Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume最新文献

{"title":"Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Increase After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions Subsequent to Primary TKA.","authors":"Kian Niknam, Bradley A Lezak, Nathaniel P Mercer, Joseph X Robin, Erik Hansen, Drew Lansdown, Ran Schwarzkopf","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may benefit from arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) to improve range of motion and decrease pain. However, the rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and of the need for future revision TKA (rTKA) have only been studied in a limited capacity in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare PJI and revision outcomes in patients who had undergone TKA between those who subsequently underwent arthroscopic LOA and those who did not undergo arthroscopic LOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver database was utilized to identify patients who had undergone primary TKA between 2016 and 2021. ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) and CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes were then used to identify patients who underwent LOA for arthrofibrosis. The rates of PJI and rTKA were compared between patients who did and did not undergo LOA. Multivariable logistic and Cox regressions, controlling for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, and a body mass index of >30 kg/m2, were performed to compare the rates of PJI and revision between the LOA and no-LOA groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 383,143 patients were identified, of whom 703 had undergone arthroscopic LOA. Patients who underwent LOA had higher overall rates of PJI (2.7% versus 1.3%; p = 0.001) and all-cause revision (9.8% versus 1.8%; p < 0.001) than those who did not. Patients who underwent LOA had significantly higher odds of PJI (odds ratio [OR], 2.00; p < 0.014), aseptic loosening-related revision (OR, 3.31; p = 0.002), and all-cause revision (OR, 5.32; p < 0.001) within 1 year after the initial TKA. There was no significant difference in 1-year PJI-related revisions between the groups (OR, 1.71; p = 0.193). In a time-to-event analysis, patients undergoing LOA had significantly higher risks of PJI (p = 0.003) and all-cause revision (p = 0.001) but not PJI-related revision (p = 0.322) or aseptic loosening-related revision (p = 0.111).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic LOA after primary TKA was associated with higher rates of PJI and subsequent revision surgery. Surgeons should consider the results of these studies when counseling patients on the importance of early rehabilitation and improving modifiable risk factors after TKA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143648676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Identifying Risk Factors from Preoperative MRI Measurements for Failure of Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Nested Case-Control Study with 5-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Zhi-Yu Zhang, Wen-Bin Bai, Wei-Li Shi, Qing-Yang Meng, Xiao-Yu Pan, Xiao-Yue Fu, Jian-Quan Wang, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying patients at high risk for failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on the basis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements has received considerable attention. In this study, we aimed to identify potential risk factors for primary ACLR failure from preoperative MRI measurements and to determine optimal cutoff values for clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review and follow-up were conducted in this nested case-control study of patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft at our institution from August 2016 to January 2018. The failed ACLR group included 72 patients with graft failure within 5 years after primary ACLR, while the control group included 144 propensity score-matched patients without failure during the 5-year follow-up period. Preoperative MRI measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to determine the optimal cutoff values for the significant risk factors. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and survival analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the determined thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) (p = 0.0076), greater posterior tibial slope in the lateral compartment (LPTS) (p = 0.0002), and greater internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS) (p < 0.0001) were identified in the failed ACLR group compared with the control group. ROC analyses showed that the optimal cutoff values for IRTS and LPTS were 5.8 mm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.708; specificity, 89.6%; sensitivity, 41.7%) and 8.5° (AUC, 0.655; specificity, 71.5%; sensitivity, 62.5%), respectively. Patients who met the IRTS (OR, 6.14; hazard ratio [HR], 3.87) or LPTS threshold (OR, 4.19; HR, 3.07) demonstrated a higher risk of primary ACLR failure and were significantly more likely to experience ACLR failure in a shorter time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative MRI measurements of increased IRTS, LPTS, and LFCR were identified as risk factors for primary ACLR failure. The optimal cutoff value of 5.8 mm for IRTS and 8.5° for LPTS could be valuable in the perioperative management of primary ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Operative Treatment of Flail Chest Injuries Does Not Reduce Pain or In-Hospital Opioid Requirements: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Niloofar Dehghan, Jessica McGraw-Heinrich, Christine Schemitsch, Aaron Nauth, Jennifer Hidy, Milena Vicente, Emil H Schemitsch, Richard Jenkinson, Hans Kreder, Michael D McKee","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute flail chest injuries revealed more ventilator-free days in operatively treated patients who had been ventilated at the time of randomization. It has been suggested that surgery for these injuries may also improve a patient's pain and function. Our goal was to perform a secondary analysis of the previous RCT to evaluate pain and postinjury opioid requirements in patients with operatively and nonoperatively treated unstable chest wall injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a previous multicenter RCT that had been conducted from 2011 to 2019. Patients who had sustained acute, unstable chest wall injuries were randomized to operative or nonoperative treatment. In-hospital pain medication logs were evaluated, and daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated. The patients' symptoms were also assessed, including generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, and shortness of breath. Additionally, patients completed the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and they were followed for 1 year postinjury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the original trial, 207 patients were analyzed: 99 patients received nonoperative treatment, and 108 received operative treatment. There were no significant differences in pain medication usage between the 2 groups at any of the examined time points (p = 0.477). There were no significant differences in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath at any time postinjury in the 2 groups. There were also no significant differences in the SF-36 scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis of a previous RCT suggested that operative treatment of patients with flail chest injuries does not reduce in-hospital daily opioid requirements. There were also no reductions in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath with operative treatment. The SF-36 scores were similar for both groups. Further work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from operative treatment of flail chest injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143575644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Balancing Tumor Control and Cartilage Preservation for Patients with Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Around the Knee: A Clinical Report from a Single Institute.","authors":"Kuan-Lin Chen, Cheng-Fong Chen, Po-Kuei Wu, Pai-Han Wang, Tain-Hsiung Chen, Chao-Ming Chen, Wei-Ming Chen","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When managing aggressive giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) around the knee joint, surgeons are often caught in a dilemma when determining whether to perform marginal excision or intralesional curettage. The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of different treatment strategies in our institute.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 64 eligible cases (34 female and 30 male) with a GCTB (37 in the distal femur, 27 in the proximal tibia) treated from 2002 to 2013. Forty patients received intralesional curettage (group A). Twenty-four received marginal excision of the tumor, with 18 of them undergoing reconstruction with unicondylar osteoarticular allograft (UOA) (group B) and 6 receiving arthroplasty reconstruction (group C). The minimum follow-up was 8 years, and the oncological status, clinical outcomes, and cartilage condition were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor recurrence was most common in group A (10 of 40, 25.0%), followed by group B (1 of 18, 5.6%) and group C (0 of 6). Eleven patients in group A (27.5%) and 6 in group B (33.3%) developed osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or 4). Five patients in group A (12.5%) and 3 patients in group B (16.7%) received total knee arthroplasty. Risk factors for the development of osteoarthritis in group A included a centrally located tumor, tumor length of >6 cm, a tumor-cartilage distance of ≤3 mm, and >50% subchondral bone involvement. In group B, osteoarthritis mostly resulted from postoperative complications. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 87.9 in group A, 84.8 in group B, and 93.3 in group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although intralesional curettage preserved cartilage and resulted in better function, it was associated with a higher tumor recurrence rate in our series. For advanced tumors close to the articular cartilage with significant subchondral bone involvement, marginal excision with UOA reconstruction might be a viable alternative. Arthroplasty should be reserved for patients who have bicondylar involvement with severe bone and cartilage loss making cartilage preservation impossible.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examining Preoperative Risk Factors for Nerve Injury in Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations.","authors":"Jason Zarahi Amaral, Basel M Touban, Rebecca J Schultz, Pablo Coello, Benjamin M Martin, Jessica A McGraw-Heinrich, Scott D McKay","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00640","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk factors for fracture-related nerve injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations are not well understood. As such, this study aimed to determine the incidence of, and preoperative risk factors for, nerve injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≤18 years with acute Monteggia or Monteggia-equivalent fracture-dislocations that underwent reduction in the operating room, including closed reduction and casting under general anesthesia and internal fixation of the ulnar fracture with or without opening the radiocapitellar joint, from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included reduction in the emergency department, concomitant ipsilateral upper-extremity fractures, malunions, or patients without preoperative imaging. Nerve function was assessed preoperatively, and nerve injury was defined as persistent motor and/or sensory deficits on postoperative examination. Patients were followed until nerve-related symptoms resolved. Logistic regression controlled for age and fracture pattern to determine preoperative risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients (mean age, 6.4 ± 2.8 years), 18.2% (27) had preoperative nerve injury. The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) was injured in 15 patients, the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) was injured in 7 patients, and other nerves were injured in 6 patients. All the nerve injuries resolved spontaneously, with a mean resolution time of 63.6 days (range, 8 to 150 days). Risk factors for nerve injury included patient age of ≥8 years (odds ratio [OR], 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 22.8; p < 0.001), lateral radial head dislocation (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.0 to 22.4; p = 0.002), an open fracture (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 16.5; p = 0.025), and a comminuted ulnar fracture (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.2; p = 0.012). PIN injury was associated with lateral radial head dislocation (p < 0.001) and a comminuted ulnar fracture (p < 0.001). AIN injury was associated with an open fracture (p = 0.002) and diaphyseal ulnar fracture (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of preoperative nerve-related injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations was 18.2%. Risk factors for preoperative nerve injury included patient age of ≥8 years, lateral radial head dislocation, an open fracture, and a comminuted ulnar fracture. All the nerve injuries resolved within 150 days, suggesting that early operative intervention may be unnecessary.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Common Comorbidities and a Comparison of 4 Comorbidity Indices in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery.","authors":"Shalin S Patel, Theresa Nalty, Douglas H Fletcher, Timothy S Ballard, Spencer J Frink, Justin E Bird, Valerae O Lewis","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.22.01273","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.22.01273","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Comorbidity indices are used to help to estimate patients' length of hospital stay, care costs, outcomes, and mortality. Increasingly, they are considered in reimbursement models. The applicability of comorbidity indices to patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the predominant comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery and to evaluate the predictive value of these indices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Patient demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and preoperative comorbidities were collected retrospectively on 300 patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery between January 2014 and March 2023. In this study, 3 subsets of 100 patients each with malignant primary bone tumors, malignant primary soft-tissue tumors, or osseous metastatic disease were randomly selected. Comorbidities were tabulated and weighted according to the guidelines of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the National Institute on Aging/National Cancer Institute (NIA/NCI) index, the van Walraven Index, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Index. Two-tailed bivariate Pearson correlations were performed to assess the relationship between the indices and between each index and patient outcomes. Comorbidities in our patient population were compared with those published in other studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The predominant comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery were hypertension, deficiency anemias, metastatic disease, recent unintended weight loss or being underweight, and fluid or electrolyte disorders. The percentage of patients with certain comorbidities exceeded those reported in other cancer, orthopaedic, and inpatient populations. The 4 comorbidity indices had variable correlation when assessing our patient population. The number of comorbidities and the weighted scores from all indices demonstrated little to no correlation with length of stay and survival in our patient sample.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The prevalence of many comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery is greater than those reported in other patient populations. Commonly utilized indices demonstrate variable correlation with one another. With these tools, there was little to no correlation between comorbidities and patient outcomes in our patient population. The comorbidities deemed protective in these tools may underestimate the true assessment of the comorbidities in patients undergoing orthopaedic oncology surgery. This highlights the importance of developing tools to properly assess the comorbidities in defined patient populations, especially as these models are used to set benchmarks for measuring patient outcomes; assessing quality, efficiency, and safety; and determining reimbursement criteria.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Level of evidence: &lt;/strong&gt;Prognostic Level III . See Instruction","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"488-495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TXA Use in Adolescent Patients Undergoing Sarcoma Surgery: Commentary on an article by Ahmed Mohamed El Ghoneimy, MD, et al.: \"Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid Infusion Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss in Pediatric Limb-Salvage Surgeries. A Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial\".","authors":"Yi Guo","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01157","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 5","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143557057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multidimensional Approach for Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Patients with a Hip Fracture: Development and External Validation of the Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30).","authors":"Louis de Jong, Eveline de Haan, Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel, T Martijn Kuijper, Gert R Roukema","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01397","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop an accurate and clinically relevant prediction model for 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous study protocol was utilized as a guideline for data collection and as the standard for the hip fracture treatment. Two prospective, detailed hip fracture databases of 2 different hospitals (hospital A, training cohort; hospital B, testing cohort) were utilized to obtain data. On the basis of the literature, the results of a univariable analysis, and expert opinion, 26 candidate predictors of 30-day mortality were selected. Subsequently, the training of the model, including variable selection, was performed on the training cohort (hospital A) with use of adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. External validation was performed on the testing cohort (hospital B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,523 patients were analyzed, of whom 302 (8.6%) died within 30 days after surgery. After the LASSO analysis, 7 of the 26 variables were included in the prediction model: age, gender, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4, dementia, albumin level, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living total score, and residence in a nursing home. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 0.789 in the training cohort and 0.775 in the testing cohort. The calibration curve showed good consistency between observed and predicted 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Rotterdam Hip Fracture Mortality Prediction-30 Days (RHMP-30) was developed and externally validated, and showed adequate performance in predicting 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery. The RHMP-30 will be helpful for shared decision-making with patients regarding hip fracture treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"459-468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Spine-Abductor Syndrome: Novel Associations Between Lumbar Spine Disease and Hip Gluteal Muscle Pathology.","authors":"Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, David C Kaelber, George Grammatopoulos, Yasuhiro Homma, Atul F Kamath","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for gluteal tears include age-related deterioration, female sex, and increased body mass index. As the literature that supports the sagittal relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip is increasing, there may be a parallel relationship between the perturbations in spinopelvic alignment caused by lumbar spine disease and gluteal muscle tears. Because no prior studies other than single-institution series have reported on this phenomenon, we investigated spine-abductor syndrome at the population level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized TriNetX, a federated research network that continuously aggregates deidentified electronic health record data from >92 million patients across the United States. The relative risks of gluteal tear encounter diagnoses and procedures were calculated for patients with and without the following characteristics: age ≥45 years, female sex, obesity, lumbar spine diagnoses, lumbar spine injections, and lumbar spine surgery. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model, we also analyzed gluteal tear-free survival over a period of ≥10 years in subgroups of patients who had been diagnosed with lumbar pathology, had been administered a lumbar injection, or had received lumbar surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8,475,800 patients who had received lumbar spine diagnoses, undergone lumbar injections, and/or undergone lumbar surgeries, 458,311 patients (5.4%) had gluteal tears, representing a relative risk of 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]:13.6 to 13.6). After controlling for age, sex, and obesity, survival analysis showed markedly increased hazard ratios (HRs) for patients having a gluteal tear encounter diagnosis in the intervening 13 years (2010 to 2023) if they had had a previous lumbar spine pathology encounter diagnosis (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.1), had undergone lumbar spine injections (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 6.2 to 9.5), or had undergone lumbar spine surgery (HR: 6.6, 95% CI: 5.3 to 8.1) in 2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a strong association between lumbar spine pathology and abductor tears. Further biomechanical and neuroanatomic studies may elucidate the effects of lumbar spine disease in relation to gluteal tears. Additionally, there may be a need to optimize diagnostic protocols for lateral hip pain in patients with a history of lumbar spine disease.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"496-503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882372/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Surgery for Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly (SOFIE): Results of the SOFIE Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mithun A Joshi, Michael Le, Ryan Campbell, Brahman Sivakumar, John Limbers, Ian A Harris, Michael Symes","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00655","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The financial and resource burden of management of olecranon fractures in the elderly is likely to increase with an aging population. There is limited evidence guiding treatment choice in this cohort. This study aimed to determine whether operative treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients provides superior 12-month functional outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted across 24 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Patients aged ≥75 years presenting with an acute (within 14 days), displaced, closed, isolated olecranon fracture were included. Operative treatment involved reduction and stabilization using tension band wiring or plate fixation. Nonoperative treatment consisted of a sling for comfort and early movement as tolerated. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the DASH score at 3 months and pain, quality of life, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), active elbow range of motion, and complication rate at 3 and 12 months. Data were analyzed based on an intention-to-treat principle, with sensitivity analyses using as-treated groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were randomized, 27 to the operative group (mean age and standard deviation [SD], 83 ± 5.8 years; 22 [81%] females) and 33 to the nonoperative group (mean age, 82 ± 4.5 years; 23 [70%] females), with no significant difference in baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference (mean difference, -6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14.9 to 1.8; p = 0.12) in the mean DASH scores at 12 months (the primary outcome) between the operative (12.3 ± 14) and nonoperative (18.9 ± 18) groups. Although active elbow extension was significantly superior in the operative group at 12 months, no other secondary outcome differed significantly between groups at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found no significant difference in DASH scores at 12 months between the operative and nonoperative groups. This supports nonoperative treatment as a reasonable option for displaced stable olecranon fractures in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142949602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}