How to Avoid the Top Ten Pitfalls of Adult Business Regulation—Part II

Scott D. Bergthold
{"title":"How to Avoid the Top Ten Pitfalls of Adult Business Regulation—Part II","authors":"Scott D. Bergthold","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A version of this paper was originally prepared for the International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting, April 21–24. The author drafted APA's Amicus Brief in the most recent case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court concerning adult business regulations, City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. and Highland Books, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1728. (See page 7 for a discussion of the Alameda decision.) Part one of this commentary ran in the May issue of Land Use Law & Zoning Digest.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A version of this paper was originally prepared for the International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Meeting, April 21–24. The author drafted APA's Amicus Brief in the most recent case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court concerning adult business regulations, City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. and Highland Books, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1728. (See page 7 for a discussion of the Alameda decision.) Part one of this commentary ran in the May issue of Land Use Law & Zoning Digest.
如何避免成人商业监管的十大陷阱(下)
本文的一个版本最初是为4月21日至24日举行的国际市政律师协会年会上准备的。作者在最近一起美国最高法院关于成人商业法规的案件中起草了APA的“法庭之友摘要”,即洛杉矶市诉阿拉米达图书公司和高地图书公司案,122 s.c.。1728. (关于阿拉米达案判决的讨论见第7页。)这篇评论的第一部分发表在5月份的《土地使用法与分区文摘》上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信