{"title":"The regression trap: why regression analyses are not suitable for selecting determinants to target in behavior change interventions.","authors":"Rik Crutzen, Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2268684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2268684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Regression analyses are commonly used for selecting determinants to target in behavior change interventions, but the aim of this article is to explain why regression analyses are not suitable for this purpose (i.e. the regression trap).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This aim is achieved by providing (1) a theoretical rationale based on overlap among determinants; (2) a mathematical rationale based on the formulas that are used to calculate regression coefficients; and (3) examples based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, the meaning of regression coefficients is commonly explained as expressing the association between a determinant and a target behavior 'holding all other predictors constant.' We explain that this often boils down to 'neglecting a part of the psyche.' Second, we demonstrate that the interpretation of regression coefficients is distorted by correlations between determinants. Third, the examples provided demonstrate the impact this has in practice. This results in interventions targeting determinants that are less relevant and, thereby, have less impact on behavior change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are theoretical, mathematical, and practical reasons why regression analyses, and by extension multivariate analyses relying on correlations, are not suitable to select determinants to target in behavior change interventions. Instead, intervention developers should consider univariate distributions and bivariate association estimates simultaneously and there are freely accessible tools available to do so.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2268684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71411988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Burnout study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: psychometric evaluation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel.","authors":"Kamonporn Wannarit, Woraphat Ratta-Apha, Pornjira Pariwatcharakul, Panate Pukrittayakamee","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2268694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2268694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed (1) to determine the psychometric properties of a Thai version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS [MP]) and (2) to examine the mean scores of burnout and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forward and back translations of the MBI-HSS (MP) questionnaire were performed. The Thai version was subsequently completed by 682 Thai physicians and nurses who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the first subsample (<i>n</i> = 341) by conducting Kaiser Mayer-Olkin sampling adequacy measurement and Bartlett's test of sphericity whereas confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the second subsample (<i>n</i> = 341) using fit indices of the normed chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>/df), the comparative fit index, the Tucker-Lewis index, and the root mean square error of approximation. This version's internal consistency was investigated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Demographic profiles were evaluated with descriptive and analytical statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Thai version of the MBI-HSS (MP) displayed good psychometric characteristics, as the Cronbach's alpha values of the 3 burnout factors ranged from 0.843 to 0.945. The CFA also showed good fit indices (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 4.473; <i>P</i> < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.075 (95%CI = 0.055-0.079); CFI = 0.946; and TLI = 0.936). The physicians' mean EE, DP, and PA scores were 25.28 ± 13.27, 7.15 ± 6.11, and 36.83 ± 8.13, respectively, whereas The nurses' mean EE, DP, and PA scores were 23.10 ± 14.14, 4.43 ± 5.06, and 35.67 ± 10.24, respectively. Healthcare professionals who were younger, single, had fewer years of practice, and had more working hours per week tended to express more burnout scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Thai version of the MBI-HSS (MP) demonstrates good psychometric properties in assessing burnout among healthcare professionals. Several factors may be pivotal in intensifying burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2268694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/52/RHPB_11_2268694.PMC10580795.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49676775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cancer, now what? A cross-sectional study examining physical symptoms, subjective well-being, and psychological flexibility.","authors":"Cecile J Proctor, Anthony J Reiman, Lisa A Best","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266220","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The impact of cancer extends beyond treatment and evaluating the adverse psychological effects in survivors is important. We examined: (1) the relationship between diagnosis, relapse, and subjective well-being using a short and a holistic measure of well-being, including comparisons between our sample and established norms; (2) if reported physical symptoms were related to components of subjective well-being; and (3) if increased psychological flexibility predicted overall subjective well-being. <b>Methods:</b> In total, 316 survivors completed online questionnaires to assess cancer, physical health (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-R; ESAS-R), subjective well-being (Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving; CIT; Satisfaction with Life Scale; SWLS) and psychological flexibility (Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy). <b>Results:</b> Relative to ESAS-R cut-points (Oldenmenger et al., 2013), participants reported only moderate levels of tiredness and slightly elevated drowsiness, depression, and anxiety; participants reported more problems with psychological health. SWLS scores were lower than published norms (<i>M</i> = 18.23, <i>SD</i> = 8.23) and a relapse was associated with the lowest SWLS scores (<i>M</i> = 16.95, <i>SD</i> = 7.72). There were differences in thriving between participants and age-matched norms (Su et al., 2014). Participants reported lower community involvement, respect, engagement with activities, skill mastery, sense of accomplishment, self-worth, self-efficacy, autonomy, purpose, optimism, subjective well-being, and positive emotions coupled with higher loneliness and negative emotions. In regression analysis, two components of psychological flexibility, Openness to Experience, <i>t</i> = 2.50, <i>p</i> < 0.13, <i>β</i> = -0.18, and Valued Action, <i>t =</i> 7.08, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>β</i> = -0.47, predicted 28.8% of the variability in total CIT scores, beyond the effects of demographic and disease characteristics and reported physical symptoms. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cancer is an isolating experience, with the adverse psychological effects that impact subjective well-being continuing after the cessation of physical symptoms. Specific components of psychological flexibility may explain some variability in thriving beyond disease characteristics and may inform psychological intervention after diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2266220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/11/RHPB_11_2266220.PMC10578084.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41234731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claire Anne Hanlon, Jennifer Chopra, Jane Boland, David McIlroy, Helen Poole, Pooja Saini
{"title":"A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James' Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis.","authors":"Claire Anne Hanlon, Jennifer Chopra, Jane Boland, David McIlroy, Helen Poole, Pooja Saini","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research supports development of informal, community-based suicide prevention interventions that can be tailored to suit men's unmet needs. The James' Place model (JPM) is a community-based, clinical suicide prevention intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Evidence supports the efficacy of the JPM and there are plans to expand to additional sites across the UK. This study evaluates therapists perceived acceptability of the JPM, and if fidelity to the planned delivery of the model is maintained within therapeutic practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Descriptive analyses of 30 completed intervention cases were examined to review fidelity of the model against the intervention delivery plan. Eight therapists took part in semi-structured interviews between November 2021 and March 2022 exploring the perceived acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to delivering the JPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analyses of James' Place audit notes revealed high levels of adherence to the JPM amongst therapists, but highlighted components of the model needed to be tailored according to individual men's needs. Thematic analysis led to the development of five themes. The first theme, <i>therapeutic environment</i> highlighted importance of the therapy setting. The second theme identified was <i>specialised suicide prevention training</i> in the JPM that facilitated therapists understanding and expertise. The third theme identified was <i>therapy engagement</i> which discusses men's engagement in therapy. The fourth theme, <i>person-centred care</i> related to adaptation of delivery of JPM components. The final theme, <i>adapting the JPM to individual needs</i> describes tailoring of the JPM by therapists to be responsive to individual men's needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings evidence therapist's acceptability and their moderate adherence to the JPM. Flexibility in delivery of the JPM enables adaptation of the model and co-production of therapy to meet men's needs. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2265142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/ed/RHPB_11_2265142.PMC10572045.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41234651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ellen C McGarity-Shipley, Eun-Young Lee, Kyra E Pyke
{"title":"A pilot cross-sectional investigation of chronic shame as a mediator of the relationship between subjective social status and self-rated health among middle-aged adults.","authors":"Ellen C McGarity-Shipley, Eun-Young Lee, Kyra E Pyke","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2268697","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2268697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective social status (SSS) is an important independent predictor of health outcomes, however, the pathways through which it affects health are poorly understood. Chronic shame has previously been suggested as a potential mechanism but this has never been investigated and the relationship between chronic shame and health is under-researched. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore whether chronic shame explains a significant portion of the association between SSS and self rated health (SRH). Two-hundred American adults aged 30-55 years were recruited via a crowd-sourcing platform and were asked to provide information on their SSS, level of chronic shame, and SRH. Chronic shame significantly mediated the relationship between SSS and SRH. This pilot study provides initial evidence that shame explains a significant portion of the relationship between subjective social status and self-rated health. These findings support the initiation of larger, longitudinal investigations into chronic shame as a mediator of the subjective social status and self-rated health relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2268697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41234652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Income dissatisfaction and migraine headache. Evidence from a nationwide population-based survey.","authors":"Sandro Rondinella, Damiano B Silipo","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266214","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate whether and to what extent income dissatisfaction (ID) is an important determinant of migraine. Indeed, ID may play a more relevant role in migraines than realized income, and it may affect both low and high-income people.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We exploit the Italian Statistical Institute (ISTAT) survey covering about 80,000 individuals for this study. On the methodological ground, an instrumental variable probit model has been implemented.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>To measure income dissatisfaction we exploit a self-reported status ranging from 1 to 4, while the migraine variable captures whether the individual suffers from migraine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that the higher the ID the greater the probability of having a migraine. This relationship is robust to the level of realized income, socioeconomic characteristics of the individual, and the existence of other illnesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high relevance of ID among low-income as well as high-income people opens up a new perspective on the determinants of migraines and provides an explanation of the contrasting evidence in the literature about the income-migraine nexus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2266214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41234732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A progressive agenda toward equity in pain care.","authors":"Tamara A Baker, Staja Q Booker, Mary R Janevic","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266221","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There are inconsistencies documenting the pain experience of Black adults and other racially minoritized populations. Often disregarded, pain among these groups is characterized by misconceptions, biases, and discriminatory practices, which may lead to inequitable pain care. <b>Methods:</b> To address this issue, this professional commentary provides an overview of pain reform and the need to declare chronic pain as a critical public health issue, while requiring that equity be a key focus in providing comprehensive pain screening and standardizing epidemiological surveillance to understand the prevalence and incidence of pain. <b>Results and Conclusions:</b> This roadmap is a call to action for all sectors of research, practice, policy, education, and advocacy. More importantly, this progressive agenda is timely for all race and other marginalized groups and reminds us that adequate treatment of pain is an obligation that cannot be the responsibility of one person, community, or institution, but rather a collective responsibility of those willing to service the needs of all individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2266221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/44/RHPB_11_2266221.PMC10561565.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41199134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sammy J S Wrede, Kevin Claassen, Dominique Rodil Dos Anjos, Jan P Kettschau, Horst C Broding
{"title":"Impact of digital stress on negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office: a follow up study.","authors":"Sammy J S Wrede, Kevin Claassen, Dominique Rodil Dos Anjos, Jan P Kettschau, Horst C Broding","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2263068","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2263068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the COVID-19 pandemic many employees perform under increasingly digital conditions. Enabling home office environments became mandatory for companies wherever possible in consideration of the ongoing pandemic. Simultaneously, studies reported on digital stress. The current literature lacks rigorous research into digital stress on psychosomatic outcomes, emotions, and disease. Therefore, we endeavor to understand how digital stress developed over the course of the pandemic and if it predicts differences in negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To answer the research question, we conducted an online survey among 441 employees in 2020 and 398 employees in 2022 from three municipal administrations in Germany, who were working from home at least occasionally. We used a cluster analysis to detect digitally stressed employees. Regression analyses were performed on digital stress, negative emotions, and physical complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed an increase from 9 to 20% in digital stress, while negative emotions and physical complaints did not show evident differences. In the multivariate model, we observe a change in the proportion of digitally stressed employees between 4 and 17%, while the control variables explain around 9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital stress did not significantly affect either negative emotions or physical complaints. However, digital stress appeared to exert a more substantial predictive influence on negative emotions. The study emphasizes rising digital stress, which contradicts a positive adaption to the digital working conditions within the observed period. The psychosomatic relations are low or lagged. Further research investigating digital stress and countermeasures, especially to understand how to prevent harmful long-term effects such as distress resulting from working from home conditions, is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2263068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/5f/RHPB_11_2263068.PMC10561583.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41199135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nadia Minian, Anika Saiva, Sheleza Ahad, Allison Gayapersad, Laurie Zawertailo, Scott Veldhuizen, Arun Ravindran, Claire de Oliveira, Carol Mulder, Dolly Baliunas, Peter Selby
{"title":"Primary healthcare provider experience of knowledge brokering interventions for mood management.","authors":"Nadia Minian, Anika Saiva, Sheleza Ahad, Allison Gayapersad, Laurie Zawertailo, Scott Veldhuizen, Arun Ravindran, Claire de Oliveira, Carol Mulder, Dolly Baliunas, Peter Selby","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265136","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2265136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge brokering is a knowledge translation strategy used in healthcare settings to facilitate the implementation of evidence into practice. How healthcare providers perceive and respond to various knowledge translation approaches is not well understood. This qualitative study used the Theoretical Domains Framework to examine healthcare providers' experiences with receiving one of two knowledge translation strategies: a remote knowledge broker (rKB); or monthly emails, for encouraging delivery of mood management interventions to patients enrolled in a smoking cessation program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 healthcare providers recruited from primary care teams. We used stratified purposeful sampling to recruit participants who were allocated to receive either the rKB, or a monthly email-based knowledge translation strategy as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Interviews were structured around domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore determinants influencing practice change. Data were coded into relevant domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both knowledge translation strategies were considered helpful prompts to remind participants to deliver mood interventions to patients presenting depressive symptoms. Neither strategy appeared to have influenced the health care providers on the domains we probed. The domains pertaining to knowledge and professional identity were perceived as facilitators to implementation, while domains related to beliefs about consequences, emotion, and environmental context acted as barriers and/or facilitators to healthcare providers implementing mood management interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both strategies served as reminders and reinforced providers' knowledge regarding the connection between smoking and depressed mood. The TDF can help researchers better understand the influence of specific knowledge translation strategies on healthcare provider behavior change, as well as potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-informed interventions. Environmental context should be considered to address challenges and facilitate the movement of knowledge into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2265136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/16/RHPB_11_2265136.PMC10557557.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41173205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Grace, Rosalind Rogers, Robin Usher, Iris Margarita Rivera, Hanan Elbakry, Shanelle Sotilleo, Renee Doe, Mariella Toribio, Narda Coreas, Miranda Olff
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Global Psychotrauma Screen in the United States.","authors":"Emma Grace, Rosalind Rogers, Robin Usher, Iris Margarita Rivera, Hanan Elbakry, Shanelle Sotilleo, Renee Doe, Mariella Toribio, Narda Coreas, Miranda Olff","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266215","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2266215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research assessing the psychometric properties of the Global Psychotrauma Screen provided support for its internal consistency reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, and divergent validity in several international samples, but not specifically in a U.S. subsample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess psychometric properties of the GPS in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational study included a convenience sample of individually recruited participants (<i>N</i> = 231) who completed an initial study with 126-item online questionnaire and a two-week follow-up study with GPS alone through the weblinks provided by the research team. Data analyzes included measuring internal consistency and test-retest reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes (EFA and CFA), convergent and divergent validity, sensitivity, specificity, and severity of the GPS symptom items. Additional CFA was conducted with data (<i>N</i> = 947) from the GPS multinational research project, U.S. subsample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity of the GPS. The construct validity results supported a three-factor structure of the GPS symptoms. The GPS domains showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity with the cut-off scores of 3 for PTSD and 5 for CPTSD domains; and the scores of 1 for the anxiety, depression, and insomnia domains respectively. The GPS risk factors predicted the GPS symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new and additional evidence on the psychometric properties of the GPS which may help health care providers with the selection of an appropriate screening instrument for trauma-related transdiagnostic symptoms. The study limitations should be addressed in future research through the replication of EFA and CFA internationally with larger samples, and the inclusion of a reference standard for dissociation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"2266215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/3b/RHPB_11_2266215.PMC10557551.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41120564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}