GeochronologyPub Date : 2021-06-02DOI: 10.5194/gchron-2021-17-supplement
A. Cunningham, J. Buylaert, A. Murray
{"title":"Supplementary material to \"Attenuation of beta radiation in granular matrices: implications for trapped-charge dating\"","authors":"A. Cunningham, J. Buylaert, A. Murray","doi":"10.5194/gchron-2021-17-supplement","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2021-17-supplement","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Mineral grains within sediment or rock absorb a radiation dose from the decay of radionuclides in the host matrix. For the beta dose component, the estimated dose rate must be adjusted for the attenuation of beta particles within the mineral grains. Standard calculations, originally designed for thermoluminescence dating of pottery, assume that the grain is embedded in a homogenous medium. However, most current applications of trapped-charge dating concern sand- or silt-sized dosimeters embedded in granular sediment. In such cases, the radionuclide sources are not homogeneous, but are localized in discrete grains or held on grain surfaces. We show here that the mean dose rate to dosimeter grains in a granular matrix is dependent on the grain-size distributions of the source grains, and of the bulk sediment, as well as on the grain size of the dosimeters. We further argue that U and Th sources are likely to be held primarily on grain surfaces, which causes the dose rate to dosimeter grains to be significantly higher than for sources distributed uniformly throughout grains. For a typical well-sorted medium sand, the beta dose rates derived from surface U and Th sources are higher by 9 % and 14 %, respectively, compared to a homogenous distribution of sources. We account for these effects using an expanded model of beta attenuation, and validate the model against Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations within a geometry of packed spheres.","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83142244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeochronologyPub Date : 2021-05-26DOI: 10.5194/GCHRON-3-337-2021
Bar Elisha, P. Nuriel, A. Kylander‐Clark, R. Weinberger
{"title":"Towards in situ U–Pb dating of dolomite","authors":"Bar Elisha, P. Nuriel, A. Kylander‐Clark, R. Weinberger","doi":"10.5194/GCHRON-3-337-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/GCHRON-3-337-2021","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Recent U–Pb dating by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass\u0000spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) has\u0000demonstrated that reasonable precision (3 %–10 %, 2σ) can be\u0000achieved for high-resolution dating of texturally distinct calcite phases.\u0000Absolute dating of dolomite, for which biostratigraphy and traditional\u0000dating techniques are very limited, remains challenging, although it may\u0000resolve many fundamental questions related to the timing of mineral-rock\u0000formation by syngenetic, diagenesis, hydrothermal, and epigenetic processes.\u0000In this study we explore the possibility of dating dolomitic rocks via\u0000recent LA-ICP-MS dating techniques developed for calcite. The in situ U–Pb dating\u0000was tested on a range of dolomitic rocks of various origins from the\u0000Cambrian to Pliocene age – all of which are from well-constrained stratigraphic\u0000sections in Israel. We present imaging and chemical characterization\u0000techniques that provide useful information on interpreting the resulting\u0000U–Pb ages and discuss the complexity of in situ dolomite dating in terms of\u0000textural features that may affect the results. Textural examinations\u0000indicate zonation and mixing of different phases at the sub-millimeter scale\u0000(< 1 µm), and thus Tera–Wasserburg ages represent mixed dates\u0000of early diagenesis and some later epigenetic dolomitization event(s). We\u0000conclude that age mixing at the sub-millimeter scale is a major challenge in\u0000dolomite dating that needs to be further studied and note the importance of\u0000matrix-matched standards for reducing uncertainties of the dated material.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74645108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeochronologyPub Date : 2021-04-16DOI: 10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021
B. Schoene, M. Eddy, C. Keller, K. Samperton
{"title":"An evaluation of Deccan Traps eruption rates using geochronologic data","authors":"B. Schoene, M. Eddy, C. Keller, K. Samperton","doi":"10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Recent attempts to establish the eruptive history of the Deccan Traps large igneous province have used both U−Pb (Schoene et al., 2019) and\u000040Ar/39Ar (Sprain et al., 2019) geochronology. Both of these studies report dates with high precision and unprecedented coverage\u0000for a large igneous province and agree that the main phase of eruptions began near the C30n–C29r magnetic reversal and waned shortly after the\u0000C29r–C29n reversal, totaling ∼ 700–800 kyr duration. These datasets can be analyzed in finer detail to determine eruption rates, which\u0000are critical for connecting volcanism, associated volatile emissions, and any potential effects on the Earth's climate before and after the\u0000Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary (KPB). It is our observation that the community has frequently misinterpreted how the eruption rates derived from\u0000these two datasets vary across the KPB. The U−Pb dataset of Schoene et al. (2019) was interpreted by those authors to indicate four major\u0000eruptive pulses before and after the KPB. The 40Ar/39Ar dataset did not identify such pulses and has been largely interpreted by\u0000the community to indicate an increase in eruption rates coincident with the Chicxulub impact (Renne et al., 2015; Richards et al., 2015). Although\u0000the overall agreement in eruption duration is an achievement for geochronology, it is important to clarify the limitations in comparing the two\u0000datasets and to highlight paths toward achieving higher-resolution eruption models for the Deccan Traps and for other large igneous provinces. Here,\u0000we generate chronostratigraphic models for both datasets using the same statistical techniques and show that the two datasets agree very well. More\u0000specifically, we infer that (1) age modeling of the 40Ar/39Ar dataset results in constant eruption rates with relatively large\u0000uncertainties through the duration of the Deccan Traps eruptions and provides no support for (or evidence against) the pulses identified by the\u0000U−Pb data, (2) the stratigraphic positions of the Chicxulub impact using the 40Ar/39Ar and U−Pb datasets do not\u0000agree within their uncertainties, and (3) neither dataset supports the notion of an increase in eruption rate as a result of the Chicxulub\u0000impact. We then discuss the importance of systematic uncertainties between the dating methods that challenge direct comparisons between them, and we\u0000highlight the geologic uncertainties, such as regional stratigraphic correlations, that need to be tested to ensure the accuracy of eruption\u0000models. While the production of precise and accurate geochronologic data is of course essential to studies of Earth history, our analysis\u0000underscores that the accuracy of a final result is also critically dependent on how such data are interpreted and presented to the broader community\u0000of geoscientists.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88986574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeochronologyPub Date : 2021-04-01DOI: 10.5194/GCHRON-3-395-2021
F. Hofmann, E. Cooperdock, A. West, Dominic Hildebrandt, Kathrin Strößner, K. Farley
{"title":"Exposure dating of detrital magnetite using 3He enabled by microCT and calibration of the cosmogenic 3He production rate in magnetite","authors":"F. Hofmann, E. Cooperdock, A. West, Dominic Hildebrandt, Kathrin Strößner, K. Farley","doi":"10.5194/GCHRON-3-395-2021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/GCHRON-3-395-2021","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We test whether X-ray micro computed tomography (microCT) imaging can be used as a tool for screening magnetite grains to improve the accuracy and precision of cosmogenic 3He exposure dating. We extracted magnetite from a soil developed on a fanglomerate at Whitewater, California, which was offset by the Banning Strand of the San Andreas Fault. This study shows that microCT screening can distinguish between inclusion-free magnetite and magnetite with fluid or common solid inclusions. Such inclusions can produce bulk 3He concentrations that are significantly in excess of expected cosmogenic production. We present Li concentrations, major and trace element analysis, and magnetite (U-Th)/He cooling ages of samples in order to model the contribution from radiogenic, nucleogenic, and cosmogenic thermal neutron production of 3He. We show that mineral inclusions in magnetite can produce 3He concentrations of up to four times that of the cosmogenic 3He component, leading to erroneous exposure ages. Therefore, grains with inclusions must be avoided in order to facilitate accurate and precise magnetite 3He exposure dating. Around 30 % of all grains were found to be without inclusions, as detectable by microCT, with the largest proportion of suitable grains in the grain size range of 400–800 µm. While grains with inclusions have 3He concentrations far in excess of the values expected from existing 10Be and 26Al data in quartz at the Whitewater site, magnetite grains without inclusions have concentrations close to the predicted depth profile. We measured 3He concentrations in aliquots without inclusions and corrected them for Li-produced components. By comparing these data to the known exposure age of 53.5 ka, we calibrate a magnetite 3He SLHL production rate of 116 ± 13 at g−1 a−1. We suggest that the microCT screening approach can be used to improve the quality of cosmogenic 3He measurements of magnetite and other opaque mineral phases for exposure age and detrital studies.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82893719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
GeochronologyPub Date : 2020-12-21DOI: 10.5194/gchron-2020-41
J. Muston, M. Forster, C. Alderton, Shawn Crispin, G. Lister
{"title":"Direct dating of overprinting fluid systems in the Martabe\u0000epithermal gold deposit using highly retentive alunite","authors":"J. Muston, M. Forster, C. Alderton, Shawn Crispin, G. Lister","doi":"10.5194/gchron-2020-41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2020-41","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The Martabe deposits in Sumatra, Indonesia formed in a shallow crustal epithermal environment (200–350 °C) associated with mafic intrusions, usually recognised in domes, adjacent to an active right-lateral wrench system. Ten samples containing alunite were collected for high-resolution 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, to determine if overprinting fluid systems could be recognised. At the same time, ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) furnace step-heating 39Ar diffusion experiments were conducted, to determine the argon retentivity of the mineral grains being analysed. The heating schedule chosen to ensure Arrhenius data uniformly populated the inverse temperature axis, with sufficient detail to allow the application of the Fundamental Asymmetry Principle (FAP) during data analysis. The heating time for each step was chosen to ensure reasonable uniformity in terms of incremental percentage gas release during each step. Results show activation energies between 360–500 kJ/mol, with normalised frequency factor between 1.89e14s−1 and 8.62e18s−1. Closure temperatures range from 390–519 °C for a cooling rates of 20 °C/Ma, giving confidence that the ages represent growth during periods of active fluid movement and alteration. The Martabe deposit formed at temperatures \u0000","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74906584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}