Experience in Managing Requirements between Distributed Parties in a Research Project Context

K. Pierce, C. Ingram, Bert Bos, Augusto Ribeiro
{"title":"Experience in Managing Requirements between Distributed Parties in a Research Project Context","authors":"K. Pierce, C. Ingram, Bert Bos, Augusto Ribeiro","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2013.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the experience of managing a requirements process between distributed parties with diverse interests in a research project context. We present some key 'lessons learned' from a new case study, the DESTECS project, and summarise lessons learned from previous experience reports. Key risks include obstacles imposed by the geographic distance, the different domain knowledge and working contexts of partners, and a risk that autonomous partners' goals do not always coincide. Our observations on a new case study broadly support a previous study, but we also propose some new lessons to learn, including the creation of a small, representative 'requirements authority' (RA), investing time in studying common concepts early in the project, and ensuring that expectations for requirements and for deliveries are made explicit.","PeriodicalId":175455,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2013.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes the experience of managing a requirements process between distributed parties with diverse interests in a research project context. We present some key 'lessons learned' from a new case study, the DESTECS project, and summarise lessons learned from previous experience reports. Key risks include obstacles imposed by the geographic distance, the different domain knowledge and working contexts of partners, and a risk that autonomous partners' goals do not always coincide. Our observations on a new case study broadly support a previous study, but we also propose some new lessons to learn, including the creation of a small, representative 'requirements authority' (RA), investing time in studying common concepts early in the project, and ensuring that expectations for requirements and for deliveries are made explicit.
有在研究项目中管理分布式各方需求的经验
本文描述了在一个研究项目环境中管理具有不同兴趣的分布式各方之间的需求过程的经验。我们从一个新的案例研究——DESTECS项目中提出了一些关键的“经验教训”,并总结了从以前的经验报告中吸取的教训。主要风险包括地理距离、合作伙伴的不同领域知识和工作环境所带来的障碍,以及自主合作伙伴的目标并不总是一致的风险。我们对一个新案例研究的观察广泛地支持了以前的研究,但是我们也提出了一些新的经验教训,包括创建一个小型的、具有代表性的“需求权威”(RA),在项目早期投入时间研究共同的概念,并确保对需求和交付的期望是明确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信