JAMA facial plastic surgery最新文献

{"title":"Is There a Selfie Epidemic?","authors":"Michael J Reilly, Keon M Parsa, Matthew Biel","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0419","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 5","pages":"367-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0419","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37367007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Management of Mandible Fracture in 150 Children Across 7 Years in a US Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Richard Kao,&nbsp;Cyrus C Rabbani,&nbsp;Janaki M Patel,&nbsp;Samantha M Parkhurst,&nbsp;Avinash V Mantravadi,&nbsp;Jonathan Y Ting,&nbsp;Michael W Sim,&nbsp;Karl Koehler,&nbsp;Taha Z Shipchandler","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Pediatric mandible fractures are the most common pediatric facial fracture requiring hospitalization, but data are lacking on management methods, outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze management methods, outcomes, and complications of pediatric mandible fractures at an urban academic tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Single-institution cohort study conducted at 2 urban level 1 pediatric trauma centers including all patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with mandible fractures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Fractures were treated by multispecialty surgical teams. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2018, and March 1, 2018.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Fracture distributions, mechanisms, treatment methods, complications, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 150 patients with 310 total mandible fractures, the mean (SD) age was 12.8 (4.6) years; 108 (72.0%) were male; 107 (71.3%) were white; and 109 (72.7%) had 2 or more mandible fractures. There were 78 condylar or subcondylar fractures (60 patients), 75 ramus or angle fractures (69 patients), 69 body fractures (62 patients), 78 symphyseal or parasymphyseal fractures (76 patients), and 10 coronoid fractures (10 patients). The most common mechanisms of injury were assault and battery, motor vehicle collisions, falls or play, and sports-related mechanisms. Thirty-eight (25%) patients were treated with observation and a soft diet. Children 12 years and older were more likely to receive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (P = .02). Of 112 patients treated with surgery, 63 (56.2%) were treated with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), 24 (21.4%) received ORIF, and 20 (17.9%) received both MMF and ORIF. Nonabsorbable plating was used in all but 1 of the ORIF procedures. Five of 44 (11.4%) patients receiving ORIF or ORIF and MMF had follow-up beyond 6 months, and 8 of the 44 (18.2%) had documented plating hardware removal; hardware was in place for a mean (SD) 180 (167) days. Sixty of the 150 patients (40.0%) had some form of follow-up, a mean (SD) 90 (113) days total after initial presentation. Thirteen patients experienced complications, for a total complication rate of 8.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Conservative management, using MMF and a soft diet, was favored for most operative pediatric mandible fractures. Open reduction internal fixation with titanium plating was less commonly used. Outcomes were favorable despite a lack of consistent follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"414-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40550296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Computer-Aided Design, 3-D-Printed Manufacturing, and Expert Validation of a High-fidelity Facial Flap Surgical Simulator.","authors":"A. Powell, S. Srinivasan, G. Green, Jennifer C. Kim, D. Zopf","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","url":null,"abstract":"Importance\u0000Facial flap procedures may be difficult for surgical trainees to conceptualize and challenging for supervising surgeons to allow entrustment early in training. Simulation outside of the operating room may accelerate and enhance the surgical education experience.\u0000\u0000\u0000Objective\u0000To design and manufacture a 3-dimensional (3-D)-printed, multilayer, anatomically accurate facial flap model for use in surgical education.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design, Setting, and Participants\u0000In this multicenter validation study, a 3-D-printed facial flap simulator was designed from a computed tomographic (CT) scan and manufactured for low-cost, high-fidelity simulation. Expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeon feedback was acquired through surgical rehearsal and performance of 8 local facial flap procedures on the facial flap simulator by 7 otolaryngologists fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery.\u0000\u0000\u0000Main Outcomes and Measures\u0000Likert scale surveys were made based on evaluation criteria categorized into domains of realism, experience, and applicability of the simulator. Measures of central tendency, variability, and confidence intervals were generated to evaluate the outcomes.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Seven expert otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons completed a Likert scale evaluation survey containing quantitative analysis of 6 questions on physical attributes, 12 questions on realism, 8 questions on experience, and 4 questions on the applicability of the simulator. All expert surgeons were additionally fellowship trained in facial plastic surgery with their mean years in practice being 11.9. Overall evaluation demonstrated valuable ability of the simulator for medical education with suggestions for future directions. Importantly, the simulator was rated on a scale of 1 (no value) to 4 (great value) as 3.86 as a training tool, 3.57 as a competency evaluation tool, and 3.43 as a rehearsal tool.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions and Revelance\u0000Expert experience with the local facial flap simulator was rated highly for realism, experience, performance, and usefulness. With slight refinement, the model has strong potential for broad use in training in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and facial plastic surgery.\u0000\u0000\u0000Level of Evidence\u0000NA.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49473311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of Persistent and Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.","authors":"Cristen Olds,&nbsp;Emily Spataro,&nbsp;Kevin Li,&nbsp;Cherian Kandathil,&nbsp;Sam P Most","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although the development of persistent opioid use after surgical procedures has garnered much attention in recent years, large-scale studies characterizing patterns of persistent opioid use among patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of immediate and long-term postoperative opioid use after plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, patients who underwent 5 classes of plastic and reconstructive procedures (nasal, eye, breast, abdomen, and soft tissue reconstruction) between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, were identified using IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental research databases. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, lacked continuous insurance coverage for 1 year preoperatively and postoperatively, had a second anesthesia event within 1 year postoperatively, and filled an opioid prescription within the year prior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Analgesic prescription patterns in the immediate postoperative period. The primary outcome was rates of persistent opioid use (opioid prescriptions filled 90-180 days postoperatively). The secondary outcome was rates of prolonged opioid use (opioid prescriptions filled 90-180 days postoperatively and again 181-365 days postoperatively). Explanatory variables included patient demographics, procedure type, and relevant comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 466 677 patients who met inclusion criteria, 96 397 (45.3%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 46.8 (17.7) years. Furthermore, 212 387 (54.6%) of the patients filled prescriptions for postoperative analgesics, with 212 387 (91.5%) of analgesic prescriptions filled being for opioids. Persistent opioid use occurred in 30 865 (6.6%) patients (5.1%-13.5% across procedure classes), while prolonged opioid use occurred in 10 487 (2.3%) patients (1.7%-5.6% across procedure classes). Patients who filled prescriptions for opioids in the perioperative period were significantly more likely to exhibit persistent (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; 95% CI, 2.80-2.94) and prolonged (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.77-3.02) opioid use than those who did not fill perioperative opioid prescriptions, with the greatest odds for persistent use found in patients who underwent breast (OR, 4.36; 95% CI, 4.10-4.63) and nasal (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 3.30-3.73) procedures. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for persistent and prolonged opioid use included perioperative opioid use, procedure type, and prior-year mental health (depression and anxiety) and substance abuse diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Given the significant risk of persistent opioid use after plastic and reconstructive procedures, it is imperative to develop ","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"286-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37032994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of Masseteric Nerve-Based Selective Neurotization for Multivectorial Augmentation of the Weak Smile.","authors":"Rueben Yap Kannan,&nbsp;Catriona Neville,&nbsp;Tamsin Gwynn,&nbsp;Karen Young,&nbsp;Vanessa Venables,&nbsp;Charles Nduka","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"340-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37206023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes of Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Combined Temporoparietal Fascia Graft and Polydioxanone Plate Construct.","authors":"Justin Morse,&nbsp;Jacqueline Harris,&nbsp;Scott Owen,&nbsp;Justin Sowder,&nbsp;Scott Stephan","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Numerous techniques are used for septal perforation repair, yet success rates remain variable. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and describe the use of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair and the expansion of this technique to patients with more challenging comorbidities, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who underwent septal perforation repair using interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2018, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2018, at the University of Iowa.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All patients underwent septal perforation repair with interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates and a temporoparietal fascia graft.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Assessing closure of septal perforation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were resolution of presenting symptoms of septal perforation, area of perforation, length of postoperative stent and silastic sheeting placement, postoperative complications and resolution, and duration of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 patients (12 women and 5 men; mean [SD] age, 45 [15] years) were included. The causes of perforations were iatrogenic (9 [53%]), rheumatologic (2 [12%]), and unknown or idiopathic (6 [35%]). Patients most commonly presented with nasal crusting (12 [71%]), whistling (9 [53%]), nasal obstruction (9 [53%]), and epistaxis (5 [29%]). Mean (SD) perforation size was 0.99 (1.04) cm2. Mean (SD) postoperative follow-up was 6.1 (4.1) months. A total of 15 patients (88%) had complete resolution of presenting symptoms at last follow-up. All perforations were closed with overlying mucosa at the most recent follow-up examination. Nine of 17 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative NOSE. There was a significant difference between the mean (SD) preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores (62.78 [27.74] vs 17.78 [15.83]; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Repair of symptomatic nasal septal perforations using a temporoparietal fascia graft combined with a polydioxanone plate was associated with positive outcomes. Repair of septal perforations caused by rheumatologic disease, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis, can be considered for repair using this technique. Resolution of symptoms appeared to be clinically more meaningful in evaluation of septal perforation ","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37318808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Use of Racial and Ethnic Terms-Reply.","authors":"Halley Darrach,&nbsp;Masaru Ishii,&nbsp;Lisa E Ishii","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0131","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0131","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40448830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Highlights.","authors":"","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1339","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4 1","pages":"269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1339","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42591531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Simplifying Mandible Fracture Repair.","authors":"Clinton D Humphrey,&nbsp;J David Kriet","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0332","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"276-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0332","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37004341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analysis of Patient-Perceived Nasal Appearance Evaluations Following Functional Septorhinoplasty With Spreader Graft Placement.","authors":"Jennifer C Fuller,&nbsp;Patricia A Levesque,&nbsp;Robin W Lindsay","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Spreader grafts have been shown to improve nasal airway obstruction in patients with nasal valve dysfunction; however, their use has been limited by concerns over their aesthetic penalty of widening the nasal dorsum.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of functional septorhinoplasty (FSRP) using spreader graft placement with patient satisfaction with nasal appearance postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in a university-based tertiary care medical center. All participants were patients undergoing FSRP for the treatment of nasal obstruction who had spreader grafts placed between June 2016 and May 2018.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and the FACE-Q Satisfaction With Nose, FACE-Q Satisfaction With Nostrils, and FACE-Q Social Functioning scales were administered to patients preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, nasal history, and outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Comparison of preoperative and postoperative NOSE and FACE-Q scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients (72 male [46.8%]) with mean (SD) age of 36.8 (15.4) years underwent FSRP with spreader graft placement. Mean (SD) last follow-up was 5.8 (4.1) months postoperatively (range, 2-12 months). Fifty-seven patients had 6 months follow-up, and 42 patients had at least 12 months of follow-up. At time of last follow-up, mean (SD) NOSE and FACE-Q Satisfaction With Nose, Satisfaction With Nostrils, and Social Functioning scores significantly improved from 62.7 (20.7) to 22.8 (21.0) (P < .001), 54.7 (22.2) to 76.2 (25.1) (P < .001), 59.4 (27.9) to 83.6 (24.8) (P < .001), and 73.6 (21.8) to 81.7 (21.9) (P < .001), respectively. When separated into those with only spreader grafts (n = 89) and those with spreader grafts plus other graft types (n = 65), there was no significant difference between score improvements in the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in final nasal appearance scores between patients undergoing functional vs dual functional and cosmetic FSRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Despite concerns that placement of spreader grafts for the treatment of nasal obstruction due to nasal valve dysfunction during FSRP may have a negative impact on nasal aesthetics, this study shows that both nasal obstruction and patient satisfaction with their nasal appearance were significantly improved following surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"305-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2118","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37253249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}