Vedic Cosmology and Ethics最新文献_第2页

Non-ritual kárman in the Veda 吠陀中的非仪式kárman

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 2019-05-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004400139_020

H. Bodewitz

{"title":"Non-ritual kárman in the Veda","authors":"H. Bodewitz","doi":"10.1163/9789004400139_020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400139_020","url":null,"abstract":"The origin of the karman doctrine is sometimes assumed to lie in theVedic sacrificial theories, since the term karman does not only denote act, action, activity, but also sacrificial act, rite or ritual at large. Moreover good acts (sukṛtāni) producing merits (one of the meanings of sukṛta) are often associated with rituals. The lasting merits of meritorious acts in the form of sacrifices then would prepare the way for the karman doctrine, which is no more purely ritualistic and includes remuneration on earth after rebirth. It is indeed true that the Vedic term karman mostly refers to the ritual, as is to be expected in Vedic ritualistic texts. However, the classical karman doctrine is more or less ethical (i.e. dealing with good and bad activities), whereas Vedic ritual is definitely not.Here lies a problem. In another publication1 I hope to show that the Vedic couple of sukṛta and duṣkṛta should be interpreted as “merit” and “demerit” and that it cannot be exclusively associated with ritual. Of coursemerits are especially obtained by sacrifices in ritual texts, but demerits are even in these texts rather general and can hardly be connected with sacrifices in the sense of the omission of sacrifices or the performance of bad sacrifices. Tull (1989) tries to prove the Vedic, ritualistic origin of the karman doctrine by associating good karman and sukṛta with the good performance of ritual and bad karman and duṣkṛta with its bad or poor performance. The ritual exactitude would be decisive. This means that Vedic karman and sukṛta / duṣkṛta would miss every ethical implication. Merit and demerit would solely be based on technical achievements and failures in the sphere of rituals. The transition to the classical karman doctrine then becomes hard to explain. According to Tull even the references to karman in the old Upaniṣads would exclusively bear on ritual. The ethical aspects were only introduced in late Upaniṣadic texts. Tull fails to explain how the completely amoral, Vedic, ritual doctrine of karman developed into the ethical, non-ritual, classical karman doctrine of the later Upaniṣads. Moreover, it is unclear how the doctrines of karman and saṁsāra could have spread over whole India and be represented in early Buddhism","PeriodicalId":113126,"journal":{"name":"Vedic Cosmology and Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126742669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Waters in Vedic Cosmic Classifications 吠陀宇宙分类中的水

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 2019-05-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004400139_005

H. Bodewitz

{"title":"The Waters in Vedic Cosmic Classifications","authors":"H. Bodewitz","doi":"10.1163/9789004400139_005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400139_005","url":null,"abstract":"According tomost publications theVedic conceptions of the cosmos are either bipartite (heaven and earth) or tripartite (i.e. including the intermediate world).1 Actually the difference between the two is not fundamental. The threefoldness is based on a preference for triadic series2 and seems to form an amplification of the bipartition.3 In some texts we also find a sevenfold universe. The cosmographical dualism of earth and heaven does not seem to belong to a more extensive structure. However, there is a different dualism, already noticed by Kirfel (1920, p. 13* f.), of upper world and underworld. Whether Kuiper’s view (1979, 5) that this dualism is based on the two moieties of the tribal organization, is correct, is difficult to prove or to disprove. It is a fact, at least, that this dualism fits into a larger structure of binary oppositions: Asuras-Devas, chaos-cosmos, non-Aryans-Aryans, night-day, darkness-light, evil-good.4 Indeed, heaven and earth, too, form a dualism non-existent before the cosmogonywhichdifferentiated light anddarkness.However, the basic opposition in the structure is between positive and negative and in this connection the subterranean underworld rather than earth itself forms an antithesis to the light of heaven. This means that the real dualism concerns either underworld (the abode of the Asuras) and heaven (the world of the Devas) or underworld and the tripartite universe as a totality. The latter bipartition may also be formulated as a quadripartition in which one fourth lies outside the cosmos.","PeriodicalId":113126,"journal":{"name":"Vedic Cosmology and Ethics","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126293898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Der Vers vicakṣaṇād ṛtavo … (JB 1, 18; 1, 50; KauṣU 1, 2)

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 2019-05-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004400139_003

H. Bodewitz

引用次数: 0

Redeath and Its Relation to Rebirth and Release 死亡及其与重生和释放的关系

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 2019-05-15 DOI: 10.1163/9789004400139_011

H. Bodewitz

{"title":"Redeath and Its Relation to Rebirth and Release","authors":"H. Bodewitz","doi":"10.1163/9789004400139_011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400139_011","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of redeath (or repeated death), though being of fundamental importance in the development of the history of Vedic ideas, has been treated in a rather stepmotherly fashion by most of the handbooks. E.g. Oldenberg (19172) only mentions the “Wiedertod” in a footnote (565, n. 1), where he refers to a footnote in his Die Lehre der Upaniṣaden. The term punarmṛtyu is found only twice in Gonda (1960, 197; 206). In 1906Oltramare indeed extensively treats “La victoire sur la secondemort” (pp. 505–509), but its origin and position in the history of Vedic conceptions do not become clear. He refers to the fear of Brahmin thinkers for the ultimate end of life in yonderworld, but fails to explainwhy this fear arose in some lateVedic texts. Keith (1925) dedicates 26 lines to the renewed death (pp. 572–573) in which he emphasizes its origin and its transition to the concept of rebirth. As usual his explanation is only based on common sense. The fear of repeated death would have developed “in accordancewith the desire to distinguish the diverse degrees of good acquired by different modes of sacrifice ... the Brahmans had to consider the claim of the richer of their patrons, and had to promise them more in the world to come than the poorer, who offered and gave less” (572). One may doubt the correctness of this rationalization, since the term punarmṛtyu is only found in rather late Vedic texts, whereas rich sacrificers were already living in the most ancient period. Moreover, it is not quite clear how the fear (thrice mentioned by Keith) for this particular type of death should be connectedwith the allegedbusiness instinct of theBrahmins.Whywas this fear absent in the earlier period? Did the Brahmins later on kid their patrons into this obsession and simultaneously offer some expensive solutions? The defeat of punarmṛtyu by means of e.g. the simple Agnihotra hardly fits into Keith’s socio-economic model. His association of redeath with the later concept of rebirth (“It remained only to transfer it to the present world and the effect of transmigration was reached,” p. 573) sounds rather simplistic in the absence of any foundation in the texts. Still these ideas about a growing fear for redeath and a logical transition from redeath to rebirth are found in several later publications.","PeriodicalId":113126,"journal":{"name":"Vedic Cosmology and Ethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125345346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

The Dark and Deep Underworld in the Veda 《吠陀》里的黑暗和深邃的地下世界

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 2002-04-01 DOI: 10.2307/3087614

H. Bodewitz

引用次数: 4

Classifications and Yonder World in the Veda 《吠陀》中的分类与彼岸世界

Vedic Cosmology and Ethics Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789004400139_015

H. Bodewitz

引用次数: 1