The Journal of American-East Asian Relations最新文献_第9页

“Chinese Perception of U.S. Presidential Candidates” “中国人对美国总统候选人的看法”

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-05-07 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-28010004

J. Hughes, Brian A. Swanson, M. Swanson

引用次数: 0

Jung H. Pak, Becoming Kim Jong Un: A Former CIA Officer’s Insights Into North Korea’s Enigmatic Young Dictator 《成为金正恩:一名前中情局官员对朝鲜神秘的年轻独裁者的洞察

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-05-07 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-28010008

Brandon K. Gauthier

引用次数: 0

Preparing the South Pacific for U.S. Influence: The uss Narragansett in Samoa, 1872 为美国在南太平洋的影响力做准备:1872年萨摩亚的纳拉甘塞特号航空母舰

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701002

K. J. Blume

引用次数: 0

Satō, America, and the Cold War: US-Japanese Relations, 1964–72, written by Fintan Hoey 《萨特、美国与冷战:1964-72年的美日关系》，作者:芬坦·霍伊

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701007

T. Tsuda

引用次数: 1

Faking Liberties: Religious Freedom in American-Occupied Japan, written by Jolyon Baraka Thomas 伪造自由:美国占领下的日本的宗教自由，作者乔利恩·巴拉卡·托马斯

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701006

J. Morgan

引用次数: 2

Gunboat Diplomacy of a Different Kind: Robert H. Pruyn and Japan’s Purchase of U.S. Warships, 1862–1865 别样的炮舰外交:罗伯特·普鲁恩与日本购买美国军舰，1862-1865

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701003

S. Fessler

引用次数: 0

Japan Rearmed: The Politics of Military Power, written by Sheila A. Smith 《日本重新武装:军事力量的政治》希拉·a·史密斯著

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701008

J. Morgan

引用次数: 0

‘Our Friends Don’t Understand Our Policies and Our Situation’: Informal U.S.-China Dialogues Following Tiananmen “我们的朋友不了解我们的政策和我们的处境”:天安门事件后的美中非正式对话

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2020-03-19 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02701004

P. Roberts

{"title":"‘Our Friends Don’t Understand Our Policies and Our Situation’: Informal U.S.-China Dialogues Following Tiananmen","authors":"P. Roberts","doi":"10.1163/18765610-02701004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765610-02701004","url":null,"abstract":"During the 1980s, an interlocking complex of U.S. non-governmental organizations (the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Asia Society, and the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations) gradually built up contacts with Chinese elites. By mid-decade, the National Committee and the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs began a series of “U.S.-China Dialogues” in which influential figures from both sides met alternately in Beijing and the United States, supposedly informally, to discuss the state of Sino-American relations. Though the outcome of the protests at Tiananmen in June 1989 shocked them, American China-watchers consciously decided that contacts and efforts at communication and understanding must continue. At the Fourth U.S.-China Dialogue meeting in Beijing in early 1990, the American and Chinese participants assumed radically different positions, with the Chinese complaining bitterly about U.S. interference in China’s internal affairs. However, as the meeting ended, both sides agreed that, while there had been little agreement, such contacts and dialogues were valuable and must continue.","PeriodicalId":158942,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of American-East Asian Relations","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130571289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“The Anatomy of Allied Occupation: Contesting the Resumption of Japanese Antarctic Whaling, 1945–1952” 《剖析盟军占领:反对日本恢复南极捕鲸，1945-1952》

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02604002

Christopher Aldous

{"title":"“The Anatomy of Allied Occupation: Contesting the Resumption of Japanese Antarctic Whaling, 1945–1952”","authors":"Christopher Aldous","doi":"10.1163/18765610-02604002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765610-02604002","url":null,"abstract":"This article scrutinizes the controversy surrounding the resumption of Japanese Antarctic whaling from 1946, focusing on the negotiations and concessions that underline the nature of the Allied Occupation as an international undertaking. Britain, Norway, Australia, and New Zealand objected to Japanese pelagic whaling, chiefly on the grounds of its past record of wasteful and inefficient operations. Their opposition forced the Natural Resources Section of General Headquarters, Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, to increase the number of Allied inspectors on board the two Japanese whaling factories from one to two, and to respond carefully to the criticisms they made of the conduct of Japanese whaling. U.S. sensitivity to international censure caused the Occupation to encourage the factory vessels to prioritize oil yields over meat and blubber for domestic consumption. Moreover, General Douglas MacArthur, the U.S. Occupation commander, summarily rejected a proposal to increase the number of Japanese fleets from two to three in 1947. With its preponderance of power, the United States successfully promoted Japanese Antarctic whaling, but a tendency to focus only on outcomes obscures the lengthy and difficult processes that enabled Japanese whaling expeditions to take place on an annual basis from late 1946.","PeriodicalId":158942,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of American-East Asian Relations","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115387897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Welcome to Japan!: How U.S. Marine Corps Orientation Materials Erase, Coopt, and Dismiss Local Resistance” “欢迎来到日本!”《美国海军陆战队定向材料如何消除、吸收和消除当地抵抗》

The Journal of American-East Asian Relations Pub Date : 2019-12-09 DOI: 10.1163/18765610-02604004

Carl A. Gabrielson

{"title":"“Welcome to Japan!: How U.S. Marine Corps Orientation Materials Erase, Coopt, and Dismiss Local Resistance”","authors":"Carl A. Gabrielson","doi":"10.1163/18765610-02604004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765610-02604004","url":null,"abstract":"After seventy years, U.S. bases in Japan continue to inspire ambivalence, resentment, resistance, and even fear for many Japanese people. To improve the public image of the U.S. armed forces, base administrators create training materials designed to promote cultural awareness, prevent troops’ crimes, and discourage bad behavior. But how does the organization whose purpose is to violently oppose foreign threats to U.S. interests conceive of cultural understanding and sensitivity? Taking as a case study the materials that U.S. Marine Corps bases in Japan produce to instruct newcomers, this article argues that such materials tend to equip base personnel preemptively with strategies for erasing, coopting, and dismissing local anti-base perspectives. Specifically, these materials depict Japanese people as friendly supporters of the military, as irrational and brainwashed puppets of anti-military political forces, or simply as decorative pieces of the cultural backdrop. It concludes that the cultural education materials the U.S. Marine Corps produces at its bases in Japan not only help marines to feel that they have or deserve the support of the Japanese people in carrying out the U.S. military agenda abroad, but that they also promote a sense of cultural superiority that fosters the very behaviors that cultural training materials are meant to prevent.","PeriodicalId":158942,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of American-East Asian Relations","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130701988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0