The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology最新文献

{"title":"Sourcing Mississippian pottery among the complex maritime cultures of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast","authors":"Neill J. Wallis, C. Trevor Duke, George M. Luer, Michael D. Glascock","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2251911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2251911","url":null,"abstract":"In eastern North America after ca. AD 1050, the spread of Mississippian cultures sparked widespread transformations to economy, material culture, political structure, and ideology. “Mississippianization” influenced the politically complex maritime polities of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast, but the lack of maize agriculture indicates changes played out differently than among many inland polities. Mississippian-style pottery sherds deposited widely in mounds and in middens at the largest administrative centers are perhaps the clearest evidence of connections to the Mississippian world. We conducted a provenance study using neutron activation analysis of 303 Mississippi Period pottery vessels from 18 sites on Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast to investigate how and from where coastal communities acquired Mississippian vessel forms, paste recipes, and iconography. The sample includes numerous Mississippian-related pottery types as well as Pinellas Plain, one of the local utilitarian wares. Four chemical groups are defined, three of which are local to the peninsular Gulf coast and one that is associated with the “Deep South,” defined here as the inland Florida panhandle and Chattahoochee River area of southern Georgia. Our results indicate that most Mississippian-style vessels were locally made but used clay sources different from some utilitarian wares such as Pinellas Plain. Using distinctive clays and paste recipes, local production of Mississippian vessels may have been controlled by competing kin-based corporate groups affiliated with each mound center. The widespread low frequency of nonlocal Mississippian sherds from the Deep South shows persistent connections to inland Fort Walton and Rood Phase polities, possibly in relation to training of coastal potters. A greater prevalence of pottery from the Deep South at Shell Creek (8LL8) at the southern edge of the sampling region may reflect a polity with greater success in acquiring prestige goods, perhaps associated with the strong and expansive political power of the Calusa.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135591823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Hālawa dune site, Moloka‘i, Hawaiian Islands: New excavations, redating, and new interpretations","authors":"Patrick V. Kirch, Jillian Swift","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2251008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2251008","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe Hālawa dune site on Moloka‘i Island has played a key role in understanding early Hawaiian history. Initially excavated in 1969–1970 and regarded then as dating to the early phase of Hawaiian settlement, the site yielded a diverse artifact assemblage and the first evidence for round-ended house foundations in Hawai‘i. Prior attempts to refine the site’s chronology yielded inconsistent results. Renewed excavations and re-analysis of previously excavated collections from the site have allowed for recovery of a stratigraphically controlled sample of faunal materials and charcoal. AMS dating of candlenut endocarp indicates initial use of Mound A cal AD 1366–1610, with occupation continuing into the post-contact period. Matched pairs of candlenut and marine mollusk shell dates allow for the derivation of a Hālawa-specific marine reservoir value (ΔR = −267), in turn permitting the calibration of 12 dates on marine mollusk shells excavated from Mound B in 1970. Faunal materials from the 2020 Mound A excavation add new information on patterns of marine exploitation, and on a trend of increased frequency of domestic pig and dog over time. Charcoal identified from Mound A indicates largely native forest taxa, but with several Polynesian-introduced plants as well, including candlenut, breadfruit, and mountain apple.Keywords: Hawaiian archaeologyfaunal analysismarine resourcesresource intensificationradiocarbon dating AcknowledgementsPermission to undertake archaeological research on lands held by Pu‘u o Hoku Ranch was provided by the landowner Lavinia Currier, whom we thank for her interest in and support of our project. Galen McCleary, Savannah Forti, and Rudi Hunke of Pu‘u o Hoku Ranch also provided valuable assistance. The late Pilipo Solatorio, respected elder of Hālawa, gave his blessing to the project and followed our work with great interest. Greg Solatorio, Kylie Tuitavuki, Kepa Lyman, and Lexi St. Denis participated in the excavation; Tuitavuki, Lyman, and Emmaline Irvine assisted with laboratory analyses. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments that helped to improve the article.Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingArchaeological research in Hālawa Valley, Moloka‘i, from 2020 to 2023 was supported by grant BCS-1939516 from the US National Science Foundation.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135696090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Landscape ecology, settlement, and land use in the Lower Río Verde Valley, Oaxaca, México: An unusual case for coastal Mesoamerica","authors":"Jessica D. Hedgepeth Balkin, Arthur A. Joyce","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2246024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2246024","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article examines the roles of coastal environments in prehispanic settlement patterns and land use within the lower Río Verde Valley, Oaxaca, México using interdisciplinary methods. We first compare population levels in the coastal zone—including areas by the estuaries and sea—to inland habitats such as the floodplain. Second, we discuss resource extraction and trade associated with the coastal zone. Excavations and a 224 km2 full-coverage survey indicate that, except during the initial Early Formative period (1600–1350 BC), coastal zone habitats were not a settlement focus. Land use concentrated on the extraction of resources such as fish, salt, and ornamental shell. These goods were consumed locally and exchanged via long-distance networks for obsidian, pottery, and during the Postclassic period (AD 800–1522), copper items. Archaeofaunal and isotopic data suggest that aquatic resources from estuarine and marine environments constituted a small proportion of the total caloric input, but may have been important sources of protein. Finally, we compare settlement patterns between the lower Verde and other Mesoamerican coastal regions. Lower Verde population in the coastal zone was low, especially relative to areas which practiced mixed subsistence into the Middle/Late Formative periods (ca. 700–150 BC). This is related to the proximity of arable lands to estuaries.Keywords: Fishingfloodplain farmingsalt productionlong-distance exchangedemographic change AcknowledgementsWe are grateful for the friendship and assistance of the San José del Progreso community. Permission to conduct our work was generously granted by the Consejo de Arqueología, the INAH, the Centro INAH Oaxaca, the Municipios of Tututepec and Jamiltepec, the Parque Nacional Lagunas de Chacahua (PNLC), local town officials, and numerous patient landowners. This article was greatly improved by the thoughtful comments of anonymous reviewers. We would also like to thank Andrew Workinger for sharing settlement data from his dissertation and Marc Levine for his input on Postclassic copper axes in Mesoamerica. The GIS suitability model benefited extensively from the expertise of Devin White.Disclosure statementThis is to acknowledge no financial interest or benefit has arisen from the direct applications of the research in this manuscript.Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the National Science Foundation under grants 1548941, BCS-0096012, and BCS-1123388; The Historical Society under the Religion and Innovation in Human Affairs Grant (for both Arthur Joyce and Sarah B. Barber), funded by the Templeton Foundation; the Vanderbilt University Research Council and Mellon Fund; the Fullbright Foundation; the H. John Heinz III Charitable Trust; the Colorado Archaeological Society under the Alice Hamilton Scholarship Fund; and the University of Colorado Boulder under the Anthropology Graduate Student Research Award, the Tinker Foundation Grant, the Beverly Sears Gra","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135695448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The stone connection: Functional and microbotanical analysis of prehistoric macrolithic tools on the island of Formentera (Balearic Archipelago)","authors":"Maria Bofill, Francisco J. Aceituno, Marta Portillo, Inés López-Dóriga, Edgard Camarós, Marian Cueto, Luis C. Teira, Pau Sureda","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2237947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2237947","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractFormentera was one of the last Mediterranean islands to be colonized by humans at the end of the third millennium BC. This island is rather small (83 km2) with marked biogeographical constraints. Typical of a semi-arid environment, the island is poor in resources and biodiversity. Macrolithic tools from the prehistoric sites of Ca na Costa (ca. 2130–1790 cal BC), Cap de Barbaria II (ca. 1740–900 cal BC), and Sa Cala (ca. 800–570 cal BC) showed similar technological, typological, and functional patterns documented in other prehistoric tool assemblages from the Balearic Islands. This common technology is reflected in the way the raw materials were procured, as well as the manufacture, the maintenance strategies, and the use of macrolithic tools (e.g., grinding stone tools, abraders, and percussion tools). Integrated phytolith and starch analyses from grinding toolkits show evidence of people’s exploitating millet-tribe species (Paniceae) during the Bronze Age, cereals that are well-adapted to nutrient-poor soils, including exotic taxa such as possible foxtail millet (Setaria cf. italica). The production and use of this stone technology suggests how the first human communities on the island achieved and shared social knowledge about the insular landscape and its environmental constraints. This integrative archaeological research in Formentera has shown development of a set of innovative, diversified, and intensive resource exploitation strategies, underlining the high adaptability and resilience of prehistoric societies as well as the sharing of technology within the Balearic archipelago and its independent evolution from mainland technologies.Keywords: Grinding stone toolsground stone toolsuse-wear analysisstarch analysisphytolith analysisBronze AgeWest Mediterranean AcknowledgementsWe thank the Archaeological Museum of Eivissa and Formentera and the geologist Luis Alberto Tostón.Notes1 (CSIC), Institute of History, Madrid, SpainAdditional informationFundingThis paper was developed with the scientific objectives and funding of different research projects and institutions: MB was supported by Consell Insular de Formentera through the “Beca d’Investigació 2014” and the Grup de Recerca GRAMPO (2017 SGR-1302). PS was supported by the Xunta de Galicia-GAIN (IN606C-2021/002) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the “Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación” programme (IJC2020-042714-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135948258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Settlement, trade, and subsistence in coastal Mesoamerica: An introduction","authors":"Jessica D. Hedgepeth Balkin","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2234851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2234851","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractOver the past several decades, a large corpus of studies has been published on the relationship between resource availability and settlement in coastal Mesoamerica, particularly regarding the prevalence of mixed subsistence systems early in the Formative Period (ca.1800–850 BC). Few recent comparative works, however, are available which draw together research on coastal human–environment interactions from several Mesoamerican regions. This article endeavors to contribute toward interregional comparisons by highlighting findings from case studies in this special section of The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. I explore broadly relevant themes, including geomorphic impacts on the archaeological record and the significance of coastal resources to coastal settlement, subsistence, and trade. While common patterns illuminate archaeological debates, it is important to identify the distinctive environmental characteristics of different regions which impact the visibility of archaeological data as well as the resources available to local populations. I emphasize the utility of conducting high-resolution interdisciplinary research to capture such ecological variability.Keywords: Geoarchaeologyagricultureaquatic faunahuman–environment interactionsinterregional exchange AcknowledgementsI extend my sincere gratitude to the contributors of this special section: Patricia Beddows, Beverly Goodman-Tchernov, Roy Jaijel, Arthur Joyce, Jeffrey Glover, Michael Loughlin, Heather McKillop, Tanya Peres, Christopher Pool, Dominique Rissolo, and Derek Smith. The ideas and conclusions presented in this introduction also benefitted extensively from the participation of both audience and forum members at the 2018 SAA convention in Washington, DC as well as discussions with Barbara Stark. The 2018 forum contributors included: Sarah Barber, Lourdes Budar, Jeffrey Glover, Jessica Hedgepeth Balkin, Arthur Joyce, Heather McKillop, Torben Rick, and Dominique Rissolo. I am also grateful for the constructive comments on this introduction by the special section authors and the helpful comments by an anonymous reviewer. Finally, this section would not have been possible without the efforts of several JICA editors: Todd Braje, Scott M. Fitzpatrick, and Christina Giovas.Disclosure statementThis is to acknowledge no financial interest or benefit has arisen from the direct applications of the research in this manuscript.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135199853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Landscapes created by millennia of cultural land use in the Fleurieu Group of Islands, Tasmania—a knowledge baseline for current and future land management under changing climates","authors":"Matthew Adesanya Adeleye, Simon Graeme Haberle, Stephen Harris, Sue O’Connor, Sandra Bowdler","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2234877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2234877","url":null,"abstract":"Aboriginal peoples have managed Australian landscapes for millennia; however, deep-time paleoecological evidence of the nature of landscape modification remains rare. The Fleurieu Group of islands in Bass Strait was one of the areas actively used by Aboriginal people in lutruwita (Tasmania), until forced dispossession of their lands due to European colonization occurred over 230 years ago, with subsequent land use including leaseholder pastoralism and nature conservation. There are emerging opportunities for greater input from Aboriginal people into land management of the islands now and into the future. This investigation of the long-term human–island ecosystem interactions in the area is aimed at providing a greater understanding of the impact of land-use changes on biodiversity and ecosystem change through time. Holocene multi-proxy paleoecological records from the islands show periods of low to high intensity land use, with the highest intensity periods occurring around 8500–6500 BP and the last 2000 years. Aboriginal land use in the past ∼2000 BP promoted a complex mosaic biodiverse landscape and provides a baseline for current and future land management on the islands and elsewhere in Tasmania.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135243676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Testing osteometric species determination on zooarchaeological dolphin remains from Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age sites in Ash-Sharqiyyah, Sultanate of Oman","authors":"Youri van den Hurk, Matteo Bormetti, Elena Maini","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2244913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2244913","url":null,"abstract":"Different Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age sites located in the Ras al-Hadd cape and Ras al-Jinz Bay area (Ash-Sharqiyyah South Governorate, Sultanate of Oman) have provided thousands of zooarchaeological dolphin remains suggesting a strong reliance on the exploitation of these animals. Dolphins are hard to identify to the species level due to a highly comparable interspecies osteological morphology as well as a general lack of extensive osteological reference collections. As a result, such remains are frequently identified as “dolphin”, without any further species identification being undertaken. In this study, we assess whether an osteometric method for distinguishing the nine dolphin species that are present in Omani waters can be used to identify the zooarchaeological specimens. Zooarchaeology by Mass-Spectrometry (ZooMS) was also undertaken on a subset of the specimens but proved ineffective due to the poor preservation of the material in an arid climate. This evidence strengthens the need for effective species identification methods based on traditional zooarchaeological methods. This research is based on our ongoing analysis of the thousands of dolphin remains from the Omani zooarchaeological assemblages.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136130265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Love thy (Middle Bronze Age) neighbor: A network model for central and northern Greece","authors":"Christopher Mark Hale","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2231867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2231867","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractA century of archaeology has identified hundreds of potential sites north of the Corinthian Isthmus on the Greek mainland and in the northeast Aegean contemporary with the Middle Helladic–Late Helladic I Period (MH–LH I, ca. 2100–1550 BC). This paper presents an exploratory nearest neighbor network model to examine connectivity in a scenario where maritime movement included widespread access to the sail (known from the wider Aegean). Analysis of clustering and centrality in the modeled network shows that nodes along the Euboean Gulf were the most important for overall connectivity, and that seemingly geographically isolated sites in the Sporades archipelago and Chalkidiki were crucial for integrating the northern Aegean with central Greece. The later Late Bronze Age palatial centers of Thebes, Orchomenos, and Dimini/Volos on the other hand do not score highly on any centrality measure in this scenario, suggesting that their inherent position on the modeled network did not greatly contribute to their eventual success. This observation is in line with recent scholarship, increasingly pointing to an important endogenous aspect to emerging complexity in central Greece.Keywords: Middle HelladicAegeanconnectivitycentralityemerging complexity AcknowledgementsThis paper owes its inspiration to the Connected Past, Heraklion 2022: Networks in the Archaeology of the Ancient Aegean conference co-organized by Carl Knappett and Stella Mandalaki together with an associated workshop on network analysis led by Tom Brughmans. Bartłomiej Lis, Alex Knodell, Laura Magno, and Michael Loy provided valuable advice on early drafts. I also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable critiques and suggestions.Disclosure statementThe author declares no conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 847639 and from the Ministry of Education and Science. PASIFIC Fellowship Agreement No PAN.BFB.S.BDN.627.022.2021.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135939070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The “island laboratory” revisited: Integrating environmental and sociocultural approaches","authors":"Helen Dawson, Llorenç Picornell-Gelabert, Manuel Calvo-Trias, Gabriel Servera-Vives, Alejandro Valenzuela-Oliver","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2235673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2235673","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image sizeKeywords: Archaeological theoryisland biogeographymodel ecosystemdecolonizationnetworks AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to all the participants at our session on the “Island Laboratory revisited” at the European Association of Archaeologists in Barcelona for their stimulating contributions and in particular to all those who submitted papers for this Special Issue and to the Editors of The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology for their patience following the delay to this publication caused by the pandemic. We wish to dedicate this Special Issue to the memory of our dear friend and colleague Carole McCartney (1965–2021), whose significant contribution to the archaeology of Cyprus remains fundamental to our understanding of island archaeology in the Mediterranean and beyond.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135937829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mapping the impacts of coastal erosion on the heritage assets of Ynys Enlli (Bardsey Island), North Wales, UK","authors":"Kirsty Ackland, H. Griffiths, L. Barker, S. Davies, T. Driver, D. Hunt","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2227944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2227944","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130932715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}