Sourcing Mississippian pottery among the complex maritime cultures of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast

Neill J. Wallis, C. Trevor Duke, George M. Luer, Michael D. Glascock
{"title":"Sourcing Mississippian pottery among the complex maritime cultures of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast","authors":"Neill J. Wallis, C. Trevor Duke, George M. Luer, Michael D. Glascock","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2023.2251911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In eastern North America after ca. AD 1050, the spread of Mississippian cultures sparked widespread transformations to economy, material culture, political structure, and ideology. “Mississippianization” influenced the politically complex maritime polities of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast, but the lack of maize agriculture indicates changes played out differently than among many inland polities. Mississippian-style pottery sherds deposited widely in mounds and in middens at the largest administrative centers are perhaps the clearest evidence of connections to the Mississippian world. We conducted a provenance study using neutron activation analysis of 303 Mississippi Period pottery vessels from 18 sites on Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast to investigate how and from where coastal communities acquired Mississippian vessel forms, paste recipes, and iconography. The sample includes numerous Mississippian-related pottery types as well as Pinellas Plain, one of the local utilitarian wares. Four chemical groups are defined, three of which are local to the peninsular Gulf coast and one that is associated with the “Deep South,” defined here as the inland Florida panhandle and Chattahoochee River area of southern Georgia. Our results indicate that most Mississippian-style vessels were locally made but used clay sources different from some utilitarian wares such as Pinellas Plain. Using distinctive clays and paste recipes, local production of Mississippian vessels may have been controlled by competing kin-based corporate groups affiliated with each mound center. The widespread low frequency of nonlocal Mississippian sherds from the Deep South shows persistent connections to inland Fort Walton and Rood Phase polities, possibly in relation to training of coastal potters. A greater prevalence of pottery from the Deep South at Shell Creek (8LL8) at the southern edge of the sampling region may reflect a polity with greater success in acquiring prestige goods, perhaps associated with the strong and expansive political power of the Calusa.","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2023.2251911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In eastern North America after ca. AD 1050, the spread of Mississippian cultures sparked widespread transformations to economy, material culture, political structure, and ideology. “Mississippianization” influenced the politically complex maritime polities of Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast, but the lack of maize agriculture indicates changes played out differently than among many inland polities. Mississippian-style pottery sherds deposited widely in mounds and in middens at the largest administrative centers are perhaps the clearest evidence of connections to the Mississippian world. We conducted a provenance study using neutron activation analysis of 303 Mississippi Period pottery vessels from 18 sites on Florida’s peninsular Gulf coast to investigate how and from where coastal communities acquired Mississippian vessel forms, paste recipes, and iconography. The sample includes numerous Mississippian-related pottery types as well as Pinellas Plain, one of the local utilitarian wares. Four chemical groups are defined, three of which are local to the peninsular Gulf coast and one that is associated with the “Deep South,” defined here as the inland Florida panhandle and Chattahoochee River area of southern Georgia. Our results indicate that most Mississippian-style vessels were locally made but used clay sources different from some utilitarian wares such as Pinellas Plain. Using distinctive clays and paste recipes, local production of Mississippian vessels may have been controlled by competing kin-based corporate groups affiliated with each mound center. The widespread low frequency of nonlocal Mississippian sherds from the Deep South shows persistent connections to inland Fort Walton and Rood Phase polities, possibly in relation to training of coastal potters. A greater prevalence of pottery from the Deep South at Shell Creek (8LL8) at the southern edge of the sampling region may reflect a polity with greater success in acquiring prestige goods, perhaps associated with the strong and expansive political power of the Calusa.
在佛罗里达半岛墨西哥湾沿岸复杂的海洋文化中寻找密西西比陶器
大约公元1050年之后,密西西比文化在北美东部的传播引发了经济、物质文化、政治结构和意识形态的广泛变革。“密西西比化”影响了佛罗里达半岛墨西哥湾沿岸政治上复杂的海洋政策,但玉米农业的缺乏表明,变化的结果与许多内陆政策不同。在最大的行政中心的土丘和垃圾堆中广泛沉积的密西西比风格的陶器碎片,可能是与密西西比世界联系的最清楚的证据。我们对来自佛罗里达半岛墨西哥湾沿岸18个地点的303件密西西比时期的陶器进行了一项来源研究,利用中子活化分析来调查沿海社区如何以及从哪里获得密西西比的容器形式、粘贴配方和图像。该样品包括许多与密西西比有关的陶器类型,以及皮内拉斯平原,一种当地的实用器物。这里定义了四种化学类群,其中三种是海湾半岛沿岸的,另一种与“深南”有关,这里定义为佛罗里达内陆狭长地带和乔治亚州南部的查塔胡奇河地区。我们的研究结果表明,大多数密西西比风格的器皿是当地制造的,但使用的粘土来源不同于一些实用的器皿,如皮内拉斯平原。使用独特的粘土和糊状物配方,密西西比器皿的当地生产可能由隶属于每个土丘中心的以亲属为基础的竞争企业集团控制。来自南方腹地的非本地密西西比碎片的广泛低频率显示了与内陆沃尔顿堡和路德阶段政策的持续联系,可能与沿海陶工的培训有关。在采样区南部边缘的贝壳溪(8LL8),来自深南的陶器更普遍,这可能反映了一个在获得声望商品方面取得更大成功的政体,这可能与卡卢萨强大而广泛的政治权力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信