Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume最新文献

{"title":"Driving Impact, Together.","authors":"Mohit Bhandari","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.25.00306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.25.00306","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 9","pages":"909"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144026362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Operative Treatment of Flail Chest Injuries Does Not Reduce Pain or In-Hospital Opioid Requirements: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Niloofar Dehghan, Jessica McGraw-Heinrich, Christine Schemitsch, Aaron Nauth, Jennifer Hidy, Milena Vicente, Emil H Schemitsch, Richard Jenkinson, Hans Kreder, Michael D McKee","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01099","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute flail chest injuries revealed more ventilator-free days in operatively treated patients who had been ventilated at the time of randomization. It has been suggested that surgery for these injuries may also improve a patient's pain and function. Our goal was to perform a secondary analysis of the previous RCT to evaluate pain and postinjury opioid requirements in patients with operatively and nonoperatively treated unstable chest wall injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a previous multicenter RCT that had been conducted from 2011 to 2019. Patients who had sustained acute, unstable chest wall injuries were randomized to operative or nonoperative treatment. In-hospital pain medication logs were evaluated, and daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated. The patients' symptoms were also assessed, including generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, and shortness of breath. Additionally, patients completed the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and they were followed for 1 year postinjury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the original trial, 207 patients were analyzed: 99 patients received nonoperative treatment, and 108 received operative treatment. There were no significant differences in pain medication usage between the 2 groups at any of the examined time points (p = 0.477). There were no significant differences in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath at any time postinjury in the 2 groups. There were also no significant differences in the SF-36 scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This secondary analysis of a previous RCT suggested that operative treatment of patients with flail chest injuries does not reduce in-hospital daily opioid requirements. There were also no reductions in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath with operative treatment. The SF-36 scores were similar for both groups. Further work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from operative treatment of flail chest injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"928-935"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143575644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiation Shielding Effect of Surgical Loupes Compared with Lead-Lined Glasses and Plastic Face Shields.","authors":"Kyle Hardacker, Pierce Hardacker, Tucker Callanan, Alan Daniels, Janine Bacic, Rachel Schilkowsky, Michael Oumano, Eren Kuris","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00642","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00642","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy plays a crucial role in various medical procedures, especially in orthopaedic and spinal surgery. However, concerns have arisen regarding ocular radiation exposure given its association with posterior lens opacities and cataracts. Protective measures are essential to mitigate ocular radiation exposure. During spine surgery, loupes are frequently used but often lack lead lining. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of surgical loupes, as compared with lead glasses and plastic face shields, on ocular radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dosimeters were positioned anterior (unshielded) and posterior (shielded) to the lens of each type of eyewear: lead glasses, surgical loupes, and plastic face shields. Eyewear/dosimeters were exposed directly to the horizontal beam of a C-arm for 2 minutes of continuous fluoroscopy. This was repeated 20 times for each type of eyewear (40 total/eyewear, 120 times overall). Radiation doses were modeled with use of generalized estimating equations with a Gaussian distribution and identity link function. Separate models were employed for each outcome, including eyewear category (lead glasses, loupes, plastic shield) and dosimeter position (anterior/unshielded versus posterior/shielded).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiation dose was significantly lower in posterior compared with anterior dosimeters for lead glasses (0.00 versus 1,689.80 mRem; p < 0.001) and for loupes (20.27 versus 1,705.95 mRem; p < 0.001). The difference for plastic face shields did not reach significance (1,539.75 versus 1,701.45 mRem; p = 0.06). Lead glasses offered the most protection, followed by surgical loupes and then plastic shields, when comparing the shielded dosimeter readings (0.00 versus 20.27 versus 1,539.75; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). There was no significant difference in radiation dose for dosimeters placed anterior to lead glasses, loupes, and plastic face shields (1,689.80 versus 1,705.95 versus 1,701.45 mRem; p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lead glasses were most effective (∼100% reduction), followed by surgical loupes (97%), whereas plastic face shields showed no significant reduction in radiation dose. Surgical loupes can substantially reduce ocular radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgical loupes may offer ocular radiation protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"e43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143670029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examining Preoperative Risk Factors for Nerve Injury in Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations.","authors":"Jason Zarahi Amaral, Basel M Touban, Rebecca J Schultz, Pablo Coello, Benjamin M Martin, Jessica A McGraw-Heinrich, Scott D McKay","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00640","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00640","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk factors for fracture-related nerve injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations are not well understood. As such, this study aimed to determine the incidence of, and preoperative risk factors for, nerve injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≤18 years with acute Monteggia or Monteggia-equivalent fracture-dislocations that underwent reduction in the operating room, including closed reduction and casting under general anesthesia and internal fixation of the ulnar fracture with or without opening the radiocapitellar joint, from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included reduction in the emergency department, concomitant ipsilateral upper-extremity fractures, malunions, or patients without preoperative imaging. Nerve function was assessed preoperatively, and nerve injury was defined as persistent motor and/or sensory deficits on postoperative examination. Patients were followed until nerve-related symptoms resolved. Logistic regression controlled for age and fracture pattern to determine preoperative risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 patients (mean age, 6.4 ± 2.8 years), 18.2% (27) had preoperative nerve injury. The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) was injured in 15 patients, the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) was injured in 7 patients, and other nerves were injured in 6 patients. All the nerve injuries resolved spontaneously, with a mean resolution time of 63.6 days (range, 8 to 150 days). Risk factors for nerve injury included patient age of ≥8 years (odds ratio [OR], 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 22.8; p < 0.001), lateral radial head dislocation (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.0 to 22.4; p = 0.002), an open fracture (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 16.5; p = 0.025), and a comminuted ulnar fracture (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.2; p = 0.012). PIN injury was associated with lateral radial head dislocation (p < 0.001) and a comminuted ulnar fracture (p < 0.001). AIN injury was associated with an open fracture (p = 0.002) and diaphyseal ulnar fracture (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of preoperative nerve-related injury in pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations was 18.2%. Risk factors for preoperative nerve injury included patient age of ≥8 years, lateral radial head dislocation, an open fracture, and a comminuted ulnar fracture. All the nerve injuries resolved within 150 days, suggesting that early operative intervention may be unnecessary.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What's Important (Arts and Humanities): Learning to Feel: Surgery, Technology, and the Limits of Digital Training.","authors":"Sonal Kumar, Shelley Noland","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01454","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01454","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143604867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sagittal Spinal Profile in Patients with Lumbosacral Hemivertebra: Preoperative Status and Postoperative Evolution at a Mean Follow-up of 7.5 Years.","authors":"Zhuosong Bai, Haoran Zhang, Yuechuan Zhang, Tongyin Zhang, Xiangjie Yin, Yunze Han, Yiqiao Zhang, Qianyu Zhuang, Jianguo Zhang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00260","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lumbosacral hemivertebra (LSHV) presents a complex challenge in treating congenital scoliosis. Previous studies have proven the effectiveness of posterior LSHV resection. However, they have primarily focused on coronal balance, neglecting the sagittal alignment, which is crucial for spinal function. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess preoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with an LSHV and to evaluate the evolution of sagittal alignment following posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed that included 58 patients with LSHV who underwent posterior LSHV resection between 2010 and 2020 and had a mean follow-up duration of 7.5 years. All patients were Han Chinese, and 30 of the 58 patients were female. The mean age was 7.3 years. Sagittal balance parameters were measured preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points. Clinical outcomes were assessed with use of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 60.3% of patients presented with sagittal imbalance (defined as a sagittal vertical axis [SVA] of >20 mm). Postoperatively, the mean SVA significantly improved, decreasing to <20 mm at the 1-year follow-up (p = 0.016). The pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) also showed significant improvement at the immediate postoperative time point (p = 0.012) and at the last follow-up (p = 0.013). Patients who underwent anterior column reconstruction demonstrated better postoperative global sagittal balance than those who did not (SVA, p = 0.015; PI-LL, p < 0.001). SRS-22 total, self-image, and satisfaction scores significantly (p < 0.001) improved postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted the prevalence of preoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with an LSHV and emphasized the impact of LSHV resection (particularly when accompanied by anterior column reconstruction) in achieving postoperative sagittal balance and in enhancing patient quality of life during the long-term follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"919-927"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Refractures in Children.","authors":"Oskari Pakarinen, Matti Ahonen, Petra Grahn, Ilkka Helenius, Topi Laaksonen","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01014","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures are common in children, but knowledge about refractures has been limited. This study aimed to determine the rate of radiographically confirmed refractures within 2 years of the primary fracture in children and to analyze the association between fracture stability and refracture risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who were <16 years of age and had at least 2 fractures in the same bone between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed from the Helsinki University Hospitals' electronic pediatric treatment register, KIDS Fracture Tool. Patients' radiographs and records were evaluated. Patients with subsequent fractures in different parts of the bone than the primary fracture, patients with pathological fractures, and patients with a systemic condition predisposing to fractures were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 20,749 fractures, 163 consecutive fractures in the same bone within 2 years were identified. After exclusions, 100 cases (0.48% of all fractures) remained, with 83 occurring within 1 year and 17 occurring in the second year after the primary fracture. Refracture rates were highest in diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures (3.76% [43 of 1,144]), diaphyseal tibial fractures (1.01% [7 of 693]), distal forearm fractures (0.55% [27 of 4,949]), and distal humeral fractures (0.49% [11 of 2,227]). The median time to refracture was 73 days (interquartile range [IQR], 56 to 131 days) for the distal forearm, 109 days (IQR, 79 to 169 days) for the diaphyseal tibia, 124 days (IQR, 80 to 178 days) for the diaphyseal forearm, and 426 days (IQR, 243 to 660 days) for the distal humerus. Displaced fractures requiring closed reduction had a significantly higher refracture risk compared with other fractures: relative risk (RR), 8.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 to 14) compared with stable fractures; RR, 5.0 (95% CI, 2.9 to 8.7) compared with fractures that had acceptable position but might be unstable and required follow-up; and RR, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.8 to 5.7) compared with fractures requiring fixation and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall refracture rate in children was approximately 0.5%, with the highest rates in both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures. The median time to refracture varied significantly by anatomic location, and displaced fractures treated with closed reduction were associated with a higher refracture risk.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"e40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047644/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Association Between Tourniquet Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison.","authors":"Brian Gibbs, Jhase Sniderman, Shariq Mohammed, Michael Kain, David Freccero, Ayesha Abdeen","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00266","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed elective procedures in North America. While advancements have been made in patient optimization, surgical technique, and implant design, tourniquet use remains a contentious issue as it relates to patient outcomes and postoperative experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the PEPPER trial, we identified 5,684 patients who underwent primary TKA, of whom 4,866 (85.6%) underwent surgery with a tourniquet (the YT group) and 818 (14.4%) underwent surgery without a tourniquet (the NT group). The cohort was predominantly female (60.8%), White (77%), and of an ethnicity other than Hispanic or Latino (96.8%). The mean age of the patients was 64.6 ± 9.2 years. The primary outcomes were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS JR); Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health Summary (PROMIS-PH10); and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), which were captured preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, discharge disposition, analgesic consumption, and postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the associations between tourniquet use and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TKA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentages of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the KOOS JR were significantly different at 1 month only (YT, 55.4%; NT, 47.9%). This difference disappeared at 3 and 6 months. There was no difference between the YT and NT groups in terms of the percentage of patients achieving the MCID for the PROMIS-PH10 or NPRS at any time point. There were no differences between the YT and NT groups at any time point with respect to the KOOS JR, PROMIS-PH10, and NPRS. There were no differences in opioid consumption, operative time, length of stay, wound-related complications, or readmissions postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tourniquet use was associated with more patients achieving the MCID for the KOOS JR at 1 month compared with no tourniquet use. This difference disappeared at 3 and 6 months. At 1, 3, and 6 months, there were no differences in opioid consumption, health-care utilization, or complications between patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Tourniquet use did not have a clinically meaningful impact on PROMs in the multivariable analysis. Arthroplasty surgeons may use these data during preoperative discussions with patients regarding tourniquet use as it relates to the surgeon's preference and how it could influence postoperative function.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"976-984"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143670021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk Stratification in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Important Adjustment for Value-Based Health Care and Quality Measurement.","authors":"Alex B Boyle, Andreea R Lucaciu, David N Bernstein, Mitchel B Harris, Anoop Prasad, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00034","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>➢ Risk stratification in orthopaedic surgery is complex and depends on the outcome of interest and multiple interdependent factors. Effective risk stratification has uses for limiting and predicting adverse events in patients undergoing discretionary surgery, avoiding the penalization of surgeons for operating on candidates whose health is situated in more difficult circumstances, and ensuring that inordinate attention is not placed on discrete musculoskeletal pathophysiology when there are other pressing health priorities.➢ For individual patient decision-making, no comprehensive risk-stratification tool currently exists, in part due to the heterogeneity of orthopaedic procedures performed and the diverse patient population treated. The Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure and the Risk Stratification Index 3.0 appear to be most promising.➢ At a population level, risk stratification may be useful in alternative payment models to ensure that hospitals that treat a disproportionate number of high-risk patients are not penalized and that cherry-picking (preferentially selecting only healthier patients with a lower risk of complications) does not occur. Any attempt to risk-stratify may have unintended consequences.➢ Orthopaedic surgeons must be aware of the tools available, their strengths, and their limitations in order to be included in decision-making as payment models and public health policies are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"1005-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143735640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Femoral Neck System Compared with 3 Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 60 and Older: A Multicenter Registry-Based Study.","authors":"Zachary O Mallon, Heather A Prentice, Adam M Schlauch, Brian H Fasig, Elizabeth W Paxton, Cameron Sadeghi, Kanu Okike","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00781","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the Femoral Neck System (FNS) is increasingly utilized for the fixation of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, studies comparing the device to the historical standard (that is, multiple cannulated screws) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of all-cause revision following fixation with the FNS device compared with multiple cannulated screws in patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥60 years of age who underwent fixation of a femoral neck fracture with the FNS or 3 cannulated screws (2017 to 2022) were identified using the Kaiser Permanente Hip Fracture Registry. Exclusion criteria were polytrauma, pathologic fracture, open fracture, additional surgeries at other sites during the same hospital stay, and prior procedures on the affected hip. The primary outcome measure was all-cause revision surgery, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards or logistic regression was performed, controlling for a wide range of potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 352 FNS and 1,686 cannulated-screw repairs were included. The overall incidence of revision at 2 years was 4.0% and 4.8% for the FNS and cannulated-screw constructs, respectively. Mortality at 2 years was 23.6% and 25.2%, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, no difference in all-cause revision risk was observed when comparing the FNS to cannulated screws (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.71; p = 0.79). A subgroup analysis of procedures performed by surgeons who used both devices also did not demonstrate a difference in revision rates (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.39 to 2.17; p = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of patients ≥60 years of age with a femoral neck fracture, the rates of all-cause revision and mortality were found to be similar between the FNS and multiple cannulated screws.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"958-967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143736090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}