Outcomes of Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Combined Temporoparietal Fascia Graft and Polydioxanone Plate Construct.

Q1 Medicine
Justin Morse, Jacqueline Harris, Scott Owen, Justin Sowder, Scott Stephan
{"title":"Outcomes of Nasal Septal Perforation Repair Using Combined Temporoparietal Fascia Graft and Polydioxanone Plate Construct.","authors":"Justin Morse,&nbsp;Jacqueline Harris,&nbsp;Scott Owen,&nbsp;Justin Sowder,&nbsp;Scott Stephan","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Numerous techniques are used for septal perforation repair, yet success rates remain variable. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and describe the use of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair and the expansion of this technique to patients with more challenging comorbidities, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who underwent septal perforation repair using interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2018, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2018, at the University of Iowa.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All patients underwent septal perforation repair with interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates and a temporoparietal fascia graft.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Assessing closure of septal perforation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were resolution of presenting symptoms of septal perforation, area of perforation, length of postoperative stent and silastic sheeting placement, postoperative complications and resolution, and duration of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 patients (12 women and 5 men; mean [SD] age, 45 [15] years) were included. The causes of perforations were iatrogenic (9 [53%]), rheumatologic (2 [12%]), and unknown or idiopathic (6 [35%]). Patients most commonly presented with nasal crusting (12 [71%]), whistling (9 [53%]), nasal obstruction (9 [53%]), and epistaxis (5 [29%]). Mean (SD) perforation size was 0.99 (1.04) cm2. Mean (SD) postoperative follow-up was 6.1 (4.1) months. A total of 15 patients (88%) had complete resolution of presenting symptoms at last follow-up. All perforations were closed with overlying mucosa at the most recent follow-up examination. Nine of 17 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative NOSE. There was a significant difference between the mean (SD) preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores (62.78 [27.74] vs 17.78 [15.83]; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Repair of symptomatic nasal septal perforations using a temporoparietal fascia graft combined with a polydioxanone plate was associated with positive outcomes. Repair of septal perforations caused by rheumatologic disease, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis, can be considered for repair using this technique. Resolution of symptoms appeared to be clinically more meaningful in evaluation of septal perforation repair than rate of perforation closure, and the NOSE scale has the potential to serve as an objective corroboration to patient-reported postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Importance: Numerous techniques are used for septal perforation repair, yet success rates remain variable. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair.

Objective: To investigate and describe the use of interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft for septal perforation repair and the expansion of this technique to patients with more challenging comorbidities, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who underwent septal perforation repair using interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates combined with a temporoparietal fascia graft from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2018, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2018, at the University of Iowa.

Intervention: All patients underwent septal perforation repair with interposition grafts of polydioxanone plates and a temporoparietal fascia graft.

Main outcomes and measures: Assessing closure of septal perforation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were resolution of presenting symptoms of septal perforation, area of perforation, length of postoperative stent and silastic sheeting placement, postoperative complications and resolution, and duration of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were assessed.

Results: A total of 17 patients (12 women and 5 men; mean [SD] age, 45 [15] years) were included. The causes of perforations were iatrogenic (9 [53%]), rheumatologic (2 [12%]), and unknown or idiopathic (6 [35%]). Patients most commonly presented with nasal crusting (12 [71%]), whistling (9 [53%]), nasal obstruction (9 [53%]), and epistaxis (5 [29%]). Mean (SD) perforation size was 0.99 (1.04) cm2. Mean (SD) postoperative follow-up was 6.1 (4.1) months. A total of 15 patients (88%) had complete resolution of presenting symptoms at last follow-up. All perforations were closed with overlying mucosa at the most recent follow-up examination. Nine of 17 patients completed both preoperative and postoperative NOSE. There was a significant difference between the mean (SD) preoperative and postoperative NOSE scores (62.78 [27.74] vs 17.78 [15.83]; P = .004).

Conclusions and relevance: Repair of symptomatic nasal septal perforations using a temporoparietal fascia graft combined with a polydioxanone plate was associated with positive outcomes. Repair of septal perforations caused by rheumatologic disease, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis, can be considered for repair using this technique. Resolution of symptoms appeared to be clinically more meaningful in evaluation of septal perforation repair than rate of perforation closure, and the NOSE scale has the potential to serve as an objective corroboration to patient-reported postoperative outcomes.

Level of evidence: 4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颞顶筋膜联合聚二恶酮板修复鼻中隔穿孔的效果。
重要性:许多技术用于鼻中隔穿孔修复,但成功率仍然不同。很少有研究评估聚二氧环酮板间置移植联合颞顶骨筋膜移植治疗鼻中隔穿孔的有效性。目的:研究并描述聚二氧环酮板间置联合颞顶筋膜移植在鼻中隔穿孔修复中的应用,并将该技术扩展到更具挑战性的合并症患者,包括肉芽肿病合并多血管炎。设计、环境和参与者:对2015年1月1日至2018年7月1日在范德比尔特大学医学中心和2017年1月1日至2018年7月1日在爱荷华大学使用聚二氧环酮板联合颞顶筋膜移植物进行间隔穿孔修复的患者进行回顾性医疗记录回顾。干预:所有患者均行中隔穿孔修补术,植入聚二氧环酮板和颞顶骨筋膜。主要结局和措施:评估鼻中隔穿孔闭合是主要结局。次要结局是出现鼻中隔穿孔症状的消退、穿孔面积、术后支架和硅橡胶片放置的长度、术后并发症和消退、随访时间。评估术前和术后鼻塞症状评估(NOSE)评分。结果:共17例患者(女性12例,男性5例;平均[SD]年龄,45[15]岁)。穿孔的原因包括医源性(9例[53%])、风湿病(2例[12%])和未知或特发性(6例[35%])。患者最常见的表现为鼻结痂(12例[71%])、口哨声(9例[53%])、鼻塞(9例[53%])和鼻出血(5例[29%])。平均(SD)穿孔尺寸为0.99 (1.04)cm2。术后平均(SD)随访6.1(4.1)个月。15例患者(88%)在最后随访时症状完全缓解。在最近的随访检查中,所有穿孔均与上覆粘膜愈合。17例患者中有9例完成了术前和术后的鼻翼手术。术前和术后鼻翼平均评分(SD)差异有统计学意义(62.78 [27.74]vs 17.78 [15.83];p = .004)。结论及相关性:应用颞顶筋膜移植联合聚二氧环酮钢板修复症状性鼻中隔穿孔具有积极的疗效。风湿病引起的室间隔穿孔的修复,包括肉芽肿病合并多血管炎,可以考虑使用该技术进行修复。在评估鼻中隔穿孔修复的临床意义上,症状的缓解似乎比穿孔闭合率更有意义,并且NOSE量表有可能作为患者报告的术后结果的客观佐证。证据等级:4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信