{"title":"Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Survives Constitutional Challenge in Post-Nollan-Dolan Era: Homebuilders Association of Northern California v. City of Napa","authors":"D. Curtin, Cecily T. Talbert, N. L. Costa","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394777","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Inclusionary housing programs1 have been in effect since the early 1970s, and are growing in popularity today as more jurisdictions view them as innovative ways to increase the supply of affordable housing as well as combat exclusionary zoning practices.2 In general, localities enact such programs pursuant to their local police power, which are typically effectuated through inclusionary housing ordinances, in zoning codes, policy statements, or a jurisdiction's housing element.3","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132530432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129661601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394778","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128726133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Takings and Land Use Regulation from a Comparative Perspective: A Review by Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold: Taking Land: Compulsory Purchase and Regulation in Asian-Pacific Countries. Tsuyoshi Kotaka & David L. Callies, editors. University of Hawaii Press, 2002","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394541","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127106146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394544","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127390558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How to Avoid the Top Ten Pitfalls of Adult Business Regulation—Part II","authors":"Scott D. Bergthold","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394540","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A version of this paper was originally prepared for the International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting, April 21–24. The author drafted APA's Amicus Brief in the most recent case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court concerning adult business regulations, City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. and Highland Books, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1728. (See page 7 for a discussion of the Alameda decision.) Part one of this commentary ran in the May issue of Land Use Law & Zoning Digest.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132759836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"Zd","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394542","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128086645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New Legislation","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394543","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “New Legislation” are abstracts of legislation enacted by the states addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as energy and environmental measures, subdivision and lot regulations, and powers of the planning commission.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128650352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lucas Limited and Penn Central Promoted","authors":"G. Bauman","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394769","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Supreme Court made three key rulings in the Tahoe-Sierra moratorium case: First, a temporary moratorium on all land-use development is not a per se facial taking; rather, the Penn Central balancing test (public purpose versus private impact) should be applied on an ad hoc, case-by-case basis to determine if a temporary restriction on use effects a regulatory taking. Second, a takings analysis should be focused on the “parcel as a whole” and not just the regulated portion of the parcel, both geographically and temporally. Third, the categorical (or per se) Lucas rule of denial of all use of property is limited to situations when the use restriction is applied permanently.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123593518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What the Supreme Court Didn't Decide in Tahoe-Sierra","authors":"D. Merriam","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394771","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In these pages, you'll read plenty of opinions about what the Court decided. Sometimes you'll wonder if the authors are even talking about the same case. It all depends on your perspective. Why, just a year ago Rhode Island Attorney General Whitehead had his head handed to him by the Court in Palazzolo when the Court found a takings claim ripe and told the AG to go back to court and try the case instead of hiding behind the gossamer bunting of the ripeness doctrine. So what did the General Whitehead do? He simply declared victory—at least you would think so from the local legal newspaper article with the headline: “U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Palazzolo in Land Dispute,” The Rhode Island Law Tribune, Week of July 4–10, 2001 at p. 6. He was quoted: “We're happy with it. The important point is under the theory Mr. Palazzolo pursued, he lost and he lost flat out.”","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128156653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}