发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Agile Method Tailoring in Distributed Enterprises: Product Owner Teams 分布式企业中的敏捷方法裁剪:产品所有者团队
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.27
J. Bass
{"title":"Agile Method Tailoring in Distributed Enterprises: Product Owner Teams","authors":"J. Bass","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.27","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores practitioner descriptions of agile method tailoring in large-scale offshore or outsourced enterprise projects. Specifically, tailoring of the product owner role is discussed. The product owner identifies and prioritizes customer requirements. But in globalized projects, the product owner must reconcile large numbers competing business interests and generate prioritized requirements for many development teams. The study comprises 8 international companies in London, Bangalore and Delhi. Interviews with 46 practitioners were conducted between February 2010 and May 2012. A grounded theory approach was used to identify that product owner teams comprise nine roles: Groom, Prioritizer, Release Master, Technical Architect, Governor, Communicator, Traveler, Intermediary and Risk Assessor. These product owner roles arbitrate between conflicting customer requirements, approve release schedules, make architectural design decisions, provide technical governance and disseminate information across teams. Understanding these roles will help agile coaches guide large scale agile teams.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125387079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
A Preliminary User Evaluation of an Infrastructure to Support Activity-Based Computing in Global Software Development (ABC4GSD) 支持全局软件开发中基于活动的计算的基础设施的初步用户评价(ABC4GSD)
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.20
Paolo Tell, M. Babar, J. Grundy
{"title":"A Preliminary User Evaluation of an Infrastructure to Support Activity-Based Computing in Global Software Development (ABC4GSD)","authors":"Paolo Tell, M. Babar, J. Grundy","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.20","url":null,"abstract":"Global Software Engineering (GSE) teams face challenges due to the need to replace traditional physical presence interactions and co-ordination with computer-mediated means. A vast majority of the available tool support for distributed collaboration is deep-seated in a desktop metaphor introduced in the `70s, and huge efforts are being devoted to overcome its known limitations. Over the last few years we have looked into the feasibility of providing an approach based on Activity-Based Computing (ABC) to address these issues in a novel way. We have developed a middleware and support tool, ABC4GSD, to enable collaborative distributed features in an application, while maintaining common interactions with the workstation that users are accustomed to. In this paper we present the results of a user evaluation we conducted on ABC4GSD using exemplar GSE scenarios. Participants' responses show positive and encouraging reception of the activity-based approach to supporting GSE.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125302990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Experience in Managing Requirements between Distributed Parties in a Research Project Context 有在研究项目中管理分布式各方需求的经验
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.23
K. Pierce, C. Ingram, Bert Bos, Augusto Ribeiro
{"title":"Experience in Managing Requirements between Distributed Parties in a Research Project Context","authors":"K. Pierce, C. Ingram, Bert Bos, Augusto Ribeiro","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.23","url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the experience of managing a requirements process between distributed parties with diverse interests in a research project context. We present some key 'lessons learned' from a new case study, the DESTECS project, and summarise lessons learned from previous experience reports. Key risks include obstacles imposed by the geographic distance, the different domain knowledge and working contexts of partners, and a risk that autonomous partners' goals do not always coincide. Our observations on a new case study broadly support a previous study, but we also propose some new lessons to learn, including the creation of a small, representative 'requirements authority' (RA), investing time in studying common concepts early in the project, and ensuring that expectations for requirements and for deliveries are made explicit.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131130258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Revisiting the Factors that Engender Trust of Global Systems Engineers 重新审视产生全球系统工程师信任的因素
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.13
B. Al-Ani, S. Marczak, R. Prikladnicki, D. Redmiles
{"title":"Revisiting the Factors that Engender Trust of Global Systems Engineers","authors":"B. Al-Ani, S. Marczak, R. Prikladnicki, D. Redmiles","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.13","url":null,"abstract":"Trust is generally considered a key element of effective and productive distributed team collaborations. In this paper, we report the results of our investigation into the factors that engender trust in Global Systems Engineering (GSE) teams in five multinational organizations. We extend our previous work by conducting a new field study focused solely on factors that engender trust and identify the implications of these factors. Our work provides significant contributions to practitioners, researchers and tool developers. Managers working in study field sites have confirmed that our findings will be used to inform future team management strategies. Our results can also be used to structure and guide future research in this field, as it identifies gaps in existing literature. Finally, our findings can be used to inform the development of future tools that aim to support collaborative work in general and GSE teams specifically.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134343359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Making Continual Code Quality Monitoring and Control Processes Work in a Global Delivery Organization: COSMOS 使代码质量持续监测和控制过程在全球交付组织中发挥作用:COSMOS
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.30
Himanshu K. Singh, Umesh Uppili, Ujwala Pavuluri
{"title":"Making Continual Code Quality Monitoring and Control Processes Work in a Global Delivery Organization: COSMOS","authors":"Himanshu K. Singh, Umesh Uppili, Ujwala Pavuluri","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.30","url":null,"abstract":"Continual monitoring and model driven quality improvement methods are becoming critical for product quality within software development organizations. But, setting up such procedures within a global delivery organization poses challenges like - variation in the engagement models across different client projects, variations in build strategies and code ownership model, process related hindrances like overlapping quality processes of the delivery and the product organizations. Moreover, these challenges emerge overtime as the processes become more understood and accepted. We present evolution and design of COSMOS toolkit which exemplifies and addresses such variations in the delivery projects and provides a consistent continual reporting for organizations. The toolkit has become a primary enabler for adoption of a continual quality control process and CQMM, a model based quality improvement process. It addresses among others, key concerns like tools & build variability, legacy code & code ownership, model based rules selection & reporting, variations in applicable thresholds.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131723148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Measuring Awareness in Cross-Team Collaborations -- Distance Matters 衡量跨团队合作中的意识——距离很重要
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.17
Zia Ur Rehman Kiani, Darja Šmite, Aamer Riaz
{"title":"Measuring Awareness in Cross-Team Collaborations -- Distance Matters","authors":"Zia Ur Rehman Kiani, Darja Šmite, Aamer Riaz","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.17","url":null,"abstract":"Developing and maintaining team awareness within and across teams working in the same project helps team members in aligning their activities and facilitates implicit coordination. This requires both task and presence awareness. In this paper, we share our findings from a survey in which we measured the level of team awareness in cross-team collaborations with varying degree of separation. To measure the levels of awareness we asked questions like who is who, who knows what, who is on a vacation, who depends on whom and alike. Results from surveying 17 pairs of teams from 15 organizations indicate that level of awareness in cross-team collaborations is generally lower than that within the teams. We also found that task and presence awareness levels are independent and can vary. In addition to distance, we identified a few other factors with potential positive and negative influence on team awareness.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129815218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Version Control in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study 分布式软件开发中的版本控制:系统映射研究
2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering Pub Date : 2013-08-26 DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2013.19
Catarina Costa, Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta
{"title":"Version Control in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study","authors":"Catarina Costa, Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.19","url":null,"abstract":"Along the last decade, many companies started using Distributed Software Development (DSD). The distribution of the software development teams over the globe has become almost a rule in large companies. However, in this context, new problems arise, which mainly involve the physical and temporal distance among the participants. Some studies show that deploying a version control system to alleviate this problem is a big challenge for distributed teams. This paper presents a systematic mapping study about works about version control that focus on DSD. We found 29 studies related to DSD version control, published between 2002 and 2012. Using the systematically extracted data from these works, we present challenges, tools, and other solutions proposed to version control in DSD. These results can support practitioners and researchers to better understand and overcome the challenges related do DSD version control, and devise more effective solutions to improve version control in a distributed setting.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128200836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信