Emergency Radiology最新文献

{"title":"Off-console automated artificial intelligence enhanced workflow enables improved emergency department CT capacity.","authors":"John McMenamy, Sergey Kochkine, Mark Bernstein, Anthony Lucero, Randy Miles, Adam Schwertner, Ashesh Thaker, David M Naeger","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02297-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02297-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Increasing CT capacity to keep pace with rising ED demand is critical. The conventional process has inherent drawbacks. We evaluated an off-console automated AI enhanced workflow which moves all final series creation off-console. We hypothesized the off-console workflow would 1) decrease overall ED CT exam begin to end times and decrease length and variability of time CT is occupied at the individual exam level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study population was identified retrospectively and included all CT exams done on all ED adult patients. 3 months of data was collected using the conventional workflow and 3 months of data was collected after implementation of the off-console workflow. Exam begin and the exam end timestamps were collected from the EMR. Additionally, 4 subgroups from the above conventional and off-console workflows were identified retrospectively with an Emergency Severity Index level 1, undergoing one of the four most common CT exam set(s) performed on ESI level 1 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,795 ED adult patients underwent ED CT in the 3 months immediately prior to implementation of the off-console workflow and 6,708 adult ED patients underwent CT in the 3 months after complete implementation. The off-console workflow demonstrated a 36% decrease in median exam begin to end times (P < 0.001). 4 subgroups demonstrated 56-75% decreases in median CT occupied time (P < 0.001) and decreases in variability in ¾ subgroups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This off-console workflow enables increased CT capacity to meet rising ED demand. Similar improvements could be expected across most exam sets and imaging settings if broadly implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142806480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Epiploic appendagitis on the vermiform appendix is often misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis.","authors":"Akihiro Horibe, Juri Funasaka, Keisuke Hiroshima, Masanobu Kiriyama","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02304-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02304-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epiploic appendagitis of the vermiform appendix is a rare cause of right lower abdominal pain that can mimic acute appendicitis and result in unnecessary surgery. Despite this, the condition can be managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone. Due to the lack of characteristic physical or laboratory findings, accurate diagnosis by imaging is crucial. The aim of this case report is to emphasize this uncommon condition to prevent misdiagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. A 57-year-old man presented with a 2-day history of abdominal pain and tenderness in the right abdominal region. Laboratory results were within the normal range. The surgeon diagnosed him as distal appendicitis or colonic diverticulitis and treated him with antibiotics, leading to improvement within several days. A subsequent review of the plain computed tomography images by the radiologist detected an oval fat density surrounded by a high-intensity rim and a high-density spot in the center at the tip of normal vermiform appendix. This led to a diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis on the vermiform appendix. Epiploic appendagitis is characterized by inflammation and ischemia resulting from torsion of the epiploic appendage. It can occur not only on the colon but also on the appendix. The imaging findings in this case were typical of epiploic appendagitis on the appendix. It is imperative for clinicians to be familiar with the clinical presentation and imaging findings of epiploic appendagitis on the appendix to ensure an accurate diagnosis, reduce unnecessary surgeries, thereby enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142806478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiology resident proficiency in identifying misplaced lines, tubes, and devices: a simulation-based study using WIDI SIM.","authors":"Alexandria Iakovidis, Kevin Pierre, Abheek Raviprasad, Isabella Carvalho, Alina Zankevich, Roberta Slater, Christopher Sistrom, Otgonbayar Batmunh, Priya Sharma, Anthony Mancuso, Dhanashree Rajderkar","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02295-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02295-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate placement of medical devices is crucial in critical care to prevent severe complications. This study aims to evaluate radiology residents' proficiency in identifying four specific critical misplacements of medical devices using the Wisdom in Diagnostic Imaging Simulation (WIDI SIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,102 responses from radiology residents who participated in the WIDI SIM between 2010 and 2022. The majority were first- and second-year residents from multiple institutions. The simulation presented four specific cases featuring misplacements of an endotracheal tube in the esophagus, an intrauterine device embedded in the myometrium, a peripherally inserted central catheter in the right internal jugular vein, and an umbilical venous catheter in the splenic vein. Residents provided free-text interpretations scored on a 0-10 scale by subspecialty radiologists. Errors were categorized as observational (failure to identify misplacement) or interpretive (misinterpretation of identified misplacement). Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparisons tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all cases, residents' average scores did not meet the acceptable standard of 7 points. Observational errors were predominant, indicating a failure to recognize these specific device misplacements. Effective report rates were low: 58% for the endotracheal tube case, 35% for the intrauterine device, 19% for the peripherally inserted central catheter, and 25% for the umbilical venous catheter. Significant performance improvements were observed between first- and second-year residents in three of the four cases (p-values ranging from < 0.0001 to 0.0238), but overall proficiency remained suboptimal even among senior residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals gaps in radiology residents' ability to identify these specific misplaced lines, tubes, and devices accurately. The consistent pattern of underperformance, primarily due to observational errors, suggests a need for targeted educational interventions to improve resident proficiency in this aspect of emergency radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142784575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Occipital condyle fractures revisited.","authors":"Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Akua Afrah Amoah, Dhairya A Lakhani, Tej D Azad, Ali Bydon, David M Yousem","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02303-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02303-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) are classified by the Anderson and Montesano system into Type I (comminuted, minimally displaced), Type II (stable, associated with basilar skull fractures), and Type III (unstable avulsion fractures). We retrospectively analyzed 24,986 cervical spine CT examinations of emergency department patients over five years to determine the incidence and characteristics of OCFs, mechanism of injury, and associated intracranial and cervical spine injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The study was IRB-approved and HIPAA compliant. We retrospectively reviewed the CT brain and CT cervical spine reports performed from July 2018 to August 2023. Variables collected included age, sex, clinical presentation, coincident brain and cervical spine injuries, treatments, and OCF classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three of 24,986 patients (0.25%) had OCFs, predominantly male (41 males, 22 females), with an average age of 51.1 years; 22/63 (34.9%) occurred in asymptomatic patients. Concurrent injuries included cervical spine fractures (33.3%) at C1 and C2 and intracranial injuries (47.6%), mostly subarachnoid and subdural hemorrhages. OCFs were categorized into Anderson-Montesano Type I (9 cases), Type II (24 cases), and Type III (30 cases), with unstable Type III fractures more common in MVC victims; stable fractures had higher rates of intracranial injuries. There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality, or concurrent cervical spine or chest/abdominal/pelvic findings between stable and unstable OCFs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the importance of comprehensive imaging and evaluation in trauma cases to identify OCFs, even in asymptomatic patients, with a high rate of concurrent C1-2 and intracranial injuries.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance/application: </strong>Being aware of occipital condyle fractures, types, and complications is important in the emergency radiology evaluation of trauma patients, especially given high rates of C1-2 fractures and intracranial bleeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142779604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correlation between adult trauma center status and radiology resident performance on trauma cases in the WIDI SIM exam.","authors":"Kevin Pierre, Abheek Raviprasad, Isabella Amador, Alexandria Iakovidis, Jay Talati, Christopher Sistrom, Roberta Slater, Linda Lanier, John Rees, Ivan Davis, Anthony Mancuso, Priya Sharma, Dhanashree Rajderkar","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02302-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02302-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether adult trauma center status influences radiology resident performance on trauma cases in the Emergent/Critical Care Imaging SIMulation (WIDI SIM) exam.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 29,290 WIDI SIM exam scores from 110 adult trauma cases across 55 radiology residency programs. Residents were categorized by training level-R1 (n = 17,801), R2 (n = 9,136), R3 (n = 1,826), R4 (n = 527)-and by their program's adult trauma center designation: Level 1 (n = 20,121), Level 2 (n = 1,870), Level 3 (n = 1,029), Level 4 (n = 487), and no trauma designation (n = 5,834). A Generalized Linear Mixed Model with a negative binomial distribution was used to evaluate the effect of trauma center status on resident performance, adjusting for resident level, imaging modality, and case specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no statistically significant difference in resident scores based on adult trauma center status (p > 0.05 for all trauma levels compared to no trauma designation). Resident level significantly influenced performance, with higher-level residents scoring better than R1 residents (p < 0.001 for R2-R4). Imaging modality and case specialty also significantly affected scores. Residents performed better on MR, US, and XR modalities compared to CT (p ≤ 0.002), and scored lower on chest, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and neuro cases compared to abdominopelvic cases (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adult trauma center status did not significantly impact radiology resident performance on trauma cases in the WIDI SIM exam. Resident training level, imaging modality, and case specialty were significant factors influencing performance. These findings suggest that resident education and exposure to diverse imaging modalities and specialties are more critical determinants of diagnostic accuracy than the trauma center designation of their training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical prediction scale approach derived from a retrospective study to reduce the number of urgent, low-value cranial CT scans.","authors":"Juana María Plasencia-Martínez, Elena Otón-González, Marta Sánchez-Canales, Herminia Ortiz-Mayoral, Estefanía Cotillo-Ramos, Nuria Isabel Casado-Alarcón, Mónica Ballesta-Ruiz, Ramón Villaverde-González, José María García-Santos","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02274-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-024-02274-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fifty percent of cranial CT scans performed achieve no benefit and entail risks. Our aim is to determine the yield of non-traumatic urgent cranial-CT and develop a pretest clinical probability scale approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients seen in our emergency department between 2017-2021 and referred for urgent cranial-CT for non-traumatic reasons were retrospectively recruited and randomly selected. Presenting complaint (PC), demographic variables, Relevant radiological findings (RRF) on the urgent cranial-CT and Relevant clinical-radiological findings (RCRF: admission need or RRF detection on the urgent cranial-CT or cranial CT/MRI in the following three months) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 702 patients, with median age 62 [47-76] years, 363 (51.7%) females. RCRF were observed in 404 (57.55%); of these, 352 (50.1%) required admission. RRF were detected in 190 (27.06%): 36 acute ischemic and 27 acute hemorrhagic lesions, 115 masses, 9 edema, and 27 hydrocephalus. Predictive PC for urgent cranial-CT were motor, speech, sensory deficits, sudden alteration of mental status, epileptic seizure, cognitive impairment, neurological symptoms in cancer patients, acute headache without a prior history and with meningeal signs; nausea, vomiting, or hypertensive crisis; visual deficits, and dizziness. This algorithm provided sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV, 95%CI in brackets) of 92.1% (89-94.5%), 27.5% (22.5-33.0%), 63.3% (59.2-67.2%), and 71.9% (62.7-80.0%), to diagnose RCRF, and 97.4% (93.4-99.1%), 21.3% (17.8-25.1%), 31.5% (27.7-35.4%), and 95.6% (90.1-98.6%), to diagnose RRF. In patients not requiring admission (n = 350), the NPV for RRF was 98.8% (93.6-100%); the negative likelihood ratio 0.08 (0.01-0.57), and sensitivity remained at 97.8% (82.2-99.9%). Applying it would have avoided performing 85/350 urgent cranial-CT (24.29%). To find one RRF, we would have gone from performing 7.8 (350/45) to 5.9 (265/45) CTs, failing to diagnose 1/45 (2.2%) RRF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proposed clinical scale could potentially decrease 24% of urgent cranial-CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"835-843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141765742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Current analysis of age and cervical spine fractures.","authors":"Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Mahla Radmard, Shuchi Zinzuwadia, Akua Afrah Amoah, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02291-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-024-02291-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Canadian Cervical Spine Rule (CCR) was based on patient data from 25 years ago and recommended cervical spine computed tomography (CSCT) for trauma patients aged 65 and older. We sought to determine the differences in rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic fractures of trauma patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old, given the changing demographics and heterogeneity in today's elderly population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study of CSCT results from two hospitals in our health system included 5 years of trauma patient data. In addition to the primary variable of fracture rates, we separated the patients into symptomatic / asymptomatic groups and ≥ 65 and < 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ≥ 65 age group, 190 fractures among 9455 CSCTs (2.0%) were identified (112 females = 58.9%); 29 (0.3%) were in asymptomatic patients. In patients < 65, there were 199 (1.6%) fractures out of 12,531 CSCTs of which 19 (0.15%) were asymptomatic and 46 were female (23.1%). The rates of fractures in the older cohort (2.0%) were substantially different than those reported in the original CCR articles (5.2% and 6.6%). However, the fracture rates reported for those < 65 (1.4% and 1.7% historically) were similar to the current findings (1.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cervical spine fracture rate at our institution for patients ≥ 65, at 2.0%, was higher than those patients < 65 (1.6%) and favored female (58.9-23.1%) patients. The findings were much lower than those CCR percentages that led to scanning trauma patients who are 65 and older. Asymptomatic fractures are rarer still (0.15-0.30%).</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"881-886"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiology resident proficiency in pediatric trauma cases: a comparative analysis based on trauma center status using the WIDI SIM exam.","authors":"Kevin Pierre, Abheek Raviprasad, Alexandria Iakovidis, Isabella Amador, Jay Talati, Christopher Sistrom, Roberta Slater, Linda Lanier, Evelyn Anthony, Dhanashree Rajderkar, Anthony Mancuso, Priya Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02296-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-024-02296-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the correlation between pediatric and adult trauma center status and radiology resident performance on pediatric trauma cases using the WIDI SIM exam.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The WIDI SIM is a validated computer-aided simulation that assesses radiology residents' preparedness for independent call duty. It includes 65 cases across various imaging modalities derived from actual patient encounters. Faculty score free-text responses using a standardized 0-10 scale rubric. We analyzed 8,488 WIDI SIM exam scores from 35 pediatric trauma cases across 52 programs. A negative binomial regression model adjusting for resident level, imaging modality, and case specialty was employed to evaluate the impact of pediatric and adult trauma center status on resident performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both pediatric trauma center status (p = 0.0005) and adult trauma center status (p = 0.0003) were significant predictors of higher resident scores. Resident level was also significant, with higher-level residents performing better than first-year residents (p < 0.001). Residents performed worse on MR and US modalities compared to CT, and performance varied by case specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiology residents' pediatric trauma imaging skills are significantly linked to pediatric and adult trauma center status. Given most pediatric traumas occur outside pediatric trauma centers, targeted training strategies should be considered to ensure residents develop essential diagnostic skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"867-871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient factors associated with embolization or splenectomy within 30 days of initiating surveillance for splenic trauma.","authors":"Fatah Tidadini, Eugenie Martinet, Jean-Louis Quesada, Alison Foote, Chayma El Wafir, Edouard Girard, Catherine Arvieux","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02285-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-024-02285-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-operative management of hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma has been recommended for more than 25 years, but in practice embolization and/or splenectomy (intervention) is often needed within the first 30 days. Identifying the risk factors associated with the need for intervention could support more individualized decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the SPLASH randomized clinical trial, a comparison of outcomes of surveillance or embolization. 140 patients were randomized, 133 retained in the study (embolization n = 66; surveillance n = 67) and 103 screened and registered in the non-inclusion register. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates were used to identify risk factors contributing to embolization and/or splenectomy within 30 days after initiating surveillance only for splenic trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>123 patients (median age, 30 [23; 48] years; 91 (74%) male) initially received non-operative management. At the day-30 visit, 34 (27.6%) patients had undergone an intervention (31 (25.2%) delayed embolization and 4 (3.3%) splenectomy). Multivariate analysis identified patients with OIS grade 4 or 5 splenic trauma (HR = 4.51 [2.06-9.88]) and (HR = 34.5 [6.84-174]); respectively) and splenic complications: arterial leak (HR = 1.80 [1.45-2.24]), pseudoaneurysm (HR = 1.22 [1.06-1.40]) and pseudocyst (HR = 1.41 [1.21-1.64]) to be independently associated with increased risk of need for an intervention within 30 days of initiating surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that more than 1 in 4 patients who received non-operative management needed embolization or splenectomy by day 30. Arterial leak, pseudoaneurysm, pseudocyst, and OIS grade 4 or 5 were independent risk factors linked to the need for an intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02021396.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"823-833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multi-institutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education.","authors":"Liesl Eibschutz, Max Yang Lu, Payam Jannatdoust, Angela C Judd, Claire A Justin, Brandon K K Fields, Natalie L Demirjian, Madan Rehani, Sravanthi Reddy, Ali Gholamrezanezhad","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02284-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-024-02284-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous studies have demonstrated that radiologists and other providers perceive the teratogenic risks of radiologic imaging to be higher than they actually are. Thus, pregnant patients were less likely to receive ionizing radiation procedures. While it is imperative to minimize fetal radiation exposure, clinicians must remember that diagnostic studies should not be avoided due to fear of radiation, particularly if the imaging study can significantly impact patient care. Although guidelines do exist regarding how best to image pregnant patients, many providers are unaware of these guidelines and thus lack confidence when making imaging decisions for pregnant patients. This study aimed to gather information about current education, confidence in, and knowledge about emergency imaging of pregnant women among radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created and distributed an anonymous survey to radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers to evaluate their knowledge and confidence in imaging pregnant patients in the emergent setting. This study included a questionnaire with the intent of knowing the correct answers among physicians primarily across the United States (along with some international participation). We conducted subgroup analyses, comparing variables by specialty, radiology subspecialty, and training levels. Based on the survey results, we subsequently developed educational training videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>108 radiologists, of which 32 self-identified as emergency radiologists, ten emergency medicine providers and six OB/GYN clinicians completed the survey. The overall correct response rate was 68.5%, though performance across questions was highly variable. Within our 18-question survey, four questions had a correct response rate under 50%, while five questions had correct response rates over 90%. Most responding physicians identified themselves as either \"fairly\" (58/124, 47%) or \"very\" (51/124, 41%) confident. Amongst specialties, there were differences in performance concerning the knowledge assessment (p = 0.049), with the strongest performance from radiologists. There were no differences in knowledge by training level (p = 0.4), though confidence levels differed significantly between attending physicians and trainees (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights deficiencies in knowledge to support appropriate decision-making surrounding the imaging of pregnant patients. Our results indicate the need for improved physician education and dissemination of standardized clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"851-866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}