Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter最新文献_第4页

Frater Bercaldus – Berealdus – Bertholdus de Maisberch: Analysen und Dokumente zu Johann Albert Fabricius’ Hinweisen auf Berthold von Moosburg 弗雷特·贝尔杜思—贝尔库德斯·贝里齐:对乔恩·艾尔伯特·法里齐乌斯的分析和文件的回顾指向马克斯堡的文章

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2017-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.00005.jec

Udo Reinhold Jeck

{"title":"Frater Bercaldus – Berealdus – Bertholdus de Maisberch: Analysen und Dokumente zu Johann Albert Fabricius’ Hinweisen auf Berthold von Moosburg","authors":"Udo Reinhold Jeck","doi":"10.1075/bpjam.00005.jec","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00005.jec","url":null,"abstract":"In early modernity, church historians initially showed little interest in Berthold of Moosburg. They knew him as a commentator of Proclus, but they did not recognise his importance for the history of Neoplatonism. The librarians and bibliographers who came across Berthold’s commentary on Proclus in the Balliol College Library at Oxford showed no interest in the philosophical content of this work. An article on Berthold in the monumental work Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum (1719) summarised the available information. It was Johann Albert Fabricius (1668–1736) who took notice of it. Fabricius was very interested in Proclus as well as in Neoplatonic theology and its narration in the Elements of Theology; he had started to collect all available information regarding this issue and had also come across Berthold’s commentary. However, he did not ignore him, as many had done before, but properly recognised the importance of Berthold for the history of the reception of Proclus’s philosophy. Fabricius always referred to the Dominican thinker when dealing with Proclus’s Elements of Theology, in particular in his own Bibliotheca graeca. One of the attentive readers of this work was the German philologist Friedrich Creuzer. In 1822, within the framework of publishing Neoplatonic writings, Creuzer reedited Proclus’s Elements of Theology. As a consequence of this new edition, Proclus together with his medieval commentator came into the focus of leading representatives of classical German philosophy.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114286283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Die Harmonisierung platonischer und aristotelischer Ontologie im neuplatonischen Kategorienkommentar 柏拉图和亚里士多德灵魂起源合而为一

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2017-12-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.00003.wel

T. Welt

引用次数: 0

Platons Darlegung des Sokratischen ‚Umsonst‘ in den Dialogen der ersten Tetralogie (Euthyphron, Apologie, Kriton und Phaidon) 柏拉图的律例Sokratischen‚免费’的对话中第Tetralogie (Euthyphron Apologie Kriton和Phaidon)

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.01QUE

Andrés Quero-Sánchez

{"title":"Platons Darlegung des Sokratischen ‚Umsonst‘ in den Dialogen der ersten Tetralogie (Euthyphron, Apologie, Kriton und Phaidon)","authors":"Andrés Quero-Sánchez","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.18.01QUE","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.18.01QUE","url":null,"abstract":"The author interprets the dialogues belonging to Plato’s first Tetralogy, i. e. Euthyphro,\u0000Apology, Crito and Phaedo, as a coherent whole, in which the concept of ‘gratuitousness’\u0000plays the leading role. The expression ‘gratuitous’ does not mean here, however,\u0000‘arbitrary’ or ‘as someone likes’ but rather ‘free’, ‘gratis’, ‘for nothing’. Based on\u0000such an interpretation the author discusses then the important similarities existing\u0000between – on the one hand – Plato’s metaphysics of ‘gratuitousness’ and – on\u0000the other hand – Meister Eckhart’s ‘mystics’ (in which the concept of ‘why-less’\u0000being [wesen sunder warumbe] is crucial) and Schelling’s Philosophy of Identity\u0000(in which the concept of ‘absolute’ being plays the fundamental role). These three\u0000thinkers are all interested in the world as it is not merely for us or for something\u0000else – that is not in the world as it merely appears to someone under particular\u0000given conditions –, but in the world as it is in itself. However, this distinction\u0000between ‘appearances’ and ‘things-in-themselves’ is not to be thought as an epistemological\u0000but rather as an ethical or existential one, which is not related to the\u0000way how we ‘can know’ the world but rather to the way how we ‘should live’ in it.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115690208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Norbert Winkler (Hrsg.), Von der wirkenden und möglichen Vernunft. Philosophie in der volkssprachigen Predigt nach Meister Eckhart 另一个内涵。通过艾克哈特大师的民间传说中的哲学

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.19SCH

F. Schweitzer

引用次数: 0

Porphyry’s Definitions of Death and their Interpretation in Georgian and Byzantine Tradition 斑岩对死亡的定义及其在格鲁吉亚和拜占庭传统中的解释

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.02ALE

L. Alexidze

{"title":"Porphyry’s Definitions of Death and their Interpretation in Georgian and Byzantine Tradition","authors":"L. Alexidze","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.18.02ALE","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.18.02ALE","url":null,"abstract":"Beginning from Plato, there exists a philosophical tradition, which interprets philosophy\u0000as preparation for death. However, for Plato the death of a philosopher\u0000does not necessarily imply death in its ordinary meaning, but rather a spiritual\u0000way of life maximally free from corporeal affections. This kind of relationship between philosophy and death was intensively discussed\u0000in late antique philosophy, Patristics, medieval Byzantine philosophy, and\u0000also in medieval Georgian literature. Based on Plato’s and Plotinus’ philosophy,\u0000Porphyry presented definitions of three kinds of death in his Sententiae (8; 9; 23):\u0000(1) ‘death’ of a philosopher, (2) natural death, (3) ‘death’ of a soul.\u0000The aim of this paper is to provide a philosophical analysis of three concepts\u0000of death in the post-Porphyrian tradition, mainly in Byzantine and Georgian\u0000texts. The paper is based on the analysis of the above mentioned issues in the texts\u0000of Porphyry (also of Plotinus, as of his predecessor), Macrobius, Michael Psellos,\u0000as well as in the old Georgian versions of the works of Ammonios Hermiae, John\u0000of Damascus and John Sinaites. We also take into consideration the views on\u0000the relation between philosophy and death in the thought of the philosophers\u0000of Humanism and Renaissance, such as Georgios Gemistos Plethon, Marsilio\u0000Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, and Michel de Montaigne, whether or not\u0000and to what extent their views on the relation between philosophy and death are\u0000different from the theories of ancient and medieval Platonists.","PeriodicalId":148050,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130517746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Manfred Gerwing, Johannes Quidort von Paris († 1306). De antichristo et de fine mundi – Vom Antichrist und vom Ende der Welt 曼弗雷德Gerwing;约翰福音Quidort巴黎(†1306).反基督教与万迪与末日

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.18SCH

F. Schweitzer

引用次数: 0

“Wondrous Paths”: the Ismāʿīlī context of Saadya’s ‘Commentary on Sefer Yeṣira’ “奇妙之路”:萨迪亚《塞弗尔注释Yeṣira》的ismu - al - i语境

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.03STR

S. Stroumsa

引用次数: 3

Jürgen Mittelstraß, Die griechische Denkform. Von der Entstehung der Philosophie aus dem Geiste der Geometrie "尤尔根中校，希腊思想的特色"从几何学中产生的哲学

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.18.11duf

Stefan Düfel

引用次数: 0

Franz Brentano, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles 弗兰茨·布雷特诺，来自于阳光之父又源于亚里士多德

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/BPJAM.18.13JUN

C. Jung

引用次数: 0

Nicholas of Amsterdam on Universal Knowledge 阿姆斯特丹的尼古拉斯论宇宙知识

Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI: 10.1075/bpjam.18.08plu

O. Pluta

引用次数: 0