SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)最新文献_第6页

Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Sectoral and Institutional Approach 外国直接投资的决定因素:部门和机构方法

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.5089/9781455202218.001

J. Walsh, Jiangyan Yu

引用次数: 289

FDI Flows to Low-Income Countries: Global Drivers and Growth Implications 流入低收入国家的外国直接投资:全球驱动因素和增长影响

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2010-06-01 DOI: 10.5089/9781455201150.001

Era Dabla‐Norris, Jiro Honda, Amina Lahreche, Geneviève Verdier

引用次数: 86

External Debt Sustainability in Hipc Completion Point Countries: An Update 重债穷国完成点国家的外债可持续性:最新情况

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI: 10.5089/9781451872750.001.A001

Jie-An Yang, D. Nyberg

引用次数: 19

Sovereign Risk, FDI Spillovers, and Growth 主权风险、FDI溢出与增长

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2008-07-14 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00718.x

L. Maliar, Serguei Maliar, F. Sebastián

引用次数: 8

The Effect of FDI on India and Chinese Economy: A Comparative Analysis FDI对印度和中国经济的影响:比较分析

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2008-02-02 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1089964

Dr. S.R. Keshava

{"title":"The Effect of FDI on India and Chinese Economy: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Dr. S.R. Keshava","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1089964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1089964","url":null,"abstract":"India and China are the two emerging economic giants of the developing world, both situated in Asia with 37% of world population (Asian Development Outlook2005) and with more than 9% growth in their respective GDP of their economies (World Development Report 2006). China got independence in 1949, after 2 years of India's political Independence (1947), but today, China has surged far ahead of India in socio-economic development indicators. The FDI in India is just 3.4% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation in India by 2004 and 5.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP by 2004, whereas in China it was 8.2% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and 34.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP during the same year. In order to estimate the effect of FDI on economic growth the model formed is Y = A X1 a X2 b X3 y X4 x. The 't' ratio for the constant (a), GDI(x1), HC (x3), LF (x4) all are greater than two implying the strong significance of these variables on the GDP, but FDI is showing positive, but not relatively significant effect on GDP. The R2 for the model as a whole is 0.93, the F value is significantly high revealing the significance of the fitness of the model. The D-W Statistics for the model is 1.825 revealing, the problem of auto-correlation has been fairly solved. The model shows that 1 percent increase in GDI leads to increase in GDP by all most 0.5 percent. The 1% increase in FDI brings about an increase in GDP by 0.12 percent. The coefficient for human capital is 0.34 percent and that of the labour force is 0.7 percent. Thus GDI and HC significantly affect the GDP. However the coefficient of FDI though not significant as other variables in the study, is positive.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114845905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 28

Horizontal and Vertical FDI Spillovers: Recent Evidence from the Czech Republic 横向和纵向FDI溢出:来自捷克共和国的最新证据

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2007-09-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1093662

Juraj Stancík

引用次数: 61

Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance 超越二分法:社会责任与财务绩效的曲线关系

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2006-11-01 DOI: 10.1002/SMJ.557

Michael L. Barnett, R. Salomon

{"title":"Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance","authors":"Michael L. Barnett, R. Salomon","doi":"10.1002/SMJ.557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.557","url":null,"abstract":"A central and contentious debate in many literatures concerns the relationship between financial and social performance. We advance this debate by measuring the financial–social performance link mutual funds that practice socially responsible investing (SRI). SRI fund managers have an array of social screening strategies from which to choose. Prior studies have not addressed this heterogeneity within SRI funds. Combining modern portfolio and stakeholder theories, we hypothesize that the financial loss borne by an SRI fund due to poor diversification is offset as social screening intensifies because better-managed and more stable firms are selected into its portfolio. We find support for this hypothesis through an empirical test on a panel of 61 SRI funds from 1972 to 2000. The results show that as the number of social screens used by an SRI fund increases, financial returns decline at first, but then rebound as the number of screens reaches a maximum. That is, we find a curvilinear relationship, suggesting that two long-competing viewpoints may be complementary. Furthermore, we find that financial performance varies with the types of social screens used. Community relations screening increased financial performance, but environmental and labor relations screening decreased financial performance. Based on our results, we suggest that literatures addressing the link between financial and social performance move toward in-depth examination of the merits of different social screening strategies, and away from the continuing debate on the financial merits of either being socially responsible or not.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115942450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1272

Do Institutions Matter for FDI? A Comparative Analysis for the MENA Countries 制度对外国直接投资重要吗?中东和北非国家的比较分析

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2006-06-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.917581

V. Daniele, U. Marani

{"title":"Do Institutions Matter for FDI? A Comparative Analysis for the MENA Countries","authors":"V. Daniele, U. Marani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.917581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.917581","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the underpinning factors of foreign direct investments towards the MENA countries. Our main interpretative hypothesis is based on the significant role of the quality of institutions in order to attract FDI. In MENA experience the growth of FDI flows proved to be notably inferior to that recorded in the EU or in Asian economies, such as China and India. Our research, firstly, stresses three major factors for such a poor performance: i) the small size of local markets and the lack of real economic integration; ii) the changes in the scenario of international competition; iii) economic and trading reforms in the MENA have been slow and mostly insufficient. Using the Kaufmann, Kraay and Mastruzzi (2005) governance indicators, we examine the role of \"institutional quality\" on FDI through a regression analysis. Our analysis shows that institutions play an important role in the relative performances of countries in attracting FDI. Lastly, data on institutional quality and business climate show the relative disadvantages of MENA. Our paper suggests that MENA countries require deep institutional reforms in order to improve their attractiveness in terms of FDI.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"1940 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129288785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 67

FDI and Growth: What Causes What? FDI与增长:因果关系?

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00755.x

A. Chowdhury, G. Mavrotas

引用次数: 523

Does Food Aid Harm the Poor? Household Evidence from Ethiopia 粮食援助会伤害穷人吗?来自埃塞俄比亚的家庭证据

SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic) Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI: 10.7208/9780226318004-015

J. Levinsohn, M. McMillan

引用次数: 90