European Review of International Studies最新文献_第2页

Amphibious Diplomacy 两栖外交

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010013

Earl Wang

{"title":"Amphibious Diplomacy","authors":"Earl Wang","doi":"10.1163/21967415-10010013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-10010013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The European Union (EU) and Taiwan (officially the Republic of China) are both non-conventional polities in international relations and the study of diplomacy. On the one hand, the EU is a ‘unique economic and political union between 27 European countries’. On the other hand, Taiwan is able to concurrently carry out two distinct forms of foreign relations. First, diplomacy as a sovereign country with states that it maintains formal diplomatic relations. Second, in the relations with states and other polities without diplomatic ties, and under their divergent ‘One China’ policies, Taiwan operates as a paradiplomatic actor or one that is within the intervals of diplomacy and paradiplomacy. Observing such a phenomenon, this article proposes the notion of ‘amphibious diplomacy’ and empirically studies the notion through how, in practice, the EU and Taiwan have been carrying out their negotiation of the Bilateral Investment Agreement (bia) given the constraints of an absence of diplomatic relations and the EU’s ‘One China’ policy. The article incorporates first-hand material from semi-structured interviews with interlocutors whose work allows them to obtain practical knowledge about the EU-Taiwan bia.","PeriodicalId":145597,"journal":{"name":"European Review of International Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133907418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Frédéric Ramel, La bienveillance dans les relations internationales frederic Ramel，国际关系中的仁慈

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010010

Damien Mahiet

引用次数: 0

Post-War Interventionism and Diplomatic Practice in Bosnia Herzegovina: Too Much or Too Little? 战后干涉主义与波黑外交实践:太多还是太少?

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010001

N. Minasi

{"title":"Post-War Interventionism and Diplomatic Practice in Bosnia Herzegovina: Too Much or Too Little?","authors":"N. Minasi","doi":"10.1163/21967415-10010001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-10010001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000After almost 30 years from the Dayton Agreement of 1995, time has come to appraise the successes and failures of interventionism in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). By drawing on insights from a practitioner’s perspective, the article explores the dynamic of diplomatic action and offers a template to assess its (in)effectiveness. With time, rifts have emerged in the international community both in messaging and operational terms, which have reduced, rather than increased, the positive effects of concerted action. Moreover, whilst the Office of the High Representative (ohr) has been an important tool for reconstruction and peace-making, its role remains incompatible with the prospect of full European Union (EU) membership, thus becoming a divisive actor. At the same time the US and UK have come to see the ohr and other non-EU organisations, such as nato and the osce, as the main tools for a continued presence in the country, making overall cooperation more complicated. A “grand plan” is therefore needed to reunite the forces of the players of good will. This will require an arrangement for the winding up of the ohr, coupled with constitutional reform. To this end a new vision for BiH is necessary, both at the international and local level, to better spell out what a “European BiH” should really look like.","PeriodicalId":145597,"journal":{"name":"European Review of International Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115906016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nina Hall, Transnational Advocacy in the Digital Era 尼娜·霍尔:《数字时代的跨国倡导》

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010006

J. Gilson

引用次数: 0

The Role of Narratives in World Politics 叙事在世界政治中的作用

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010002

Alicja Prochniak, Cristian Niţoiu

引用次数: 0

Michal Onderco, Networked Nonproliferation: Making the NPT Permanent 网络防扩散:使《不扩散核武器条约》永久化

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010012

M. Spektor

引用次数: 1

Wilfried von Bredow, Armee ohne Auftrag. Die Bundeswehr und die deutsche Sicherheitspolitik 我没接到命令联邦国防军和德国安全政策

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010004

Aline Bartenstein

引用次数: 0

Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and J. C. Sharman, Vigilantes Beyond Borders: NGOs as Enforcers of International Law Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, J. C. Sharman，《超越国界的义务警员:非政府组织作为国际法的执行者》

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-10010007

Thibaut Jaulin

引用次数: 0

Norm Entrepreneurship with Chinese Characteristics? Constructing a ‘Green bri’ 中国特色的规范创业?建设“绿色一带一路”

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-09030005

Etienne Höra

引用次数: 0

Investigating Turkey’s Changing Narratives Regarding Interventions in Libya and Syria 调查土耳其在干预利比亚和叙利亚问题上不断变化的说法

European Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI: 10.1163/21967415-09030003

B. Erdogan

引用次数: 0