{"title":"The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002875","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine how fracture clinic patients perceive the dangers of distracted driving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Analysis of patient perception subset data from the original DRIVSAFE study; a large, multicenter cross-sectional study, surveying fracture clinic patients about distracted driving.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Level 1 Canadian trauma center fracture clinics.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>English-speaking patients with a valid Canadian driver's license and a traumatic musculoskeletal injury sustained in the past 6 months.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Primary outcome was patients' safety ratings of driving distractions. As per the original DRIVSAFE study, patients were categorized as distraction-prone or distraction-averse using their questionnaire responses and published crash-risk odds ratios (ORs). A regression analysis was performed to identify associations with unsafe driving perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1378 patients, 749 (54.3%) male and 614 (44.6%) female. The average age was 45.8 ± 17.0 years (range 16-87). Sending electronic messages was perceived as unsafe by 92.9% (1242/1337) of patients, while reading them was seen as unsafe by 81.2% (1086/1337). Approximately three-quarters of patients viewed making (78.9%, 1061/1344) and accepting (74.8%, 998/1335) calls on handheld mobile phones as unsafe. However, 31.0% (421/1356) of patients believed that they had no differences in their driving ability when talking on the phone while 13.1% (175/1340) reported no driving differences when texting. Younger age (OR, 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.96], P < 0.001), driving experience (OR, 1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.09], P < 0.001), and distraction-prone drivers (OR, 3.79 [95% CI 2.91-4.94], P < 0.001) were associated with unsafe driving perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a clear association between being prone to distractions and unsafe driving perceptions, with distraction-prone drivers being 3.8 times more likely to perceive driving distractions as safe. This information could potentially influence the appropriate delivery and content of future educational efforts to change the perception of driving distractions and thereby reduce distracted driving.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"e347-e354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141759375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dane Brodke, Sai Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Nathan O'Hara, Cynthia Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha McKibben, Robert O'Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul Perdue, Graham Dekeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas Marchand, Marshall James Fairres, Loren Black, Erika Roddy, Ashraf El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon, Zachary Working, Christopher Lee
{"title":"Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails.","authors":"Dane Brodke, Sai Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Nathan O'Hara, Cynthia Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha McKibben, Robert O'Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul Perdue, Graham Dekeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas Marchand, Marshall James Fairres, Loren Black, Erika Roddy, Ashraf El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon, Zachary Working, Christopher Lee","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to profile modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (mRUST) scores over time in distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails and identify predictors of radiographic union timing and delayed progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten Level I Trauma Centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>The inclusion criteria were patients with distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33A and 33C) treated with intramedullary nails, with a minimum follow-up of one year or until radiographic union or reoperation. The exclusion criteria were fractures treated with combination nail-plate constructs, pathologic fractures, and patients under 18 years old.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome was the mRUST score at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal 3-month mRUST score predicting reoperation. Multivariable models were used to identify predictors of radiographic union timing and delayed progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 155 fractures in 152 patients, with a mean patient age of 51 and a mean follow-up of 17 months. A 3-month mRUST score of ≤8 predicted reoperation with a PPV of 25%, and a NPV of 99%. The timing of radiographic union was associated with tobacco use (1.2 months later; p = 0.04), open fracture (1.4 months later; p = 0.04), and the use of topical antibiotics (2.1 months longer; 95% CI: 0.33 - 3.84; p = 0.02), however topical antibiotics was at high risk of being confounded by injury severity. Delayed progression to fracture healing, wherein the most rapid radiographic healing occurs more than 3 months post-operatively, was predicted by chronic kidney disease (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 3-month mRUST score >8 suggests a very high likelihood of avoiding reoperation for nonunion.Tobacco use and open fractures were associated with a longer time to radiographic union. Chronic kidney disease is associated with a delayed radiographic progression, suggesting a need for adjusted expectations and management strategies in these patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ryan P Serbin, Calvin Chandler, Benjamin Averkamp, Madeline Rieker, Ziqing Yu, Laurence B Kempton, Joseph R Hsu, Kevin D Phelps
{"title":"Temporary Reduction Assisting Corridor Constraint Wires (TRACC-wires) for Intramedullary Nailing of Periarticular Fractures: A Technical Trick and Case Series.","authors":"Ryan P Serbin, Calvin Chandler, Benjamin Averkamp, Madeline Rieker, Ziqing Yu, Laurence B Kempton, Joseph R Hsu, Kevin D Phelps","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002905","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek
{"title":"Radiographic Accuracy of Identifying Anterolateral Tibial Plafond Involvement in Pronation Abduction Ankle Fractures.","authors":"Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction.METHODSDesign: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review.SETTINGFive level 1 trauma centers in the United States.PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIAAdult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONSThe presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard.RESULTS61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%.CONCLUSIONSAnterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEPrognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142258368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cassandra Ricketts,Mir Ibrahim Sajid,Meghan McCaskey,Reed Andrews,Hassan R Mir
{"title":"Ankle Fractures Treated with Locked Fibular Intramedullary Nailing: Description and Outcomes of a Minimally Invasive Open Technique.","authors":"Cassandra Ricketts,Mir Ibrahim Sajid,Meghan McCaskey,Reed Andrews,Hassan R Mir","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002908","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESTo describe and report outcomes of a minimally invasive open intramedullary (IM) fibular nailing technique for fixation of ankle fractures.METHODSDesign: Case Series.SETTINGUrban Level 1 trauma center.PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIAAdult patients with ankle fractures (OTA 44A-C) treated with locked fibular IM nailing via a minimally invasive open technique for fracture and syndesmotic reduction between 2021 and 2024.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Quality of reduction, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).RESULTSA total of 150 consecutive patients operated by a single surgeon were included. Mean age was 53.3 (17-97) years, and mean BMI was 30.6 ± 7.4 kg/m2. 93(62%) patients were female, and 78 (52%) patients were Caucasian. 72 (48%) patients were obese, 40 (27.7%) patients were current/former smokers, 39 (26%) patients were diabetic, and 23 (15.3%) patients had open fractures. 37 (24.7%) patients had isolated lateral malleolus fractures, 48 (32%) had bimalleolar fractures, and 65(43.3%) had trimalleolar fractures. 123 (82%) patients had 2 syndesmotic screws placed, 26 (17.3%) had 1 screw, and 1 (0.7%) had none.Quality of reduction was good for 98%, fair for 2%, and poor for none per McLennan's criteria. 113 patients (75.3%) were followed until clinical and radiographic union for a mean of 7.6 months (range 3-22) months). 110 patients (97.3%) went on to successful clinical and radiographic union following the index procedure. No patient had a superficial surgical-site infection, and 3 (2.6%) had deep surgical-site infections. 3 patients had a loss of reduction, and 6 patients had implant failure (5 broken syndesmotic screws, and 1 medial malleolus screw). 9 (8%) patients had unplanned reoperations (3 for debridement, 2 for loss of reduction, and 4 for removal of symptomatic implants).Mean ankle range of motion at final follow-up visit was 12.9° (0-40) of dorsiflexion, 39.6° (10-70) of plantarflexion, 23.5° (5-40) of inversion, and 18.2° (5-50) of eversion. Mean PROs at final follow-up visit were: Global Physical Health: 42.4 (23.5-67.6), Global Mental Health: 47.5 (21-67.6), Physical Function: 37.5 (14.7-57.8), Pain: 54.9 (22-72) and Mobility: 36.9 (16-65.3).CONCLUSIONSMinimally invasive open fibular IM nailing allowed for excellent reduction and results in union with low rates of complications and good patient reported outcomes.LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christian Michelitsch,Benedikt Jochum,Andrin Baer,Samuel Haupt,Philipp F Stillhard,Jonathan Copp,Christoph Sommer
{"title":"Closed reduction followed by percutaneous fixation of acute femoral neck fractures in young adults: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Christian Michelitsch,Benedikt Jochum,Andrin Baer,Samuel Haupt,Philipp F Stillhard,Jonathan Copp,Christoph Sommer","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002910","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the surgical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young adults treated with a closed reduction technique as it pertains to reduction quality, rates of union and risk factors for complication.METHODSDesign: Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and electronic medical record review.SETTINGLevel 1 Swiss Trauma center.PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIABetween 2012 and 2021, young adults with isolated FNF (AO/OTA 31-B1) treated with percutaneous screw fixation were selected. Exclusion criteria were open reduction technique, age over 65 or under 16, pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures.OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONSPrimary outcome was quality of reduction, as assessed by three experienced trauma surgeons' evaluation of, intraoperative and/or first postoperative radiographs using the overall impression, the Garden's alignment index, and Lowell`s criteria. Additionally, clinical outcomes, conversion to arthroplasty and complications following closed reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures was reviewed.RESULTSA total of 54 patients with a median (IQR) age of 57.5 (48-60) years were included. Among them, 22 (41%) were female and 32 (59%) were male. The closed reduction technique demonstrated satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases. Major complications occurred in 19%, with 17% requiring conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Unacceptable or borderline acceptable reduction quality correlated significantly with the need for later conversion (p=0.03).CONCLUSIONSThe study supported the use of the closed reduction technique for acute FNF in patients under 65, achieving satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases with comparable complication rates to treatment of young femoral neck fractures with open reduction. Furthermore, it underscored the significance of the surgeon's overall impression of reduction quality, alongside the established reduction criteria, the Garden alignment index and Lowell's criteria, in evaluating the quality of the reduction. Additionally, risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty was associated with worse closed reduction quality.LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Muhamed M Farhan-Alanie,Alastair Stephens,Hamza Umar,Ali Ridha,Mateen Arastu,Michael Blankstein
{"title":"Shall We Not Pressurise It? Effects of Bone Cement Pressurisation on Mortality and Revision Following Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.","authors":"Muhamed M Farhan-Alanie,Alastair Stephens,Hamza Umar,Ali Ridha,Mateen Arastu,Michael Blankstein","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002914","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to compare 30-day post-operative mortality, and revision for aseptic femoral component loosening and all-causes following hip hemiarthroplasty performed with or without pressurisation of the bone cement in neck of femur fracture patients.METHODSDesign: Retrospective cohort study.SETTINGLevel I trauma center.PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIAPatients ≥60 years with OTA/AO 31B who underwent a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty from 10th December 2007 (database inception) to 15th November 2023 (search date) were reviewed.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Comparisons were made between patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty with versus without pressurisation of the bone cement for outcomes 30-day post-operative mortality, revision for aseptic femoral component loosening, and revision for all-causes.RESULTS406 procedures among 402 patients, and 722 procedures among 713 patients were performed with and without pressurisation of the bone cement respectively. Mean ages were 83.1 and 84.3 years (p=0.018), with 72.2% and 68.6% (p=0.205) females in the pressurised and non-pressurised cement patient groups respectively. There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality (7.2% versus 8.2%; HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.46-1.73, p=0.727). There were no differences in all-cause revision (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.27-4.04, p=0.953). No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Survival at 10 years post-operatively was 15.3% (95%CI 11.46-19.64) and 12.6% (95%CI 7.67-18.82) among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with and without bone cement pressurisation respectively.CONCLUSIONSThere were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with, compared to, without bone cement pressurisation. Bone cement pressurisation did not confer any advantages for revision outcomes which may be attributed in part to patients' high mortality rate and low survival beyond 10 years post-operatively.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew B Rees,Alexander R Dombrowsky,Samuel L Posey,Meghan K Wally,Laurence B Kempton,Joseph R Hsu,Kevin D Phelps
{"title":"Why Make the Cut? The Anconeus Triceps Hemipeel Approach for Distal Humerus Exposure Without Olecranon Osteotomy.","authors":"Andrew B Rees,Alexander R Dombrowsky,Samuel L Posey,Meghan K Wally,Laurence B Kempton,Joseph R Hsu,Kevin D Phelps","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002913","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David A Zuelzer, Lunden Ryan, Ryan Mayer, Tyler Pease, Stephen Warner, Jon Eastman, Raymond D Wright, Milton L C Routt
{"title":"Using an Intraoperative Stress Exam to Direct Treatment in Posterior Femoral Head Fracture-Dislocations.","authors":"David A Zuelzer, Lunden Ryan, Ryan Mayer, Tyler Pease, Stephen Warner, Jon Eastman, Raymond D Wright, Milton L C Routt","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the results of a treatment algorithm incorporating an EUA performed intraoperatively after fixation of the femoral head through a Smith Petersen approach to determine need for posterior wall or capsule repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Level 1 trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All acute, traumatic femoral head fractures from posterior hip dislocations treated at participating centers over a 5-year period from 2017-2022. Injuries were classified according to the Pipkin system.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the result of intraoperative EUA performed after femoral head fixation to determine the need for Kocher-Langenbeck exposure for posterior wall and/or capsule fixation. The secondary outcomes included rates of avascular necrosis, heterotopic bone formation, late instability, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studied were 63 males and 22 females with mean age 32.5 (range 18-71). 79 of 85 (92.9%) patients had a stable EUA after fixation of the femoral head through a Smith-Petersen approach. Six (6/85, 7.1%) underwent an additional Kocher-Langenbeck approach for posterior wall or capsule fixation. This included 1 Pipkin I, 1 Pipkin II, and 4 Pipkin IV injuries. Of the Pipkin IV injuries, 51/55 (92.7%) had stable EUA and did not require fixation of their posterior wall. This included 7 patients with wall involvement >20%. Five patients were excluded because of planned fixation of their posterior wall based on preoperative imaging. Of patients with at least 6 months follow up, 16 of 65 (26.4%) developed radiographic evidence of AVN and 21 of 65 (32.3%) evidence of heterotopic bone formation. Seven out of 65 (10.8%) were converted to total hip arthroplasty over the study period. When comparing patients with a single exposure with those with additional KL exposure, they did not vary in their rate of AVN (27.1% vs. 0.0%, P=0.3228), HO formation (30.5% vs. 50.0%, P=0.3788), or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (10.2% vs. 16.7%, P=0.510).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found residual posterior hip instability after femoral head fixation in patients with and without posterior wall fractures after posterior dislocations. The results of this study support use of an EUA after femoral head fixation to identify residual posterior hip instability in all femoral head fractures from posterior hip dislocations, regardless of Pipkin type. Use of the Smith-Petersen exposure remains a viable surgical option and may be improved with incorporation of an EUA after femoral head fixation. For Pipkin IV injuries with posterior wall fractures with indeterminate stability, an EUA accurately identifies residual instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a com","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher J Pettit, Carolyn F Herbosa, Abhishek Ganta, Steven Rivero, Nirmal Tejwani, Philipp Leucht, Sanjit R Konda, Kenneth A Egol
{"title":"Evaluating the Severity Spectrum: A Hierarchical Analysis of Complications during Hip Fracture Admission Associated with Mortality.","authors":"Christopher J Pettit, Carolyn F Herbosa, Abhishek Ganta, Steven Rivero, Nirmal Tejwani, Philipp Leucht, Sanjit R Konda, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine which in-hospital complications following the operative treatment of hip fractures are associated with increased inpatient, 30-day and 1 year mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single academic medical center and a Level 1 Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients who were operatively treated for hip fractures (OTA/AO 31A, 31B and Vancouver A,B, and C periprosthetic fractures) at a single center between October, 2014 and June, 2023.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Occurrence of an in-hospital complication was recorded. Cohorts were based upon mortality time points (during admission, 30-days and 1-year) and compared to patients who were alive at those time points to determine which in- hospital complications were most associated with mortality. Correlation analysis was performed between patients who died and those who were alive at each time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,134 patients (average age of 79.6 years, range 18-104 years and 66.6% female) met inclusion for this study. The overall mortality rate during admission, 30 days and 1 year were found to be 1.6%, 3.9% and 11.1%, respectively. Sepsis was the complication most associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR: 7.79, 95% CI 3.22 - 18.82, p<0.001) compared to other in-hospital complications. Compared to other in-hospital complications, stroke was the complication most associated with 30-day mortality (OR: 7.95, 95% CI 1.82 - 34.68, p<0.001). Myocardial infarction was the complication most associated with 1-year mortality (OR: 2.86, 95% CI 1.21 - 6.77, p=0.017) compared to other in-hospital complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative sepsis, stroke and myocardial infraction were the three complications most associated with mortality during admission, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality, respectively, during the operative treatment of hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}