{"title":"The Effect of FDI on India and Chinese Economy: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Dr. S.R. Keshava","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1089964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India and China are the two emerging economic giants of the developing world, both situated in Asia with 37% of world population (Asian Development Outlook2005) and with more than 9% growth in their respective GDP of their economies (World Development Report 2006). China got independence in 1949, after 2 years of India's political Independence (1947), but today, China has surged far ahead of India in socio-economic development indicators. The FDI in India is just 3.4% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation in India by 2004 and 5.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP by 2004, whereas in China it was 8.2% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and 34.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP during the same year. In order to estimate the effect of FDI on economic growth the model formed is Y = A X1 a X2 b X3 y X4 x. The 't' ratio for the constant (a), GDI(x1), HC (x3), LF (x4) all are greater than two implying the strong significance of these variables on the GDP, but FDI is showing positive, but not relatively significant effect on GDP. The R2 for the model as a whole is 0.93, the F value is significantly high revealing the significance of the fitness of the model. The D-W Statistics for the model is 1.825 revealing, the problem of auto-correlation has been fairly solved. The model shows that 1 percent increase in GDI leads to increase in GDP by all most 0.5 percent. The 1% increase in FDI brings about an increase in GDP by 0.12 percent. The coefficient for human capital is 0.34 percent and that of the labour force is 0.7 percent. Thus GDI and HC significantly affect the GDP. However the coefficient of FDI though not significant as other variables in the study, is positive.","PeriodicalId":118874,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1089964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
India and China are the two emerging economic giants of the developing world, both situated in Asia with 37% of world population (Asian Development Outlook2005) and with more than 9% growth in their respective GDP of their economies (World Development Report 2006). China got independence in 1949, after 2 years of India's political Independence (1947), but today, China has surged far ahead of India in socio-economic development indicators. The FDI in India is just 3.4% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation in India by 2004 and 5.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP by 2004, whereas in China it was 8.2% of FDI flows as a percentage of Gross Fixed Capital Formation and 34.9% of FDI stocks as a percentage of GDP during the same year. In order to estimate the effect of FDI on economic growth the model formed is Y = A X1 a X2 b X3 y X4 x. The 't' ratio for the constant (a), GDI(x1), HC (x3), LF (x4) all are greater than two implying the strong significance of these variables on the GDP, but FDI is showing positive, but not relatively significant effect on GDP. The R2 for the model as a whole is 0.93, the F value is significantly high revealing the significance of the fitness of the model. The D-W Statistics for the model is 1.825 revealing, the problem of auto-correlation has been fairly solved. The model shows that 1 percent increase in GDI leads to increase in GDP by all most 0.5 percent. The 1% increase in FDI brings about an increase in GDP by 0.12 percent. The coefficient for human capital is 0.34 percent and that of the labour force is 0.7 percent. Thus GDI and HC significantly affect the GDP. However the coefficient of FDI though not significant as other variables in the study, is positive.
印度和中国是发展中世界的两个新兴经济巨人,都位于亚洲,占世界人口的37%(2005年亚洲发展展望),各自经济的GDP增长超过9%(2006年世界发展报告)。在印度政治独立(1947年)两年后,中国于1949年独立,但今天,中国在社会经济发展指标上远远领先于印度。到2004年,印度的外国直接投资仅占印度固定资本形成总额的3.4%,占2004年外国直接投资存量占GDP的5.9%,而同年在中国,外国直接投资占固定资本形成总额的8.2%,外国直接投资存量占GDP的34.9%。为了估计FDI对经济增长的影响,所形成的模型为Y = A X1 A X2 b X3 Y X4 x。常数(A)、GDI(X1)、HC (X3)、LF (X4)的t比均大于2,说明这些变量对GDP的影响具有较强的显著性,但FDI对GDP的影响是正的,但不是相对显著的。模型整体的R2为0.93,F值显著高,说明模型的适应度显著。模型的D-W统计量为1.825,说明自相关问题得到了较好的解决。该模型显示,GDI增加1%会导致GDP增长0.5%。外商直接投资每增长1%,带动国内生产总值增长0.12%。人力资本系数为0.34%,劳动力系数为0.7%。因此,GDI和HC显著影响GDP。然而,FDI的系数虽然不像研究中的其他变量那样显著,但却是正的。