发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Australian Journal of Law and Religion最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Conversion Practices Legislation in Victoria -- A Potential Crisis for Church Authority? 维多利亚的宗教信仰立法——教会权威的潜在危机?
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/f328n
Rhett Martin
{"title":"Conversion Practices Legislation in Victoria -- A Potential Crisis for Church Authority?","authors":"Rhett Martin","doi":"10.55803/f328n","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/f328n","url":null,"abstract":"The Victorian Change or Suppression (Conversion) Practices Prohibition Act 2021 (Vic) prohibits change and suppression practices that alter or fundamentally change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Whilst the intent of the Act is worthy, the devil is very much in the detail, especially in how the Act includes religious and psychiatric practices and services in its potential ambit. The other contentious issue is the range of powers provided to the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, which some argue potentially blur the lines on separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature. This paper argues some amendments to the Act may be required in order to address these issues.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115242312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law: Next Stop Section 116? 澳大利亚宪法中的比例性:下一站第116节?
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/f94t
A. Gray
{"title":"Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law: Next Stop Section 116?","authors":"A. Gray","doi":"10.55803/f94t","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/f94t","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"36 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114134380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: "Christians: The Urgent Case for Jesus in Our World" 书评:《基督徒:耶稣在我们世界的迫切诉求》
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/p32m
K. Murray
{"title":"Book Review: \"Christians: The Urgent Case for Jesus in Our World\"","authors":"K. Murray","doi":"10.55803/p32m","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/p32m","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114484582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Statements of Belief as Political Communication 作为政治传播的信仰宣言
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/z910u
Timothy Nugent
{"title":"Statements of Belief as Political Communication","authors":"Timothy Nugent","doi":"10.55803/z910u","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/z910u","url":null,"abstract":"There is increased interest in legislation that shields some forms of expression not only from the legislature but also from sanctions by powerful private institutions such as social media companies, professional associations, and employers. The Religious Discrimination Bill 2022 (Cth), if passed, would have prohibited ‘qualifying bodies’ from implementing conduct rules that restrict ‘statements of belief’ in their effects. Other provisions of the Bill implicitly provided some protection for ‘religious speech’ within the broader ambit of ‘religious belief or activity’. Using the Religious Discrimination Bill as an example, this paper examines laws that restrict private censure of speech with respect to the implied freedom of political communication. It is argued that laws that limit private censorship of political speech may place a burden upon political communication if they are not constructed in a manner that is ‘viewpoint neutral’. Such laws can thus only be valid if the criteria of ‘compatibility’ and ‘proportionality’ are met (as established in Lange and its progeny). The power imbalance between individuals and large private institutions may warrant limits on private censorship. However, such limits are best framed so as not to discriminate between viewpoints. Laws that protect the expression of particular ideas, such as those based in religious doctrine, must demonstrate a legitimate reason for differential treatment compared to other foundational beliefs.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133316620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Position of Religious Schools Under International Human Rights Law 宗教学校在国际人权法下的地位
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/i270m
M. Fowler
{"title":"The Position of Religious Schools Under International Human Rights Law","authors":"M. Fowler","doi":"10.55803/i270m","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/i270m","url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the application of international human rights law to the employment of persons by Australian religious schools. In particular, it considers the claim, increasingly made in support of Australian domestic legislative reform, that the application of ‘inherent requirements’ tests to employees within religious schools appropriately gives effect to the requirements of international law. Part One observes that that law is found in two primary protections: the protection provided to religious schools as the collective manifestations of the religious beliefs of individuals, including parents and guardians, and the protection against discrimination. Part Two illustrates the domestic implications of these regimes by considering the human rights rationales offered by the governmental proponents of the Victorian Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Bill 2021. It concludes that the Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Act 2021(Vic) is an inadequate implementation of relevant international human rights law and that similar legislation in development in other States and the Commonwealth should be scrutinised carefully.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123412147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legislating Gender Prejudice: Religion and the Overturning of Roe v Wade 性别偏见立法:宗教与罗伊诉韦德案的推翻
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/l364u
R. Macleod
{"title":"Legislating Gender Prejudice: Religion and the Overturning of Roe v Wade","authors":"R. Macleod","doi":"10.55803/l364u","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/l364u","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the intersection of religion, gender identity, and gender prejudice within the American context of religious conservatism and the overturning of Roe v Wade. Discussion considers the overturning as a dangerous move that negates the rights and religious liberties of women, with adverse implications also for the rainbow community. Notably, this legislative context depicts the power of conservative Christian ideology to sustain hierarchical gender norms anchored in a binary consciousness, which privileges and empowers men (typically white, elite, heterosexual men), while diminishing and disempowering women and gender-diverse persons as non-normative and subsidiary. Discussion further conveys that this male-centred/androcentric ideology continues the oppressive legacy of male-dominant, fundamentalist biblical interpretation — a mode of interpretation heavily criticised within contemporary mainstream biblical scholarship as flawed and grievous in its promotion of gender prejudice. Accordingly, the overturning of Roe v Wade is relevant to the Australian context, for the same androcentricity and legacy of biblically-justified gender prejudice underpins all Western cultures. That is, manifold people, knowingly or reflexively, religious or otherwise, adhere to this biased interpretation and prejudicial gender consciousness through entrenched psychosocial Western norms. Not least, much scholarship has stressed that the issue of gender bias deeply pervades the structures of Australia’s justice system. Ultimately, this paper emphasises that understanding androcentricity and the legacy of injurious androcentric biblical interpretation is necessary to the tasks of negotiating religious freedom for all persons and cultivating non-sexist social and legal structures that uphold the rights of multiple gender identities and subjectivities.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123421278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cherry Picking Human Rights 精选人权
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/h406f
N. Aroney
{"title":"Cherry Picking Human Rights","authors":"N. Aroney","doi":"10.55803/h406f","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/h406f","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128387321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Politics of Indonesia's New Criminal Code 印尼新刑法的政治
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/h161a
R. Hefner
{"title":"The Politics of Indonesia's New Criminal Code","authors":"R. Hefner","doi":"10.55803/h161a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/h161a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130491445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Religious Freedom, Section 109 of the Constitution, and Anti-discrimination Laws 宗教自由、宪法第109条和反歧视法
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/c59x
N. Foster
{"title":"Religious Freedom, Section 109 of the Constitution, and Anti-discrimination Laws","authors":"N. Foster","doi":"10.55803/c59x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/c59x","url":null,"abstract":"Many Australian anti-discrimination statutes contain special provisions to balance equality with religious freedom. However, if these religious freedom provisions in state anti-discrimination laws are narrowed too much, the laws may become inoperative by virtue of s 109 of the Australian Constitution, which says that an inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law shall be resolved in favour of the latter. This article explores the relationship between religious freedom, s 109 of the Australian Constitution, and anti-discrimination laws. It concludes that, to avoid constitutional difficulty, states should ensure religious freedom provisions in their anti-discrimination statutes are at least as wide in scope and effect as that provided by the Commonwealth in its antidiscrimination statutes.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123871561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Book Review of Law and Religion in the Commonwealth: The Evolution of Case Law 《英联邦的法律与宗教:判例法的演变》书评
Australian Journal of Law and Religion Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.55803/y742z
B. Bussey
{"title":"Book Review of Law and Religion in the Commonwealth: The Evolution of Case Law","authors":"B. Bussey","doi":"10.55803/y742z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55803/y742z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124805802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信