ARCH@CPSWeek最新文献_第2页

A Benchmark for Component-based Hybrid Systems Safety Verification 基于组件的混合动力系统安全验证基准

ARCH@CPSWeek Pub Date : 2017-06-27 DOI: 10.29007/9jm3

Andreas Müller, Stefan Mitsch, W. Retschitzegger, W. Schwinger, André Platzer

{"title":"A Benchmark for Component-based Hybrid Systems Safety Verification","authors":"Andreas Müller, Stefan Mitsch, W. Retschitzegger, W. Schwinger, André Platzer","doi":"10.29007/9jm3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29007/9jm3","url":null,"abstract":"At scale, formal verification of hybrid systems is challenging, but a potential remedy is the observation that systems often come with a number of natural components with certain local responsibilities. Ideally, such a compartmentalization into more manageable components also translates to hybrid systems verification, so that safety properties about the whole system can be derived from local verification results. We propose a benchmark consisting of a sequence of three case studies, where components interact to achieve system safety. The baseline for the benchmark is the verification effort from a monolithic fashion (i.e., the entire system without splitting it into components). We describe how to split the system models used in these case studies into components with local responsibilities, and what is expected about their interaction to guarantee system safety. The benchmark can be used to assess the performance, automation, and verification features of component-based verification approaches. ∗Work partly funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P28187-N31. This research was sponsored by the AFOSR under grant number FA9550-16-1-0288. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of any sponsoring institution, the U.S. government or any other entity. G. Frehse and M. Althoff (eds.), ARCH17 (EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 48), pp. 65–74 Component-based CPS Verification Müller, Mitsch, Retschitzegger, Schwinger, Platzer System ( Component A ∥ Component B ) System Proof System Contract ( Contract A ∧ Contract B ) Component A Proof A Contract A Component B Contract B","PeriodicalId":136799,"journal":{"name":"ARCH@CPSWeek","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124870780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}