Jasmijn M Rootlieb, Sigrid Polspoel, Patrick Brienesse, Cas Smits
{"title":"Remote self-testing for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of wireless streaming on speech recognition in noise.","authors":"Jasmijn M Rootlieb, Sigrid Polspoel, Patrick Brienesse, Cas Smits","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>20 normal hearing participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F<sub>4,194</sub> = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"314-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zoe McNeice, Dani Tomlin, Barbra H B Timmer, Camille E Short, Karyn Galvin
{"title":"Adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist: a qualitative study of what was and was not successfully communicated about listening difficulties.","authors":"Zoe McNeice, Dani Tomlin, Barbra H B Timmer, Camille E Short, Karyn Galvin","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2351033","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2351033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Some adults experience challenges in successfully communicating their listening difficulties to their audiologist, and report feeling that they are not always listened to or understood. This project examined adults' recollections of discussions with their audiologist to explore (1) how adults report describing their listening difficulties and (2) information that adults report they do not communicate, or do not communicate successfully, to their audiologist.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interview transcripts were analysed using a template analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Fifteen adults who self-report listening difficulties, and who had previously consulted an audiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified from adults' recollections of how they describe their listening difficulties: (1) situation or context of listening difficulties, (2) behavioural responses, (3) impacts of listening difficulties and (4) contributing factors. Adults report not always successfully communicating (1) emotional concerns and impacts, (2) descriptions of sound quality and (3) descriptions of changed listening experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results provide insights about the times when adults feel that communication with their audiologist is successful, or unsuccessful. The results are useful for informing interventions to help adults and audiologists communicate more effectively together. To further inform interventions, factors affecting adults' communication should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"343-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140912215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jacqueline Young, Harriet Withey, Sian Lloyd Jones, Luise V Marino, Abby Milchard, Lisa Garner, Annabel Forsdyke, Rachel Kidd
{"title":"My hearing explained for children: exploring use of this discussion tool in clinical practice.","authors":"Jacqueline Young, Harriet Withey, Sian Lloyd Jones, Luise V Marino, Abby Milchard, Lisa Garner, Annabel Forsdyke, Rachel Kidd","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2369645","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2369645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical use of 'My Hearing Explained for Children' (MHEfC) with children aged 8-11 years, from the perspectives of the child, parents and audiologist.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed methods randomised control trial. Participants completed evaluation questionnaires after their appointment. Statistical and thematic analyses were used to examine the rating scale and open response elements of the questionnaires respectively.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>45 families participated, 24 randomised to MHEfC and 21 to standard care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of MHEfC increased the appointment duration by 8.2 minutes (95% CI 4.1 to 14.2 minutes), which was acceptable to parents (96%) and audiologists (67%). It promoted conversation around 'behavioural and communication tactics', 'specific listening situations' and 'listening effort' at the expense of 'anatomy/physiology/aetiology'. MHEfC positively impacted the discussion of test results (54%); ease of finding joint solutions to problems (71%); and the nature of issues and management options discussed (54%). Parental satisfaction with discussion was high on both pathways, so some parents and audiologists questioned MHEfC necessity and recommended targeted use in future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHEfC was acceptable to children (70%) and parents (86%). It successfully promoted child-centred topics of discussion and can positively impact discussion outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"402-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141544802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The experience of stigma related to hearing loss and hearing aids: perspectives of adults with hearing loss, their families, and hearing care professionals.","authors":"Mansoureh Nickbakht, Katie Ekberg, Monique Waite, Nerina Scarinci, Barbra Timmer, Carly Meyer, Louise Hickson","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2353862","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2353862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore when and how stigma-induced identity threat is experienced by adults with hearing loss (HL) and their family members (affiliate stigma) from the perspectives of adults with HL, their family members, and hearing care professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative descriptive methodology with semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Adults with acquired HL (<i>n</i> = 20), their nominated family members (<i>n</i> = 20), and hearing care professionals (<i>n</i> = 25).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups of participants believed that both HL and hearing aids were associated with stigma for adults with HL. Two themes were identified, specifically: (1) an association between HL and hearing aids and the stereotypes of ageing, disability, and difference; and (2) varied views on the existence and experience of stigma for adults with HL. Hearing care professionals focused on the stigma of hearing aids more than HL, whereas adult participants focused on stigma of HL. Family member data indicated that they experienced little affiliate stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stigma-induced identity threat related to HL and, to a lesser extent, hearing aids exists for adults with HL. Shared perceptions that associate HL and hearing aids with ageing stereotypes were reported to contribute to the identity threat, as were some situational cues and personal characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"S12-S19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141186347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How do adults with hearing loss, family members, and hearing care professionals respond to the stigma of hearing loss and hearing aids?","authors":"Nerina Scarinci, Monique Waite, Mansoureh Nickbakht, Katie Ekberg, Barbra Timmer, Carly Meyer, Louise Hickson","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2406885","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2406885","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the perspectives and experiences of adults with hearing loss (HL), their family members, and hearing care professionals on how they respond to the stigma of HL and hearing aids (HAs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative descriptive approach using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Three participant groups were recruited, including 20 adults over the age of 50 years with HL, 20 family members who had a close relationship to the adults with HL, and 25 hearing care professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes described how adults with HL, family members, and hearing care professionals respond to the stigma of HL and HAs, namely: (1) some people tell others about their HL and HAs and some people don't; (2) telling or not telling depends on the situation; and (3) people deal with the stigma of HL and HAs in different ways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a range of volitional responses to the stigma of HL and HAs. People affected by HL may not tell others about their HL and/or HAs because of the stigma, and these volitional responses are influenced by situational cues. Adults with HL and family members manage the stigma of HL and HAs in different ways and require a person-centred approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"S20-S27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142464505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph A de Gruy, William W Laurenzo, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Oishika Paul, Christopher Lee, Christopher Spankovich
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of problematic tinnitus.","authors":"Joseph A de Gruy, William W Laurenzo, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Oishika Paul, Christopher Lee, Christopher Spankovich","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence and characteristics of problematic tinnitus in a representative United States (US) sample.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study of the NHANES database from 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>8029 records were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of any tinnitus was 16.32%. Only 1.38% reported tinnitus as a big problem or worse. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between tinnitus constancy and duration with severity, where more constant perception and longer duration was related to increased severity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Multivariable models showed a clear relationship of increased odds ratio (OR) of problematic tinnitus with constancy of tinnitus but not duration. Furthermore, multivariable models showed higher Body Mass Index (OR= 1.013, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), sleep trouble (OR = 2.016, 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) and comorbidities (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.94) were all associated with increased problematic tinnitus, but not non-problematic tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of problematic tinnitus is much lower than the prevalence of any tinnitus. There was also a relationship between BMI, sleep trouble, other comorbidities and increased odds of problematic tinnitus. Tinnitus severity was significantly related to constancy of perception but had a less clear relationship to duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"307-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141727172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reliability of an extended version of the 3m™ Eargage tool to assess earcanal size and assist earplug selection.","authors":"Bastien Poissenot-Arrigoni, Laurence Martin, Alessia Negrini, Djamal Berbiche, Olivier Doutres, Franck Sgard","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2352045","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2352045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the ability of an extended version of the 3 M<sup>TM</sup> Eargage to estimate the earcanal size and assess the likelihood that a particular earplug can fit an individual's earcanal, ultimately serving as a tool for selecting earplugs in the field.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Earcanal morphology, assessed through earcanal earmolds scans, is compared to earcanal size assessed with the extended eargage (EE) via box plots and Pearson linear correlations coefficients. Relations between attenuation measured on participants (for 6 different earplugs) and their earcanal size assessed with the EE are established via comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>121 participants exposed to occupational noise (103 men, 18 women, mean age 47 year<i>s</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The earcanal size assessed with the EE allows for estimating the area of the earcanal's first bend cross-section (correlation coefficient <math><mi> </mi><mi>r</mi></math> = 0.533, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Extremely large earcanals (12.7% of earcanals in our sample) lead to significantly lower earplug attenuation (potentially inadequate) than smaller earcanals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EE is a simple and inexpensive tool easily deployable in the field to assist earplugs selection. When extended with sizes larger than the maximum size of the commercial tool, it allows for detecting individuals with extremely large earcanals who are most likely to be under-protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"392-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141156915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Barbra H B Timmer, Katie Ekberg, Carly Meyer, Monique Waite, Nerina Scarinci, Mansoureh Nickbakht, Louise Hickson
{"title":"Using Ecological Momentary Analysis to explore stigma experiences in the real world for adults with acquired hearing loss.","authors":"Barbra H B Timmer, Katie Ekberg, Carly Meyer, Monique Waite, Nerina Scarinci, Mansoureh Nickbakht, Louise Hickson","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2418970","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2418970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to use Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to capture how stigma-induced identity threat is experienced by adults with hearing loss and how they respond to such threats in daily life.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Twenty adults with hearing loss from 53 to 88 years (mean age of 69.4 years) completed a range of demographic and stigma questionnaires in the laboratory and, over a two-week period, answered daily EMA surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 633 EMA surveys were collected. Five participants reported 13 listening events in which they experienced stigma. These events were typically when conversing with family or friends who were aware of the adults' hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of individual stigma experiences captured by EMA were low, when viewed across a large number of social interactions. However, as a group, a quarter of the participants in this study experienced stigma over a two-week period, typically from others close to them. This suggests that stigma experiences may be a regular occurrence for some adults with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"S28-S38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Who do you tell about your hearing loss? A stigma-induced identity-threat model for adults with hearing loss.","authors":"Katie Ekberg, Mansoureh Nickbakht, Carly Meyer, Monique Waite, Barbra Timmer, Nerina Scarinci, Louise Hickson","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2489569","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2489569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper collates findings from six studies in the special issue and maps them onto the Major and O'Brien (2005) model for a holistic representation of how adults with hearing loss (HL) experience stigma-induced identity threat, how they respond, and the association with hearing aid (HA) use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Findings were obtained using a range of methods: qualitative interviews, Ecological Momentary Assessment, and Conversation Analysis in phase 1; and online self-report surveys in phase 2. Data from phase 1 informed the survey used in phase 2.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Phase 1 included 20 adults with HL and their significant others (SOs). Phase 2 included 331 adults with HL and 313 SOs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings support the view of stigma being context and relationship specific as suggested by the Major and O'Brien (2005) model. 'Not telling' was found to be a key way that the stigma of HL is responded to in everyday life. HL disclosure, in addition to attitudes towards HAs, stereotypical beliefs, and personal characteristics, were associated with HA use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical implications are discussed, including how hearing care professionals might support adults with HL and their SOs who experience stigma related to HL and/or HAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"S65-S70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}