Syiah Kuala Law Journal最新文献

{"title":"Kedudukan Kesaksian Polisi Penangkap Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkoba","authors":"Teuku Hendra Gunawan, Dahlan Ali, M. N. Rasyid","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12530","url":null,"abstract":"Putusan No. 1531 K/Pid.Sus/2010 Mahkamah Agung memutus bebas terdakwa tindak pidana narkotikabernama Ket San.Salah satu pertimbangan utama Mahkamah Agung adalah perihal kedudukan 2 (dua) orang polisi yang menangkap Ket San yang kemudian juga hadir sebagai saksi dipersidangan. Permasalahan yang perlu dikaji yaitu hubungan antara tersangka dengan polisi penangkapdan pembuktian kesaksian polisi penangkap dalam perkara tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkoba.Tujuan penulisan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara tersangka dengan polisi penangkap dan bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian saksipolisi penangkap dalam perkara penyalahgunaan narkoba.Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa selama proses pemeriksaan berlangsung, seseorang yang disangka atau didakwa melakukan sesuatu tindak pidana dilindungi oleh hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 50 sampai Pasal 68 KUHAP. Polisi Penangkap boleh bersaksi sepanjang memenuhi kualifikasi saksi sebagaimana diatur Pasal 1 angka 26 dan 27 KUHAP dan tidak dapat dipertimbangkan apabila keterangan saksi tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 185 ayat (6) KUHAP, secara formal kehadiran polisi penangkap di persidangan pada saat memberi keterangan yang sifatnya verbalisan. Disarankan bagi instansi penegak hukum untuk profesionalisme, wajib menghormati hak orang yang melakukan tindak pidana dalam memperoleh hak-haknya danketerangan saksi yang berasal dari Polisi Penangkap saja dalam satu perkara pidana sebaiknya dihindari kecuali Penuntut Umum memiliki alat bukti lain yang untuk mendukung pembuktian di persidangan.Ruling No. 1531 K/Pid. Sus/2010 Supreme Court break free of narcotics crime defendants named Ket San. One of the main considerations of the Supreme Court is about the position of two policemen who arrested Ket San which is then also present as witness in the courts. Problems that need to be examined are; the relationship between the suspect with police catcher and  the strength of police testimony in the case Crime Catcher drug abuse. The purpose of writing to find out the relationship between the suspect and catcher with the police how the strength of police testimony in the case Crime Catcher drug abuse. The research method used i.e. empirical juridical. The results of the research it is known that during the review process progresses, a person who is suspected or claimed to do something criminal acts are protected by law as set forth in article 50 to Article 68 Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). Police Capture may testify all meet the qualifications of the witness as provided for article 1 numbers 26 and 27 Code of Criminal Procedure and cannot be taken into consideration when the witnesses are contrary to Article 185 paragraph (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, formally capture police presence is used at the time of giving the information to its verbalisan. Recommended for law enforcement agencies to work are professionalism, respect the right of the person obligated to p","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114971730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perlindungan Data Pribadi Nasabah Dalam Penawaran Transaksi Asuransi Oleh PT.Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero)","authors":"Bahagia Bahagia, S. Rahayu, Teuku Muttaqin Mansur","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12108","url":null,"abstract":"Perlindungan asuransi merupakan antara dua pihak, yaitu perusahaan asuransi dan pemegang polis, yang menjadi dasar bagi penerimaan premi oleh perusahaan asuransi sebagai imbalan untuk: memberikan penggantian kepada tertanggung atau pemegang polis karena kerugian, kerusakan, biaya yang timbul, kehilangan keuntungan, atau tanggung jawab hukum kepada pihak ketiga yang mungkin diderita tertanggung atau pemegang polisi karena terjadi suatu peristiwa yang tidak pasti. Tujuan penelitian ialah mekanisme perlindungan hukum data pribadi nasabah serta perjanjian asuransi yang dilakukan oleh pihak asuransi dengan nasabah PT BNI (Persero), menyebabkan PT BNI (Persero) melakukan wanprestasi kepada nasabahnya dikaitkan tanggungjawab melindungi data nasabah, dan upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh nasabah yang merasa dirugikan perihal data pribadinya. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa dalam mekanisme perlindungan data telah dilaksanakan hanya saja terjadi kebocoran data nasabah dikarenakan kelalaian dalam membuat kesepakatan terhadap pihak kedua (asuransi) walaupun itu adalah anak perusahaan Bank sendiri. Penyebab terjadi wanprestasi terhadap perlindungan asuransi adalah dikarenakan pihak BNI masih menggunakan metode telemarketing dalam penawaran asuransinya. Upaya hukum untuk memenangkan hak serta keadilan pihak nasabah sering ditempuh pengancara menggugat. Disarankan agar hendaknya maka sangat dianjurkan bagi nasabah untuk lebih cermat dan memahami serta memperhatikan hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan produk yang ditawarkan.Insurance protection is between two parties, namely insurance companies and policy holders, which are the basis for premium receipts by insurance companies in return for: providing reimbursement to the insured or policy holder due to loss, damage, costs incurred, loss of profits, or legal responsibility to third parties that might be suffered by the insured or police holder because of an uncertain event. The research objective is the mechanism of legal protection of customers' personal data and insurance agreements carried out by insurance parties with customers of PT BNI (Persero), causing PT BNI (Persero) to default to its customers associated with responsibility to protect customer data, and legal efforts that can be taken by customers who feel harmed regarding his personal data. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of this study that in the data protection mechanism have been carried out only the customer data leak occurred due to negligence in making an agreement with the second party (insurance) even though it was a subsidiary of the Bank itself. The reason for the default on insurance protection is because BNI still uses the telemarketing method in its insurance offer. Legal efforts to win the rights and justice of the customers are often pursued by claimants. It is suggested that it should be highly recommended for customers to be more careful and understand and pay ","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129733900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kedudukan Peraturan Daerah Yang Dibatalkan Oleh Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015","authors":"Rahmat Qadri Nasrun, H. Djalil, E. Efendi","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12158","url":null,"abstract":"Pada tahun 2016 Menteri Dalam Negeri membatalkan 3.143 Peraturan Daerah bermasalah. Kemudian pada tahun 2017 Mahkamah Konstitusi mengeluarkan sebuah Putusan yang mencabut kewenangan Menteri Dalam Negeri untuk membatalkan Peraturan Daerah. Akan tetapi masih ada Pemerintah Daerah yang melaksanakan Peraturan Daerah yang dibatalkan oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri sebelum keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan, untuk menganalisis kekuatan eksekutorial Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri yang membatalkan peraturan daerah sebelum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta untuk menganalisis kedudukan peraturan daerah yang dibatalkan oleh Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri yang masih dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Daerah setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber data penelitian adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama. Menteri Dalam Negeri masih dapat melaksanakan Keputusan untuk membatalkan Peraturan Daerah karena Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak berlaku surut, namun idealnya yang lebih berhak membatalkan Peraturan Daerah adalah Mahkamah Agung. Kedua, Kedudukan Peraturan Daerah yang dibatalkan oleh Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri yang masih dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Daerah setelah dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi maka Peraturan Daerah tersebut tidak langsung batal karena ada mekanisme yang harus dilakukan yaitu pencabutan. Selama belum ada pencabutan, maka Peraturan Daerah dimaksud tetap ada tetapi tidak bisa dilaksanakan. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah Pusat agar merevisi Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 khususnya pasal yang mengatur tentang pembatalan Peraturan Daerah dan apabila mengeluarkan suatu peraturan perundang-undangan harus berpedoman pada hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat itu.In 2016 the Minister of Home Affairs canceled 3,143 problematic Regional Regulations. Then in 2017 the Constitutional Court issued a Decision revoking the authority of the Minister of Home Affairs to cancel the Regional Regulation. However, there are still Regional Governments who carry out Regional Regulations that have been canceled by the Minister of Home Affairs before the decision of the Constitutional Court is issued. This study aims to analyze the executorial power of the Decree of the Minister of Home Affairs which overturned regional regulations before the Constitutional Court Decision and to analyze the position of regional regulations which were canceled by the Decree of the Minister of Home Affairs which was still implemented by the Regional Government after the Constitutional Court Decision. The research method used is normative legal research. The source of research data is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that : first, The Minister of Home A","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123638099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pengawasan dan Pembinaan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran","authors":"Irma Mulia Fitri, Ilyas Ismail, Suhaimi Suhaimi","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V3I1.12323","url":null,"abstract":"Pengawasan atas Notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri dalam melaksanakan pengawasan, menteri membentuk Majelis Pengawas, Majelis Pengawas berjumlah 9 (Sembilan) orang terdiri  atas unsur pemerintah sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang, Organisasi Notaris sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang dan ahli atau akedemisi sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang. Pengawas terhadap notaris meliputi perilaku notaris dan pelaksanaan  jabatan notaris yang diatur dalam  pasal 67  Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang jabatan notaris. Berdasarkan aturan pasal 70 (a) Tentang  Majelis Pengawasan Daerah (MPD) berwenang menyelenggarakan sidang untuk memeriksa adanya dugaan pelanggaran kode etik atau pelanggaran pelaksanaan jabatan notaris. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan adalah Penelitian Yuridis Empris.Supervision towards notaries is conducted by a Minister by foundingsupervisory council which consists of 9 members; 3 are from the government agency; 3 are from the notary agency;and 3 other are from experts or academics. The supervision includes the notaries’ attitude and how the notaries conduct their duties which are regulated in Article 67 of Law No.30 of 2004 and Law No.2 of 2014 about notary position. Based on the regulation in article 70 (a) about Regional Supervisory Council mentions that this council is authorized to hold a meeting to investigate if there are any suspicions about codes of ethics violations or the violation towards notary duties. The type of this study is a Juridical Empirical.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122915713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dalam Perkara Faraid di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho","authors":"M. Syukri, Azhari Yahya, Iman Jauhari","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11766","url":null,"abstract":"Pasal 54 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman menjelaskan bahwa: “Pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan dalam perkara perdata dilakukan oleh panitera dan juru sita dipimpin oleh Ketua Pengadilan.” Namun pada kenyataannya ada para pihak yang menolak melaksanakan kewajibannya sebagaimana termuat dalam putusan pengadilan meskipun putusan tersebut telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (in kracht van gewijsde). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan hakim dalam perkara faraid di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho sehingga tidak dapat dieksekusi, hambatan dalam melakukan eksekusi dan upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencegah hambatan pelaksanaan eksekusi tersebut. Metode Penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris melalui pengambilan data lapangan dan kepustakaan. Penelitian lapangan dimaksudkan untuk memperoleh data primer. Penelitian kepustakaan sebagai data sekunder dilakukan dengan cara mempelajari buku-buku, peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur yang ada relevansi dengan masalah yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan Hakim hanya mengikuti prosedur penegakan hukum formil dan materil sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Majelis Hakim kurang menggali hukum nilai-nilai hukum adat yang berlaku dalam masyarakat. Hambatan dalam melakukan eksekusi karena pihak tergugat memanfaatkan celah hukum mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Negeri. Upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencegah hambatan tersebut dengan memberikan pemahaman hukum kepada masyarakat melalui meja informasi tentang proses hukum dalam perkara perdata.According Article 54 section (2) of Law Number 48 of 2009 of Judiciary Power (Law of Judiciary Power) states that: “The Implementation of court judgment in civil case is conducted by secretary of court and bailiff led by Head of the Court”. However, in fact, there are several parties refuse to perform the obligation according to the court judgment, even when it is conducted by the secretary of court and the bailiff and led by the Head of the Court. The practice of the court judgment faces several obstacles instead of being in permanent legal force status (in kracht van gewijsde). This research is conducted to analyze the legal consideration of in faraid case at Sharia Court of Jantho which makes it non-executable, the obstacles in performing execution towards the court judgment of permanent legal force at Sharia Court of Jantho, and the efforts implemented to prevent occurring obstacles in executing the court judgment at Sharia Court of Jantho. The research method used in this study is empirical yuridicial through data gained in field and library research. Field research is performed to collect primary data by doing interview to respondents and informants. The library research is conducted by studying books, laws and other relevant literatures. The results of this study shows that the legal consideration of in faraid case at Sharia Court of Jantho is in accordance to the procedure of law","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128157321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legalitas Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh","authors":"Wahyu Ramadhani, Said . Iskandar, Radhali Radhali","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11604","url":null,"abstract":"Maraknya penangkapan akhir-akhir ini yang dilakukan oleh KPK yang dikenal dengan istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan atau OTT memunculkan polemik apakah sah atau tidak sah. Pihak-pihak yang menganggap bahwa OTT adalah ilegal mendasarkan pada argumentasi bahwa tidak adanya istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP, yang ada hanyalah Tertangkap Tangan.Perbedaan tersebut kemudian disimpulkan bahwa OTT adalah illegal.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah Tertangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP dan OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dengan melakukan studi bahan kepustakaan guna mengumpulkan data sekunder. Penelitian hukum normatif dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka (kepustakaan) yang merupakan data sekunder. Dari analisis yang dapat dipahami maka OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah tertangkap tangan dalam KUHAP bahwa Pasal 111 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Pasal 1 butir 19 KUHAP diatas dasar hukum bagi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam melakukan Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) yang dianggap illegal serta memandang bahwa Operasi Tangkap Tangan berbeda dengan Tertangkap Tangan yang terdapat pada pasal-pasal tersebut. Kemudian OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery sering digunakan oleh penyidik BNN, menilai bahwa praktik KPK dalam OTT telah menggunakan dua tindakan tersebut (interdiction and entrapment) yang berarti penyidik KPK telah mengadopsi tanpa kewenangan yang telah dimiliki penyidik BNN, sehingga KPK telah melakukan tiga jenis tindakan yang melanggar UU (interdiction, entrapment dan dalam proses penyelidikan). Rampant catching lately done by KPK is known by the term Operation Catch hand or OTT gave rise to polemic whether legitimate or illegitimate. Parties who consider that OTT is illegal basing on arguing that the absence of a Capture Operation term of hands in the code of criminal procedure, only Caught hand. The difference is then inferred that OTT is illegal. This research aims to clarify OTT corruption eradication Commission Against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure  and OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known with the term Controlled Delivery. Research methods the research methods used are normative legal (juridical normative) and conduct studies of materials libraries in order to collect data on the secondary. Normative legal research done by researching library materials (library) which is a secondary data. From the analysis that can be understood then the OTT corruption eradication Commission against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure  that Article 111 p","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"78 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116309070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia","authors":"Safriadi Safriadi, Faisal A. Rani, M. Sjafei","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11762","url":null,"abstract":"Pasal 24 UUD Tahun 1945 menjelaskan bahwa MK berwenang mengadili pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir yang putusannya bersifat final. MK sebagai pengawal konstitusi diharapkan dapat melahirkan putusan-putusan yang objektif. Namun pada kenyataannya MK melahirkan amar putusan yang kontraversi, karena pertimbangan hukum menyimpang dari asas-asas hukum universal, seperti asas ultra petita dan ultra veres. Identifikasi masalah penelitian ini ialah (1) Mengapa Hakim MK melakukan ultra veres dan (2) Hakim MK memberikan pertimbangan hukum bersifat ultra petitadalam megadili perkara pengujian undang-undang terhadap UUD Tahun 1945. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sebab-sebab Hakim MK melakukan ultra veres dan ultra petita dalam mengadili perkara-perkara pengujian undang-undang terhadap UUD Tahun 1945. Metode Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif yang terdiri dari bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan historis, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan filsafat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hakim MK melakukan ultra veres dalam mengadili perkara-perkara pengujian undang-undang terhadap UUD Tahun 1945 karena karena memiliki kewenangan lebih yang diberikan oleh UUD Tahun 1945 sehingga  dapat merusak tatanan keharmonisan dalam penagakan hukum antar lembaga kekuasaan negara. Hakim MK memberikan pertimbangan hukum bersifat ultra petita karena hanya menjadikan undang-undang sebagai sumber hukum dalam penemuan hukum dan mengabaikan sumber-sumber hukum lainnya seperti hukum yang tidak tertulis yaitu nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat.Article 24 of the Indonesia Republic’s Constitution 1945 provides that the Constitutional Court is eligible to try at the first and final levels which the decision is final. The Constitutional Court must be working with other institutions in enforcing law. However, the court decided controversial decision, as in treating the cases has been acting beyond its power, the legal consideration violates universal rules of law, such as ultra petita and ultra veres. The identified research problems are (1) the Constitutional Court judges commits ultra veres and (2) the Constitutional Judges provides law consideration based on ultra petita. This research aims to analyze the reasons of judges for committing ultra veres and ultra petita in treating cases reviewing the acts towards the Constitution 1945. This is normative legal research, which comprises of primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research approach used in this research is historical, comparative and philosophical approaches. The research shows that the Constitutional Court judges commits ultra veres in treating cases reviewing the acts towards the Constitution 1945 having impacts on the ruin of the harmonization of law enforcement between states’ institutions. The Constitutional Judges provides law consideration based on ultra petita in treating cases reviewing the acts t","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127544055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peranan Hakim Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian di Mahkamah Syar’iyah","authors":"Bahrun Bahrun, Syahrizal Abbas, Iman Jauhari","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11718","url":null,"abstract":"Pasal 4 ayat (1) dan (2) Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 menyatakan bahwa wajib terlebih dahulu diupayakan penyelesaian melalui mediasi, begitu pula Pasal 17 ayat (1) Hakim Pemeriksa Perkara mewajibkan Para Pihak menempuh Mediasi. Karena Mediasi diharapkan menjadi wadah pilihan untuk memperoleh solusi yang didasarkan pada kepentingan dan kebutuhan pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan peranan dan hambatan hakim mediator serta untuk mengetahui upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencegah dan mengatasi terjadinya hambatan tersebut. Jenis penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelitian kepustakaan untuk data sekunder dan penelitian untuk memperoleh data primer. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Berdasarkan penelitian diketahui peranan hakim mediator dalam menangani perkara/sengketa sudah berjalan, namun belum optimal. Terbukti dari 18 (delapan belas) kasus, jumlah kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi hanya 2 (dua) kasus, sedangkan tahun 2016 sampai 2017 belum ada kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi. Hal tersebut disebabkan jumlah mediator yang terbatas dan kurang memiliki kapastitas sumber daya yang memadai. Upaya untuk mencegahnya berupa sosialisasi manfaat mediasi dan mengikuti pelatihan mediasi serta mediasi harus dilakukan secara profesional. Ketua Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh hendaknya melakukan sosialisasi manfaat Mediasi, dan Mahkamah Agung RI hendaknya mengevaluasi praktik mediasi dan menambah jumlah hakim.Article 4 paragraph (1) and (2) Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 states that it must first be pursued a settlement through mediation, as well as Article 17 paragraph (1) of the Judicial Examining Judge requiring the Parties to take Mediation. Because Mediation is expected to be a container of choice to obtain solutions that are based on the interests and needs of the parties. This research aims to know and explain the roles of mediator judges and obstacles faced by the judgesin settling the dispute of marital propertiesafter the divorce at Mahkamah Syar’iyah of Banda Aceh. This research also aims to know the efforts done to prevent and handlethe hurdles in settling the disputes post-divorce at Mahkamah Syar’iyah of Banda Aceh. This is juridical empirical research. The data are collectedthrough library research in order to obtain secondary data and field research is conducted in order to obtain primary data.This research applies qualitative analysis. Based on the research, it is known that the role of mediator judges in handling cases / disputes is already underway, but not optimal. It is evident from 18 cases, the number of cases completed through mediation is only 2 cases, whereas in 2016 until 2017 there have been no cases completed through mediation. This is due to the limited number of mediators and lack of adequate resource capacity. Efforts to prevent it in the form of socializing the benefits of mediation and participating in mediation and mediation training mu","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132129983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fungsi Hukum Prosedural Dalam Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat","authors":"Fhadilah Eka Pratiwi, Eddy Purnama, H. Jalil","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.12396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.12396","url":null,"abstract":"Hukum prosedural pengisian jabatan pimpinan DPR tertuang dalam Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2014 dan Peraturan DPR No. 1 Tahun 2014. Sesuai dengan asas legalitas, penyelenggaraan pemerintahan dalam suatu negara hukum menghendaki kepastian hukum dan persamaan perlakuan. Pengisian jabatan pimpinan DPR terhadap Setya Novanto dan Fahri Hamzah tidak mengikuti prosedural yang sama. Usulan penggantian Setya Novanto oleh Golkar dilaksanakan oleh pimpinan DPR, akan tetapi usulan pemberhentian Fahri Hamzah oleh PKS tidak dilaksanakan sesuai dengan prosedur yang berlaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian penggantian dan pemberhentian Setya Novanto dan Fahri Hamzah dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan kajian yang telah dilakukan terbukti bahwa pemberhentian dan penggantian jabatan pimpinan DPR terhadap Setya Novanto dan Fahri Hamzah tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Dalam pemberhentian Fahri Hamzah ternyata tidak sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Terjadinya cacat hukum prosedural membawa konsekuensi terhadap jabatan, sehingga jabatan Fahri Hamzah sebagai pimpinan DPR saat ini tidak sah. Penerapan asas legalitas akan mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan persamaan perlakuan. Berkaitan dengan proses pemberhentian Fahri Hamzah diharapkan pimpinan DPR melanjutkan usulan pemberhentian dari PKS tersebut ke rapat paripurna.The procedural law in fulfillment the head of house of representative contained in  UU. No. 17 Tahun 2014 and  Peraturan DPR No. 1 Tahun 2014. According to the principle of legality, administration of the constitutional state require legal certainty and equal treatment. Fulfillment the head of house of representative on Setya Novanto and Fahri Hamzah not following the same procedural.  The proposal to replace Setya Novanto by Golkar was caried out to the plenary session but the dismissal proposal from PKS was not carried  according to regulation. This study aims to confirm replacement and dismissal process of Setya Novanto and Fahri Hamzah under the regulation. This study use normative lagal research. Based on the research it is prove that the replacement and dismissal of the head of house of represantive on Setya Novanto and  Fahri Hamzah not according to the regulation. Fahri Hamzah dismissal not according to the regulation. This legal defective cause a consequence on head of house of representative position, so that Fahri Hamzah position as one of head of DPR is not valid. Application of the principle of legality will realize the rule of law and equality  treatment. In related with the dismissal process of Fahri Hamzah, it is expected that the head of representative continue the dismissal proposal from PKS to the plenary session.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114054144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Penetapan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi","authors":"R. Ferdian, Mohd. Din, M. Gaussyah","doi":"10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11648","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24815/SKLJ.V2I3.11648","url":null,"abstract":"Adanya kerugian negara pada sebuah perkara dan besaran nilai kerugian merupakan hal yang sangat penting, saat ini masih terdapat polemik, baik pada alat bukti yang dihadirkan maupun penafsiran tentang “kerugian negara”. Tujuan penulisan untuk mengetahui dasar penentuan kerugian negara dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan mengetahui proses penetapan kerugian negara dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi, Penulisan dilakukan dengan penelitian kepustakaan, dan pendekatan yuridis normatif, hasil penelitian diketahui dalam menentukan nilai kerugian negara pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi, jika perkaranya sederhana maka penentuan nilai kerugian negara dilakukan oleh Kejaksaan, jika perkaranya perlu audit secara mendalam maka Kejaksaan berkoordinasi dengan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) atau dengan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) sebagai alat bukti awal persidangan mengenainya nilai kerugian negara. Proses Penetapan kerugian negara yaitu dengan menghadirkan LHPKKN dari BPKP atau hasil perhitungan sendiri oleh Kejaksaan. Disarankan agar disebutkan pada setiap Undang-Undang yang mengatur mengenai tindak pidana korupsi bahwa hanya BPK lembaga yang berwenang menetapkan nilai kerugian keuangan negara. Perlu diperbanyak sumber daya auditor yang mumpuni di seluruh kantor perwakilan BPK.The existence of the losses of the State on a matter and the magnitude of value of loss is very important, currently there is still debated, both on the evidence presented as well as the interpretation of the \"loss of State\" itself, the purpose of writing to know the basis of the determination of the loss of the State in criminal acts of corruption and know the process of determination of State losses in the case the crime of corruption, The writing is done by research libraries, and normative juridical approach, research results known in determining the value of the losses of the State on the matter a criminal offence of corruption, If a simple matter then the determination of the value of the loss of the State done by the Prosecutor's Office itself, If the matter needs to be in-depth auditing thus Prosecution Agency coordinate with the Financial Examiner (BPK) or the bodies of financial supervision and development (BPKP) as a proof of the early trials of its value losses of the State. The process of the determination of the loss of the country namely by presenting LHPKKN from BPKP or calculation result by the Prosecutor's Office. It is recommended that mentioned on any legislation governing the crime of corruption that only the authorized institution of the BPK set the value of the financial loss to the State. Need to be copied the Auditors qualified resources across the Office of the representative of the BPK.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121757105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}