{"title":"Exposed Hardware: A True Contraindication for a Spinal Cord Stimulator? A Case Report and Review of the Literature","authors":"","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.231","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Infection is one of the most common complications of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation and causes severe morbidity for the patients and is costly for the health system and insurance. Every effort to minimize the risk of infection Post-SCS implantation has to be made.\u0000\u0000CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old man suffered right arm brachial plexus avulsion and subdural hematoma requiring a craniotomy and subsequently a cranioplasty with a metal mesh in 1998. Over the years he developed significant neuropathic pain which was controlled with a combination medication regimen until recently. In our clinic, a trial of cervical SCS showed significant improvement of pain. The consulting neurosurgeon, while evaluating his skull, noticed a very small skin defect, exposing a metal plate with no signs of infection. Based on that, he refused to implant the SCS. The patient is now seeking alternative treatment methods.\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION: Well-designed animal/human studies investigating the effects of exposed hardware for seeding infection to remote implants in the body are required to scientifically extrapolate if exposed hardware is a true contraindication for implanting an SCS or other devices in the body. \u0000\u0000KEY WORDS: Spinal cord stimulator, brachial plexus injury, complex regional pain syndrome, exposed hardware, surgical infection","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124159441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with Bilateral Cochlear Implants","authors":"","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.189","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) has become very popular in the management of chronic pain worldwide. As it relies on generating high-frequency electrical impulses, there is a risk of interference with other devices such as cochlear implants that utilize similar principles. A literature search did not reveal any case reports of HF-SCS implantation in a patient with cochlear implants.\u0000\u0000CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old White woman with a history of bilateral cochlear implants (Cochlear Americas Nucleus® with cp910 processor) for severe sensorineural hearing loss presented to our chronic pain clinic with lumbosacral radiculopathy. The patient underwent a HF-SCS trial with entry point at the L1-L2 space and the leads positioned at the top and bottom of T8. The patient did not experience any auditory interference with her Cochlear implant at triple the average SCS stimulation strength. During the follow-up visit the next week, the patient reported nearly 80% symptomatic pain relief and significant functional improvement. There was no change in her hearing and no evidence of interference. The patient ultimately underwent percutaneous SCS paddle electrode placement and at 3 months, continues to have excellent pain relief without any auditory interactions.\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION: We successfully implanted a HF-SCS at the thoracic level in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants without any auditory interference. \u0000\u0000KEY WORDS: Cochlear implant, lumbar radiculopathy, spinal cord stimulation","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114115170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Retrospective, Single-Center Study Investigating the Effects of a Novel Miniature Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain","authors":"N. V. Ba","doi":"10.36076/PMCR.2020/4/185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36076/PMCR.2020/4/185","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Tietze syndrome is believed to be a result of recurrent microtrauma and characterized by painful localized inflammation and swelling of the chest wall. Chronic inflammatory changes may infiltrate surrounding tissues, leading to nerve root irritation and subsequent neuralgia. Resultant chronic neuropathy has been historically treated with conservative therapies and local nerve blocks, but the role of implantable neurostimulators have not been well described.\u0000\u0000CASE REPORT: A 73-year-old woman presented with chronic pain in the left paracentral chest area with episodes of burning and tingling, which radiated to the left shoulder, left arm, and left upper side of the jaw and face. Following the implantation of a permanent neurostimulator, the patient reported a near complete resolution of her pain symptoms.\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION: The role of implantable neurostimulators in the treatment of chronic neuropathy in the setting of Tietze syndrome is promising and their use may become a mainstay option in the future.\u0000\u0000KEY WORDS: Tietze Syndrome, neuromodulation, spinal cord nerve stimulation, pain management, neuralgia, implantable spinal cord stimulator","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115313651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation as an Alternative of\u0000Vertebroplasty for Pain Treatment after Vertebral Compression\u0000Fractures","authors":"Laureano Delange Segura","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/179","url":null,"abstract":"Vertebral fractures are very frequent among the population affected by osteoporosis, being pain one of the most distressing associated symptoms. The classic treatment of vertebral fractures is, in principle, conservative. However, in the case of persistent pain, vertebral augmentation techniques and radiofrequency ablation (in the event that vertebral augmentation techniques can’t be applied) have proved to be useful. We present the case of a patient who developed severe pain secondary to an acute T2 and L3 fracture, in addition to a posterior T6 fracture. It was treated successfully with L3 vertebroplasty and facet joints denervation of T1-T2 and later T5-T6, this being justified by the technical impossibility of performing vertebroplasty on said levels. The patient was discharged from the hospital with managed pain relief and more than a 50% reduction in opioids doses. Three months later, she continued experiencing pain relief. Radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch of facet joints can be useful in the treatment of pain associated with vertebral fractures in patients where vertebral augmentation techniques are contraindicated or as a complementary treatment for persistent pain. Key words: Vertebral compression fracture, percutaneous vertebroplasty, radiofrequency ablation, medial branch, facet joints, osteoporosis","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125600102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}