JAAOS Global Research & Reviews最新文献

{"title":"Characterization of More Than a Third of a Million Toy-Related Fractures","authors":"Scott J. Halperin, Sofia Prenner, H. Moore, J. Grauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00013","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The toy industry has grown substantially over time, with billions of dollars of toys sold each year in the United States alone. Even after safety considerations, injuries can result. This study examined toy-related fractures in the US Emergency Departments (ED). Methods: The 1999 to 2018 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission was examined data for fractures involving a toy-related injury. The incidence, trends, and anatomic locations for such fractures were assessed. Results: In total, 347,135 toy-related fractures were identified, of which 237,754 (68%) were in patients younger than 18 years, 182,516 (53%) were sustained by male subjects, and a 95% yearly incidence increase was observed over the years of the study. Anatomically, 37% were shoulder/arm/elbow, 24% wrist/hand/finger, 19% ankle/toe/foot, 10% leg/knee, 6% face/neck/head, and 4% trunk/pubic region. Discussion: Despite safety considerations with toy design, more than a third of toy-related fractures were seen in the ED, with a nearly doubling yearly incidence over the study period. This could be contributed to by increased production and prevalence of toys and/or rougher play and increased overall violence. These results are important not only for patient safety but also for orthopaedic surgeons, EDs, toy manufacturers, and policymakers.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115859494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Continued Increase in Cost of Care Despite Decrease in Stay After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis","authors":"K. Shaw, B. Ange, V. George, Joshua S. Murphy, N. Fletcher","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00192","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) for children undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Hospitalization event data from the Kids Inpatient Database were queried for all PSF events for AIS performed in 2009, 2012, and 2016 using diagnosis and surgical codes. Data were subdivided into two groups: pre–enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) (2009 and 2012) and post-ERAS (2016). The primary outcome variables were LOS and total treatment charge (adjusted for 2020 inflation). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify differences in outcome variables. Results: A total of 12,010 unique hospitalization events were identified, 74% female, mean 14.3 years. There was a decrease in LOS (pre-ERAS: 5.4 ± 4.0 versus 4.3 ± 3.2 days, P < 0.0001) with an increase in adjusted total treatment charge (pre-ERAS $193,544.4 ± $108,116.1 versus $200,469.1 ± $110,112.6; P = 0.0013). Pre-ERAS, male sex, smaller hospital, and non-Medicaid insurance were predictive of longer LOS, whereas pre-ERAS, older age, non-White race, male sex, hospital outside the Northeast, and non-Medicaid insurance were predictive of higher treatment costs. Discussion: There continues to be a significant decrease in LOS for PSF hospitalization events for AIS; however, total treatment charges continue to rise. Future research should investigate potential factors influencing total treatment charges after PSF for AIS.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115143873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ethnic and Sex Diversity in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"N. Vij, Ian M Singleton, R. Bisht, Francisco Lucio, Selina C. Poon, M. Belthur","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00321","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although the diversity in orthopaedic residency programs has been studied, the diversity within academic orthopaedics has not. Methods: The board of specialty societies, five leading journals and the National Institutes of Health RePORTER tool, and three accreditation organizations were explored. Results: The board of directors comprised 220 (72%) Caucasians, 36 (12%) Asians, 4 (1%) Hispanic/Latinos, 29 (9%) African Americans, and 18 (6%) Other individuals; 250 (81%) were men, and 57 (19%) were women. The editorial boards comprised 288 (77%) Caucasians, 62 (16%) Asians, 14 (4%) Hispanic/Latinos, 8 (2%) African Americans, and 4 (1%) Other individuals; 341 (91%) were men, and 35 (9%) were women. The National Institutes of Health grant recipients comprised 117 (64%) Caucasians, 58 (32%) Asians, 4 (2%) Hispanic/Latinos, and 3 (2%) African Americans; 128 (70%) were men, and 54 (30%) were women. On average, Caucasians, Asians, Hispanic/Latinos, and African Americans received $776,543, $439,600, $420,182, and $494,049, respectively. On average, men and women received $759,426 and $419,518, respectively. The accreditation boards comprised 45 (82%) Caucasians, 6 (11%) Asians, and 4 (7%) African Americans; 45 (82%) were men, and 10 (18%) were women. Conclusions: Academic orthopaedic surgery does not resemble the United States. Residency, fellowship committees, and professional organization boards need to become aware of these disparities.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123484094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Promoting Wellness in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency","authors":"Vincent P. Federico, J. Higgins, Michael T. Nolte, M. Kogan","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00227","url":null,"abstract":"The challenges associated with surgical residency have been well documented and described. Despite implementation of work-hour restrictions, residency remains a balancing act between patient care, surgical and clinical education, medical record documentation, and research endeavors. The added challenge of balancing these duties with life outside of the hospital further complicates the situation. Multiple studies have documented the stress associated with residency training, highlighting the prevalence of emotional exhaustion, detachment from people both in and out of the hospital, and a concerning rate of clinical depression among residents. Moreover, this emotional exhaustion has been shown to directly correlate with residents' clinical performance and abilities to carry out academic duties. More recently, feelings of isolation and detachment have been exacerbated by the necessity of COVID-19 precautions and change in clinical duties. The Accreditation for Graduate Medical Education (ACGM) now requires all residencies to include programming that focuses on resident well-being. Programs have implemented various strategies in an effort to help their trainees cope with the stress associated with residency and beyond. Despite the variety in approaches of programs, these initiatives have the similar objective of teaching resilience and the ability to navigate stressors in a healthy and effective manner. The programming can also serve to promote resident interaction and develop camaraderie in an effort to minimize feelings of emotional exhaustion and isolation. In this article, we discuss the importance of sustained physician wellness and describe approaches from various professions that can be implemented into the wellness curriculum for residency programs across the country. By promoting a culture of wellness and incorporating effective wellness programming, our aim is that residents will be able to succeed not only in their training but also in their personal lives and professional endeavors after graduation.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"375 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123228023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes of an Institutional Rapid Recovery Protocol for Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Safety Net Hospital","authors":"Adam J. Taylor, R. Kay, J. Bryman, Erik Y. Tye, D. Longjohn, S. Najibi, Robert P Runner","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00173","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Rapid recovery protocols (RRPs) for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) can reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) and improve patient care in select cohorts; however, there is limited literature regarding their utility in marginalized patient populations. This report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an institutional RRP for TJA at a safety net hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of 573 primary TJA patients was done, comparing the standard recovery protocol (n = 294) and RRP cohorts (n = 279). Measured outcomes included LOS, 90-day complications, revision surgeries, readmissions, and emergency department visits. Results: The mean LOS reduced from 3.0 ± 3.1 days in the standard recovery protocol cohort to 1.6 ± 0.9 days in the RRP cohort (P < 0.001). The RRP cohort had significantly fewer 90-day complications (11.1% versus 21.4%, P = 0.005), readmissions (1.4% versus 5.8%, P = 0.007), and revision surgeries (1.4% versus 4.4%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: A RRP for primary TJA can be successfully implemented at a safety net hospital with a shorter LOS and fewer acute adverse events. Such protocols require a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort with strict adherence to evidence-based practices to provide high-quality, value-based surgical health care to an underserved cohort.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128039472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To Use or Not Use Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: Utilization of Neuromonitoring During Spine Surgeries and Associated Conflicts of Interest, a Cross-Sectional Survey Study","authors":"Jesse E. Bible, Madison L. Goss","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00273","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are no universal guidelines that dictate the indications for the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in spine surgery resulting in its variable use. The choice to use IONM has been both cited in malpractice lawsuits and insurance claims, but no data exist regarding surgeons' rationale for making this choice. The goal of this study was to assess (1) the use of certain IONM modalities during common spine surgeries, (2) surgeons' rationale for use of IONM, and (3) IONM practices and potential conflicts of interest associated with its use. Methods: Respondents were asked to select each IONM modality they used during 20 different surgical scenarios within the spine followed by rating the importance of several reasons when selecting to use IONM. Finally, the occurrence of conflicts of interest, out-of-network billing, and cost were assessed. Results: Approximately one-half (47%) of respondents who perform anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion/total disk arthroplasty for radiculopathy use IONM, opposed to 76% for myelopathy. The presence of cord compression and/or neurologic symptoms increased IONM use by approximately 30% during trauma cases. Medicolegal was the reason of highest importance when choosing to use IONM (7.4 ± 2.9; mean ± SD), followed by surgeon reassurance (6.2 ± 2.7; P < 0.0001 versus medicolegal) and belief it affects patient outcomes (5.2 ± 3.0; P = 0.004 versus reassurance). Conclusions: Although there is increasing use of IONM, this has not translated to an absolute requirement for every spine surgery. Surgeons are faced with opposing influences of the medicolegal system and insurance payers. Future guidelines on using IONM should not be absolute, but rather should consider the risks of each procedure, along with how patients and surgeons value these risks, in addition to the costs. The findings of this study should help to serve as a guide to surgeons, payers, and courts as contemporary, common practices for the use of IONM during spinal surgical scenarios.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114548917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Length of Stay Increases 90-day Readmission Rates in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty","authors":"J. Benito, Justin Stafford, Hyrum Judd, Mitchell K. Ng, A. Corces, M. Roche","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00271","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative length of stay (LOS) of 1 day compared with that of 2 to 4 days after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day readmissions. Methods: PearlDiver identified TKA (n = 648,758) and THA patients (n = 346,732) between 2005 and 2014. Groups consisted of control (LOS = 1 day) and study (LOS = 2 to 4 days) groups. Study and control groups were matched to age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Logistic regression analysis and odds ratio analyzed 90-day readmission rates. P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: TKA patients' LOS of 2 days (odds ratio [OR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.77 to 3.00), LOS of 3 days (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.69 to 2.91), and LOS of 4 days (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.72 to 2.95) had greater 90-day readmission compared with LOS of 1 day (P < 0.05). THA patients with an LOS of 2 days (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 2.77 to 3.10), an LOS of 3 days (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.75 to 3.07), or an LOS of 4 days (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.73 to 3.05) had greater 90-day readmission compared with an LOS of 1 day (P < 0.05). Conclusion: LOS >1 day has greater odds of 90-day readmission after an index procedure. Efficient progression to early discharge regarding patient-specific risk factors plays a large role in preventing readmission.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115611617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Mital D. Patel, M. Williams, Merritt J Thompson, Parth N. Desai","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00027","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the past decade, online physician review websites have become an important source of information for patients, with the largest and most popular being Healthgrades.com. Our study aims to investigate demographic and volume-based trends for online reviews of every Healthgrades-listed orthopaedic surgeon through a nationwide, retrospective analysis. Methods: All available demographic and rating information for orthopaedic surgeons (n = 28,713; Healthgrades.com) was analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance, Tukey Studentized Range (Honestly Significant Difference), linear regression, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The mean rating for all surgeons was 3.99 (SD 0.92), and the mean number of ratings was 13.43 (SD 20.4). Men had a greater mean rating at 4.02 compared with women at 3.91 (P < 0.0001), and DO surgeons had greater mean rating at 4.11 compared with MD surgeons at 3.90 (P < 0.0001). The correlation between rating and age had a significant negative correlation (P < 0.0001). The correlation between average online rating and number of reviews had a significant positive correlation (P < 0.0001). Discussion: Our analysis suggests that greater online ratings are associated with the male sex and DO degrees. In addition, our study discovered that the number of ratings was positively correlated with greater mean online ratings, whereas older age was negatively correlated with greater mean online ratings.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124111150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply to the Editor Regarding Metal Hypersensitivity in Joint Arthroplasty: A Review Article","authors":"Johannes Michiel van der Merwe","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129926346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Risk Stratification of Operatively Treated Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures Reveals Differences in Short-Term Outcomes and Procedure Costs Between Sliding Hip Screw Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nail","authors":"S. Konda, Rachel A. Ranson, Ariana Lott, Tensae Assefa, Joseph P. Johnson, A. Ganta, K. Egol","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00242","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study sought to retrospectively compare short-term outcomes between sliding hip screw (SHS) fixation versus short cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) in a risk-stratified cohort of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture patients. Data of 458 patients, aged 55 years and older, who sustained intertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31A1-3) and were treated with either SHS or short CMN from October 2014 to March 2019 were collected. Patient demographics, injury severity, and functional status were used to calculate a score using the Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged system. Based on the Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged tool, 229 patients (50%) were placed into a low-risk cohort, whereas 229 patients (50%) were placed into a high-risk cohort. Results: Four hundred eleven patients were treated with CMN and 47 patients were treated with SHS. Procedural time was shorter for low- and high-risk patients treated with CMN versus SHS. Need for transfusion did not differ between implant types in either risk cohort. In the high-risk cohort, incidence of major complications and number of overall inpatient complications were higher in the SHS group. In the low-risk cohort, patients with SHS were discharged home more often and ambulated a greater distance before discharge. Although total costs did not differ between groups, procedural costs were lower in the SHS group for both risk cohorts. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that implant type was a significant predictor of all aforementioned significant bivariate analyses. Conclusion: In low-risk and high-risk patients, those treated with CMN had shorter surgical time but higher procedural costs. A decrease in implant cost may optimize the value of shorter procedural times associated with CMN use, especially for high-risk patients. Our results suggested that high-risk hip fracture patients should be treated with CMN for both stable and unstable fractures and low-risk stable fracture patterns should be treated with SHS.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115229097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}