Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal最新文献_第3页

The Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or, the 2014 Amendments to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act 统一可撤销交易法;或者是2014年《统一欺诈转让法修正案》

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-11-27 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2541949

Kenneth C. Kettering

引用次数: 2

The Internet is the New Marketplace of Ideas: Why Riley v. California Supports Net Neutrality 互联网是新的思想市场:为什么莱利诉加州案支持网络中立

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-10-24 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2514523

Adam Lamparello

引用次数: 1

Dolul În Reglementarea Codului Civil. Privire Specială Asupra Dolului În Afaceri (Fraud in the Context of the New Romanian Civil Code. Special Aspects Fraud in Business Law)

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-08-16 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2481580

Bazil Oglindă

引用次数: 0

Government Spending, Shocks, and the Role of Legislature Size: Evidence from the American States 政府支出、冲击和立法规模的作用:来自美国各州的证据

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-08-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2478979

William B. Hankins

引用次数: 7

Α�?κτο�?�?ος: Protecting Biodiversity Against the Effects of Climate Change Through the Endangered Species Act Α�?κτο�?�?ος:通过《濒危物种法》保护生物多样性免受气候变化的影响

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-03-28 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2436702

J. Chen

引用次数: 1

Testimony Before the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet, Hearing on Section 512 of Title 17 (113th Congress) 在美国众议院司法委员会法院、知识产权和互联网小组委员会关于第17编第512条的听证会上的证词(第113届国会)

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2014-03-13 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2470726

Annemarie Bridy

引用次数: 3

Procedural Choice in Majoritarian Organizations 多数主义组织中的程序选择

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2013-10-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1371288

D. Diermeier, Carlo G. Prato, Razvan Vlaicu

引用次数: 27

Review of Russia's Economic Legislation in June 2013 2013年6月俄罗斯经济立法回顾

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2013-07-31 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2304385

I. Tolmacheva, Julia Grunina

引用次数: 0

Workplace Mobbing and Workplace Harassment Regulation in Russia 俄罗斯的工作场所抢劫和工作场所骚扰法规

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2013-07-17 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2399654

Daria V. Chernyaeva

{"title":"Workplace Mobbing and Workplace Harassment Regulation in Russia","authors":"Daria V. Chernyaeva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2399654","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2399654","url":null,"abstract":"Studies on mobbing and harassment in Russia - whether from a legal, sociological, psychological or economical viewpoint - are sporadic and usually included into more general research projects devoted to discrimination, gender issues and human rights. Doctrine does not provide consistent terminology. Legislation does not address these issues consistently in their entirety, recognizing only specific instances of their manifestation. Collective agreements contain only general provisions on this subject if any, and enterprise regulations have mostly superficial clauses unenforceable because of the lack of essence and relevant procedures. Russian legislative landscape also lacks stakeholders seriously interested in establishment and promotion of anti-mobbing and anti-harassment culture in the workplaces. Both government and public demonstrate a “we have more urgent questions to address” attitude. In this context absence of landmark cases and court decisions is a logical consequence and a natural result of the general disregard. Thus it is all the more important to highlight the circumstances in which a judicial protection can now be provided. This analysis and further research - including comparative studies - may help to reveal possible directions for the policy development in this field both in doctrinal and regulatory aspects. This paper attempts to outline the state of the art and the major tendencies in legal regulation of mobbing and harassment phenomena in Russia nowadays and to suggest possible explanations and solutions to the problems revealed.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115317489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Section 103(5) of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 as Inspired by the Common-Law 'in duplum' Rule (1) 2005年《国家信贷法案34》第103(5)条受普通法“双物制”规则的启发(1)

Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal Pub Date : 2013-05-05 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2363905

A. Friedman, J. Otto

{"title":"Section 103(5) of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 as Inspired by the Common-Law 'in duplum' Rule (1)","authors":"A. Friedman, J. Otto","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2363905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2363905","url":null,"abstract":"It is important to keep the common-law in duplum rule in mind and make any distinctions if necessary when analysing and interpreting section 103(5) of the National Credit Act. Cambell states in this regard that the in duplum rule can amplify section 103(5) where it is not in conflict with the National Credit Act. There is the presumption in South African law of interpretation of statutes that a statutory provision does not alter the existing common law more than clearly stated, whether expressly or by necessary implication. The Supreme Court of Appeal in the Nedbank case was requested in main to deal with the interpretation of section 103(5) of the National Credit Act and did not deal in depth with its possible impact on other legal principles underlying the common-law in duplum rule or other provisions of the National Credit Act. These include questions relating to whether the operation of section 103(5) is suspended pendente lite and the effect of a judgment after debt enforcement proceedings on section 103(5) of the National Credit Act. Another question which arises is whether there is a “novation” of a debt when the national consumer tribunal or a court grants a consent order in terms of section 138 read with section 86(8)(a) of the National Credit Act or a court grants a re-arrangement order in terms of section 87(1)(b)(ii) of the National Credit Act. In order to answer these questions it is important to establish the nature and effect of these orders.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123605624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0