median 1 week; p = 0.21). Notably, postsurgical pain (0-10 on the visual analog scale) and need for narcotic use in the first week (yes/no) after the procedure were significantly lower post-LITT (average visual analog scale score 1.7 vs 5 points, narcotic use 4% vs 81%; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). When asked which procedure they would choose-having experienced both craniotomy and LITT-surveyed patients overwhelmingly chose LITT over craniotomy (89% vs 11%, p < 0.0001). Of note, the patients who preferred craniotomy experienced improved neurological function postcraniotomy or suffered new deficits post-LITT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, patients reported less pain and narcotic use post-LITT relative to craniotomy and generally preferred the former procedure if given the choice. Validation of these results in future studies can help inform decision-making in clinical scenarios where there is equipoise between LITT and craniotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Editorial. Factors that influence functional recovery after MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas.","authors":"Sarah T Menacho","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24607","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 5","pages":"E5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introduction. Complications: our best way to learn.","authors":"Roberto C Heros","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.FOCUS23740","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.FOCUS23740","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 4","pages":"E1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142365925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Complications: skull base and cerebrovascular.","authors":"Walter C Jean, Fady T Charbel, Aaron A Cohen-Gadol, William T Couldwell, Michael T Lawton, Michael McDermott, Jacques J Morcos, Robert F Spetzler, Harry R van Loveren","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.FOCUS24379","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.FOCUS24379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurosurgical complications are a rich source for learning, but they are grossly underutilized for the purpose of surgeon education. Details of the complications, which make them all the more powerful as teaching tools, are restricted to morbidity and mortality conferences behind closed doors, and open discussions of the topic are blurred by hypotheticals in order to shield the presenters from medicolegal risks. In this issue of Neurosurgical Focus, 9 neurosurgeons were invited to present complications they encountered along with the details and specific lessons they learned. The contributors were picked for their well-known track record of skill, experience, and candor, so readers can be confident in the lessons. The video and the accompanying written article present the clinical facts. The actions that led to the complications are demonstrated in the surgical video segments. In ancient Western civilization, the seven \"deadly sins\" categorized and conceptualized human malfeasance, and similarly, the neurosurgical correlate of this set of sins can provide a framework for discussing the errors that lead to unexpectedly poor outcomes. Although errors in judgment and planning grow rarer with experience, errors in execution can still occur, no matter the stage of one's career. Interestingly, even though skill and experience do not eliminate complications, they may affect the lesson that the neurosurgeon takes home. The lack of open discourse on complications may slow progress in the field and set the stage for repeating mistakes. The writing and production teams hope that this work opens a rich source of learning. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.7.FOCUS24379.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 4","pages":"E2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introduction. Focused ultrasound: current and future indications.","authors":"Rees Cosgrove, Vibhor Krishna, Kara Beasley, Nir Lipsman","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS23739","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS23739","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 3","pages":"E1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142109989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of refractory essential tremor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Mohammad Mirahmadi Eraghi, Mohammadreza Alizadeh, Khaled M Taghlabi, Emad N Eskandar, Amir H Faraji","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS24326","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS24326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an emerging treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET). The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term (up to 5 years) safety and efficacy of unilateral MRgFUS in the treatment of ET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a systematic search through 4 databases to find relevant clinical studies. Binary outcomes were analyzed and reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, while continuous outcomes were analyzed and reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals. Furthermore, a univariable meta-regression was performed to evaluate the association between various covariates and the outcomes including the mean difference in the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) score and hand tremor scores. Sensitivity analysis was performed to address any heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 studies comprising 1818 patients with ET who underwent MRgFUS were identified. Of the 1539 patients with data on sex, 1095 (71.2%) were male. The mean follow-up duration ranged from 3 months to 8.4 years among the studies. The mean total CRST score significantly decreased at 3, 6, and 12 months post-MRgFUS (SMD -4.5, p = 0.0069; SMD -4.9, p = 0.0045; and SMD -2.95, p = 0.0039, respectively). The mean hand tremor scores significantly mitigated at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-MRgFUS (SMD -3.99, p = 0.05; SMD -4.5, p = 0.05; SMD -1.99, p < 0.0001; SMD - 2.07, p = 0.0002; and SMD -2.1, p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, the mean Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire scores were improved at 3 months (SMD -2.8, p = 0.0025), 6 months (SMD -4.1, p = 0.04), 12 months (SMD -1.57, p = 0.0004), 2 years (SMD -1.64, p = 0.0003), and 3 years (SMD -1.14, p = 0.08). Our meta-regression findings showed that sex (p = 0.03), unlike age, handedness, symptom duration, and peak energy levels at 3 months, was associated with a significantly higher mean difference in tremor severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides strong evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of unilateral MRgFUS for the treatment of ET in terms of tremor severity and quality of life with acceptable adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 3","pages":"E2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142109991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}