Family practice最新文献

{"title":"School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis.","authors":"Kirsti Wahlberg, Kristine Pape, Bjarne Austad, Andreas Asheim, Kjartan S Anthun, Johan H Bjørngaard, Gunnhild Å Vie","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A national policy in Norway demanding certificates for medical absences in upper secondary school was implemented in 2016, leading to an increase in general practitioner (GP) visits in this age group.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the policy's effect on the use of primary and specialist healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study following all Norwegian youth aged 14-21 in the years 2010-2019 using a difference-in-differences approach comparing exposed cohorts expected to attend upper secondary school after the policy change in 2016 with previous unexposed cohorts. Data were collected from national registries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absence policy led to the increased number of contacts with GPs for exposed cohorts during all exposed years, with estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) in the range from 1.14 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.11-1.18) to 1.25 (95% CI 1.21-1.30). Consultations for respiratory tract infections increased during exposed years. However, there was no conclusive policy-related difference in mental health consultations with GPs. In specialist healthcare we did not find conclusive evidence of an effect of absence policy on the risk of any contact per school year, but there was a slightly increased risk of contacts with ear-nose-throat specialist services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found an increase in general practice contacts attributable to the school absence policy. Apart from a possible increase in ear-nose-throat contacts, increased GP attention did not increase specialized healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142143048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure in unselected patients in primary care: a systematic review.","authors":"Perrine Allimant, Lucas Guillo, Thomas Fierling, Andry Rabiaza, Isabelle Cibois-Honnorat","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is the most frequent cardiovascular pathology in primary care. Echocardiography is the gold standard for diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of HF. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is of growing interest in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment of unselected patients in primary care by non-expert physicians with cardiac POCUS (cPOCUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched in Medline, Embase, and Pubmed up to January 2024 for interventional and non-interventional studies assessing LVEF with cPOCUS in unselected patients with suspected or diagnosed HF in hospital or outpatient settings, performed by non-expert physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies were included, involving 6598 patients, of whom 60.2% were outpatients. LVEF was assessed by 351 non-expert physicians after an initial ultrasound training course. The LVEF was mainly assessed by visual estimation (90.2%). The most frequent views were parasternal long/short axis, and apical 4-chamber. The median time of cPOCUS was 8 minutes. A strong agreement was found (κ = 0.72 [0.63; 0.83]) compared to experts when using different types of ultrasound devices (hand-held and standard), and agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84 [0.71; 0.89]) with the same device. Training course combined a median of 4.5 hours for theory and 25 cPOCUS for practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of cPOCUS by non-expert physicians after a short training course appears to be an accurate complementary tool for LVEF assessment in daily practice. Its diffusion in primary care could optimize patient management, without replacing specialist assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eating disorder recovery requires attention to the social lives of those affected.","authors":"Aoife-Marie Foran, Aisling T O'Donnell, Orla T Muldoon","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad028","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"626-628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9482149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The unknown silent drug reaction in acne patients: rare case of isotretinoin-induced haematuria.","authors":"Igor Kapetanovic, Dubravka Zivanovic, Margita Mijuskovic, Snezana Minic","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad043","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acne vulgaris is one of the most frequent visits to primary care physicians and dermatologists alike. Isotretinoin is the backbone of acne treatment. In most countries, depending on the health care system, isotretinoin is prescribed by dermatologists but primary care physicians are a part of the follow-up and interpreting analysis. Adverse effects of isotretinoin on the kidney and urinary system are mostly limited to sparse case reports. Specifically, gross and microscopic haematuria is not mentioned to be associated with isotretinoin. Lack of data regarding these adverse effects can lead to doubt regarding further patient management not only with dermatologists but also primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report a 16-year-old male patient with isotretinoin-induced haematuria with multiple episodes and subsequent challenge and de-challenge. No personal or familial history of nephrological disease was present. Ultrasound imaging and nephrology workup was within normal limits. Other aetiologies were excluded. Nephrology consult stated there was no contraindication for isotretinoin use and was reinstated at 0.6 m/kg/day. More frequent observation was indicated until completion of isotretinoin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our case raises awareness to other dermatologists and primary care physicians that haematuria can be secondary to isotretinoin but not a contraindication for further use if asymptomatic and microscopic. More extensive evaluation and monitoring should be done if the patient is symptomatic with other abnormalities and symptoms. Urinalysis should be a part of routine follow-up monitoring in patients on isotretinoin. Furthermore, delineating and differentiating when to refer to a nephrologist is essential for physicians, patients, and the health care system overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"615-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10022474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Disagreement between patients' and general practitioners' estimates of patient health literacy increases from the top to the bottom of the social ladder: a cross-sectional study in the Paris area.","authors":"Céline Casta, Sophie Bucher, Pierre Labitrie, Théotime Nadot, Henri Panjo, Laurent Rigal","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad056","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Associated with both socioeconomic position and health outcomes, health literacy (HL) may be a mechanism contributing to social disparities. However, it is often difficult for general practitioners (GPs) to assess their patients' HL level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse disagreements about patient HL between GPs and their patients according to the patient's socioeconomic position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each of the 15 participating GPs (from the Paris-Saclay University network), every adult consulting at the practice on a single day was recruited. Patients completed the European HL Survey questionnaire and provided socio-demographic information. For each patient, doctors answered 4 questions from the HL questionnaire with their opinion of the patient's HL. The doctor-patient disagreement about each patient's HL was analysed with mixed logistic models to study its associations with patients' occupational, educational, and financial characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis covered the 292 patients (88.2% of the 331 included patients) for whom both patients and GPs responded. The overall disagreement was 23.9%. In all, 71.8% of patients estimated their own HL as higher than their doctors did, and the gap between doctors' answers and those of their patients widened from the top to the bottom of the social ladder. The odd ratio for the 'synthetic disagreement' variable for workers versus managers was 3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lower the patient's place on the social ladder, the greater the gap between the patient's and doctor's opinion of the patient's HL. This greater gap may contribute to the reproduction or maintenance of social disparities in care and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"451-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9570476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Primary care professionals' views on population-based expanded carrier screening: an online focus group study.","authors":"Lieke M van den Heuvel, Anke J Woudstra, Sanne van der Hout, Suze Jans, Tjerk Wiersma, Wybo Dondorp, Erwin Birnie, Phillis Lakeman, Lidewij Henneman, Mirjam Plantinga, Irene M van Langen","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad011","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population-based expanded carrier screening (ECS) involves screening for multiple recessive diseases offered to all couples considering a pregnancy or during pregnancy. Previous research indicates that in some countries primary care professionals are perceived as suitable providers for ECS. However, little is known about their perspectives. We therefore aimed to explore primary care professionals' views on population-based ECS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four online focus groups with 14 general practitioners (GPs) and 16 community midwives were conducted in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight various perspectives on the desirability of population-based ECS. Participants agreed that ECS could enhance reproductive autonomy and thereby prevent suffering of the child and/or parents. However, they also raised several ethical, societal, and psychological concerns, including a tendency towards a perfect society, stigmatization, unequal access to screening and negative psychosocial consequences. Participants believed that provision of population-based ECS would be feasible if prerequisites regarding training and reimbursement for providers would be fulfilled. most GPs considered themselves less suitable or capable of providing ECS, in contrast to midwives who did consider themselves suitable. Nevertheless, participants believed that, if implemented, ECS should be offered in primary care or by public health services rather than as hospital-based specialized care, because they believed a primary care ECS offer increases access in terms of time and location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While participants believed that an ECS offer would be feasible, they questioned its desirability and priority. Studies on the desirability and feasibility of population-based ECS offered in primary care or public health settings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"571-578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9143452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perceived importance and interest in research by Chilean primary care providers.","authors":"Diego García-Huidobro, Marcela Aracena, Paulina Bravo, Karla González, Mauricio Soto, Pamela von Borries, Jaime C Sapag","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad012","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs) are relevant stakeholders for primary care research (PCR).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the perceived importance and interest in PCR of a national sample of Chilean PCPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Chilean PCPs. An electronic survey assessing perceived relevance of PCR, research training and experience, training interests, and demographics was disseminated through emails and WhatsApp messages. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals for high interest in PCR, high interest in using research methods, and high interest in receiving research training, and predictors of these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 providers completed the online survey. Only 26.4% of PCPs had research experience as a principal or co-investigator. However, most clinicians perceived PCR as very important (92.5%) and were interested in using research methods (90.7%) and receiving training (94.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in these perceptions between provider's discipline, role, sex, age, and geographical location after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite few Chilean PCPs have research training, a large majority perceive it as important, are interested in using it in their practice and would like to receive training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"610-614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10583699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale.","authors":"Zehra Betul Kingir, Mesut Sancar, Pinar Ay, Refik Demirtunc, Cagatay Nuhoglu, Cemile H Misirli, Betul Okuyan","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad040","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale (FCMAHS) was developed to evaluate the hassles and concerns experienced by family caregivers in medication administration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale (FCMAHS-TR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FCMAHS-TR was developed after translation, cultural adaptation, and a pilot study. The cross-sectional study was conducted among family caregivers (≥18 years) in community pharmacies. Test-retest reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. Hypothesis testing was used for the assessment of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (68.7%) of the family caregivers were female (n = 470). In the test-retest reliability analysis (n = 30), the ICC value was 0.917 (P < 0.001). In EFA analysis (n = 251), the Kaiser‒Meyer‒Olkin (KMO) measure was 0.799, 62.6% of the total variance was explained by five factors including eighteen items, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.836. According to CFA (n = 219), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.0654, and the comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.918. In construct validity, family caregivers with low reading ability of health-related materials and with high care burden had significantly higher median scores for all the factors of the FCMAHS-TR (P < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FCMAHS-TR can be used to evaluate the hassle and concerns experienced by family caregivers in medication administration. This scale can be used by healthcare professionals to identify family caregivers who need individualized interventions for medication administration hassles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"596-604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46499833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A scoping review of evidence-based guidance and guidelines published by general practice professional organizations.","authors":"Emer O'Brien, Seamus Duffy, Velma Harkins, Susan M Smith, Noirin O'Herlihy, Aisling Walsh, Barbara Clyne, Emma Wallace","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad015","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmad015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) need robust, up-to-date evidence to deliver high-quality patient care. There is limited literature regarding the role of international GP professional organizations in developing and publishing clinical guidelines to support GPs clinical decision making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify evidence-based guidance and clinical guidelines produced by GP professional organizations and summarize their content, structure, and methods of development and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review of GP professional organizations following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Four databases were searched and a grey literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they were: (i) evidence-based guidance documents or clinical guidelines produced de novo by a national GP professional organization, (ii) developed to support GPs clinical care, and (iii) published in the last 10 years. GP professional organizations were contacted to provide supplementary information. A narrative synthesis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six GP professional organizations and 60 guidelines were included. The most common de novo guideline topics were mental health, cardiovascular disease, neurology, pregnancy and women's health and preventive care. All guidelines were developed using a standard evidence-synthesis method. All included documents were disseminated through downloadable pdfs and peer review publications. GP professional organizations indicated that they generally collaborate with or endorse guidelines developed by national or international guideline producing bodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this scoping review provide an overview of de novo guideline development by GP professional organizations and can support collaboration between GP organizations worldwide thus reducing duplication of effort, facilitating reproducibility, and identifying areas of standardization.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JXQ26.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"404-418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324327/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10763983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Characterizing primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder using electronic medical records: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alexander Singer, Leanne Kosowan, Dhasni Muthumuni, Alan Katz, Hasan Zafari, Farhana Zulkernine, J Don Richardson, Morgan Price, Tyler Williamson, John Queenan, Jitender Sareen","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac139","DOIUrl":"10.1093/fampra/cmac139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has significant morbidity and economic costs. This study describes the prevalence and characteristics of patients with PTSD using primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study used EMR data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). This study included 1,574 primary care providers located in 7 Canadian provinces. There were 689,301 patients that visited a CPCSSN provider between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. We describe associations between PTSD and patient characteristics using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multiple logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 689,301 patients included, 8,817 (1.3%, 95% CI 1.2-1.3) had a diagnosis of PTSD. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.4, 95% CI 4.2-4.7, P < 0.001), alcohol abuse/dependence (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001), and/or drug abuse/dependence (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5-2.8, P < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared with patients without those conditions. Patients residing in community areas considered the most material deprived (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.1, P < 0.001) or the most socially deprived (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.3, P < 0.001) had higher odds of being diagnosed with PTSD compared with patients in the least deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of PTSD in Canadian primary care is 1.3% (95% CI 1.25-1.31). Using EMR records we confirmed the co-occurrence of PTSD with other mental health conditions within primary care settings suggesting benefit for improved screening and evidence-based resources to manage PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"434-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10365067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}