发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Public Deliberation最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners 参与性和审议性从业者在澳大利亚:工作环境如何创造不同类型的从业者
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.343
Helen E. Christensen
{"title":"Participatory and Deliberative Practitioners in Australia: How Work Context Creates Different Types of Practitioners","authors":"Helen E. Christensen","doi":"10.16997/JDD.343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.343","url":null,"abstract":"Public institutions in Australia are subject to increasing statutory requirements to engage their communities, and consequently the number of practitioners has increased. These participatory and deliberative practitioners design, deliver, and evaluate democratic processes on behalf of public institutions. This article argues that the practitioner body has broadened, where different types of practitioners can now be identified in Australia. This broadening is the result of three main variables: (1) whether practitioners are employed by or contracted to public institutions; (2) whether they are engaged to work on projects with limited or considerable scope; and (3) whether they are focused on limited time frame processes or entire programs. Drawing on the results of a mixed method study, including survey and semi-structured interviews, this article explores the work contexts that shape the contemporary Australian practitioner, drawing lessons that can inform their practice in other contexts.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129438222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Stories Communities Tell: How Deliberative Practitioners Can Work with Community Narratives 社区讲述的故事:深思熟虑的从业者如何与社区叙事合作
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.344
Lori L. Britt, R. Alexander
{"title":"Stories Communities Tell: How Deliberative Practitioners Can Work with Community Narratives","authors":"Lori L. Britt, R. Alexander","doi":"10.16997/JDD.344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.344","url":null,"abstract":"How do past experiences of public engagement shape the way communities view the role of public input today? In this article, we examine the case of a community in a mid-Atlantic college town whose civic history is shaped by stories of skepticism and hope regarding past experiences of public decision-making. We use methods of interpretive analysis to surface their stories—the tensions, the plot, the actors, and complicating events—to understand how communities make sense of their roles in civic life, the norms they share, and the values they wish their communities can practice. We argue that being attuned to the storied nature of civic culture provides an invaluable resource for practitioners of dialogue and deliberation to adapt the design of public engagement in a way that speaks to past experiences and brings forth the communities’ shared aspirations.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"4032 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127545322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Review of After Gun Violence: Deliberation and Memory in the Age of Political Gridlock by Craig Rood (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2019) 《枪支暴力后:政治僵局时代的思考与记忆》，克雷格·鲁德著(宾夕法尼亚州大学公园:宾夕法尼亚州立大学出版社，2019年)
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.349
Amanda Pasierb
{"title":"Review of After Gun Violence: Deliberation and Memory in the Age of Political Gridlock by Craig Rood (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2019)","authors":"Amanda Pasierb","doi":"10.16997/JDD.349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.349","url":null,"abstract":"Review of After Gun Violence: Deliberation and Memory in the Age of Political Gridlock by Craig Rood (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2019)","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127858712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Arrive at Peace in Deeply Divided Societies? Using Deliberation to Refine Consociational TheoryHow to Arrive at Peace in Deeply Divided Societies? Using Deliberation to Refine Consociational Theory 如何在分裂严重的社会中实现和平?如何在分裂严重的社会中实现和平?用深思熟虑来完善关联理论
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/jdd.347
J. Steiner, M. Jaramillo
{"title":"How to Arrive at Peace in Deeply Divided Societies? Using Deliberation to Refine Consociational TheoryHow to Arrive at Peace in Deeply Divided Societies? Using Deliberation to Refine Consociational Theory","authors":"J. Steiner, M. Jaramillo","doi":"10.16997/jdd.347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.347","url":null,"abstract":"In the 1960s, consociational theory was developed to explain how deeply divided societies can arrive at peace. The theory had, on the one hand, an institutional component with an emphasis on power-sharing institutions and, on the other, a cultural component stressing the importance of a spirit of accommodation. Initially, the theory was based on case studies of countries like Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands and Switzerland, which allowed dealing with both institutional and cultural aspects. Later on, when the theory was tested with a large sample of countries, the cultural aspect was increasingly neglected, because it was difficult to empirically operationalize. The key argument of the article is that the concept of deliberation helps emphasize the cultural aspect of consociational theory, in the hopes of refining, not replacing, consociational theory.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129875230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Deliberation and Consociation: Joint Pathways to Peace in Divided Societies 深思熟虑与联合:分裂社会中通往和平的共同道路
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.348
Arend Lijphart
{"title":"Deliberation and Consociation: Joint Pathways to Peace in Divided Societies","authors":"Arend Lijphart","doi":"10.16997/JDD.348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.348","url":null,"abstract":"In this short commentary, Arend Lijphart continues the conversation on the role of deliberation in promoting the “spirit of accommodation” in deeply divided societies. Jurg Steiner and Maria Clara Jaramillo started this discussion in their article “How to Arrive at Peace in Deeply Divided Societies? Using Deliberation to Refine Consociational Theory” published in this same issue.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124673101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Everyday Epistemologies: What People Say About Knowledge and What It Means for Public Deliberation 日常认识论:人们对知识的看法及其对公共审议的意义
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.345
Colene J. Lind
{"title":"Everyday Epistemologies: What People Say About Knowledge and What It Means for Public Deliberation","authors":"Colene J. Lind","doi":"10.16997/JDD.345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.345","url":null,"abstract":"Public knowledge presents a persistent problem for democratic deliberation. While especially salient for public participation in technical decision-making, scholars agree that all deliberations are best informed by quality, shared information. But what kind of knowledge is required in deliberation? Can deliberative practices foster requisite learning? Through rhetorical analysis of 20 small-group, public conversations about water policy in Kansas, USA, I sought to describe cultural understandings of public knowledge to inform future research and deliberative practice. Discussants voiced three epistemologies, which I label cognitivist, sociocultural, and behaviorist, each with distinct implications for democracy. I argue that researchers and practitioners should further consider how and when to foreground epistemological assumptions in deliberation. I also question whether facts are the most critical information for community self-determination, and instead argue that deliberators be pushed to openly discuss their values.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133833813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Participatory Deliberative Democracy for Peace in El Salvador 萨尔瓦多参与式协商民主促进和平
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.346
Marcia D. Mundt
{"title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy for Peace in El Salvador","authors":"Marcia D. Mundt","doi":"10.16997/JDD.346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.346","url":null,"abstract":"Postconflict societies such as El Salvador, surpassing 25 years of relative peace since signing the 1992 Chapultepec Peace Accords, have employed many mechanisms to rebuild and establish lasting peace. This study explores the impacts of four types of deliberative democracy mechanisms employed in this postconflict context to build grassroots participation in public policy-making: cabildos abiertos (open town hall meetings), asociaciones de desarrollo comunitario (community development associations), presupuestos participativos (participatory budgeting), and planes estrategicos participativos (participatory strategic plans). Findings suggest that individual participation in these forms of deliberative democracy implemented in postconflict El Salvador is associated with increased trust in local government. However, participation is also associated with higher levels of direct experience with personal violence and decreased satisfaction with one’s community. Findings suggest that implementing participatory deliberative democracy mechanisms in postconflict contexts is not alone enough to address the critiques of top-down liberal peacebuilding. Participatory forums for policy-making in postwar contexts should be designed and employed with conflict dynamics in mind to foster possible positive effects of deliberative democracy while mitigating potential negative effects on peacebuilding.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132785834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Habermas and the Media by Hartmut Wessler (Medford, MA: Polity, 2018) 《哈贝马斯与媒体》书评，作者:哈特穆特·韦斯勒(马萨诸塞州梅德福:Polity, 2018)
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.350
F. Sanglard, Gabriella Hauber
{"title":"Review of Habermas and the Media by Hartmut Wessler (Medford, MA: Polity, 2018)","authors":"F. Sanglard, Gabriella Hauber","doi":"10.16997/JDD.350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.350","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"31 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132837063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
21st Century Town Hall Meetings in the 1990s and 2000s: Deliberative Demonstrations and the Commodification of Political Authenticity in an Era of Austerity 1990年代和2000年代的21世纪市政厅会议:紧缩时代的审议示威和政治真实性的商品化
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.330
Caroline W. Lee
{"title":"21st Century Town Hall Meetings in the 1990s and 2000s: Deliberative Demonstrations and the Commodification of Political Authenticity in an Era of Austerity","authors":"Caroline W. Lee","doi":"10.16997/JDD.330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.330","url":null,"abstract":"The public participation field grew dramatically in the United States during the 1990s and 2000s, in part due to the flagship dialogue and deliberation organization AmericaSpeaks and its trademarked 21st Century Town Hall Meeting method for large group decision-making. Drawing on participant observation of three such meetings and a multi-method ethnography of the larger field, I place these meetings in context as experimental deliberative demonstrations during a time of ferment regarding declining citizen capacity in the United States. AmericaSpeaks’ town meetings were branded as politically authentic alternatives to ordinary politics, but as participatory methods and empowerment discourses became popular with a wide variety of public and private actors, the organization failed to find a sustainable business model. I conclude by discussing the challenges for contemporary town hall meetings in an era when political authenticity is a valuable commodity.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126826029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction: The New England Town Meeting: A Founding Myth of American Democracy 简介:新英格兰城镇会议:美国民主的一个创始神话
Journal of Public Deliberation Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI: 10.16997/JDD.329
P. Cossart, Andrea Felicetti, James T. Kloppenberg
{"title":"Introduction: The New England Town Meeting: A Founding Myth of American Democracy","authors":"P. Cossart, Andrea Felicetti, James T. Kloppenberg","doi":"10.16997/JDD.329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.329","url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding notable exceptions, historical investigation is far from central in deliberative scholarship and even recent work on participatory research stresses the need for more historical work. The aim of our introduction to this collective volume is to assess and to draw attention to the contribution of historical analysis in the current scholarly debate on democracy, in particular regarding the ways in which participation and deliberation emerge and develop in New England’s famous town meetings. Town meetings have traditionally been cited as one of the fullest and earliest realizations of the idea of democratic government and of deliberation at work. Nowadays the great debate on deliberative and participatory democracy has contributed to restoring the town meetings as a symbol of democratic deliberation. The critical study of how one of the oldest and most inspiring forms of democratic participation has evolved is not only a fascinating endeavor in itself, it is also a unique opportunity to better understand how and to what extent these institutional practices, inspired by ideals of deliberation and participation, can support – or impede – the democratization of today’s societies.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122517648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书