发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Efficiency of two commercial ELISA kits compared with the BAM culture method for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods. 两种商用ELISA试剂盒与BAM培养法检测天然污染食品中李斯特菌的效率比较。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.819
C. W. Noah, N. C. Ramos, Gipson Mv
{"title":"Efficiency of two commercial ELISA kits compared with the BAM culture method for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods.","authors":"C. W. Noah, N. C. Ramos, Gipson Mv","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.819","url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of 2 commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Listeria-Tek and Tecra) for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods was evaluated and compared with that of the culture method described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Both ELISAs use modified University of Vermont (UVM-1) medium as a primary enrichment; the BAM method uses Listeria enrichment broth. Secondary enrichments for Listeria-Tek and Tecra, respectively, were Fraser broth and UVM-2, which contains additional acriflavin-HCl. When ELISA test results differed, secondary enrichments were tested against the other ELISA; Fraser broth was used to determine recovery rates because of its superiority over UVM-2. Of the 178 food samples examined, the presence of Listeria was detected and culturally confirmed in 38, 37, and 40 samples by the BAM, Listeria-Tek, and Tecra methods, respectively. Differences in results of the ELISAs compared with those of the BAM method were not statistically significant; however, differences between results of the 2 ELISA methods were significant. It was concluded that as rapid screening methods, the Listeria-Tek and the Tecra kits qualify as alternative methods to the BAM cultural method.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"44 1","pages":"819-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78907041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
New trends in analytical technology and methods for pesticide residue analysis. 农药残留分析技术和方法的新动向。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
J E Conaway
{"title":"New trends in analytical technology and methods for pesticide residue analysis.","authors":"J E Conaway","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"715-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12947399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New trends in analytical technology and methods for pesticide residue analysis. 农药残留分析技术和方法的新动向。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.715
J. Conaway
{"title":"New trends in analytical technology and methods for pesticide residue analysis.","authors":"J. Conaway","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.715","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"20 1","pages":"715-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72933629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Comparison of an ELISA-based screening test with liquid chromatography for the determination of aflatoxins in corn. elisa筛选法与液相色谱法测定玉米中黄曲霉毒素的比较。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.827
R. W. Beaver, M. A. James, T. Lin
{"title":"Comparison of an ELISA-based screening test with liquid chromatography for the determination of aflatoxins in corn.","authors":"R. W. Beaver, M. A. James, T. Lin","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.827","url":null,"abstract":"An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test (CITE PROBE) was compared to liquid chromatography (LC) for the determination of aflatoxins in naturally contaminated corn samples. The CITE PROBE, with a positive/negative cutoff of 5 ng/g aflatoxin B1, was correct (based on LC results) on 47 of 51 samples. Two of the incorrect responses by the CITE PROBE were false positives on samples containing 4.4 ng/g and 4.1 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. Another incorrect response was a false negative on a sample containing 5.5 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. The fourth incorrect response was a false positive on a sample containing 1.9 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. On the basis of these results, the CITE PROBE was determined to be a reliable screening method for the detection of greater than or equal to 5 ng/g aflatoxins in corn.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"1 1","pages":"827-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89179985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Residue analysis of glyphosate and its principal metabolite in certain cereals, oilseeds, and pulses by liquid chromatography and postcolumn fluorescence detection. 用液相色谱法和柱后荧光检测法分析某些谷物、油籽和豆类中草甘膦及其主要代谢物的残留。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.842
Y. Wigfield, M. Lanouette
{"title":"Residue analysis of glyphosate and its principal metabolite in certain cereals, oilseeds, and pulses by liquid chromatography and postcolumn fluorescence detection.","authors":"Y. Wigfield, M. Lanouette","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.842","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.842","url":null,"abstract":"A postcolumn liquid chromatographic method to determine the extractable residues of glyphosate (GLYPH) and its principal metabolite, (aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA), in various cereals and beans is described. The finely ground sample is extracted with a mixture of chloroform and water, and the resulting aqueous layer is passed through a cation exchange column. The eluate is adjusted to pH 7-10 and passed through an anion exchange column. The second column is eluted with 0.3M HCl solution and the resulting acidic eluate is analyzed with liquid chromatography coupled with postcolumn fluorescence detection. The mean recoveries for GLYPH in barley, canola, dry pea, flax, soybean, wheat, and white bean ranged from 90.0 to 98.1%, with coefficients of variation (CV) from 2.9 to 10.0% and limits of detection (LOD) from 0.07 to 0.14 ppm. Similarly, mean recoveries for AMPA in the same crops ranged from 87.4 to 98.9%, with CV from 4.6 to 7.7 and LOD from 0.05 to 0.12 ppm. Using this method, an analyst can routinely analyze 6 samples per 1.5 days. The advantages of this procedure are discussed.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"26 1","pages":"842-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90975570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Postharvest-applied agrochemicals and their residues in fresh fruits and vegetables. 采后施用的农药及其在新鲜水果和蔬菜中的残留。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
E Papadopoulou-Mourkidou
{"title":"Postharvest-applied agrochemicals and their residues in fresh fruits and vegetables.","authors":"E Papadopoulou-Mourkidou","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many agrochemicals are applied postharvest on fruits and vegetables to extend their lives and preserve quality during storage, transport, and marketing. Persistence and distribution of residues on the edible portions of produce have been reported for citrus fruits, pome fruits, stone fruits, mangos, strawberries, bananas, kiwi fruits, avocados, some minor fruit commodities, and bell peppers and tomatoes. Data on the persistance and residues of the fungicides benomyl, biphenyl, sec-butylamine, captan, carbendazim, dicloran, fosetyl-aluminum, guazatine, imazalli, iprodione, metalaxyl, o-phenylphenol, prochloraz, thiabendazole, thiophanate-methyl, triadimeton, and vinclozolin, the fumigants ethylene dibromide, methyl bromide, and sulfur dioxide, the insecticides dimethoate and fenthion, the antiscald compounds diphenylamine and ethoxyquin, and the growth regulators 2,4-D and daminozide are presented and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"745-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12945804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FDA monitoring program. Residues in foods--1990. FDA监控程序。食品残留物——1990年。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
N J Yess
{"title":"FDA monitoring program. Residues in foods--1990.","authors":"N J Yess","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1990, under regulatory monitoring, a total of 19,962 samples of domestically produced food from all 50 states and Puerto Rico and imported food from 92 countries were analyzed by FDA for pesticide residues. Of these, 19,146 were surveillance samples, which are collected when there is no suspicion of a pesticide problem. No residues were found in 60% of domestic surveillance samples and in 64% of import surveillance samples. Of the 19,146 surveillance samples, 2.8% were violative. Under the incidence/level aspect of monitoring, 172 samples of fish/shell-fish, 330 samples of whole milk, and 3502 samples of processed foods including baby foods were analyzed for pesticide residues. Findings from these projects were consistent with regulatory monitoring data. The findings of the 1990 Total Diet Study are evidence that actual dietary intakes of pesticides are generally well below the standards established by FAO/WHO and by EPA. The 1990 results are similar to those obtained in earlier years and demonstrate the continuing safety of the food supply relative to pesticide residues.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"121A-141A"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12945805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of an ELISA-based screening test with liquid chromatography for the determination of aflatoxins in corn. elisa筛选法与液相色谱法测定玉米中黄曲霉毒素的比较。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
R W Beaver, M A James, T Y Lin
{"title":"Comparison of an ELISA-based screening test with liquid chromatography for the determination of aflatoxins in corn.","authors":"R W Beaver,&nbsp;M A James,&nbsp;T Y Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test (CITE PROBE) was compared to liquid chromatography (LC) for the determination of aflatoxins in naturally contaminated corn samples. The CITE PROBE, with a positive/negative cutoff of 5 ng/g aflatoxin B1, was correct (based on LC results) on 47 of 51 samples. Two of the incorrect responses by the CITE PROBE were false positives on samples containing 4.4 ng/g and 4.1 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. Another incorrect response was a false negative on a sample containing 5.5 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. The fourth incorrect response was a false positive on a sample containing 1.9 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. On the basis of these results, the CITE PROBE was determined to be a reliable screening method for the detection of greater than or equal to 5 ng/g aflatoxins in corn.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"827-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12945809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recovery of Salmonella from shell eggs. 从带壳鸡蛋中回收沙门氏菌。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
P Stephenson, F B Satchell, G Allen, W H Andrews
{"title":"Recovery of Salmonella from shell eggs.","authors":"P Stephenson,&nbsp;F B Satchell,&nbsp;G Allen,&nbsp;W H Andrews","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A preenrichment procedure and a direct selective enrichment procedure were compared for recovery of Salmonella artificially inoculated into liquid whole egg, egg yolk, and egg albumen. For liquid whole egg and egg yolk, the 2 procedures were comparable. With egg albumen, however, preenrichment in lactose broth gave significantly higher recoveries than did direct selective enrichment in either selenite cystine or tetrathlonate broths. The lactose preenrichment procedure was used to determine the survival of S. enteritidis in egg yolk and egg albumen over a period of 7 days. As shown by most probably number determinations, counts of S. enteritidis inoculated into egg albumen decreased by 3 log units, whereas those in egg yolk did not change significantly. It is recommended, therefore, that only the egg yolk be examined for this pathogen. In a comparison of 5 different preenrichment media (lactose broth, brain heart infusion broth, trypticase soy broth, buffered peptone water, and nutrient broth), lactose broth was somewhat less productive than the other 4 media for the recovery of Salmonella from egg yolks. Trypticase soy broth gave the highest recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"821-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12945738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficiency of two commercial ELISA kits compared with the BAM culture method for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods. 两种商用ELISA试剂盒与BAM培养法检测天然污染食品中李斯特菌的效率比较。
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists Pub Date : 1991-09-01
C W Noah, N C Ramos, M V Gipson
{"title":"Efficiency of two commercial ELISA kits compared with the BAM culture method for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods.","authors":"C W Noah,&nbsp;N C Ramos,&nbsp;M V Gipson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficiency of 2 commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Listeria-Tek and Tecra) for detecting Listeria in naturally contaminated foods was evaluated and compared with that of the culture method described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Both ELISAs use modified University of Vermont (UVM-1) medium as a primary enrichment; the BAM method uses Listeria enrichment broth. Secondary enrichments for Listeria-Tek and Tecra, respectively, were Fraser broth and UVM-2, which contains additional acriflavin-HCl. When ELISA test results differed, secondary enrichments were tested against the other ELISA; Fraser broth was used to determine recovery rates because of its superiority over UVM-2. Of the 178 food samples examined, the presence of Listeria was detected and culturally confirmed in 38, 37, and 40 samples by the BAM, Listeria-Tek, and Tecra methods, respectively. Differences in results of the ELISAs compared with those of the BAM method were not statistically significant; however, differences between results of the 2 ELISA methods were significant. It was concluded that as rapid screening methods, the Listeria-Tek and the Tecra kits qualify as alternative methods to the BAM cultural method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"74 5","pages":"819-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12945807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信