Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.).最新文献

What is cognitive consistency, and why does it matter? 什么是认知一致性，为什么它很重要?

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-005

Bertram Gawronski, Skylar M. Brannon

{"title":"What is cognitive consistency, and why does it matter?","authors":"Bertram Gawronski, Skylar M. Brannon","doi":"10.1037/0000135-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-005","url":null,"abstract":"In the spring 2015, the first author of this chapter attended a small group conference where he had the opportunity to chat with one of the most distinguished senior researchers in the area of cognitive dissonance. Puzzled by the increasingly narrow focus of dissonance research since the publication of Festinger’s (1957) seminal book, the said author asked this eminent scholar about his views on exposure to beliefconflicting information as a source of dissonance. Causing even more puzzlement, the scholar replied that such mental conflicts do not involve any dissonance. He further stated that dissonance is exclusively caused by discrepancies between attitudes and behavior and occurs only for behaviors with aversive consequences for which the actor takes personal responsibility (cf. Cooper & Fazio, 1984). After a short back-and-forth, the two researchers ended the conversation by agreeing to disagree. Yet, one of them was left with an unpleasant feeling caused by the conflict between his belief that dissonance is a much broader phenomenon and the views of the eminent scholar he had just been exposed to. One potential interpretation of the two conflicting views is that they reflect different empirical assumptions that could be tested in a carefully designed study. For example, one could design an experiment in which participants are presented with information that conflicts with their personal beliefs and measure whether exposure to this information elicits unpleasant feelings. Yet, another potential interpretation is that the two conflicting views are rooted in different definitions of theoretical concepts. In the latter case, it would be very difficult (if not impossible) to resolve the disagreement on the basis of empirical data (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2015). For example, even if participants experienced unpleasant feelings in response to information that conflicts with their beliefs, a skeptic might argue that these feelings are distinct from dissonance, because dissonance is (by definition) limited to by discrepancies between attitudes and behavior.1 Expanding on the second interpretation, the current chapter aims to make a theoretical case for broader conceptualizations of cognitive consistency and dissonance that go beyond the relation between attitudes and behavior. In line with earlier concerns","PeriodicalId":165852,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.).","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129011296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 35

Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. 失调，伪善和自我概念。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/10318-005

E. Aronson

引用次数: 97

Improving the 1957 version of dissonance theory. 改进了1957年版的失调理论。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-002

J. Mills

引用次数: 23

Neural basis of cognitive dissonance. 认知失调的神经基础。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-011

Keise Izuma, K. Murayama

引用次数: 7

Self-affirmation theory: An update and appraisal. 自我肯定理论:更新与评价。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/10318-006

Joshua Aronson, Geoffrey L. Cohen, P. Nail

引用次数: 55

Understanding the motivation underlying dissonance effects: The action-based model. 理解不协调效应背后的动机:基于行为的模型。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-004

E. Harmon-Jones, Cindy Harmon-Jones

引用次数: 9

Moving beyond attitude change in the study of dissonance-related processes: An update on the role of discomfort. 在认知失调相关过程的研究中超越态度变化:不适作用的最新进展。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-012

P. Devine, J. Tauer, K. E. Barron, A. Elliot, Kristen M. Vance, E. Harmon-Jones

引用次数: 6

In search of the motivation for dissonance reduction: The drive to lessen aversive consequences. 寻找减少失调的动机:减少厌恶后果的动力。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-009

J. Cooper

引用次数: 3

Modeling cognitive dissonance as a parallel constraint satisfaction network with learning. 认知失调与学习的平行约束满足网络模型。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-010

S. Read, Brian Monroe

引用次数: 3

Dissonance now: How accessible discrepancies moderate distress and diverse defenses. 现在的不和谐:可接近的差异如何缓和痛苦和多样化的防御。

Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/0000135-006

Ian M McGregor, I. Newby-Clark, M. Zanna

引用次数: 8