Diagnostic Value of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Fracture-Related Infections: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hans Lapica, Akshay Daji, Josué G Layuno-Matos, Paul E Gerges, Devin John, Miguel A Cartagena-Reyes, Scott M Sandilands
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Fracture-Related Infections: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Hans Lapica, Akshay Daji, Josué G Layuno-Matos, Paul E Gerges, Devin John, Miguel A Cartagena-Reyes, Scott M Sandilands","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the previously established neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) threshold of 2.45 accurately diagnoses fracture-related infection (FRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective diagnostic study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Included were consecutive adults (≥18 y) who underwent deep-tissue or bone biopsy for suspected FRI between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2024; excluded were patients with immunosuppressive and oncological disorders or missing laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of NLR-reported as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve-for fracture-related-infection. Neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratios of patients with confirmed fracture-related-infection confirmed via bone or deep tissue biopsy were compared with those of patient's with negative (aseptic) biopsies. Per AO/ASIF consensus criteria, biopsy results were considered positive for infection if: (1) phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens were identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens, or (2) the presence of microorganisms in deep tissue specimens confirmed by histopathological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty biopsies from 29 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 40 biopsies, 27 were septic and 13 aseptic. The septic cohort had a mean age of 44 years with a range of 18-64 and consisted of 20 males and 2 females. The aseptic cohort had a mean age of 49 with a range of 27-70 and consisted of 6 males and 1 female. Using the pre-specified NLR threshold of 2.45, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing fracture-related infection were 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1) and 92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8), respectively. Exploratory Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested an optimal NLR cut-off point of 2.52 for detecting FRI, with an area-under-the-curve of 0.89 (95 % CI 0.74-1.00). Median NLR was significantly higher in septic biopsies, 4.79 (IQR 3.95-8.54), than in aseptic biopsies, 1.78 (IQR 1.50-2.15) (p = 0.003). An NLR > 2.45 occurred in 92.6 % of septic versus 7.7 % of aseptic biopsies (p < 0.001; OR 150, 95 % CI 12.4-1822.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An NLR threshold of 2.45 provided high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fracture-related infection. These findings support its potential utility as a non-invasive screening tool to detect fracture-related infections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether the previously established neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) threshold of 2.45 accurately diagnoses fracture-related infection (FRI).

Methods: Design: Retrospective diagnostic study.

Setting: Single Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Included were consecutive adults (≥18 y) who underwent deep-tissue or bone biopsy for suspected FRI between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2024; excluded were patients with immunosuppressive and oncological disorders or missing laboratory data.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of NLR-reported as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve-for fracture-related-infection. Neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratios of patients with confirmed fracture-related-infection confirmed via bone or deep tissue biopsy were compared with those of patient's with negative (aseptic) biopsies. Per AO/ASIF consensus criteria, biopsy results were considered positive for infection if: (1) phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens were identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens, or (2) the presence of microorganisms in deep tissue specimens confirmed by histopathological examination.

Results: Forty biopsies from 29 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 40 biopsies, 27 were septic and 13 aseptic. The septic cohort had a mean age of 44 years with a range of 18-64 and consisted of 20 males and 2 females. The aseptic cohort had a mean age of 49 with a range of 27-70 and consisted of 6 males and 1 female. Using the pre-specified NLR threshold of 2.45, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing fracture-related infection were 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1) and 92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8), respectively. Exploratory Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested an optimal NLR cut-off point of 2.52 for detecting FRI, with an area-under-the-curve of 0.89 (95 % CI 0.74-1.00). Median NLR was significantly higher in septic biopsies, 4.79 (IQR 3.95-8.54), than in aseptic biopsies, 1.78 (IQR 1.50-2.15) (p = 0.003). An NLR > 2.45 occurred in 92.6 % of septic versus 7.7 % of aseptic biopsies (p < 0.001; OR 150, 95 % CI 12.4-1822.3).

Conclusions: An NLR threshold of 2.45 provided high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fracture-related infection. These findings support its potential utility as a non-invasive screening tool to detect fracture-related infections.

Level of evidence: III.

中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值对骨折相关感染的诊断价值:回顾性分析。
目的:确定先前建立的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)阈值2.45是否能准确诊断骨折相关感染(FRI)。方法:设计:回顾性诊断研究。地点:单一的一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:纳入2018年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间因疑似FRI接受深部组织或骨活检的连续成人(≥18岁);排除了免疫抑制和肿瘤疾病或缺少实验室数据的患者。结果测量和比较:主要结果是nlr的诊断准确性,报告为骨折相关感染的敏感性、特异性和接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积。通过骨或深部组织活检确诊骨折相关感染的患者与无菌活检阴性患者的中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率进行比较。根据AO/ASIF共识标准,活检结果被认为是感染阳性,如果:(1)通过培养从至少两个单独的深层组织/植入物标本中鉴定出表型上难以区分的病原体,或(2)组织病理学检查证实深层组织标本中存在微生物。结果:29例患者40例活检符合纳入标准。在40例活检中,27例败血症,13例无菌。脓毒症队列平均年龄44岁,年龄范围18-64岁,包括20名男性和2名女性。无菌队列的平均年龄为49岁,范围为27-70岁,包括6男1女。使用预先指定的NLR阈值2.45,诊断骨折相关感染的敏感性和特异性分别为92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1)和92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8)。探索性受试者工作特征分析表明,检测FRI的最佳NLR截止点为2.52,曲线下面积为0.89 (95% CI 0.74-1.00)。脓毒症活检的NLR中位数为4.79 (IQR 3.95 ~ 8.54),明显高于无菌活检的1.78 (IQR 1.50 ~ 2.15) (p = 0.003)。脓毒症活检的NLR为92.6%,无菌活检的NLR为7.7% (p < 0.001; OR 150, 95% CI 12.4-1822.3)。结论:骨折相关感染的NLR阈值为2.45,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。这些发现支持了它作为一种检测骨折相关感染的非侵入性筛查工具的潜在效用。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信