The Position of Religious Schools Under International Human Rights Law

M. Fowler
{"title":"The Position of Religious Schools Under International Human Rights Law","authors":"M. Fowler","doi":"10.55803/i270m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the application of international human rights law to the employment of persons by Australian religious schools. In particular, it considers the claim, increasingly made in support of Australian domestic legislative reform, that the application of ‘inherent requirements’ tests to employees within religious schools appropriately gives effect to the requirements of international law. Part One observes that that law is found in two primary protections: the protection provided to religious schools as the collective manifestations of the religious beliefs of individuals, including parents and guardians, and the protection against discrimination. Part Two illustrates the domestic implications of these regimes by considering the human rights rationales offered by the governmental proponents of the Victorian Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Bill 2021. It concludes that the Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Act 2021(Vic) is an inadequate implementation of relevant international human rights law and that similar legislation in development in other States and the Commonwealth should be scrutinised carefully.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55803/i270m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the application of international human rights law to the employment of persons by Australian religious schools. In particular, it considers the claim, increasingly made in support of Australian domestic legislative reform, that the application of ‘inherent requirements’ tests to employees within religious schools appropriately gives effect to the requirements of international law. Part One observes that that law is found in two primary protections: the protection provided to religious schools as the collective manifestations of the religious beliefs of individuals, including parents and guardians, and the protection against discrimination. Part Two illustrates the domestic implications of these regimes by considering the human rights rationales offered by the governmental proponents of the Victorian Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Bill 2021. It concludes that the Equal Opportunity (Religious Exceptions) Amendment Act 2021(Vic) is an inadequate implementation of relevant international human rights law and that similar legislation in development in other States and the Commonwealth should be scrutinised carefully.
宗教学校在国际人权法下的地位
本文审议了国际人权法对澳大利亚宗教学校雇用人员的适用问题。特别是,委员会考虑到一种越来越支持澳大利亚国内立法改革的说法,即对宗教学校内的雇员适用"固有要求"测试适当地执行了国际法的要求。第一部分指出,这项法律体现在两项主要保护中:对宗教学校的保护,作为个人,包括父母和监护人的宗教信仰的集体表现,以及对歧视的保护。第二部分通过考虑《2021年维多利亚平等机会(宗教例外)修正案法案》的政府支持者提供的人权理由,说明了这些制度对国内的影响。委员会的结论是,《2021年平等机会(宗教例外)修正案》(维克)没有充分执行相关的国际人权法,应当仔细审查其他国家和英联邦正在制定的类似立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信