CABI One Health最新文献

{"title":"One Health, many perspectives: Exploring Indigenous and Western epistemologies","authors":"Michelle Pollowitz, Cole Allick, Keala B. Campbell, Nicole lee Kamakahiolani Ellison, Giselle Perez-Aguilar, Melissa Vera, Vickie Ramirez, Deborah Nadal, Julianne Meisner","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 The One Health approach, which assesses the interconnectedness of animal, human, and environmental health, fails to include and amplify Indigenous knowledge and Indigenous scientists. To effectively center Indigenous knowledge next to and within the One Health approach, which is historically based in Western science, the similarities and differences between Indigenous science, specifically Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), and One Health must be explored. The objective of this project is to identify values in Indigenous science that are unsupported or underrepresented in Western science and then collaboratively ideate recommendations that Western allies can take to center and support Indigenous scientists and elevate Indigenous knowledge. From January to March 2023, the study team conducted semi-structured interviews with Indigenous knowledge keepers via Zoom video calls. American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian (Kānaka Maoli), and other Indigenous participants from the global diaspora residing in the continental United States and Hawaiian Islands were recruited through social media and referrals from Indigenous leaders who had participated in formative (phase 1) interviews completed in 2022. In those formative interviews, four themes emerged and called for further exploration of Indigenous perspectives on (1) the natural world, (2) cultural heritage, (3) value expression, and (4) reflection. These ideas were reframed into questions asked in subsequent (phase 2) interviews in 2023. Thematic identification methods were used to highlight key ideas throughout the interviews. Participants noted gaps between their Indigenous worldviews and the One Health model, particularly relating to contrasts with Western culture, holistic expression, power in action, identity and belonging, maintaining community and cultural practices, and sharing information/education. It was also noted that One Health must do more than just uplift Indigenous values to support Indigenous scientists and should instead collaborate with TEK keepers and foster practices that are inclusive and validating of other knowledge systems. Phase 2 interview responses highlighted Indigenous principles that are underrepresented in One Health practice. These principles were transformed into considerations specifically for Western-rooted scientists to improve allyship to Indigenous science and scientists. Adoption of the considerations would strengthen partnership between One Health practitioners and Indigenous scientists and promote collaboration across many ways of knowing.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The One Health theory encourages transdisciplinary collaboration to break down siloing and innovate solutions. Yet, One Health practice, and the Western scientific approach it takes, often excludes involvement with Indigenous ways of knowing and disclaims Indigenous knowledge keepers who have been conducting “One Health” work since time immemorial. Indigenous knowledge keepers who self-identified as c","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141710435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of a protocol for using geo-trackers to identify zoonotic enteric pathogen transmission pathways in a pilot study in Kenya","authors":"P. J. Busienei, S. Simiyu, Daniel K. Sewell, Abisola Osinuga, Kelly K. Baker","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Humans and animals can be exposed to fecally-transmitted pathogens in both private and public domain environments. Animals may also acquire pathogen infections from these two environments and transmit them to humans through different pathways. Evidence on how often and where interactions occur between the two environments could improve the effectiveness of public health programs for preventing zoonotic disease transmission and response to disease outbreaks. This study aimed to develop a protocol for using geo-trackers to measure the spatial-temporal movement and interaction between animals and children in households and public areas in low- and middle-income categories of urban neighbourhoods in Kenya. It also aimed to identify opportunities and challenges for the scale-up of these methods’ for surveillance of other zoonotic diseases of public health significance. One commercial geo-tracker device with the best technological performance and usability that met pre-defined criteria for the study context was identified. Community engagement meetings were then conducted to gather input on a proposed study protocol. Afterwards, infants and animals were geo-tracked in 10 households in urban informal settlements of Kibera and Jericho, Nairobi over two consecutive weeks with iterative improvements to protocols. The effectiveness of the geo-tracking exercise was evaluated through in-depth interviews with Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) and infant caregivers. Animal and infant behaviour and battery reliability of the geo-trackers were also monitored; and observed opportunities and challenges in implementing the protocol during the exercise were documented. Community members were receptive and accepted the use of geo-trackers on animals and children. In pilot testing, there was no change of behaviour from 10 infants tracked. Discomfort was observed for up to 30 min after the placement for some of the seven animals tracked, but the animals quickly adjusted. The battery for all geo-tracker devices lasted for the 24-h geo-tracking period. Some caregivers and CHVs were concerned whether the geo-trackers could record personal information. It was shown that geo-tracker devices can be successfully deployed to study animal-child interactions and movement in different categories of urban neighbourhoods. Recommendations have been made on the lessons learnt from the study to help scientists who would use geo-trackers for future community-based human and animal research.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Assessing human and animal risks of acquiring enteric infections from environmental contamination, or contributing to pathogen contamination of the environment requires understanding spatial-temporal patterns of human and animal movement between private households and the community. Movement of domestic animals is relevant for understanding household-community spatial patterns of pathogen transmission because animal ownership and contact with humans is common, and free-roaming animals carryin","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141009745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Toward social and ecological equity: A feminist lens on One Health","authors":"Monique Léchenne, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Aurélie Cailleau, Helena Greter, Agnes Yawe, Kristina Pelikan, Kathrin Heitz Tokpa, R. Tschopp, Lisa Crump, Brigitte Bagnol","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139857878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of a One Health Clinic: Enhancing access to healthcare and housing for young adults experiencing homelessness with animals","authors":"Jessica C. Kelley, Vickie Ramirez, Julianne Meisner","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The One Health Clinic (OHC) is a transdisciplinary approach to healthcare services delivery, providing low-barrier healthcare and community services for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) and their companion animals that integrate human, animal, and environmental health. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an OHC model in a youth and young adult shelter on access to healthcare, housing, and community resources. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with six OHC client participants and three provider participants, and a thematic analysis was used to study the effects of the OHC model on two key outcomes: overall health for humans and their companion animal(s), and access to public services for humans and their companion animal(s). Results showed that the OHC model provides multiple services in one place which reduces barriers to accessing health services, housing, and community resources. The integrated healthcare services promote positive interactions with providers and facilitate access to healthcare, housing, and community resources for PEH and their companion animals. Settings with similar goals of client health and access to healthcare, as well as housing services and community resources, can utilize the OHC care model to integrate services for lower barrier access to healthcare and community services to promote health on an individual level and from a One Health perspective.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Our study on the OHC model demonstrates the tangible impact of integrating healthcare services for homeless young adults and their companion animals. In the One Health context, our work addresses the complex interplay between human, animal, and environmental well-being. By bridging healthcare, housing, and community resources, the OHC model enhances access and reduces barriers. The One Health approach enriches impact, as collaboration across sectors yields multifaceted benefits. The transdisciplinary nature of our research fuses academic and non-academic knowledge, ensuring a holistic perspective. Practical solutions emerge from diverse insights, transcending traditional boundaries. This co-produced transformational knowledge facilitates real-world change, impacting lives, promoting resilience, and fostering sustainability. The OHC model exemplifies how cooperative, transdisciplinary efforts yield breakthroughs that elevate health, save lives, and nurture the optimal environment for people and their companion animals to live, work, and play.\u0000","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"68 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139797342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of a One Health Clinic: Enhancing access to healthcare and housing for young adults experiencing homelessness with animals","authors":"Jessica C. Kelley, Vickie Ramirez, Julianne Meisner","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The One Health Clinic (OHC) is a transdisciplinary approach to healthcare services delivery, providing low-barrier healthcare and community services for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) and their companion animals that integrate human, animal, and environmental health. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an OHC model in a youth and young adult shelter on access to healthcare, housing, and community resources. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with six OHC client participants and three provider participants, and a thematic analysis was used to study the effects of the OHC model on two key outcomes: overall health for humans and their companion animal(s), and access to public services for humans and their companion animal(s). Results showed that the OHC model provides multiple services in one place which reduces barriers to accessing health services, housing, and community resources. The integrated healthcare services promote positive interactions with providers and facilitate access to healthcare, housing, and community resources for PEH and their companion animals. Settings with similar goals of client health and access to healthcare, as well as housing services and community resources, can utilize the OHC care model to integrate services for lower barrier access to healthcare and community services to promote health on an individual level and from a One Health perspective.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Our study on the OHC model demonstrates the tangible impact of integrating healthcare services for homeless young adults and their companion animals. In the One Health context, our work addresses the complex interplay between human, animal, and environmental well-being. By bridging healthcare, housing, and community resources, the OHC model enhances access and reduces barriers. The One Health approach enriches impact, as collaboration across sectors yields multifaceted benefits. The transdisciplinary nature of our research fuses academic and non-academic knowledge, ensuring a holistic perspective. Practical solutions emerge from diverse insights, transcending traditional boundaries. This co-produced transformational knowledge facilitates real-world change, impacting lives, promoting resilience, and fostering sustainability. The OHC model exemplifies how cooperative, transdisciplinary efforts yield breakthroughs that elevate health, save lives, and nurture the optimal environment for people and their companion animals to live, work, and play.\u0000","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"298 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139857399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Toward social and ecological equity: A feminist lens on One Health","authors":"Monique Léchenne, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Aurélie Cailleau, Helena Greter, Agnes Yawe, Kristina Pelikan, Kathrin Heitz Tokpa, R. Tschopp, Lisa Crump, Brigitte Bagnol","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"59 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139797830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Animal welfare as the basis of One Health: A UN convention on animal welfare, health, and protection poses a realistic solution to improved animal welfare and human health","authors":"A. Goetschel","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Animal welfare is closely linked to animal health and human welfare and health, as the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) emphasizes in its Global Animal Welfare Strategy of 2017. As a result of recent pandemics, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the WOAH have created the One Health High Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), committed to animal health and human health in the One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026) and pledged to “[work] together for the Health of Humans, Animals, Plants and the Environment.” Despite these important acknowledgments and efforts from leading world organizations, including the One Health quadripartite, the latter has so far been reluctant to actively pursue the adoption of a legally binding commitment to improve the protection and welfare of animals globally. Animal welfare remains without relevant provisions.\u0000 \u0000 In the following, it is argued this must be integrated into the OHHLEP in addition to the creation of an “Animal Think and Do Tank” in the form of a technical working group, which would finalize a UN Convention on the issue, as proposed, e.g., in the drafted UN Convention on Animal Health and Protection (UNCAHP) 2018. The “Animal Think and Do Tank,” within its One Health context, must manifest a transdisciplinary approach, since – unlike globally binding legislation – policies, agreements, and declarations of various world organizations do not suffice to bring about a fundamental change in animal welfare. Acknowledging that animal protection is a complex and multifaceted issue involving ethical, cultural, social, religious, political, economic, and scientific dimensions (GAL Association,\u0000 2018\u0000 , Preamble), these aspects must be represented within the decision making process regarding the Convention’s content. Besides veterinarians, experts of further disciplines related to One Health must be consulted – such as lawyers and legal academics specializing in animal, international, and UN law, competent representatives of the animal welfare and animal rights movements, and ethicists and economists. Measures must be taken to improve transparency and overall confidence in the dialogue between the actors, including competent and not specifically scientific representatives of the animal protection and animal rights movement as elements of civil society to advocate for the fundamental interests of animals.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This article proposes that a UN Convention on Animal Health and Protection would further the enforceability of a One Health approach to human, environmental, and animal health. Science has proven that these elements are intertwined, but they remain disparate at a legislative level in many jurisdictions. It is suggested that placing animal welfare provisions on a UN-Convention footing by utilizing the positioning of the WOAH and UNEP is the most effective way of rendering One Health policy a gl","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139892856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Animal welfare as the basis of One Health: A UN convention on animal welfare, health, and protection poses a realistic solution to improved animal welfare and human health","authors":"A. Goetschel","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Animal welfare is closely linked to animal health and human welfare and health, as the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) emphasizes in its Global Animal Welfare Strategy of 2017. As a result of recent pandemics, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the WOAH have created the One Health High Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), committed to animal health and human health in the One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026) and pledged to “[work] together for the Health of Humans, Animals, Plants and the Environment.” Despite these important acknowledgments and efforts from leading world organizations, including the One Health quadripartite, the latter has so far been reluctant to actively pursue the adoption of a legally binding commitment to improve the protection and welfare of animals globally. Animal welfare remains without relevant provisions.\u0000 \u0000 In the following, it is argued this must be integrated into the OHHLEP in addition to the creation of an “Animal Think and Do Tank” in the form of a technical working group, which would finalize a UN Convention on the issue, as proposed, e.g., in the drafted UN Convention on Animal Health and Protection (UNCAHP) 2018. The “Animal Think and Do Tank,” within its One Health context, must manifest a transdisciplinary approach, since – unlike globally binding legislation – policies, agreements, and declarations of various world organizations do not suffice to bring about a fundamental change in animal welfare. Acknowledging that animal protection is a complex and multifaceted issue involving ethical, cultural, social, religious, political, economic, and scientific dimensions (GAL Association,\u0000 2018\u0000 , Preamble), these aspects must be represented within the decision making process regarding the Convention’s content. Besides veterinarians, experts of further disciplines related to One Health must be consulted – such as lawyers and legal academics specializing in animal, international, and UN law, competent representatives of the animal welfare and animal rights movements, and ethicists and economists. Measures must be taken to improve transparency and overall confidence in the dialogue between the actors, including competent and not specifically scientific representatives of the animal protection and animal rights movement as elements of civil society to advocate for the fundamental interests of animals.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This article proposes that a UN Convention on Animal Health and Protection would further the enforceability of a One Health approach to human, environmental, and animal health. Science has proven that these elements are intertwined, but they remain disparate at a legislative level in many jurisdictions. It is suggested that placing animal welfare provisions on a UN-Convention footing by utilizing the positioning of the WOAH and UNEP is the most effective way of rendering One Health policy a gl","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"200 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139832732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"One Medicine vs One Health: Policy disconnect in India","authors":"Sandul Yasobant, F. Memon, Pachillu Kalpana, Deepak Saxena","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2024.0001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 One Health is an integrated, unifying approach to balancing and optimizing the health of people, animals, and ecosystems in a sustainable manner. It is a global movement to align our thinking and policy on human, animal, and environmental health, which is critical for effectively combating diseases at the human-animal-environmental interfaces. The Indian government intends to implement the much-needed and globally recognized ‘\u0000 One Nation, One Health System’\u0000 policy by 2030; however, given the complexity of India’s healthcare system in terms of One Health implementation, it seems to be a long way to go move and accelerate the collaboration among system stakeholders at various levels. Government of India aims to integrate modern and traditional medical systems such as allopathy, ayurveda, and homeopathy in education, medical practice, and research in the larger domain of One Health. Basically, their larger focus is on intra-human health systems integration rather than inter-system integration, which is also not aligned with the principles of One Medicine. Perhaps this could be the foundation for launching the One Health concept, and which will include more relevant stakeholders working at the human-animal-ecosystem interface in the coming years. The current initiative neither fulfils the essential principle of the One Medicine or One Health concept nor will it serve the purpose of the Global One Health joint plan of action. There is an urgent need for broadening the inter-systems stakeholders at all levels and adopting the principles of One Health more holistically in alignment with the global movement.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 One Health, a comprehensive approach to human, animal, and ecosystem well-being, is well-recognized worldwide. India’s visionary ‘One Nation, One Health System’ policy targets 2030, focusing on integrating diverse medical practices like allopathy, ayurveda, and homeopathy. This marks a foundational stride towards broader engagement across the human-animal-ecosystem interface. Nonetheless, the current proposal has been marked as a shortfall for global One Health principles and objectives. While recognizing the significant room for improvement, this article delicately underscores the need for more comprehensive implementation aligning with One Health principles and considering inter-system harmony beyond the intra-system.\u0000","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139619293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mentorship of the next generation of One Health workers through experiential learning: A case of students of Makerere University","authors":"P. Nsamba, I. Rwego, Edwinah Atusingwize, Sylvia Wanzala, E. Buregyeya, Gabriel Tumwine, D. Tuhebwe, Charles Drago Kato, A. Musewa, J. Kungu, Frank Mwiine, P. Waiswa, Sarah Nitumusiima, I. Naigaga, H. Amuguni, Katherine Pelican, Jeff Bender, Saul Tzipori, J. Kabasa, W. Bazeyo","doi":"10.1079/cabionehealth.2023.0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2023.0024","url":null,"abstract":"Multiple zoonotic disease outbreaks occurred in Uganda over the past two decades and have needed operationalization of the One Health (OH) Approach to respond effectively. Between 2016 and 2018, the African One Health University Network (AFROHUN) supported 61 students (25 females, 36 males) to join multisectoral and multidisciplinary government national and district task force disease response teams. The goal of joining these teams was to build and strengthen the students’ disease investigation and response skills in real time using a One Health approach. Qualitative methods were used to collect student and partner responses on their field experiences. The AFROHUN project identified the experiential knowledge and skills that the students gained. Student project reports were reviewed by the joint technical teams from the university and the national/district task forces. These included training materials and disease outbreak investigation and response reports. Partnerships and collaboration between the university One Health networks and the government enabled 35 graduate and 26 undergraduate students to receive joint mentorship from the national or district task force outbreak response teams. Most participants were from degree programs in Public Health, Epidemiology, Environmental Health, Veterinary, Wildlife Sciences, and Infectious Disease Management, while few students were from social sciences. Students were mentored in seven competency-based areas of disease management: (1) biorisk management, (2) community engagement and coordination, (3) epidemiology, (4) leadership, (5) outbreak investigation and response, (6) risk communication, and (7) surveillance. In conclusion, zoonotic outbreaks provided real-life learning opportunities for students in disease outbreak investigation and response using a multidisciplinary and multisectoral approach. The identified skills can be incorporated into educational materials such as curricula and present an ideal opportunity to build partnerships for workforce development. The next generation of One Health workers, those capable of working across sectors and disciplines to improve the health of animals, humans, plants, and the environment, need soft and technical skills to guarantee optimal preparedness, prevention, and response to disease outbreaks and understand the animal to human transmission dynamics of disease. In countries where emerging, re-emerging, and endemic zoonoses and hemorrhagic fevers are prevalent, it is crucial to provide these real-life or experiential training opportunities for university students, working closely in multidisciplinary teams. The “real-time” joint mentorship by the government’s multidisciplinary and multisectoral outbreak response teams, during disease outbreaks, provides an opportunity to build and strengthen student skills in biorisk management, community engagement and coordination, epidemiology, leadership, outbreak investigation and response, risk communication, a","PeriodicalId":136109,"journal":{"name":"CABI One Health","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139208092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}