International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Making sense of academia-industry gap in the evolving cloud service brokerage 理解不断发展的云服务经纪中学术界和工业界的差距
Bimlesh Wadhwa, A. Jaitly, Bharti Suri
{"title":"Making sense of academia-industry gap in the evolving cloud service brokerage","authors":"Bimlesh Wadhwa, A. Jaitly, Bharti Suri","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593858","url":null,"abstract":"Two key elements to bridge the academia-industry gap are communication and collaboration. The purpose of any such effort is co-creation of knowledge and developing continually informed relationships. Cloud computing has got a significant interest from both academia and industry. It offers a myriad of possibilities for software engineering researchers to study the development of multilateral software. With cloud-based products and services growing exponentially in their popularity and usage, there grew a need for a business model to effectively manage cloud costs, resources, capacity, agility and flexibility [3]. Cloud Service Brokers (CSBs) have emerged as a solution to address this growing need and facilitate smooth cloud adoption, management, migration and maintenance for cloud users and providers [4] [5]. According to Gartner, the CSB sector is expected to grow to a whopping $ 100 Billion in revenue by the end of 2014 [1]. However, there is an evident void in the academic research space in the area of CSBs. For example, owing to the absence of a centralized registry of the CSB utilities, it is extremely difficult for cloud users to select a CSB. In this paper, we provide an analysis of industry and academia role in this area highlighting industry issues in which academia can participate.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129913010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
A formal systems engineering approach in practice: an experience report 实践中的正式系统工程方法:经验报告
Wolfgang Böhm, Maximilian Junker, Andreas Vogelsang, Sabine Teufl, Ralf Pinger, Karsten Rahn
{"title":"A formal systems engineering approach in practice: an experience report","authors":"Wolfgang Böhm, Maximilian Junker, Andreas Vogelsang, Sabine Teufl, Ralf Pinger, Karsten Rahn","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593856","url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a successful research transfer project executed in collaboration between Siemens AG, fortiss GmbH and Technische Universität München. The goal of the project was to evaluate if the SPES modeling framework (SPES MF), which has recently been developed by an industrial and academic consortium, and which is implemented within the tool AutoFOCUS3, can be directly applied to a real-life, productive, industrial system. To achieve this, we performed a case study, in which we created models for requirements and functionality for a part of a Siemens train automation system. The results indicate that the SPES MF can indeed be beneficially used in this context. Furthermore, by applying such a structured modeling approach, we were able to reveal several issues in the original requirements specifications. In this paper, we report on our experiences in setting up and performing such kind of collaboration between industry and academia. We discuss the success factors as well as problems that we encountered during the project.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130511279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Overcoming challenges in collaboration between research and practice: the agile research network 克服研究与实践协作中的挑战:敏捷研究网络
H. Sharp, Laura Plonka, Katie Taylor, Peggy Gregory
{"title":"Overcoming challenges in collaboration between research and practice: the agile research network","authors":"H. Sharp, Laura Plonka, Katie Taylor, Peggy Gregory","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593859","url":null,"abstract":"There is wide acceptance in the software engineering field that industry and research can gain significantly from each other and there have been several initiatives for encouraging collaboration between the two. However there are some often-quoted challenges in this kind of collaboration. For example, that the timescales of research and practice are incompatible, that research is not seen as relevant for practice, and that research demands a different kind of rigour than practice supports. These are complex challenges that are not always easy to overcome. For the last year we have been using an approach designed to address some of these challenges and to bridge the gap between research and practice, specifically in the agile software development arena. So far we have collaborated successfully with two partners and have investigated two practitioner-driven challenges with agile. In this short paper we will introduce the approach, how it addresses the collaboration challenges between research and practice, and describe the lessons learned from our experience.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121979268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
An exploratory study on reuse at google 谷歌重用的探索性研究
V. Bauer, J. Eckhardt, B. Hauptmann, M. Klimek
{"title":"An exploratory study on reuse at google","authors":"V. Bauer, J. Eckhardt, B. Hauptmann, M. Klimek","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593854","url":null,"abstract":"Software reuse is a challenging and multifaceted topic. Significant research effort has been spent to address technical and organizational aspects. However, adoption of proposed practices and novel approaches often proceeds slowly. Additionally, little is known on how reuse is currently effected in practice and which solutions have proven useful. This paper aims to shed light on the matter by studying the current practice of reuse at Google. We conduct an exploratory study with a total of 49 participants of which 39 answered our online questionnaire and 10 participated in our 1h interviews. We assess reuse practices, success factors and challenges and collect ideas for improvement. We distill our findings to provide practitioners with examples of scalable reuse practices and detail on prerequisites required to implement/tailor a similar reuse approach. Furthermore, we point out open issues to support researchers and practitioners alike to align their efforts for developing solutions.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126973779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
Confessions of an industrial researcher: a typical bollywood story (invited talk) 一个工业研究者的自白:一个典型的宝莱坞故事(特邀演讲)
Thomas Zimmermann
{"title":"Confessions of an industrial researcher: a typical bollywood story (invited talk)","authors":"Thomas Zimmermann","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593851","url":null,"abstract":"There’s a guy. There’s a girl. In the beginning they don’t like each other. Then they fall in love but when they fall in love their families do not accept. In the end, how they unite is the story of many Bollywood movies. Research-practice partnerships are similar. How research and practice can overcome hurdles and join together is the topic of this talk. \u0000 At Microsoft Research I am in the fortunate position of being able to bridge two worlds. As part of my work, I collaborate with engineers from large-scale software projects at Microsoft as well as students and professors from universities all over the world. I will describe the collaboration model of the Empirical Software Engineering (ESE) group at Microsoft Research and share my experiences based on several successful collaborations over the past years. I will discuss best practices, challenges, common mistakes, and lessons learned based on several empirical studies related to refactoring, bug reporting, and analytics in general.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133495635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Certus: glimpses of a centre for research-based innovation in software verification and validation Certus:一个以研究为基础的软件验证和验证创新中心的一瞥
S. Sen
{"title":"Certus: glimpses of a centre for research-based innovation in software verification and validation","authors":"S. Sen","doi":"10.1145/2593850.2593857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593850.2593857","url":null,"abstract":"What is gratifying to a software engineering researcher? Three of many possible answers to this question are (a) the in- tellectual exercise in developing/disseminating approaches that address novel challenges (b) recognition from impact in a community of researchers (c) widespread use of novel ideas, including software, in the society at large leading to enhancement of human ability and job creation. A culmina- tion of these sources requires an organizational effort. This article presents glimpses of a research-based innovation cen- tre, Certus, to facilitate such a culmination for software engi- neering researchers. Certus has established a body of knowl- edge, methods and tools for the validation and verication (V&V) of software systems in the local Norwegian indus- try. Certus works in close cooperation with five founding user partners and is hosted by the Simula Research Labo- ratory. We present the organizational structure of Certus and describe how Certus's life and health is planned and evaluated on a regular basis as a research-based innovation centre. We hope that this document will serve as a ba- sis to encourage national/international funding schemes to create call for proposals for long-term research-based inno- vation centres. This, we believe, is one way to justify use of tax payers resources in creating a win-win situation for the triple helix: government, researchers and industry.","PeriodicalId":149332,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practices","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115625530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信